4
SF | EDITORIAL
March 2021 | Vol. 21 No. 3 www.medicalacademic.co.za
This article was independently sourced by Specialist Forum.
The minefield of saving lives by Merlita Kennedy and Jared Ishmael, Webber Wentzel
T
he recent move to charge a medical practitioner with murder rather than culpable homicide for the death of a patient after surgery is alarming, because it could deter innovation and new entrants to the profession. Media reports suggest that South African medical practitioners are increasingly being criminally charged when patients pass away under their care. While this may appease those close to the deceased, what effects will this trend have on South African medical practitioners and medical practice in South Africa? It has been reported by various South African media outlets that the National Prosecuting Authority of South Africa (NPA) has changed the charges against a prominent medical practitioner, aged 73, from culpable homicide to murder following the death of a patient after surgery.1 The NPA has not advanced any reasons for amending the charges. It must be noted that the anaesthetist who worked alongside this medical practitioner was killed in 2020 at the age of 56 and to date, no arrests have been made. 2 Murder is defined as the intentional killing of another human. Culpable homicide is defined as the negligent unlawful killing of another human being3. The charges of culpable homicide and murder, while both relate to the killing of a human being, differ in the way that they address fault or culpability. The former centres on negligence while the latter centres on intention in its various forms. The nature of medical practice is that practitioners often carry out procedures on people whose health is already compromised (which is why they need medical assistance) and this often happens under immensely stressful conditions. That a medical practitioner will produce the desired result cannot be guaranteed, given the number of variables associated with medical practice. Consequently, medical practitioners cannot be compelled to provide the desired result but to diligently apply themselves in a manner similar to that of a reasonable practitioner, regardless of the consequences.
Threat of harsh sanction The threat of harsh sanction, may, in the eyes
of the NPA, deter medical practitioners from deviating from that standard. However, the prospective implications are severe: medical practitioners will be conflicted between performing procedures to assist patients and the threat of criminal sanction if those procedures produce an unintended adverse result. In addition, given the risky nature of medical innovation, practitioners will be reluctant to carry out what may be medically innovative procedures, for fear of criminal sanction. The criminal sanction of medical practitioners for conduct undertaken in the performance of their duties will have a chilling effect on new entrants to medical practice because the profession itself will carry the risk of criminal sanction for procedures performed on every patient in the normal course of the medical practitioner’s career, without time limitations. As a result, colloquially speaking, a medical practitioner could face criminal sanction for 'a hard day’s work'. This must be viewed in the context of South Africa’s low doctorpatient ratio of approximately 40.7 doctors per 100 000 people4 and the poor socio-economic conditions of the majority of South Africans.
Grievances of those who have lost loved ones While the grievances of those who have lost loved ones following medical procedures deserve to be heard and addressed, a balance must be struck between holding medical practitioners accountable and allowing them the freedom to practise and innovate in a profession that is pivotal to human existence and wellbeing.
References 1. https://www.iol.co.za/news/npa-charges-dr-peterbeale-with-murder-fraud-over-10-year-old-patientsdeath-a65a8c36-f795-4946-b55c-8d162849573a 2. https://www.iol.co.za/thepost/news/i-had-nothingto-do-with-hit-on-doctor-77f6de3b-8332-4d5b-89a74424368e5c31 3. James Grant Critical Criminal Law RS 02 of 2018 at page 14. 4. https://www.medicalbrief.co.za/archives/africa-checkputs-together-numbers-doctor-patient-ratios/ SF
EDITORIAL EDITOR: René Bosman René.bosman@newmedia.co.za SUB EDITOR: Gill Abrahams LAYOUT & DESIGN: Allison McCallum ADVERTISING ADVERTISING EXECUTIVES Charissa Piek | 082 306 1205 charissa.piek@newmedia.co.za DISTRIBUTION & SUBSCRIPTIONS Felicity Garbers felicity.garbers@newmedia.co.za PUBLISHING TEAM GENERAL MANAGER: Dev Naidoo PUBLISHING MANAGER: Johann Gerber Johann.Gerber@newmedia.co.za PRODUCTION MANAGER: Angela Silver ART DIRECTOR: David Kyslinger CONTACT Johannesburg Office: Ground floor, Media Park, 69 Kingsway Avenue, Auckland Park, 2092 Postal Address: PO Box 784698, Sandton, Johannesburg, 2146 T +27(0)11 877 6111 F +27(0)11 713 9024 www.medicalacademic.co.za PRINTING
COVER PRICE Specialist Forum per issue R80,00 VAT Incl. ISSN: 2218-8282 Published by New Media, a division of Media24 (Pty) Ltd MANAGEMENT TEAM CEO: NEW MEDIA: Aileen Lamb COMMERCIAL DIRECTOR: Maria Tiganis BRAND STRATEGY DIRECTOR: Andrew Nunneley CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: Venette Malone CEO: MEDIA24: Ishmet Davidson
HEAD OFFICE 8th floor, Media24 Centre, 40 Heerengracht, Cape Town 8001 PO Box 440, Green Point, Cape Town 8051 Tel: +27 (0)21 406 2002 www.newmedia.co.za
Unless previously agreed in writing, The Specialist Forum owns all rights to all contributions, whether image or text. SOURCES: Shutterstock, supplied images, editorial staff. While precautions have been taken to ensure the accuracy of its contents and information given to readers, neither the editor, publisher, or its agents can accept responsibility for damages or injury which may arise therefrom. All rights reserved. © Specialist Forum. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, photocopying, electronic, mechanical or otherwise without the prior written permission of the copyright owners.
