Health Canada (Emergency Management Guide for Crude Oil Incidents)

Page 68

Section 4. CASE STUDIES

4.4

Guidance for the Environmental Public Health Management of Crude Oil Incidents

CASE STUDY (marine oil spill): Marathassa Incident, April 2015

A sheen of oil was observed in English Bay on 8 April 2015 at16:48 PST. The Captain and representatives of M/V Marathassa initially denied that early on the morning of April 8, 2015 the ship had discharged an unknown quantity of intermediate fuel oil (suspected to be IFO 3802) into English Bay on April 8. Response: The Canadian Coast Guard activated the Unified Command as per the Incident Response System. Oil containment and recovery by West Coast Marine Response Corporation (WCMRC) started at 21:25 on April 8 with on-water recovery operations. A boom was placed around M/V Marathassa at 03:25 on April 9. A National Aerial Surveillance Program (NASP) flight at 12:20 hours on April 9 estimated that approximately 2,800 litres of fuel oil remained on the water. On-water recovery operations were completed on April 12, recovering an estimated 1,400 litres of oil. Additional work on search, recovery, vessel cleaning, and decontamination continued until April 23. Shoreline assessment and clean up using the Shoreline Cleanup and Assessment Technique (SCAT) took place from April 9 to 24. Additional survey and monitoring programs included (1) aerial overflights and underwater surveys to determine surface and subtidal oil extent; (2) oil, sediment, water, and biological sampling and analysis; and (3) wildlife rescue and rehabilitation. Operational updates were provided by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) throughout the response [DFO, 2015]. DFO closed Burrard Inlet to all recreational fishing for shellfish and groundfish [Johnson, 2015]. Beaches in Vancouver and North Vancouver were closed for over a month [CBC News, 2015c] Recommendations: Key recommendations from the Butler report [Butler, 2015] for improved spill response include: •

ensuring the Coast Guard has adequate staff to respond to a major marine pollution incident in the region at any given time;

continuing implementation of the Incident Command System, including exercises with all partners, First Nations, provincial and municipal partners, and non-governmental organizations as part of the plan;

ensuring accurate information is released by Unified Command and/or Incident Command as soon as possible regarding the type, quantity, and fate and effects of a pollutant, including any information that is related to public health concerns; and

developing a rapidly deployable communications and IT system that facilitates a more effective and timely electronic interface with partner agencies during an incident.

Legal issues: Charges under the Canada Shipping Act, the federal Fisheries Act, and the Canadian Migratory Birds Act were filed against the M/V Marathassa and Alassia Newships Management Inc., the Greece-based ship’s owners in 2017 [Hunter, 2017].

56

Version 1.0 – August 2018


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Annex J2: Major international crude oil spills involving pipeline/storage tank/ onshore wells

5min
pages 149-151

Annex G: Guidance on onsite response to pipeline incidents, derailments and marine incidents

5min
pages 132-134

4.4 CASE STUDY (marine oil spill): Marathassa Incident, April 2015

2min
page 68

Annex F: Epidemiological studies on mental health effects related to exposure to oil spills

36min
pages 108-131

Annex E: Epidemiological studies on physical/physiological effects experienced by humans exposed to oil spills

32min
pages 87-107

4.2 CASE STUDY (pipeline incident): Marshall, MI, pipeline spill, 25 July, 2010

2min
page 66

Annex B: Crude oil pipelines in Canada and the United States

1min
page 83

Seaforth Channel, October 2016

1min
page 67

Figure 11: Causes and contributing factors to Lac-Mégantic derailment

1min
page 65

Figure 10: Lac-Mégantic derailment

3min
pages 63-64

4.1 CASE STUDY (rail incident): Lac-Mégantic derailment, 6 July 2013

5min
pages 61-62

Table 16: Crude oil releases that resulted in significant changes in regulations

1min
page 60

3.3.1 Population health follow-up research considerations

4min
pages 56-57

Checklist 8: Human decontamination and treatment considerations

1min
page 54

Checklist 9: Data collection considerations from participants in follow-up studies

1min
page 58

Checklist 7: Evacuations vs sheltering-in-place considerations

2min
page 53

Checklist 3: Typical local hazmat response activities undertaken by first responders

1min
page 49

Checklist 6: Specialized medical and toxicological resources to inform a response to hazmat incidents

1min
page 51

Checklist 2: Health-related concerns in the event of a major crude oil release

1min
page 48

Figure 9: Major symptoms experienced by oil spill clean-up workers engaged in the Deepwater Horizon clean up along the coast of Louisiana following exposure to oil spill and dispersant

1min
page 33

Checklist 1: Proposed activities to better prepare communities to the risk of a crude oil release

2min
page 45

Box 4: What are the reference values for assessing health risks from acute exposure to air pollutants?

3min
page 37

1.9 What happens when crude oil is released into the environment?

2min
pages 28-29

their community for the risk of a crude oil release?

1min
page 44

Box 6: What is the Incident Command System (ICS)?

1min
page 47

3.2 What actions should to be taken if a sudden major crude oil release occurs?

1min
page 46

1.8.2 Rail

1min
page 26
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Health Canada (Emergency Management Guide for Crude Oil Incidents) by NIVA Inc. - Issuu