SERVING UP THE D’OH! SERVING UP THE D’OH!

Loaded. A4

Supreme court rules in favour of PRRD over unpermitted campground

Supreme court rules in favour of PRRD over unpermitted campground

Supreme court rules in favour of PRRD over unpermitted campground

Over

Tom Summer Local Journalism Initiative Reporter

Tom Summer Local Journalism Initiative Reporter

Tom Summer Local Journalism Initiative Reporter

A judicial review between the Peace River Regional District and a Pouce Coupe couple operating an unpermitted campground has been settled in Supreme Court, with Justice Shelley C. Fitzpatrick ruling that the couple sought to avoid consequences from agricultural zoning and district bylaws.

A judicial review between the Peace River Regional District and a Pouce Coupe couple operating an unpermitted campground has been settled in Supreme Court, with Justice Shelley C. Fitzpatrick ruling that the couple sought to avoid consequences from agricultural

A judicial review between the Peace River Regional District and a Pouce Coupe couple operating an unpermitted campground has been settled in Supreme Court, with Justice Shelley C. Fitzpatrick ruling that the couple sought to avoid consequences from agricultural

A judicial review between the Peace River Regional District and a Pouce Coupe couple operating an unpermitted campground has been settled in Supreme Court, with Justice Shelley C. Fitzpatrick ruling that the couple sought to avoid facilities, convenience store, restaurant, and other business related buildings at 437 Briar Ridge Road. facilities, convenience store, restaurant, and other business related buildings at 437 Briar Ridge Road. facilities, convenience store, restaurant, and other business related buildings at 437 Briar Ridge Road. facilities, convenience store, restaurant, and other business related buildings at 437 Briar Ridge Road.

“They sought to avoid the consequences arising from the fact that the Property was in the ALR and that certain zoning and building bylaws applied,” reads the July 10, 2023 judgment, made in Dawson Creek Supreme Court.

“They sought to avoid the consequences arising from the fact that the Property was in the ALR and that certain zoning and building bylaws applied,” reads the July 10, 2023 judgment, made in Dawson Creek Supreme Court.

“They sought to avoid the consequences arising from the fact that the Property was in the ALR and that certain zoning and building bylaws applied,” reads the July 10, 2023 judgment, made in Dawson Creek Supreme Court.

“They sought to avoid the consequences arising from the fact that the Property was in the ALR and that certain zoning and building bylaws applied,” reads the July 10, 2023 judgment, made in Dawson Creek Supreme Court.

The property remains in the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) and was never zoned for commercial or non-farm use, with the ruling noting the couple were unaware of the ALR status at the time of purchase.

The couple, Lyle Pringle and Doreen Shadow, had been operating 22 RV sites, a food truck, a rental shack, workshops, washroom

The property remains in the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) and was never zoned for commercial or non-farm use, with the ruling noting the couple were unaware of the ALR status at the time of purchase.

The couple, Lyle Pringle and Doreen Shadow, had been operating 22 RV sites, a food truck, a rental

The couple, Lyle Pringle and Doreen Shadow, had been operating 22 RV sites, a food truck, a rental

The couple, Lyle Pringle and Doreen Shadow, had been operating

The property remains in the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) and was never zoned for commercial or non-farm use, with the ruling noting the couple were unaware of the ALR status at the time of purchase.

The property remains in the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) and was never zoned for commercial or non-farm use, with the ruling noting the couple were unaware of the ALR status at the time of purchase.

Continued on page A5

Continued on page A5

Continued on page A5