PAD 520 Week 2 DQ 1 Developing Policy Arguments and Debate and DQ 2 Policy Arguments To Purchase This Material Click below Link http://www.snaptutorial.com/PAD%20520/product-19946PAD-520-Week-2-DQ-1-Developing-Policy-Arguments-andDebate-and-DQ-2-Policy-Arguments
For more classes visit www.snaptutorial.com
Week 2 Discussion 1 Developing Policy Arguments and Debate� Please respond to the following: Develop a policy argument or claim that is definitive, designative, evaluative, and advocative, using one of these terms: (a) crime, (b) pollution, (c) terrorism, (d) quality of life, (e) global warming, (f) fiscal crisis, (g) human rights, and (h) unemployment. Convert the argument in the first discussion into a policy debate by providing an objection and a rebuttal. Explain if and why the qualifier changed after introducing an objection and rebuttal. If the qualifier did not change, explain why it did not change. Week 2 Discussion 2 “Policy Arguments� Please respond to the following: From the case study, Case 8.1, use the argument mapping procedures presented in the chapter and provide two pros and two cons (or strengths and weaknesses) of the recommendation that the United States should NOT intervene in the Balkans. From the e-Activity, discuss two different modes of argument and examples of formal and informal fallacies. Provide the source(s) of the modes of arguments and fallacies you identified.