RE I MB U R SE ME NT & C LINICA L ISSUES
A DENIAL AND APPEAL: A TRUE STORY Written by: CLAUDIA AMORTEGUI
These past couple months I have been involved in a case that leaves me flabbergasted at every turn I take. As you can expect, the names and locations have been changed but it is a true story, and it starts like this … A 27-year-old man who is diagnosed with cerebral palsy and quadriplegia has been using a power wheelchair for many, many years. We will call him Max. Max is bright, active and had been independent for many years. As time passed, his spasms have worsened, which left him apprehensive when driving his power wheelchair outside his home. Max also had some other postural changes. Due to both issues, his seating and positioning therapist and his physician each evaluated him to see what, if anything, could be done to help him. After the evaluations, a couple items were ordered to be added to his current power wheelchair. The goal, allowing Max to be able to independently drive his power wheelchair once again and to be properly seated. In all my years doing this, I can honestly say that I have not seen very many physicians who have been so detailed in their documentation. I am used to seeing this with occupational or physical therapists experienced in seating and positioning but not physicians. Well, this physician was beyond detailed. The information even included how Max used to be independent, the exact changes in his health and why the specific items were needed. The physician even stated what would happen if Max did not obtain the ordered items.
THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT ME; THIS IS ABOUT EVERYONE IN A WHEELCHAIR.
Although not necessarily a surprise, the state Medicaid office denied the claim. You would think they never read the documentation. Initially, the state asked specific questions. The supplier answered, but much of it was just pointing to the specific documentation that had already been provided. Everyone waited for a response. No surprise it was denied again. This time their reasons were infuriating.
52
DIRECTIONS 2022.1
One of the denials, simply makes it that anyone in a power wheelchair should not be granted the same technology available on most, if not all, automobiles. I can even go further and say the technology on automobiles is not just for the person driving but to protect both property and other people. Maybe the state thinks if a person is in a wheelchair, they are not able to “handle” the technology. Or maybe if you are in a wheelchair, you should have eyes behind your head and superpower eyesight allowing them to see through their own body and solid objects. Another denial states they did not see what skills Max was lacking to achieve independent, safe driving of a power wheelchair. It appears they missed all the documentation from the physician and seating and positioning therapist that clearly states not only why Max is no longer safe but specifically what has changed with his condition. The documentation even states the item is the one thing they need to make Max safe and independent while driving his power wheelchair once again. The next denial caused my mouth to hit the floor. Simply put — just strap Max in with seat belts and harnesses — he’ll be fine. Great … don’t worry if his body breaks or is crushed, he at least will still be strapped in. It gets better. Now the state is going after the dog. Can’t Max or his family use environmental controls to keep the dog from running around the house when Max is in his power wheelchair? Sorry … if you are in a wheelchair, you should not have a pet. Better yet, they likely wouldn’t pay for any environmental controls for any reason. I guess we should just keep the dog in a cage or Max just needs to not be in his power wheelchair. And finally, the last part of the denial. Simply, can Max not just have a caregiver when he goes outside alone,
