Health Canada (Emergency Management Guide for Crude Oil Incidents)

Page 132

Annexes

Guidance for the Environmental Public Health Management of Crude Oil Incidents

Annex G: Guidance on onsite response to pipeline incidents, derailments and marine incidents Response to a pipeline incident The Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG2016) [ERG, 2016] provides general instructions for responders to pipeline incidents. (Indications of pipeline ruptures are given on page 22.) Safety of both the responder and the community is the top priority. The responder should approach a pipeline incident from upwind, uphill, and upstream while using air monitoring equipment to detect for the presence of explosive and/or toxic levels of hazardous materials: • always wear proper personal protective equipment; • never attempt to operate pipeline valves; • never attempt to extinguish a flame before shutting off supply, as this can cause formation of explosive mixtures; and • do not enter a vapour cloud in an attempt to identify the product(s) involved. ERG 2016 tells responders to (see page 24): • identify the operator and, if possible, the product; • notify the pipeline operator; • establish a command post; • secure the site; and • develop a plan to evacuate or shelter-inplace. ERG 2016 discusses factors to be considered in determining protective action distances for crude oil release from ruptured pipelines (see below).

Response to a derailment The advice given in the case of a derailment would be similar to that given for a pipeline rupture except that the rail company would be 120

notified. Information specific to derailments involving Bakken crude oil is given in a report by the NWAC [NWAC, 2015].

Response to a marine incident Canadian response to marine oil spills is detailed in the Canadian National Oil Spill Preparedness and Response Regime [TC, 2012]. The Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) oversees the response to ship-source oil spills in Canadian waters. The onus for responding to pollution incidents is placed on the polluter who hires a response organization to do the clean-up. The four certified response organizations, based on geographical areas, are described in reference [TC, 2016]. The CCG monitors the polluter's efforts and steps-in to manage the response only if a polluter is unknown, unwilling, or unable to respond to an incident. The CCG can seek compensation for costs incurred when managing or monitoring the response to an incident. Transport Canada guidelines for reporting incidents involving marine pollutants are given in reference TC, 2016 and regional contact numbers for reporting a marine pollution incident in reference CCG, 2015.

Initial isolation and protective action distances The determination of protective action distances is best left to the incident response team (HAZMAT coordination/incident commander/industry expert). The Initial Isolation Zone defines an area SURROUNDING the incident in which persons may be exposed to dangerous (upwind) and life threatening (downwind) concentrations of material.

Version 1.0 – August 2018


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Annex J2: Major international crude oil spills involving pipeline/storage tank/ onshore wells

5min
pages 149-151

Annex G: Guidance on onsite response to pipeline incidents, derailments and marine incidents

5min
pages 132-134

4.4 CASE STUDY (marine oil spill): Marathassa Incident, April 2015

2min
page 68

Annex F: Epidemiological studies on mental health effects related to exposure to oil spills

36min
pages 108-131

Annex E: Epidemiological studies on physical/physiological effects experienced by humans exposed to oil spills

32min
pages 87-107

4.2 CASE STUDY (pipeline incident): Marshall, MI, pipeline spill, 25 July, 2010

2min
page 66

Annex B: Crude oil pipelines in Canada and the United States

1min
page 83

Seaforth Channel, October 2016

1min
page 67

Figure 11: Causes and contributing factors to Lac-Mégantic derailment

1min
page 65

Figure 10: Lac-Mégantic derailment

3min
pages 63-64

4.1 CASE STUDY (rail incident): Lac-Mégantic derailment, 6 July 2013

5min
pages 61-62

Table 16: Crude oil releases that resulted in significant changes in regulations

1min
page 60

3.3.1 Population health follow-up research considerations

4min
pages 56-57

Checklist 8: Human decontamination and treatment considerations

1min
page 54

Checklist 9: Data collection considerations from participants in follow-up studies

1min
page 58

Checklist 7: Evacuations vs sheltering-in-place considerations

2min
page 53

Checklist 3: Typical local hazmat response activities undertaken by first responders

1min
page 49

Checklist 6: Specialized medical and toxicological resources to inform a response to hazmat incidents

1min
page 51

Checklist 2: Health-related concerns in the event of a major crude oil release

1min
page 48

Figure 9: Major symptoms experienced by oil spill clean-up workers engaged in the Deepwater Horizon clean up along the coast of Louisiana following exposure to oil spill and dispersant

1min
page 33

Checklist 1: Proposed activities to better prepare communities to the risk of a crude oil release

2min
page 45

Box 4: What are the reference values for assessing health risks from acute exposure to air pollutants?

3min
page 37

1.9 What happens when crude oil is released into the environment?

2min
pages 28-29

their community for the risk of a crude oil release?

1min
page 44

Box 6: What is the Incident Command System (ICS)?

1min
page 47

3.2 What actions should to be taken if a sudden major crude oil release occurs?

1min
page 46

1.8.2 Rail

1min
page 26
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.