SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOOD STUDI
HITACHI CAMPUS, SAN JOSE
+10 P UP
RAMP UP
RAM
+10
150000 sq ft on 2 levels
RAMP UP
RAMP UP
RAMP
UP
140000 sq ft on 2 levels RAMP UP
JES
SIC
A'S
ELE
VATED
WA
LKWA Y
+0 0
Nicola Szibbo. Troy Reinhalter. Kirsten Heming. Benjamin Lueck. Sean Flanagan. Nancy Nam. Yaou Zhang. Kathryn Moll. Jessica Yang. JaeYeong Yang.
will nd bike e use.
-200
will be accessible both onstreet and off-street. On street lanes and sidewalks will provide routes for commuters and commercial passerbys. Off-street routes will provide pleasant, slower meandering routes through the development.
JAN FEB
MAR APR MAY JUN
SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOOD STUDI
ets act
e areas of e na-
JUL
AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC
HITACHI CAMPUS, SAN JOSE
FRAMEWORK PLANS
priority.
funcs for allow
Direct pedestrian access will be available to both tran-
Parking
stations. Bridges will be Solar/Green Roofs sitconstructed for both transit
stations, Caltrain and VTA, allowing bikers and pedestrians to pass safely and quickly overSolar dangerous arterials. ft2 PV: 385,930
are discour-
Mix of onstreet, podium, and underground lots; very little surface parking. Parking is out of sight at the rear in the retail district.
(8.8 a)
hildren. 200
1”=400’
400
On average, units have an installed capacity of solar panels equal to 10% of the
800
LEGEND
od
On-Street Sidewalk/Lane Off-Street Pathway
On-street Entrance Off-street Entrance
Owing the transit-oriented nature of the project, it is reasonable to provide less parking than a similar development that does not possess such good transit access.
The total yearly production would be approximately 5.8 gan. Nancy Nam. Yaou Zhang. Kathryn Moll. Jessica Yang. JaeYeong Mwh Yang. (assuming 15Kwh/ft2). Professor Harrison Fraker. Fall 2009. Green Roofs: 259,400 ft2 (6 a) Electricity production is prioritzed on rooftops but
PARKING COUNT On Street Parking 1200 Off Street Parking 2375 Total 3575
still exists. Green roofs could be intensive or extensive, and would also capture rainwater. 1”=400’
200
400
800
Approximate parking ratio 3575 spaces/2560 units= 1.35 200
1”=400’
LEGEND
400
800
LEGEND
Roofs with Solar
Green Roofs
On Street Parking
Podium Parking
Phasing
Density
The development will be completed in 4 phases. The dense nodes at the north and south are critical and
Phase 2
800 Units 76 du/a
Average Density: 35 du/a 800 Units 76 du/a
More than two-thirds of the new residents will be housed distance to transit. Creating density around transit nodes is essential to the TOD strategy.
202 Units 18 du/a
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 1) Southern Retail and High Density Transit Village Phase 2
Phase 4
Phase 2) Dense Northern Development & Retail Spine
Phase 3
400 Units 50 du/a
New development will be far more dense than typical suburban sprawl pattern, but similar to recent condomium projects built to the south.
150 Units 44 du/a 184 Units 33 du/a 300 Units 55 du/a
98 Units 22 du/a 200 Units 7 du/a
1”=400’
200
400
Underground Parking
800
Phase 1
Phase 3
Phase 1
Phase 3
1”=400’
200
400
Phase 4) Optional adaptive re-use of Hitachi buildings for
800
LEGEND
LEGEND High Density
Phase 3) Single Family Residential and neighborhoods bordering Cottle Rd
Phase 1
Medium Density
Lower Density
Phase 1 Phase 2
Phase 3 Phase 4
Nicola Szibbo. Troy Reinhalter. Kirsten Heming. Benjamin Lueck. Sean Flanagan. Nancy Nam. Yaou Zhang. Kathryn Moll. Jessica Yang. JaeYeong Yang.
Arch 201. UC Berkeley.
Professor Harrison Fraker. Fall 2009.