Qualifica(on of informa(on
• This presentation primarily focuses on less known but latest science consensus forming technologies on strict effect basis, while a bulk of highest efficiency low cost techs & a majority of "outrageous" or controversial claims category contradict predominant view, especially of Wikipedia & Western media/NGOs. Hence attendants/readers are recommended to re-assess the data individually. • Regarding Controversial But Future Critical Technologies Discussed: ■ Term “Free energy” or “Over-unity” in this presentation is defined as seeming as if: -1 Drawing more energy than existing or continuous motion with no energy input. -2 “Work is done” by other than Thermodynamic Free Energy: open system symptom. -3 Using free material generally not considered as fuel. ■ Inventors-scientists-witnesses: their claims might involve higher likelihood of: -4 Fabrication, reliability exaggeration, or statistical error chance of observed effect. -5 Significant quality gap between inventions, yet -6 At least collective majority seems to consistently produces claimed effects. • More detailed reference list will be produced & published separately. The research is updated based on reviewing academic papers & journals, books, presentations, speeches, patents, lab/product testimonies/complaints, publications & public records of research institutes/think tanks/military/space & gov't agencies/industry associations/NGOs/media. Most effects quoted have accumulative-consistent evidence from unrelated era & source, but mechanics & categorization are hypothetical. Commercialized company/products are shown in Boldface Dark Blue. Due to space constraints, referenced individuals names are given only last name or part of first name unless web search identification becomes difficult(often non-Western names are given in full or in their native language), company names are also listed in a way that is findable by internet search.
4