Washington Square News | Opinion
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2020
9
RACE
The Nuance of Blackness in Representation
By MAUREEN ZEUFACK Staff Writer Non-American Black actors playing American roles in films has long been a topic of contention. This highly controversial subject calls to question: what is the “Black experience?” Is there a universal one? And more importantly, who can tell Black stories? Although in the United States, we’re all lumped into the category of African-American, not all Black people are the same. The Black diaspora is diverse with people from all backgrounds. Some, however, feel as though if an actor is not American, they don’t have the understanding of what it means to be Black in America, and therefore should not portray them in film. But there are layers to this issue that are deeply rooted. The critically-acclaimed 2019 film “Queen and Slim” stars actors Jodie Turner-Smith and Daniel Kaluuya, both Black Brits. The film tells a very American story, exploring the topic of police brutality in the U.S. Although neither Kaluuya nor Turner-Smith are African-American, they were able to embody the essence of important, authentic characters. They were able to comprehend and latch onto the core of the story in “Queen and Slim” because they know what it’s like to be discriminated against, and — through living in the United States — know what it’s like to fear law enforcement in a Black body. Regardless of origin, there’s a certain universality to the Black experience regarding the shared understanding of how the effects of colonization and oppression continue to impact Black lives. The film was well-executed and its protagonists’ non-Americanness was not a deficit to its storytelling. This discussion is controversial because the issue deals with cultural, ethnic and social backgrounds in addition to race. While there are booming centers of film across the globe, the United States is especially a powerhouse in the film industry. Thus, many cinematic narratives are from an American perspective. There are talented actors from across the globe, and if someone is able to tell a story with honesty and respect, I see no issue. Let’s remember that it is an actor’s job to portray lives that aren’t their own. There are several examples of this in film, such as Kenyan-Mexican actress Lupita Nyong’o’s role in “12 Years A Slave.” Much of the controversy surrounding non-American blacks playing American roles — especially in films depicting slavery — is the belief that due to their heritage, foreign actors don’t have the same ties to slavery as
Submitting to
Black Americans do. Some say non-American Blacks should not portray Black Americans because their origins mean they can’t fully comprehend the Black American experience. Because of this, they believe they take roles from Black American actors. Others suppose that allowing non-American Blacks to play American Blacks in cinema says that all Black people are the same. But if this is the case, can’t the same be said for Black American actors and their portrayals of non-American Blacks in film? Aren’t Americans taking roles from them too? Will Smith’s portrayal of Nigerian doctor Bennet Omalu in “Concussion” (completely butchering the accent, God love him). There’s also the idea that if the actors involved are all Black, they should be able to tell each other’s stories. It’s a more utopian sentiment, that regardless of origin, our race links us in a shared community of blackness, and that Black creatives from all backgrounds can be entrusted with the weighty responsibility and privilege of portraying each other. A non-American Black actor may not have the same understanding of Black American life, but if someone is best-suited to play a role, regardless of ethnicity, why should they be limited? As a first-generation Cameroonian-American, I don’t have the same direct relation to slavery that my Black American counterparts do. But as an American, that history is deeply personal to me. As a black person, there’s an innate understanding of the historical oppression and white supremacy that has impacted Black people of all geographic origins. Even as Black immigrants and their children experience discrimination in the present, the historical impact of centuries of racism and oppression on the African-American community should not be overlooked. We should acknowledge the cultural differences in actors and let them guide the process of developing on-screen stories. For instance, having non-American actors immerse themselves in historically Black communities if a role requires such. Black is Black. The research and cultural sensitivity in the production of a film are essential and the awareness of differences in cultural and ethnic backgrounds across the diaspora regarding casting imperatively informs our place in the world and the sociopolitical knowledge we possess. Oftentimes, it comes down to who was the best person to tell the story, regardless of if they are from the West Indies or England. Above all, it is crucial that Black stories are being told and shared with global audiences. And if these stories are told with authenticity and integrity to the types of people portrayed — sans tokenism and caricatures of Black people — I say bring the movies on.
STAFF EDITORIAL
Incompetence and Disaster in the Democratic Party On Feb. 6, President Trump was acquitted of his impeachment charges by the United States Senate. This was after the House of Representatives impeached him over a whistleblower’s complaint, claiming he asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Biden, a candidate in the Democratic primary, and his son, Hunter Biden. The two articles brought against him were accusations of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. WSN’s Editorial Board wrote on this topic when Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) first launched the impeachment inquiry through the House. We wrote on the possibility of manipulated elections and the hypocrisy of the United States, considering the government’s role in tampering with elections abroad and its history of domestic voter suppression. The reality of impeachment is simple. While pushing for Trump’s removal, Pelosi and the Democratic Party have helped the president increase the defense budget by $21 billion and pass the environmentally catastrophic United States-Mexico-Canada-Agreement, just to name two examples of consequential bipartisan legislation from the impeachment period. Both of these instances show the underlying ineffectiveness of Democratic opposition while showing that the party only projects an intent to impeach. In a way, this collaboration shows the party’s inability to unify in the most pressing political moments and decisions, and thus showing a serious incompetency in performing their most important role in government. They also showcase a serious contradiction: how can one be fundamentally opposed to a president while promoting his most crucial policies? An obvious, recent example was the meltdown of the Iowa Democratic caucuses. Results were significantly delayed because of an app purchased by the Iowa Democratic Party for vote recording, which failed. It was also found that former Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s campaign paid the creators of the
app, Shadow Inc., $42,500 for software services in late July 2019. The overarching umbrella corporation’s CEO, Tara McGowan, has further connections to Buttigieg — her husband works as the senior strategist for his campaign. The controversial financial dealings, at its best, shows the Iowa Democratic Party’s inability to administer an election. At its worst, it shows the party turned a blind eye to corruption in its caucus. The failed app was also reported to have been untested and full of errors prior to the caucus. The final version was only sent to campaign officials 10 days before the start of the election. ProPublica reports that the technology was insecure and that “vote totals, passwords and other sensitive information could have been intercepted or even changed.” Additionally, the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Christopher Krebs said that the app had not been properly checked by the agency. It’s appalling how a private company was allowed to create an app that had such a significant impact on one of the most important elections for the Democratic candidacy without being vetted by the proper authorities. Though what occurred in Iowa may seem suspicious and conspiratorial, what’s more likely and even more dangerous is that the party is seriously incompetent. This incompetence is a constant reoccurrence, as shown both in the Iowa caucuses and in the Democrats’ inability to confront Trump. This poses an important question: if the party can’t even conduct a successful election, how would it be possible to convict a sitting president? These two events may seem like separate issues, but they both expose holes in the party on the state and national level. While criticism and action against President Trump is an obvious necessity, the flaws of the Democratic Party must be exposed as well. Clearly, in the midst of electoral chaos and the failure of removal of the president, the Democratic Party’s political strategy and administrative procedures aren’t working.
Email the Editorial Board at editboard@nyunews.com. CHAIR Jun Sung CO-CHAIR Emily Dai, Gabby Lozano, Asha Ramachandran, Helen Wajda CHAIR EX OFFICIO Cole Stallone, Abby Hofstetter,
Ronni Husmann, Paul Kim, Anna-Dmitry Muratova
Email Maureen Zeufack at opinion@nyunews.com.
SEND MAIL TO: 75 THIRD AVE. #SB07, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10003 OR EMAIL: OPINION@NYUNEWS.COM WSN welcomes letters to the editor, opinion pieces and articles relevant to the NYU community, or in response to articles. Letters should be less than 450 words. All submissions must be typed or emailed and must include the author’s name, address and phone number. Members of the NYU community must include a year and school or job title. WSN does not print unsigned letters or editorials. WSN reserves the right to reject any submission and edit accepted submissions in any and all ways. With the exception of the staff editorial, opinions expressed on the editorial pages are not necessarily those of WSN, and our publication of opinions is not an endorsement of them.