Health Canada (Emergency Management Guide for Crude Oil Incidents)

Page 60

Section 4. CASE STUDIES

Guidance for the Environmental Public Health Management of Crude Oil Incidents

Table 16: Crude oil releases that resulted in significant changes in regulations Incident

Date

Location

Description

Change

LacMégantic derailment

Jul 6 2013

LacMégantic, Quebec

A runaway train of 72 tank cars loaded with Bakken crude oil crashed. 63 cars derailed and exploded in the centre of town causing a massive fire. 47 people were killed, half the downtown area destroyed. About 5.6 million litres of crude oil was released.

See Section 4.1

Deepwater Horizon (DWH) (Macondo blowout)

Apr 20 2010

Gulf of Mexico

Fire and explosion occurred on the Deepwater Horizon, a semi-submersible drilling platform. The rig sank; a sea-floor oil gusher flowed for 87 days until capped on 15 Jul 2010 and sealed on 19 Sep 2010. 11 died, 17 were injured (3 critically). Total discharge was estimated as 4.9 million barrels. 2,500 to 68,000 square miles were affected. Total costs were $61.6 billion (Jul 2016) [Mufson, 2016]; litigation is ongoing. [National Commission, 2011].

New safety rules and regulations

Exxon Valdez

Mar 24 1989

Prince William Sound, Alaska

A super tanker grounded on Bligh Reef; eight of 11 tanks punctured; about 35,000 metric tonnes of Alaska North Slope crude escaped. Approx. 1,300 miles of shoreline were affected. At least 36,000 seabirds and 1,000 sea otters died. Exxon Mobil paid $3.5 billion in clean-up costs and $5 billion in legal and financial settlements. Court case for natural resource damages is still being pursued [ARLIS, 2017; Macalister, 2010].

The “double hull” amendment of 6 Mar 1992 promulgated and voted in for all vessels built after 6 Jul 1996 (MARPOL convention, rule 13F); USA Oil Pollution Act of 1990 [EPA, 1990]

Torrey Canyon

Mar 18 1967

near Lands End, Cornwall

A tanker ran aground on Pollard Rock on the Seven Stones Reef. Approx. 119,000 tonnes of Kuwait crude oil was lost into the sea or burned. More than 15,000 seabirds died. Many of the detrimental impacts of the spill later related to the high volume, high concentration, and high toxicity of the dispersant and detergents used. [ITOPF, 2014b]

Initiated first elements of the French, British, and European policies of prevention and response against large oil slick disasters.

48

Version 1.0 – August 2018


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Annex J2: Major international crude oil spills involving pipeline/storage tank/ onshore wells

5min
pages 149-151

Annex G: Guidance on onsite response to pipeline incidents, derailments and marine incidents

5min
pages 132-134

4.4 CASE STUDY (marine oil spill): Marathassa Incident, April 2015

2min
page 68

Annex F: Epidemiological studies on mental health effects related to exposure to oil spills

36min
pages 108-131

Annex E: Epidemiological studies on physical/physiological effects experienced by humans exposed to oil spills

32min
pages 87-107

4.2 CASE STUDY (pipeline incident): Marshall, MI, pipeline spill, 25 July, 2010

2min
page 66

Annex B: Crude oil pipelines in Canada and the United States

1min
page 83

Seaforth Channel, October 2016

1min
page 67

Figure 11: Causes and contributing factors to Lac-Mégantic derailment

1min
page 65

Figure 10: Lac-Mégantic derailment

3min
pages 63-64

4.1 CASE STUDY (rail incident): Lac-Mégantic derailment, 6 July 2013

5min
pages 61-62

Table 16: Crude oil releases that resulted in significant changes in regulations

1min
page 60

3.3.1 Population health follow-up research considerations

4min
pages 56-57

Checklist 8: Human decontamination and treatment considerations

1min
page 54

Checklist 9: Data collection considerations from participants in follow-up studies

1min
page 58

Checklist 7: Evacuations vs sheltering-in-place considerations

2min
page 53

Checklist 3: Typical local hazmat response activities undertaken by first responders

1min
page 49

Checklist 6: Specialized medical and toxicological resources to inform a response to hazmat incidents

1min
page 51

Checklist 2: Health-related concerns in the event of a major crude oil release

1min
page 48

Figure 9: Major symptoms experienced by oil spill clean-up workers engaged in the Deepwater Horizon clean up along the coast of Louisiana following exposure to oil spill and dispersant

1min
page 33

Checklist 1: Proposed activities to better prepare communities to the risk of a crude oil release

2min
page 45

Box 4: What are the reference values for assessing health risks from acute exposure to air pollutants?

3min
page 37

1.9 What happens when crude oil is released into the environment?

2min
pages 28-29

their community for the risk of a crude oil release?

1min
page 44

Box 6: What is the Incident Command System (ICS)?

1min
page 47

3.2 What actions should to be taken if a sudden major crude oil release occurs?

1min
page 46

1.8.2 Rail

1min
page 26
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Health Canada (Emergency Management Guide for Crude Oil Incidents) by NIVA Inc. - Issuu