Health Canada (Emergency Management Guide for Crude Oil Incidents)

Page 61

Guidance for the Environmental Public Health Management of Crude Oil Incidents

4.1

Section 4. CASE STUDIES

CASE STUDY (rail incident): Lac-Mégantic derailment, 6 July 2013

At 22:50 Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on July 5, 2013, a Montreal, Maine, and Atlantic Railway (MMA) train (MMA002) arrived at Nantes, Quebec, carrying 7.7 million litres of petroleum crude oil (UN 1267) in 72 Class 111 tank cars and was parked on a descending grade on the main track. The engineer applied hand brakes on all five locomotives and two other cars, shut down all but the lead locomotive and left. The train was now held by the hand brakes and the air brakes on the lead locomotive. Shortly after the engineer left, the Nantes Fire Department responded to a 911 call reporting a fire on the train. The firefighters extinguished the fire and shut the lead locomotive down. Air pressure for the air brakes slowly reduced. Just before 1:00 a.m., the air pressure had dropped to a point at which the combination of locomotive air brakes and hand brakes could no longer hold the train and it began to roll downhill toward Lac-Mégantic, just over seven miles away [TSB, 2014a]. The train, having reached a top speed of 105 kph, derailed near the centre of the town at about 1:15 a.m. Fiftynine of the 63 derailed tank cars were breached and released crude oil due to tank damage (see TSB, 2014b Table 3, Photos 16-23). Approximately 6 million litres of petroleum crude oil was quickly released. The fire, which burned for nearly two days, began almost immediately. The ensuing blaze and explosions left 47 people dead. Another 2,000 people were evacuated. Forty buildings and 53 vehicles were destroyed [TSB, 2014b]. One hundred fifteen businesses were destroyed, displaced, or rendered inaccessible [RC, 2013]. The hydrocarbon recovery and clean-up operation began as soon as the fire was extinguished and the site was stabilized, approximately two days after the derailment. About 740,000 litres of crude oil were recovered from the derailed tank cars. Crude oil migrated into the town’s sanitary and storm sewer systems by way of manholes. An estimated 100,000 litres of crude oil ended up in Mégantic Lake and the Chaudière River by way of surface flow, underground infiltration, and sewer systems Approximately 31 hectares of land was contaminated [TSB, 2014b]. Public health response Actions taken by the Public Health Department (PHD) of the Eastern Townships, in close collaboration with community-based organizations, during the impact phase emergency response (July-August 2013) included: providing direct services needed to protect the citizens and the on-site responders from health hazards (e.g., exposure to chemical, physical, and biological agents); risk assessments for on-site responders and clean-up personnel including firefighters, police, decontamination, team members, railway specialists, and contractors; initiation of epidemiological investigations; and risk communication to the general public and disaster workers [Généreux, 2015]. During the recovery operations phase (September 2013 to present), the PHD implemented a local surveillance system focusing on health issues related to the train derailment to keep track of the potential after-effects of the tragedy and conducted the first survey on population health (2014) [Généreux, 2015]. The second survey (2015) found that 67% of the residents of Lac-Mégantic continue to suffer moderate to severe post-traumatic stress and that one in six reported an increase in alcohol consumption [Généreux, 2016; Vision, 2016; Peritz, 2016]. The third survey (2016) indicated that (1) the population is still suffering from the consequences of the tragedy, particularly individuals who were more exposed and those experiencing difficulties in coping with the loss of a loved one; (2) psychological health is stable and even showing some improvement; and (3) use of medical and psychosocial services is increasing [Sante estrie, 2017]. Environmental monitoring and remediation The Quebec Ministry of the Environment immediately deployed a mobile laboratory to measure air quality. Elevated concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), nitrogen oxide, and total suspended particles (TSP) resulted in the Medical Health Officer ordering the evacuation of 1,000 people downwind of the disaster site [Genereux, 2015]. Municipal water systems that used the Chaudiere River were obliged to find alternate sources [Millette, 2014a]. The initial work focused on preventing the spread of contamination via preferential paths (e.g., sewers) into water courses [Millette, 2014b]. Surface water and sediment sampling stations were set up on Lac-Mégantic and the Chaudière River [Millette, 2014b; Galvez-Cloutier, 2015]. Contaminated soil, primarily in the impact zone

Version 1.0 – August 2018

49


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Annex J2: Major international crude oil spills involving pipeline/storage tank/ onshore wells

5min
pages 149-151

Annex G: Guidance on onsite response to pipeline incidents, derailments and marine incidents

5min
pages 132-134

4.4 CASE STUDY (marine oil spill): Marathassa Incident, April 2015

2min
page 68

Annex F: Epidemiological studies on mental health effects related to exposure to oil spills

36min
pages 108-131

Annex E: Epidemiological studies on physical/physiological effects experienced by humans exposed to oil spills

32min
pages 87-107

4.2 CASE STUDY (pipeline incident): Marshall, MI, pipeline spill, 25 July, 2010

2min
page 66

Annex B: Crude oil pipelines in Canada and the United States

1min
page 83

Seaforth Channel, October 2016

1min
page 67

Figure 11: Causes and contributing factors to Lac-Mégantic derailment

1min
page 65

Figure 10: Lac-Mégantic derailment

3min
pages 63-64

4.1 CASE STUDY (rail incident): Lac-Mégantic derailment, 6 July 2013

5min
pages 61-62

Table 16: Crude oil releases that resulted in significant changes in regulations

1min
page 60

3.3.1 Population health follow-up research considerations

4min
pages 56-57

Checklist 8: Human decontamination and treatment considerations

1min
page 54

Checklist 9: Data collection considerations from participants in follow-up studies

1min
page 58

Checklist 7: Evacuations vs sheltering-in-place considerations

2min
page 53

Checklist 3: Typical local hazmat response activities undertaken by first responders

1min
page 49

Checklist 6: Specialized medical and toxicological resources to inform a response to hazmat incidents

1min
page 51

Checklist 2: Health-related concerns in the event of a major crude oil release

1min
page 48

Figure 9: Major symptoms experienced by oil spill clean-up workers engaged in the Deepwater Horizon clean up along the coast of Louisiana following exposure to oil spill and dispersant

1min
page 33

Checklist 1: Proposed activities to better prepare communities to the risk of a crude oil release

2min
page 45

Box 4: What are the reference values for assessing health risks from acute exposure to air pollutants?

3min
page 37

1.9 What happens when crude oil is released into the environment?

2min
pages 28-29

their community for the risk of a crude oil release?

1min
page 44

Box 6: What is the Incident Command System (ICS)?

1min
page 47

3.2 What actions should to be taken if a sudden major crude oil release occurs?

1min
page 46

1.8.2 Rail

1min
page 26
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Health Canada (Emergency Management Guide for Crude Oil Incidents) by NIVA Inc. - Issuu