scientific journal of the modern education & research institute • The Kingdom of Belgium
interpretations of being within the framework of science and modern popular culture is a phenomenon that is often defined as a kind of «destruction». Thus, chronic discretion of social transformations can be expressed both from the standpoint of scientific and technical changes in the economic sphere, and from the standpoint of a certain «moral predestination», that is, from the standpoint of changing ethical paradigms, which, for their part, are based on an understanding of the safe existence of society. The two named phenomena themselves are in the rigid framework of scientific differentiation and, in the language of science and philosophy, find their expression in the inherent antagonism of personal and social. A person is a political being that cannot but influence the concept of safety, which is directly dependent on the civilian qualities of the person. Individual and social safety is achieved by the subject as a result of the inclusion of his individual being in social communication. At the same time, even the refusal of the subject from any individual manifestations of the personal in the social environment is often considered as a personal quality, which contributes not only to personal socialization, but also to the social protection of society as a human aggregate. One must agree that «a return to the problem of the safety of the individual is connected with the era of globalization»10. So, O.M. Manzhueva emphasizes the dissonance between technology and ethics11, which should be taken into account when constructing various safety concepts, since it is precisely the correctly compiled methodologies for the formation of genuine thinking and a sense of safety in it that allow us to adequately consider various phenomena, processes and objects in a person’s reality. The vision of safety in a qualitatively different semantic field does not cancel the interpretation of its concept, rather peculiar to the modern scientific tradition, by various researchers12, reflecting an incorrect understanding of the essence of safety both in the scientific and philosophical communities, and at the level of social regulation mechanisms. The concept of safety is of particular scientific significance also because it cannot be viewed in isolation from being and from the process of development of the individual and society as a whole. This shows solidarity with O.M. Manzhueva13, however, another important problem occurs. The established stable determinants of the «technical», which are fixed in the social development of the individual, almost always in a certain way transform the personal and individual understanding of being a person, which affects, first of all, the nature of a person’s understanding of the world, and secondly, an understanding of existential threat. The very concepts of safety that are formed in the closed framework of the scientific and philosophical communities often play the role of a paradigm that cannot only protect the material and spiritual human existence, but also to a certain extent become a coordinate system fixed in culture through the generally accepted understanding of the problematics of being in its philosophical interpretation. That is why the analysis of safety concepts cannot be abstracted from «operating» with concepts not abstract and speculative, but of essential methodologies that take into account not only the ontological characteristics, but also the epistemological and hermeneutical features of alternative contextual areas of knowledge. Obviously, the determinative «correlation factor» in the development of everyday and labor culture of a person has historically been social transformations. As for the technical sphere, modern methodologists of science cannot but capture significant essential changes in the picture of the human world in historical technical perfection reaches the apogee of its development, possible at this «turn» of evolution, and forms a sense of safety and safety in the individual. This feeling becomes inherent in all members of society, because both technical development and, to a lesser extent, social being, transforming, create new contextual fields for a person’s understanding of the world essence, destroys the prevailing understanding of the concept of safety in the social mind.
10 11 12 13
P. 3. Kuzmin M.D. «Safety» and «Economic Safety» as a category of social cognition: dissertation of the candidate in philos. sciences. – Tyumen, 2014. – 22 p. P. 4, P. 307. Manzhueva O.M. Philosophical paradigm of information safety: dissertation of the Dr. In philos. sciences. – Moscow, 2016. – 452 p. P. 4. Manzhueva O.M. The philosophical paradigm of information safety: dissertation of the Dr. in phios. Sciences. – Moscow, 2016. – 452 p. С.3. Ibid. 67