
7 minute read
Pepperstone vs FBS 2025: Compared – Which Is the Better Broker?
from Pepperstone review 1
by Jone Eva
1. Introduction
As the online trading landscape evolves through 2025, traders face more broker choices than ever before. Two popular names in the global Forex and CFD industry are Pepperstone and FBS.
While both have established solid reputations, they serve slightly different audiences. Pepperstone focuses on fast execution, institutional-grade technology, and transparent pricing. FBS, on the other hand, attracts traders with its low minimum deposits, high leverage options, and beginner-friendly environment.
In this in-depth comparison of Pepperstone vs FBS 2025, we’ll look at regulation, trading platforms, instruments, fees, and support — to help you decide which broker is best suited to your trading goals.
2. Background Overview
Pepperstone, founded in 2010 in Melbourne, Australia, has grown into one of the world’s leading brokers for Forex and CFD trading. It’s known for its reliable execution, professional-grade infrastructure, and multiple global regulations.
FBS, founded in 2009, is a global broker that has gained popularity in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. It offers several account types, high leverage in certain jurisdictions, and marketing promotions that appeal to entry-level traders.
While Pepperstone targets experienced traders and professionals, FBS focuses on accessibility and simplicity for those just entering the trading world.
Open your Pepperstone account today

3. Regulation and Safety
Pepperstone
Pepperstone operates under multiple top-tier regulators worldwide, including:
ASIC – Australia
FCA – United Kingdom
CySEC – European Union
DFSA – Dubai
BaFin – Germany
CMA – Kenya
SCB – Bahamas
Client funds are held in segregated accounts with Tier-1 banks, and retail clients are protected by negative balance policies.
FBS
FBS holds regulation in several jurisdictions, including the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) and other regional authorities. In addition, it operates through offshore entities that allow for higher leverage limits and promotional flexibility.
Verdict
Both brokers are legitimate, but Pepperstone offers stronger regulatory coverage and transparency. FBS is safe when trading through its regulated entities but may vary in protection depending on your region.
4. Market Instruments and Product Range
Pepperstone
Pepperstone offers over 1,300 CFDs across:
70+ Forex pairs
Global stock indices
Commodities such as gold, silver, and oil
Share CFDs and ETFs
Cryptocurrencies
It’s ideal for traders who want fast access to liquid global markets.
FBS
FBS focuses primarily on Forex and metals, with additional CFDs on indices, energy, and cryptocurrencies depending on jurisdiction. Its selection is narrower than Pepperstone’s but sufficient for beginner traders who mainly trade Forex.
Verdict
If you want broader market access and multi-asset flexibility, Pepperstone is superior. If you trade only a few major currency pairs or commodities, FBS offers adequate variety.
5. Trading Platforms and Technology
Pepperstone
Pepperstone provides access to MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, and TradingView. Each platform supports algorithmic trading, advanced charting, and copy-trading integrations.
Pepperstone’s execution speeds average around 30 milliseconds, supported by low-latency networks and servers close to major liquidity providers. This makes it ideal for scalpers, algorithmic traders, and anyone who values speed and reliability.
FBS
FBS offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and its own FBS Trader App for web and mobile use. The platforms are straightforward and user-friendly, well-suited for beginners but without the high-performance optimization of Pepperstone’s setup.
Verdict
For advanced and high-speed trading, Pepperstone clearly leads. For simplicity and mobile convenience, FBS works well for less technical traders.
6. Trading Costs and Fees
Pepperstone
Pepperstone offers two main account types:
Standard Account – spread-only pricing starting from ~1 pip, no commissions.
Razor Account – raw spreads from 0.0 pips + small commission (about $7 per round-turn lot).
Pepperstone has a reputation for tight spreads, low trading costs, and no hidden fees. There are no deposit or withdrawal fees for most methods and no inactivity fee in most regions.
Open your Pepperstone account today
FBS
FBS provides several account options, including:
Cent Account – very low minimum deposit, trading in cents.
Standard Account – fixed or variable spreads, depending on platform.
ECN Account – raw spreads with commissions.Spreads are competitive but can vary depending on the account type and regional entity.
Verdict
For frequent and professional traders, Pepperstone offers more consistent and lower costs. For small-balance traders or those just learning, FBS provides flexible entry and micro-account options.
7. Minimum Deposit and Accessibility
Pepperstone requires a minimum deposit of around $0–$200 depending on region, allowing easy access to live trading. Account opening is fully digital and usually completed within a day.
FBS is known for its very low entry barrier, sometimes allowing deposits as small as $1–$10 in certain account types. This makes it highly appealing to beginners or traders with limited capital.
Verdict:FBS wins for accessibility and low entry cost, while Pepperstone targets traders who prefer a more professional environment with moderate funding levels.
8. Research, Education, and Market Insights
Pepperstone focuses on practical education and execution-based learning. It provides trading guides, webinars, daily analysis, and Smart Trader Tools for MT4 and MT5. The integration with TradingView enhances technical analysis capabilities.
FBS invests heavily in beginner education, offering tutorials, market news, and basic analytics directly in its app and website. The tone is beginner-friendly but less in-depth for professional traders.
Verdict:For advanced traders who want technical resources, Pepperstone provides richer tools. For new traders looking for an easy learning curve, FBS is simple and approachable.
9. Customer Support and Experience
Pepperstone offers 24/5 multilingual support via live chat, phone, and email. Its customer service team is praised for being responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive in solving account or execution issues.
FBS also provides 24/7 support through live chat, social media, and email. The availability of round-the-clock assistance is helpful for global clients, though response times can vary during high-traffic hours.
Verdict:Both brokers provide excellent support. Pepperstone edges ahead for professionalism and trading expertise, while FBS offers friendly, beginner-oriented service.
10. Advanced Trading Tools and Features
Pepperstone stands out for its automation capabilities, including API trading, VPS hosting, and compatibility with algorithmic systems. Traders can also use copy-trading platforms like Myfxbook and DupliTrade.
FBS provides convenient account types such as Cent and Micro accounts, promotional bonuses, and high leverage options for some regions. While these appeal to entry-level traders, they come with higher risk.
Verdict:If you value automation, precision, and data-driven trading, Pepperstone is the better choice. If you prefer flexible leverage and promotional features, FBS may be more attractive.
11. Deposit and Withdrawal Options
Both brokers support common payment methods such as bank transfers, credit/debit cards, and e-wallets.
Pepperstone generally processes withdrawals quickly, often within 24 hours, and does not charge internal fees.
FBS offers a wide range of local payment options, which is convenient in emerging markets. However, withdrawal times may depend on the payment channel and regional entity.
Verdict:Pepperstone offers faster, smoother processing for established markets. FBS provides more local methods for traders in developing regions.
12. Awards and Industry Reputation
Pepperstone has consistently received awards for best trading experience, execution speed, and customer service. Its reputation among professional traders remains very strong.
FBS has won awards for being a popular broker in emerging markets and for accessibility. It is widely recognized for its marketing campaigns and community engagement.
Both brokers have loyal user bases, but Pepperstone commands greater respect in institutional and advanced-trader circles.
13. Which Broker Should You Choose in 2025?
Your choice depends entirely on your trading style and goals.
Choose Pepperstone if you:
Trade frequently or use algorithms
Value ultra-fast execution and raw spreads
Prefer MT4, MT5, cTrader, or TradingView
Seek regulation from top-tier authorities
Want transparent, professional service
Choose FBS if you:
Are new to trading or trade small volumes
Prefer very low minimum deposits
Want higher leverage options (where permitted)
Enjoy bonus promotions and easy onboarding
Trade mainly Forex and simple CFDs
14. Final Verdict
Both Pepperstone and FBS are reputable brokers, but they serve distinct segments of the trading community.
Pepperstone is best for serious traders seeking precision, low spreads, and institutional-grade execution. It’s a professional environment built for consistent, long-term trading success.
FBS is ideal for beginners or smaller traders looking for simple account options, low barriers to entry, and flexible leverage.
In 2025, Pepperstone remains the stronger all-around choice for active traders and professionals, while FBS is a solid option for those taking their first steps in Forex.
The best broker ultimately depends on your experience, capital, and risk appetite — not just marketing claims.
See more:





