Pepperstone Vs Exness 2025: Compared - which is better broker?

In 2025, Pepperstone and Exness remain two of the most talked‑about forex and CFD brokers. Both deliver tight pricing, robust regulation, and advanced platforms—but subtle differences can make one a better fit depending on your needs. This in‑depth comparison covers regulation, account types, trading costs, platforms, execution, leverage, funding, education, and support to help you decide which broker suits you best.

Open your Pepperstone account today

1. Regulation & Safety

Pepperstone is regulated by ASIC (Australia), FCA (UK), CySEC (EU), DFSA (Dubai) and CMA (Kenya). Client funds are held in segregated accounts, negative‑balance protection applies, and UK clients benefit from FSCS cover up to £85,000.

Exness holds licenses from FCA (UK), CySEC (EU), FSCA (South Africa) and FSA (Seychelles). It also segregates client funds and provides negative‑balance protection, with EU clients covered by ICF compensation up to €20,000.

Conclusion: Both meet top‑tier standards. Pepperstone’s additional MENA/Africa licences give it a slight edge for those regions, while Exness’s FSCA license is valuable in South Africa.

2. Account Types & Minimum Deposits

Pepperstone offers a zero‑minimum Standard Account, a Razor Account (raw spreads + commission, recommended deposit $200), swap‑free Islamic options, and a VIP tier (from $50,000). Exness offers a Standard/Pro Account from just $1, a Raw Spread Account (raw spreads + $6 commission), plus swap‑free and professional accounts.

Conclusion: Exness wins on the lowest entry barrier ($1 vs $0 for Pepperstone Standard, but Pepperstone Razor needs $200). Pepperstone’s VIP tier and spread betting are unique offerings.

3. Spreads, Commissions & Costs

On major forex pairs (EUR/USD), Pepperstone Standard spreads average ~1.0 pip; Razor all‑in cost is ~0.6 pip. Exness Standard is ~1.1 pip; Raw Spread all‑in cost is ~0.5 pip thanks to its slightly lower $6 commission. Neither broker charges deposit, withdrawal, or inactivity fees.

Conclusion: Exness Raw Spread is marginally cheaper by ~0.1 pip, but practical costs are near identical.

4. Trading Platforms & Tools

Both brokers support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and cTrader. Pepperstone adds TradingView integration, free VPS, and third‑party research (Autochartist, Trading Central). Exness offers its own web‑based Exness Terminal with built‑in analytics and an economic calendar.

Conclusion: Pepperstone is preferred if you value TradingView and advanced chart‑pattern tools; Exness excels with its lightweight web terminal and in‑platform analysis.

5. Execution Quality & Liquidity

Each operates an ECN/STP model with no dealing desk. Both report sub‑30 ms latency and sub‑0.5% negative slippage. Regionally, Pepperstone’s DFSA and Kenyan liquidity pools shine in MENA/Africa, while Exness’s South African entity offers strong local depth.

Conclusion: Execution is essentially equal; choose based on your region’s liquidity advantage.

6. Leverage & Risk Controls

Non‑ESMA clients can access up to 1:500 leverage on both brokers; ESMA‑restricted retail clients are capped at 1:30 on majors. Exness professional clients may access up to 1:2000, whereas Pepperstone caps at 1:500. Both offer guaranteed stop‑loss orders and negative‑balance protection.

Conclusion: Exness offers higher maximum leverage for professionals; Pepperstone’s leverage is ample for most retail strategies.

7. Funding Methods & Processing

Both support bank transfers, credit/debit cards, Skrill, Neteller, and crypto funding. Deposits via cards and e‑wallets are instant; withdrawals process within 24 hrs (e‑wallets) or 1–3 days (bank). Neither charges broker fees.

Conclusion: Funding options and speeds are comparable; Exness offers marginally more crypto choices.

8. Education & Support

Pepperstone’s Trader’s Hub features live webinars, video courses, Autochartist signals and Trading Central analysis. Exness Academy provides structured tutorials, daily market commentary, and integrated terminal insights. Both deliver 24/5 multi‑lingual support with sub‑2‑minute live‑chat response.

Conclusion: Pepperstone has a broader third‑party research ecosystem; Exness offers a more streamlined, in‑platform learning experience.

9. Who Should Choose Which?

• Beginners with tiny capital: Exness Standard (from $1).

• Cost‑conscious scalpers: Exness Raw Spread (slightly lower commission).

• Professional/algorithmic traders: Pepperstone Razor + VPS + TradingView.

• MENA & African clients: Pepperstone (DFSA, Kenya licences).

• High‑leverage professionals: Exness (up to 1:2000).

Conclusion

Both Pepperstone and Exness stand among the best brokers in 2025. Exness offers the lowest entry deposit and highest professional leverage, while Pepperstone delivers broader regional regulation, integrated TradingView, and robust third‑party research tools. Your ideal choice depends on your capital size, strategy, and regional considerations.

Open your Pepperstone account now and trade with the conditions that best fit your goals!