Portfolio3
MaxBorshchevskiy
Arizona Season 2010-2011
2nd year M.Arch
To the Review Committee Dear Reader, Thank you so much for taking the time to read this portfolio. It is my third completed portfolio since I started my Masters at Taliesin, The Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture. This season in Arizona was full of exciting moments and new impressions. I want to share with you my learning experiences and new expectations for the final Wisconsin season.
Yours sincerely,
Maxim Borshchevskiy
Introductory Letter Arizona 2010-2011 Season
Box project 3
1
Structures seminar
12
Structures 1&2
14
Construction Document Technology
16
Codes
18
Technical Drawing
19
Proportions & Scale
21
Building Systems
23
Construction Contracts
24
Field Trips
25
Relaxation
26
Instructor Evaluations
29
Assessment Map
39
Bibliography
40
Looking Forward
41
Table of contents Arizona 2010-2011 Season
1
For my third Box project I designed a house for my family back in Russia. The design process was very challenging.As I had to consider the unique conditions of the site and follow the requirements of my clients program. I consider the project I presented for the review a successful schematic design; the idea which will be further developed to become a new residence for my family.
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CRITICAL GROUND
Gavrilkovo Settlement
My goal with this project was to design a modern, comfortable and sustainable house. I developed structural and mechanical systems of the building, worked on interiors and paid special attention to smaller details. I believe that this process helped me to learn more about residential design.
Program requirements:
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
New building site area- 0,164 hectar/ 0,404 acre Site requirements Access road 3,5-4 (11,5- 13 ft) m wide, with efficient snow removal/ site drainage system
1-
Preferable building placement- lower property line Provide access to the waterfront with series of steps/ platforms following the terrain
REPRESENTATION
Building preferable orientation- longer axes orientation- east-west/ 45 degrees to slope Basement Mechanical room/hot water boiler/ diesel generator/ HVAC system Skiing gear storage room Sauna – 3-6 sq.m(30-65 sq.ft) with locker room/ shower/ toilet
2
MATERIAL FACTS
Swimming pool 9-12 (100 -130 sq.ft) m length with sun deck/ terrace access/East-West orientation preferred
Ground floor
1
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
Public zone on ground floor with entry hall and toilet Open terrace under canopy with barbecue zone Living room -40-50 sq.m (430-540 sq.ft)/ 1,5-2 floor height with fireplace and panoramic views Kitchen- 25-30 sq.m (270-320 sq.ft) might be connected with living room/ separate entrance
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
Architectural Studio- 25-30 sq.m (270-320 sq.ft) separate entrance/bathroom First floor 2-3 Guest bedrooms with one bathroom- 10-12 sq.m (110-130 sq.ft)
3
Master bedroom-2 rooms, 15-18 sq.m (160-190 sq.ft) total floor area with balconies and shared bathroom Bedroom 12-14 sq.m (130-150 sq.ft) with balcony Garage or canopy for 2-3 cars and boat/ATV/snowmobile . Can be separate from the house. Security room/house on site Possible “bania” building with outside deck and hot tub Gas heating/ electrical system connection from existing lines Possible sustainability features
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
Possible terracing of the site
Storage rooms/ laundry
I also compared building codes, structural and mechanical systems in Russia versus the United States, and analyzed Frank Lloyd Wright’s design principles that could have been applicable to my design. I explored better solutions for my project and finally did my best to design a new home for my family.
SOCIAL CONTEXT
-property for sale lineStructures/ material selection - client Provide fire-protection system Total floor area 450-550 sq.m (4850-5950 sq.ft)
DESIGN COMPOSITION
SITE PHOTOs My client’s major requirement was to design a habitable and comfortable dwelling for our family as a year-round alternative to our city apartment. I went through a series of case studies and multiple preliminary designs and sketches before I found the best solution to the given problem. I considered the connection to the landscape and vertical planning of the site as important parts of my design. Structural systems and material choices for the project were chosen according to the climatic conditions, aesthetic qualities and cost effectiveness. Spatial composition of interior spaces, framing of the important views and achieving the balance between exterior and interior spaces were my major concerns in the design. I also integrated sustainability features such as passive solar and grey water harvesting in my design. This project helped me to better understand the relationship between various spaces and also to realize the importance of details in a smaller scale project.
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
PRELIMINARY DESIGNS
2
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CRITICAL GROUND
SOCIAL CONTEXT
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
DESIGN COMPOSITION
3
SITE PLAN 1- HOUSE 2- GARAGE 3- EXISTING HOUSE
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CRITICAL GROUND
SOCIAL CONTEXT
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
2080 (0,51 acre) m2 total site area 145,5 m2 pavement area 427.5 m2 floor area total 152.3 m2 (1639 sq.ft.) living area 235.6 m2 (2535 sq.ft.) built up area
N
DESIGN COMPOSITION
4
UPEER LEVEL PLAN 1-STUDIO A: 29.9 m2
2-BATHROOM A: 2.8 m2
3-LOBBY A: 19.0 m2
4-HALLWAY A: 5.5 m2
5-BEDROOM A: 16.1 m2
9-BATHROOM A: 5.5 m2
10-BATHROOM A: 3.7 m2
11-BALCONY A: 8.7 m2
12-BALCONY A: 20.6 m2
13-GARAGE3 A: 8.7 m2
6-CLOAKROOM A: 3.8 m2
7-GALLERY A: 22.3 m2
8-MASTER BEDROOM A: 13.5 m2
14-GARAGE2 A: 44.9 m2
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
15-GARAGE1 A: 20.6 m2
16-DIESEL GENERATOR A: 4.6 m2
CRITICAL GROUND
SOCIAL CONTEXT
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
N
DESIGN COMPOSITION
5
LOWER LEVEL PLAN 1-GUEST ROOM A: 12.6 m2
2-GUEST ROOM A: 10.0 m2
3-BATHROOM A: 4.6 m2
4-CORRIDOR A: 4.8 m2
5-WINTER GARDEN-HALL A: 36.3 m2
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
6-KITCHEN-DINING ROOM A: 41.2 m2
7-LIVING ROOM A: 42.4 m2
8-TERRACE
CRITICAL GROUND
A: 141.4 m2
SOCIAL CONTEXT
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
N
DESIGN COMPOSITION
6
BASEMENT PLAN 1-MECHANICAL ROOM A: 9.9 m2
2-CORRIDOR A: 24.6 m2
3-SKIGEAR STORAGE A: 11.1 m2
4-LOCKER ROOM A: 5.3 m2
5-STORAGE/ LAUNDRY A: 8.1 m2
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
6-SHOWERS A: 6.1 m2
7-SAUNA A: 8.6 m2
8-TOILET
CRITICAL GROUND
A: 2.8 m2
9-MECHANICAL RM A: 2.8 m2
10-CHILLOUT A: 15.3 m2
SOCIAL CONTEXT
11-SWIMMING POOL A: 59.4 m2
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
N
DESIGN COMPOSITION
7
SECTIONS
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CRITICAL GROUND
SECTION B-B
SOCIAL CONTEXT
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
DESIGN COMPOSITION
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
WALL SECTION SECTION C-C
8
ELEVATIONS
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
NORTH ELEVATION
CRITICAL GROUND
SOCIAL CONTEXT
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
DESIGN COMPOSITION
WEST ELEVATION
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
EAST ELEVATION
MECHANICAL DIAGRAM
-diesel- generator for backup
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
9
-Split-packaged airconditioning system with indoor units on each floor -Gas heater unit with louvers for air supply -Hot-water heating (natural gas supplied from public system). Two-pipe system with radiators. -Hot-water radiant system in bathrooms/ living room/ studio/ bedrooms -Hot water boiler -Electric supply- public system -Natural gas supply- public system -Water supply- from public system -Mechanical ventilation air ducts Private sewage disposal system
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CRITICAL GROUND
-Swimming pool equipment -pump/ dehumidefier/ heater/ filtration system -Passive solar gain in two-storied sun-space / thermal mass floors -Geothermal heat pump/ 2 Mammoth WLC072/ WLC-043 units (27 k/watt total)/ overall zondes depth- 480 m
-Rainwater storage tank on site
SOCIAL CONTEXT
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
-Rectangular tube columns 100x200
-Cast-in-place concrete beams and columns -Roof and upper level floor 2-way spaning structural system glu-lam beams (300x100) typ 750 mm. o.c. -Load-bearing walls- solid glu-laminated wood walls with moisture protective and fire fire-retardant coatings -Cast-in-place concrete slab below grade/ typ. 300mm -Cast-in-place concrete walls below grade/ typ 250mm/ 150mm retaining walls typ.
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
DESIGN COMPOSITION
BOX NARRATIVES BOX3 Midpoint Narrative Max Borshchevskiy 2nd year M.Arch In the first stage of my design I was focused on spatial composition and organization of interior and exterior spaces of the project. The most important part of the original concept was to achieve a perfect north-south orientation for major living spaces to provide solar gain and magnificent views of the river. The topography of the site was a real challenge in placement of the building and parking platform. I decided to create 2 terraces- one for the parking level and another for the house, leaving the natural terrain of the site untouched. After discussing the landscaping with my client I may add some additional terraces for gardening. The main entrance to the house is now on the second level- which is a parking level. The building is divided in 2 wings- the first oriented south-north and turned 40% to slope. It has three bedrooms at entry level and kitchen-living room- dining on the first level. The second wing is 15% offset from the horizontal grid and oriented south-east/ north-west. The studio is located on the entry level with 2 guest rooms below. Two wings are connected with entrance lobby and 2 story winter garden space. The basement level has a swimming poolsauna complex, laundry, storage and mechanical room. Swimming pool is lit by 2 skylights. The exterior composition of the structure is based on the dynamic composition of two wings and different level terraces. The whole structure including parking area and garage is covered with a lowpitched roof with openings above. The orientation of the building provides additional protection from snow melt and also gives some shading in the summer by means of deep overhangs and northoriented terraces. Floor-to-ceiling windows in the living room and bedrooms provide views and create a lighter impression of the building; I think they work well with horizontality of walls and cantilevered balconies.. I consider my design at this point not more than a basic shape. The next step will be to develop the structural system and landscape design. I will also work on mechanical systems for the house as I am particularly interested in using sustainability features in my design.
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
10
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CRITICAL GROUND
SOCIAL CONTEXT
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
DESIGN COMPOSITION
BOX NARRATIVES
Box 3 Final Narrative Borshchevskie Residence. Gavrilkovo, Russia. Max Borshchevskiy 2nd year M.Arch
This is my third Box project in Master’s program at Taliesin. It was probably my most moving and interesting project to date. Designing a house for my family was definitely a great experience and turned out to be one of the most developed and complete architectural designs. Working with my clients was a very exciting, but at the same time very challenging process. The fact that your client is a professional architect and your father at the same time made me particularly attentive to any suggestions and comments concerning my design. Probably my best accomplishment with this project was the final approval of my design concept by my father. Achieving the goals that I have outlined in my Box proposal was my major focus for the past three months. My winter break vacation in Russia helped me to better understand what is critically important for my design. Visiting the site and discussing the project with members of my family helped me to realize certain weaknesses of my design. One of the major concerns after midpoint critiques was interior circulation. In my final design I maximized the usable floor space and developed a more efficient circulation pattern. Following the advice of Michael P. Johnson I also made some changes in the geometry of my floor plan. I turned the Studio wing to a full 45 degrees angle to the other part of the structure. That change helped me to better organize my circulation on the lower and upper levels and to improve the overall constructability of the project. The grid system for the building is based on 1500 mm unit that can be easily divided in smaller parts multiple of 300 which is a common unit used in building construction. I also changed the orientation of the master bedroom and created a twostory sunspace on the south side of the main wing of the building. This sustainable feature became a central design element and an efficient way to minimize the amount of energy required to heat the building during the winter period. The thermal mass floors in the kitchen and living room act as a passive solar design system for the house. The curtain wall system also brought in a better visual connection between the exterior and interior spaces. A sliding door in the master bedroom provides natural ventilation in summer.
Box3 Arizona 2010-2011
Another sustainable feature of my design is the mechanical system for the building. I am considering a geothermal heat pump system with vertical zonding. Two “Mammoth WLC” series heat pumps would maximize the energy savings in winter and may also support the air conditioning system in summer. Another option is a more traditional two-pipe gas heating system with radiators. Radiant floor heating is used in bathrooms, bedrooms and in the pool area. Split-system with air-handling units on every floor is used for air conditioning. The other important issue was the vertical layout of the building. In my final design I developed the idea of having the main entrance on the upper level and providing a direct access to the house from the car port. The visual accent in the main entry is provided by a higher ceiling in the lobby area and a clerestory above. The overall design composition of the building was also changed since the midpoint review. The third roof over the lobby area is now sloping towards the west side of the site, providing natural light through the clearstory windows. The horizontality of the building is expressed in long cantilevered balconies with solid railings painted white. Floor-to-ceiling windows in the north-east corner of the building visually lighten the structure. Floating roofs and vertical loadbearing walls create a visual rhythm and make structural system of the building more articulated. The structural system of the building is pretty straight forward and efficient. The basement level walls and cantilevered slab are designed as cast-in-place reinforced concrete with additional beams and columns in critical connections that are integrated into the wall system. Above grade load bearing walls are designed as glulaminated wall system. It is exposed both from the interior and exterior and provides the natural texture of the wood and also provides enough insulation in winter. Glu-lam beams are used to support the roof structure and upper level floor. In my final design I paid special attention to the landscape features of my site. The upper portion of the site is stepping down the slope with three terraces. They are oriented towards the river views and get enough sun for active vegetation. The lower terrace connects to the cantilevered balcony with a pedestrian bridge. The lower portion of the site has three more terraces that go down to the pool level and close the circulation loop within the building. I consider my project a successful conceptual idea and a good starting point for implementing the new family residence idea in life. March 6, 2011
11
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CRITICAL GROUND
SOCIAL CONTEXT
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
DESIGN COMPOSITION
Completing the Structures course was one of my major priorities for the Arizona season. The lack of experience in structural design from my previous education made me particularly interested in this course. Our instructor Greg Brickey presented the material in a clear and understandable manner and helped me to understand the basics of structural systems and their integration in architectural design. We did a series exercises for wood, steel and concrete structures, developed our skills in tracing loads, drawing shear and moment diagrams and doing structural calculations.
We had to complete several research projects, choose and compare buildings in Phoenix and all over the world, analyze how well the structural system was integrated into their architectural design, whether they support each other and also explore which buildings best fit into the environment.
Structures Seminar Arizona 2010-2011
Structures Seminar Research Project 1
Borshchevskiy Maxim 2nd year M. Arch.
RESEARCH
The adjective that I have chosen to describe myself was 'nice'. The three buildings that I've chosen appeal to me personally in one or another way. I believe that beauty in architecture can be only achieved by harmonizing all the elements of the building, balancing the structural essence with aesthetic values like proportion, scale and spatial composition of spaces. I consider the following three buildings thriving examples of modern architecture, in which architecture and structure are coexisting in harmony without dominating one over another. According to my personal preferences I decided to put them in three categories: -NICE University of Chicago's new Graduate School of Business, Chicago. Architect- Rafael Viñoly. The Chicago Booth is a very good example of how structural system can be integrated into design composition, become the visible dominant of the interior space. The main lobby is a steel structure with a skylight roof and glazed enclosure that maximizes daylight in the central space. The roof structure is a pointed vault built with tubular steel members. The shape of the roof allows rainwater harvesting and accelerates hot air convection. It also effectively concentrate snow load on the column axis rather than in the span. The massing of the elevations and proportional relations between elements are developed according to the surrounding context. The structure of the building serves its function and being exposed, form the interior spaces.
Structures Seminar Research Project 2
Borshchevskiy Maxim 2nd year M. Arch.
12
My descriptive adjective was 'nice'. For the second assignment I have chosen three buildings in Phoenix area. As in the previous assignment I will analyze them according to their ability to balance structure and architecture. My main criteria will be how harmony of proportion, scale and spatial composition of spaces can interact with structural essence of the building without dominating one over another. The following three buildings are presented in random order and all three are categorized as “Nice”.
-NICE
Optima Camelview Luxury Garden Condo. Scottsdale, AZ. Architect- Douglas Sydnor The Optima residential condominium building is a multifunctional complex. Six-storied high structure contains luxury apartment, offices and retail, underground parking and full set of services including fitness, spa, indoor and outdoor swimming pools and other features. The spatial composition is based on interaction between the building elements and landscape features. Together they create the feeling of privacy and protection. The dynamic composition of the structure is based on the rhythm of long cantilevered balconies, floor-to-ceiling glazing and deep roof overhangs that provide shading. Series of pedestrian bridges span over shaded green courtyards with water features. The steel frame structural system became a good solution for a dynamic architecture of the building, allowed more flexibility in designing interior spaces.
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
-NICE Tempe transportation center Tempe, AZ. Architects- Architecton and Otak
- VERY NICE Kaufmann residence (Fallingwater), Pennsylvania. Architect- Frank Lloyd Wright Fallingwater was the first project of Mr. Wright that I studied and it is still my favorite. There are many features of this building that I personally admire but the most important for me is the dynamic composition of the building that would be impossible without the structural system of reinforced concrete cantilevered balconies. Among other interesting aspects of the building are spatial composition, harmony of vertical and horizontal surfaces in relationship to surrounding landscapes, and exceptional use of materials and textures.
-REALLY NICE Jubilee Church, Rome. ArchitectRichard Meier. I believe that Jubilee Church is an exceptional example of contemporary architecture. It is amazing how the architectural idea was expressed in the form using advantages of structural system. The three curved concrete shell arcs, simple geometry of white stucco vertical walls, almost invisible glass ceilings and skylights that span the entire length of the building result in the harmony of interior and exterior spaces. Materials used in the building increase the visual lightness of interior, diffuse the natural light and articulate the holiness of the
The 40,300 sq.ft building in downtown Tempe houses a bus plaza ,multistory building containing offices for the city's transit division, commercial space, a community room, and an indoor bike garage with shower facilities. New center consists of a stretched a 52-footwide, curved driveway, lined by 13 bus shelters, across nearly the entire width of the 2.7-acre, triangular site. Western portion of the site is a three-story, steel-framed box. The other part of the composition is 2,400-square-foot wing that was envisioned as an expressive counterpoint to West Wing. New transportation center is a good example of modern architecture that serves its function and at the same time brings in dynamism of contemporary architecture into the urban fabric. The steel frame structure allowed longer spans and more freedom to create interesting interior spaces. It also provided structural stiffness for multiple cantilevers and support for outside shading devices and grid elements. Use of low-E, insulated glass and motorized screens as well as opaque facades with slit windows provided effective protection from sun exposure and brought in more playfulness to facade architecture. -NICE Rocky Slope Residence.Phoenix, AZ Architect- Jones Studio I consider Rocky Slope Residence a good example of contemporary west residential architecture. The composition of the building is an interesting mix of organic and modernistic architecture. The spatial composition of spaces and the geometry of the building is more parallel to modernistic approach to design. The designer’s attention to the building placement on the site, sensitivity to the sharp change in elevation and overall horizontality in elevations resulted in big overhangs and careful selection of materials for walls and roofs. Use of natural desert landscaping and special attention to details relate this building to organic architecture. Designers ideas were expressed in flexible structural system which was a combination of concrete masonry units for load- bearing walls and steel structural elements for longspan roofs and cantilevers. Floor-toceiling windows provided the sense of lightness and openness for the interior spaces.
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
TREEHOUSE
We studied the loads which act upon buildings and resulting forces that act within structural elements. I became familiar with traditional and contemporary methods of analyzing these forces. I also built a basic understanding of the way in which load-bearing structure is used in architectural design. One of the assignments for Structures Seminar course was to design a tree-house using the real size 2,4 and 6 by members and calculate all the loads. This was a very challenging exercise for me because I wanted to express my design ideas while at the same time make the structure as simple and elegant as possible. My design idea was to have two floor decks and a roof twisted in plan, all resting on three supports-branches. Assignment included completing all structural calculations.
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
REPRESENTATION Structures. Treehouse Design
Maxim Borshchevskiy 2nd year M.Arch
MATERIAL FACTS
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
Structures. Treehouse Design
Structures Seminar Arizona 2010-2011
13
Maxim Borshchevskiy 2nd year M.Arch
In Structures I&II courses we were offered a more in-depth look at structural design for wood, steel and concrete structures. In class we learned new and traditional techniques of structural analysis for typical building members like beams, slabs and columns. We had a series of field trips to construction sites, concrete batch plant and precast concrete manufacturer plant. Local product manufacturers presented a series of lectures on their products and showed us examples of different structural systems design with materials like wood, precast and cast-in-place concrete and galvanized structural steel, explaining their pluses and minuses. The most exciting assignment for these classes was to design wood and concrete structures that could span 4 feet and take the maximum concentrated load at their mid span. It was a great experience of working with real materials, designing the structure, calculating the reinforcement for concrete, and thinking through wood connections. Our final structures were tested at the ASU testing lab and were able to withstand 4,5 kips load for concrete and 2 kips load for wood structure.
Structures I&II Arizona 2010-2011
14
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
These courses helped me develop a basic understanding of the structural behavior of the systems and of their components and realize the importance of structural design. It also resulted in a deeper understanding of the nature of materials like concrete and structural wood. The final assignment for Structures II course was to choose and analyze any existing structure’s building system and do basic calculations for floor slabs, walls and roofs. My research project was a Jubilee Church in Rome by Richard Meier.
STRUCTURES II FINAL ASSIGNMENT
STRUCTURES IFINAL ASSIGNMENT
Wood Building Structural Analysis
Concrete Building Structural Analysis
15
Jubilee Church Rome ITALY 1996 - 2003
Taliesin West
The three shells after the pouring of concrete and post-tensioning
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
The Joints Going along with the construction system of the post-tensioned pre-cast concrete clad shells, Meier decided not only to expose the concrete, but also to articulate the joints. According to Meier, “We wanted to express each panel, yet minimize the joints and keep them tight for weatherproofing and for the expression of the shells.”
Architectural Drawings
The joining pattern combines two distinct geometries: Horizontal radial lines from the three concentric spheres intersect the parallel vertical lines derived from minor spheres.
EAST ELEVATION
SITE PLAN
Joints at skylights, glass ceilings and window walls accommodate the independent movement of the stiff shells, which are mainly due to temperature effects on their southern exposures and also by wind and seismic loads. An arched steel truss, held back with a series of horizontal rods, supports the center of the glass roof over the main nave.
Detail at skylight and wall over nave
FLOOR PLANS Interior view Jubilee Church
Breezeway/ kitchen at Taliesin West (1946- 1951)
WEST ELEVATION
For the Structures I final assignment we had to choose any existing building at Taliesin West and apply dead live loads per code for roof and floor structural members. I did some basic calculations of the Breezeway and Guest deck beams and discovered that they generally meet the requirements of current building code. This course was definitely a worthwhile experience for me and made me more conscious in understanding and designing the structural systems for my new architectural projects.
REPRESENTATION SECTION
The Concrete Clad Shells
The Main Structure The Jubilee Church’s
9,000-square-foot
massing is defined by three concrete shells, ranging from 56 to 88 feet in height. The shells, which are segments of a sphere, demarcate three distinct spaces -- the main sanctuary, the weekday chapel, and the baptistery, each with its own entrance. Separated by vertical expanses of glass and skylights that span throughout the entire building, the shells in appearance seem to be freestanding and to be reaching over towards the “spine” wall, but in reality, they are cantilevered onto the ground.
Breezeway/ kitchen at Taliesin West (current condition- timber members replaced by steel/ concrete beams) Structural Plan of the Jubilee Church
Exterior Curved Walls Cantilever Effect The three large white shells on the south
The three 'shells', tallest is 88 feet high, are all cut from the same approximately 38m radius sphere and built from precast concrete blocks 80cm thick by 3m tall by 2m wide. Total of 256 double-curved, prefabricated elements were utilized. The blocks are cut from the sphere along 'horizontal' radial joints and true vertical minor circle joints. These vertical joints occur at varying angles to the surface so that the blocks are only identical on a vertical stack. The joint between one block and another , which is considered the most unique and distinctive feature of entire structure, was designed to allow connection between the pre-tensioning bars and to ensure stable continuity to the structure. The detailed design of the shells is by Italcimenti, the Italian concrete supplier and fabricator. This was inspired by both the Roman use of large stone blocks and the more recent use of prefabricating blocks by Pier Luigi Nervi. It took little to convince the Italian engineers and contractors to adopt this approach.
MATERIAL FACTS
Pre-cast blocks with pre-tensioning bars
Each pre-cast block had to be lifted and set in place adjacent to others with the greatest accuracy according to the sail’s geometry to permit interconnection of the bars. The pre-cast concrete segments were then post-tensioned in situ.
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
perimeter of the church curve up and over the main body or the “spine” of the church Meier remarks, “Each shell is literally free standing and cantilevered from the
The Steel Reinforcement
ground.” The shells are tied down to the
Both pre-tensioning bars and post-
ground to resist seismic wind loads. Thus,
tensioned steel was used as reinforcement
the shells act as vertical cantilevers, and
for the concrete-clad shells.
Steel bars in between the pre-cast concrete panels
the ground as the fixed end accordingly.” Meier placed a narrow slot at floor level on Wind load resistance
on of the shells to emphasize the non-load-
is developed through a vertical cantilever
bearing aspect of the concrete panels
effect, acting across the full depth of the
immediately above it, versus the steel
cross section. These walls are composed of inner and outer shells that are connected by a diaphragm.
skeleton frame hidden within the shell. According to John Eisler, project manager of construction of Jubilee Church, “Think of a globe turned 90 degrees. The
Guest deck at Taliesin West (1946- 1951)
parallels run vertically [in this scenario], and the meridians run horizontally. As a result, a single stainless-steel form, adjustable on the The curving gantry crane
ends only, can be used for every block.”
The loading of a concrete panel
The Narrow Slot at floor level
The Construction Process
To avoid the need for a steel framework, the concrete shells were subdivided into large precast blocks with double curvatures. The curved walls are cantilevered vertically from the ground, with glass placed in and around the structures, enveloping portions of the church. Rather than being castin-place concrete, the precast concrete made it easier to control the form of the curved sections and give them the same smooth, white surface inside and out. Each segment of the semi-spherical shells weighs about eight tons with segments shipped directly to the site The pre-cast
Structures I&II Arizona 2010-2011
Guest deck at Taliesin West (current conditiontubular steel structure)
concrete blocks had to be maneuvered with extreme precision within a limited area The three concrete-clad shells and glass curtain walls
of action. Italcementi, or rather Gennaro Guala in particular, came up with a solution, by developing a special, 32-m high curving gantry crane. This machine allowed each precast block to move toward the exact X-Y-Z axes. Close-up of the Openings of the first and second shells
In Construction Document Technology class our instructor Ron Geren introduced us to the contract types, delivery methods and CSI classification systems. We became more familiar with how the architectural project develops: from the programming phase to construction documents and actual construction. The course helped me realize the importance of project scheduling, life cycle cost estimation and facility management.
Construction Document Technology Assignment No.1
with Boldt, the prime contractor for the project to see if the firms’ cultures aligned. Firms
-What worked well using this
had previously worked together on traditional design-bid-build projects in the Midwest,
method?
so they came up with a decision to proceed. The initial project team consisted of Sutter
Project Analysis
Health (the overall corporate entity), Sutter Regional Medical Foundation (the local
Maxim Borshchevskiy. 2nd year M.Arch.
Sutter affiliate,) HGA and Boldt. The three-way contract called for the core team of
SUTTER HEALTH FAIRFIELD MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING. Fairfield, California.
possible mistakes and conflicts in the project on early stages.
bid with lump sum prices. 2. The leadership Core Team -What considerations went into the site selection?
(Owner, Architect and Contractor)
The proposed site for the new medical office building was a part of Sutter Fairfield
and the IPD (Integrated Project
Medical Campus, which included existing Sutter Regional Medical Foundation building.
Team of architects, engineers,
The campus was centrally located compared to the population of both overall patients
contractors, subcontractors and
and indigent patients currently served by Sutter. Vehicular and pedestrian accessibility
owner representatives) worked
of the site for patients and employees as well as availability of alternative and public
together to design a project that
transportation in the area were amongst major considerations during the site selection.
optimizes the whole, rather than the
The construction of a Medical Campus had to meet the Sutter Health Facility Planning
individual pieces.
and Development Building Design Policy for Sustainability with respect to site selection, water efficiency and conservation, energy efficiency, material and resource efficiency and environmental air quality. The proposal for Medical Campus included sustainable design and construction practices. The main goals were to maximize green space, Project description The new medical office building is a 3-storied facility which includes administrative offices and primary care medical practices and laboratories, including rheumatology,
3. Planner scheduling allowed the
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
team to obtain reliable promises. Scheduling tools gave the team the ability to set milestones, collect promises, specify handoffs, measure results, and then, if needed, correct possible failures.
employ energy efficient hospital design, water conservation and implement a construction waste management and recycling plan for all construction components. -What factors had an influence on the project’s development and design?
4. The IPD method improved the communication between parties. It also provided an opportunity to generate sets of alternatives, define the measure of accomplishment. Finally it allowed new ideas to come from everyone on the team. The new culture of
oncology and cardiology departments. It is located in Fairfield on the Sutter Fairfield Low Court Medical Campus. Final GSF- 69,948 SF. Year began- July, 2005. Year
One of the major aspects of the project development and design was the extensive use
completed- November, 2007. Form of agreement- Multi- party contract. GMP-
of BIM technology. Design team, structural and MEP engineers were working with one
$19,573,000. Final cost- $ 19,437,600. RFIs- 123. Construction time- 15 months total.
model in which the steel structure was modeled along with duct runs, plumbing lines,
5. BIM modeling provided the teams with crucial level of coordination and problem
cable trays and sprinkler systems. Boldt and HGA held weekly live group modeling
solving.
sessions, involving owner representatives and subcontractors. These sessions enabled the team to identify over 400 system clashes that, because they were discovered early, provided significant cost savings and tighter schedule. One of the advantages of the
creativity and innovation was developed during the project.
As a result a new facility was designed and completed in only 25 months. The project also finished under budget and the final cost per square foot (excluding site work) was
Integrated Project Delivery method was an early involvement of contractor and subcontractors into the design process. That helped to define priorities and discuss
estimated to be around $60 less than similar projects in the region, according to the
constructability issues on the early stages of design. Much less detailing effort was
contractor. Sutter Health had money returned to them as a result of the project running
needed from an architect because of the direct communication between design team
under its expected Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). -What didn’t work well using this method? 1. Some of the parties were unfamiliar with the IPD and BIM methodology due to its novelty. Additional time and effort was required to integrate them into the team. Boldt intends to provide superintendants with BIM capability and experienced IPD consultants in future projects. 2. A few subcontractors did not want their representatives to attend group scheduling meetings. Boldt will make it mandatory in future projects. 3. The owners’ project manager was distracted with another project and the team felt
-What generated the need for the project?
that this fact slowed the decision making. With IPD owner must be kept engaged from earliest design and throughout construction.
Sutter Health is one of the largest health care providers in Northern California. The Fairfield Medical Office building project was the first built component of a $6.5 billion
4. The exterior glazing and skin subcontractors should be among the early selected
capital program of which several subsequent projects are in advanced stages of design,
subtrades, and be fully engaged in early design.
including the California Pacific Medical Center’s priced $1.7 billion, $320 million 5. The complete separation of the cost of work from the profit engages the team to drive
Sutter Medical Center in Castro Valley, California and the 555-bed Cathedral Hill
down the cost, and the partner’s actual savings go up.
MATERIAL FACTS
Campus in San Francisco. There was a need for a new medical facility, which would 6. Boldt and HDT collaboratively decided that shop drawings should be a part of the design, not after the design.
-How did the owner define its requirements?
-What delivery method was used and why?
The key owner’s requirement was to have the project delivered in a timely fashion and
After completion of several projects in medical industry Sutter Health started looking for
All the parties agreed that IPD method is more applicable to larger-scale, complex
within budget. The design requirements were based on the idea of a medical building
a better way to build facilities. The Sutter Lean Summit in 2004 helped to set forth a
projects and perhaps not so valuable for smaller projects.
being a custom design product, efficiently serving its function and providing comfort to
vision for transforming the way Sutter capital projects would be designed and built.
-Were there other features about the project that were unique and notable?
its occupants. There were no particular aesthetic requirements for the project. Sutter
Sutter also researched the new ways to modernize and expand their facilities in the
Health used room data sheets and narratives to establish detailed requirements.
wake of rising healthcare costs and shrinking budgets. The Integrated Lean Project
Medical personnel were involved in the programming, that allowed to be define specific
Delivery (IPD) method was selected for the new Fairfield Medical Office project.
needs and requirements of actual users of facility. Each room’s equipment needs, finishes, utilities and special requirements were documented. This approach was used to document and preserve decisions made by stakeholders during programming and ensure that the final product met stated needs. Sutter needed the building delivered in 25 months and that was accomplished despite a three month delay for reprogramming at the start of the project and with the addition of extra scope.
This project-delivery approach integrates people, systems, business structures, and
1. Boldt created a website for the project. All the submittals were made and processed electronically. More than half of submittals were processed by the architects without paper documentation.
practices into a process that collaboratively harnesses the insights and talents of all participants to reduce waste and optimize efficiency through all phases of design and construction. The process has increased performance in many areas, from design and construction of new facilities to healthcare operations and patient care. Sutter Health is an early adapter of ILPD method in the United States.
2. The project team used advantages of BIM technology for unique and costly operations. For example, BIM and GPS measurements were used to drop ducktwork hangers into the metal decking before the concrete was placed. It was done with great accuracy and 5 times faster and with less labor required.
-How was the contractor selected? Boldt Construction was selected to provide general contractor services on the project because of its prior experience in constructing similar scale projects includung healthcare facilities. Boldt is also considered pioneer in construction techniques designed to streamline projects. The fact that HGA and Boldt worked together before was also important for the owner. Three parties used the Integrated Form of Agreement (IFOA) where each party is held accountable to each other as equal partners. The IFOA creates a
CDT Arizona 2010-2011
design process, allowed to eliminate
subcontractors very early in the design process. Smaller subtrades were competitively
be able to provide variety of medical services for the people living in the area.
On a field trip to the new Federal Court building in Phoenix I learned a lot about the construction process and understood the importance of early integration of different systems into design as well as the advantages of using Building Information Modeling software.
involvement of participants in the
owner, architect, and builder to collaboratively select the main design-build
and subcontractors- with no loss of design and quality control.
We completed a series of assignments for this class, including the case study of a recently completed project with analysis of the delivery system used and the major responsibilities of an Owner, Architect and Contractor.
16
1. IPD method based on early
system of shared risk, at the same time -How was the design team selected? The design team for the project was selected through RFQ (request for qualification) issued by Sutter Health in 2005. HGA was interviewed along with other participants and won the job. The Sutter decision was primarily based on successful prior relationship with HGA and its broad experience in healthcare projects. Sutter asked HGA to meet
reducing the overall project risk instead of shifting it between the parties. HGA and Boldt were jointly responsible for construction errors and design omissions. That system required active collaboration and united problem solving based on trust and relationship. The team managed the transition from design to construction without exceeding the target cost.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Healthcare Design2009May;9(5):52-59 AIA IPD Case studies 2010 www.aia.org www.healthcarebuildingideas.com www.hga.com Photographs courtesy of HDT and Boldt
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
Contract Documents class was an introduction to the legal aspects of architectural practice. I learned a lot about construction and procurement documents, and contracting requirements. An important part of the course was to understand the National CAD Standard and Uniform Drawing System and also to realize the importance and advantages of using Building Information Modeling technology. We learned the basics of specifying. Ron introduced us to MasterFormat, UniFormat and explained how to work with these documents. We went through the bidding, negotiating and purchasing requirements of a typical construction project. Understanding the responsibilities of an architect under contract during construction phase and basics of Integrated Project Delivery method were the major learning outcomes of this class for me.
CDT Arizona 2010-2011
17
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
In the Codes class we were focused on the 2009 International Building Code. Even though the class was a brief overview of the IBC it was a great opportunity for me to analyze and compare Building Codes in Russia and the United States. We completed the series of assignments that helped us to become more familiar with building occupancies and construction types, and to better understand how the fire protection systems and fire resistive construction apply to different types of buildings. I carried out the basic understanding of the means of egress, accessibility and energy efficiency. Interior environment, materials, special construction, structural and special inspection were the topics of following classes. The final assignment was to determine the compliance of the Box project to the IBC. I think that the knowledge of Building Codes and other regulatory requirements are an important part of any architectural education.
Codes Arizona 2010-2011
18
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
Technical Drawing class with Michael P. Johnson was a great opportunity to improve my drafting technique and also to learn about the process of preparing construction documentation for the typical building in the U.S.
19
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
For this class we had to complete a full set of construction documents of a middle size commercial building. Drawings included site plan, floor plans, sections, elevations, structural and architectural details as well as mechanical and electrical diagrams and details. We were encouraged to pay special attention to quality of our drawings, line weights and hatching. I consider this course a very helpful introduction into the real world of architecture where drafting is an integral part of professional practice. I also learned a lot about the structural system of the building and integration of mechanical systems in design.
Technical Drawing Arizona 2010-2011
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
20
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
Technical Drawing Arizona 2010-2011
In Proportions and Scale class our instructor Michael P. Johnson introduced us to the proportional relationships and geometry that lays behind most of the architectural masterpieces of all times. We studied Golden Rectangle, the Canon of Proportion and Le Modulor and were offered a series of readings on the topic. The assignment for this class was to choose several wellknown architectural works and analyze their geometry by applying the Golden Rectangle or the Canon of Proportion to the architectural drawings. I chose the Le Corbusier’s Villa Savoy, Jacobs House by Frank Lloyd Wright and Seagram Building by Mies van de Rohe. It was fascinating to discover how the geometry of floor plans, sections and elevations of these buildings is based on the geometric relationships of Golden Rectangle and Canon of Proportions.This class helped me to better understand the importance of proportion and scale in development of architecture. I also became more familiar with the great work of famous architects by studying their drawings and sketches.
Proportions & Scale Arizona 2010-2011
21
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CRITICAL GROUND
REPRESENTATION
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
DESIGN COMPOSITION
22
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CRITICAL GROUND
REPRESENTATION
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
DESIGN COMPOSITION
Proportions & Scale Arizona 2010-2011
23 Building System class was a basic introduction to Mechanical and Plumbing systems of the building. The learning outcome of this class for me was the basic understanding of the relationship between the building envelope and the environmental control systems of the building. I believe that the basic knowledge of these system and the ability to integrate them into the building is very important for an architect. In this class we also focused on ASHRAE standards, building envelope systems, plumbing,water conservation and energy management systems. The assignments for the class included calculating the ceiling height, choosing the proper sizes of diffusers and returns for different types of occupied spaces and preparing a schematic design of the mechanical systems for the Box project.
Building System Arizona 2010-2011
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
2 storied residence in Kazan, Russia. Ground floor 1529 s.f. Upper level 1521 s.f. Basement 1511 s.f. MECHANICAL DIAGRAM Total 4561 s.f. Winter temperature -25.6 F Summer temperature 95 F Building systems integration solutions: Heating -Passive solar gain in two-storied sun-space/ thermal mass floors -Hot-water heating (natural gas supplied from public system). One- or two-pipe system with radiators. -Hot-water radiant system in bathrooms/ living room/ studio/ bedrooms -Hot water boiler -Gas heater unit with louvers for air supply Option: Geothermal heat pump/ 2 Mammoth WLC-072/ WLC-043 units (27 k/watt total)/ overall zondes depth- 480 m (based on a similar project in Russia) Air-conditioning system Split-packaged system with indoor units on each floor Option: Geothermal cooling Other features Water supply- from public system Private sewage disposal system Electricity- public system (diesel- generator for backup) Rainwater storage tank on site
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE PERSONAL COMPETENCE
-diesel- generator for backup -Split-packaged airconditioning system with indoor units on each floor -Electric supply- public system -Natural gas supply- public system -Water supply- from public system -Mechanical ventilation air ducts Private sewage disposal system -Swimming pool equipment -pump/ dehumidefier/ heater/ filtration system -Passive solar gain in two-storied sun-space / thermal mass floors -Geothermal heat pump/ 2 Mammoth WLC072/ WLC-043 units (27 k/watt total)/ overall zondes depth- 480 m
-Rainwater storage tank on site
In Contract Lectures class with Kim Hurtado we were focused on Building Information Modeling contracts. One of the major outcomes of this class for me was understanding how contract terms are used and their integrity in modifying the contract. Another important idea of the class was to make us more familiar with BIM industry, the process of creating and modifying of the Model. I also understood the possible liability issues and responsibilities of an architect as an active contributor to the Building Model.
24
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATION
Kim walked us through AIA E202 and Consensus DOCS 301 BIM Addendum. Overall this class was a worthwhile experience and the final role play helped to understand some intricacies of contract negotiation.
Construction Contracts Arizona 2010-2011
MATERIAL FACTS
INTEGRATED PRACTICE
PERSONAL COMPETENCE
25
New laboratory building under construction at ASU campus. Structures II field trip.
Rock Solid concrete batch plant and precast concrete masonry manufacturer plant. Structures II field trip.
Field Trips Arizona 2010-2011
New Federal Courthouse under construction. CDT class field trip.
My second Arizona season was pretty intense and I was working hard on my Box project and other classes. But as it usually happens in Taliesin we always find time for fun. We had a series of wonderful formal evenings where I met many interesting people, enjoyed delicious meals and exciting entertainments. For my winter break I was visiting my family and friends back at home. Even though my visit was a little longer than I expected, I did my best to spend as much time with members of my family as possible because they miss me so much. For the Spring break we went skiing in Colorado- we had a great time and really enjoyed the cool weather and tons of snow after Arizona’s desert climate. Part of the requirements for the Masters program is to give a certain number of shelter tours. Giving first couple tours was a little uncomfortable, but later on I really enjoyed meeting new people and talking about organic architecture. I also practiced my photography skills and the results you can see on a next couple pages.
Relaxation Arizona 2010-2011
26
27
Relaxation Arizona 2010-2011
28
Relaxation Arizona 2010-2011
Single Family Residence- Gavrilkovo, Russia Box #3
BOX PROJECT EVALUATION M.Arch
STUDENT: Max Borshchevskiy EVALUATOR: Frank Henry,
PC 1
1
PC 2
2
PC 3
3
PC 4
4
PC 5
5
PC 6
6
PC 8
PC 7
7
a b c a b c a b c a b c a b c a b c
BOX PROJECT ‐ TALIESIN WEST 2010‐11 (‐) M‐ M M+ (+) PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency CriMcal Ground Set clear design objec1ves and cri1cal perspec1ve for the project x Correlate objec1ves to specific design decisions and make those explicit x Develop the design using historical examples and Frank Lloyd Wright's work & principles x Social and Cultural Context Ar1culate social and cultural context in the design strategy of the project x Make specific reference to how the design challenges or accepts cultural precedents x Create a "social site plan" that ar1culates everyday habits of the family occupying the space x Ecology and Environment Address design strategies for the impact of the design on the environment x Give examples of specific solu1ons to ecological and environmental needs x Explore natural resources & characteris1cs of the site, rela1ng the home to the environment x RepresentaMon Convey the design with a comprehensive visual strategy x Correlate the visuals with the verbal communica1on x Concept sketches, 3D model, full set of drawings‐ sec1ons, floor plans, eleva1ons, perspec1ves x Material Facts Discuss choices and reasoning for materiality x Substan1ate choices of materials and systems in the design x Develop structural and mechanical systems that explore different combina1ons of materials x Integrated PracMce Respond to clear limita1ons and check the design's compliance to them x Treat the project as a realizable proposi1on to a design problem x
Personal Competence a Present in a clear and professional manner and keep the audience in mind b Respond to ques1ons and cri1cal reviews with interest and reflec1on c 8 Design ComposiMon a Discuss design choices with substan1al reference to composi1on b Ar1culate the design decisions with regard to geometry and part/whole rela1onships c Adapt the architectural design to the program & make it fit the unique environment of the land
M
M
M
+
M
M
M
x x
x
Combined raMng
Evaluator RaMng
x
M
x
Final EvaluaMon (pass/fail)
Pass
Frank Henry, B.Arch; Victor Sidy, M.Arch, AIA, LEED AP; Aris Georges, M.Arch, 4/1/11 EVALUATOR SIGNATURE + DATE EVALUATOR NOTES: FH‐ Max presented a very well ar1culated architectural solu1on in terms of propor1on and scale. Max's plan did not express the dynamics of the architectural form. Max's graphic presenta1ons were excellent. It was very complete. VS‐ Well executed project. S1ll not convinced that the project completely responds to unique quali1es of the site, in poe1c or celebatory ways. Find ways of humanizing the renderings, even though they are spectacular. Study more contemporary art perhaps... AG‐ Excellent visuals but the concept of the roofs and walls is too complicated to comprehend. There are unresolved circula1on issues and the size of the public spaces seems unreasoned (i.e. too much unused space in kitchen/dining but a crowded living rom.
29
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORE CURRICULUM ‐ M.Arch
Student: Max Borshchevskiy, entry date: 10/19/09 Instructor: Greg Brickey, PE; SE
PC 4
PC 3
PC 2
PC 1
Combined rating
Instructor Rating
Structures Seminar Arizona 2010‐11 (‐) M‐ M M+ (+) PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency 1 Critical Ground a n/a b 2 Social and Cultural Context a n/a b 3 Ecology and Environment a n/a b c 4 Representation + a Demonstrate appropriate structural system and basic material choices for buildings through hand drawings X
PC 8
PC 7
PC 6
PC 5
5
Material Facts Analyze forces and determine reactions Calculate forces generated in elements of a structure Develop shear and moment diagrams Demonstrate understanding of material choices for structures 6 Integrated Practice a n/a b c 7 Personal Competence a Punctual attendance at all class sessions b Class participation c Completion of all assignments, quizzes, tests, and projects as outlined in the syllabus 8 Design Composition a n/a b c a b c d
12/14/10 INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE + DATE
X X X
X X
M
X
M X
Final Evaluation (pass/fail)
P
Contact hours
12
INSTRUCTOR NOTES: Max is a natural. He has a gift for structural concepts. His challenge, or at least from my perspective, is to discover his strengths and to integrate them into his architecture.
30
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORE CURRICULUM ‐ M.Arch
PC 4
PC 3
PC 2
PC 1
Student: Max Borshchevskiy, entry date: 10/19/09 Instructor: Greg Brickey, PE; SE
Structures 1 Arizona 2010‐11 PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency 1 CriRcal Ground a n/a b 2 Social and Cultural Context a n/a b 3 Ecology and Environment a n/a b 4 RepresentaRon a Demonstrate appropriate understanding of wood and steel structural systems and basic material choices for buildings through drawings and models.
+
*
PC 7
PC 6
PC 5
5
PC 8
Material Facts Demonstrate understanding of material proper9es of wood. Demonstrate understanding of wood structural systems. Demonstrate understanding of wood systems and construc9on methods. Demonstrate understanding of wood lateral load resis9ng systems. Demonstrate understanding of material proper9es of steel. Demonstrate understanding of basic structural member selec9on and systems. Choose appropriate structural materials and framing system. Demonstrate understanding of material choices for structures. 6 Integrated PracRce a n/a b 7 Personal Competence a Punctual a<endance at all class sessions b Class par9cipa9on c Comple9on of all assignments, quizzes, texts, projects, and field excursions as outlined in the syllabus. 8 Design ComposiRon a n/a b
(‐) M‐ M M+ (+)
Combined raRng
Instructor RaRng
a b c d e f g h
4‐Apr‐11
*
* * *
+
*
* * *
+
* * *
Final EvaluaRon (pass/fail)
P
Contact hours
45
INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE + DATE INSTRUCTOR NOTES:
31
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORE CURRICULUM ‐M.Arch
PC 4
PC 3
PC 2
PC 1
Student: Max Borshchevskiy entry date: 10/19/09 Instructor: Greg Brickey, PE; SE
Structures 2 Arizona 2010‐11 PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency 1 CriRcal Ground a n/a b 2 Social and Cultural Context a n/a b 3 Ecology and Environment a n/a b 4 RepresentaRon a Demonstrate appropriate understanding of concrete, masonry, and steel structural systems and basic material choices for buildings through drawings and models.
+
*
PC 7
PC 6
PC 5
5
PC 8
Material Facts Demonstrate understanding of material proper:es of concrete and masonry. Demonstrate understanding of concrete structural systems. Demonstrate understanding of concrete systems and construc:on methodologies. Demonstrate understanding of concrete and masonry lateral load resis:ng systems. Demonstrate understanding of material proper:es of steel. Demonstrate understanding of basic structural member selec:on and systems. Choose appropriate structural materials and framing system. Demonstrate understanding of material choices for structures. 6 Integrated PracRce a n/a b 7 Personal Competence a Punctual a=endance at all class sessions b Class par:cipa:on c Comple:on of all assignments, quizzes, texts, projects, and field excursions as outlined in the syllabus. 8 Design ComposiRon a n/a b
(‐) M‐ M M+ (+)
Combined raRng
Instructor RaRng
a b c d e f g h
1‐Apr‐11
* *
*
+
* * * * * *
+
* *
Final EvaluaRon (pass/fail)
P
Contact hours
43
INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE + DATE INSTRUCTOR NOTES:
32
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORE CURRICULUM ‐ M.Arch
Student: Max Borshchevskiy Instructor: Ron Geren, B.Arch
PC 5 PC 6
a b c d e f a b c d
(‐) M‐ M M+ (+)
Understand the elements of construcLon documents Understand the differences between procurement documents and contract documents Understand the organizaLon and funcLon of contract drawings and specificaLons Understand the language and methods used in specificaLons Understand the types, funcLons, and applicaLons of documents used during the construcLon process Understand the purpose of construcLon documents in the post‐construcLon phase
Integrated PracLce Understand the concept of the project team, project delivery methods, project life cycle, and contractual relaLonships Know the phases of design and the documents associated with them Understand the contractual roles of the project team during procurement and construcLon phases Understand the responsibiliLes of the project team in the post‐construcLon phase
Combined raLng
Construc)on Document Technology, Arizona Fall 2010 PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency Material Facts
5
6
Instructor RaLng
M
X X X X X X
M X
X X X
Final EvaluaLon (pass/fail) 1/7/11 Contact hours (actual from a_endance):
Pass 30
INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE + DATE INSTRUCTOR NOTES: Very clear and organized writer. Good understanding of the contractural roles of the construc7on team. Need to ensure that when reviewing CDs, you check all appropriate documents (drawings and specifica7ons) to obtain the necesssary informa7on. Suggest being a liEle more involved in discussions.
33
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORE CURRICULUM ‐ M.Arch
Student: Max Borshchevskiy Instructor: Ron Geren, B.Arch
PC 6
6
Building Codes, Arizona Spring 2011 PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency Integrated PracLce
(‐) M‐ M M+ (+)
Understand the methods of classificaLon in the IBC: Occupancy group classificaLon and construcLon a type classificaLon b Be able to calculate allowable height and area Be able to determine fire resistance requirements for building elements, including walls, floors, doors, and windows c
d Understand the components of the means of egress system e Be able to analyze a project for compliance with the building code
Combined raLng
Instructor RaLng
M X X X X X
Final EvaluaLon (pass/fail) 4/11/11 Contact hours (actual from a^endance):
Pass 24
INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE + DATE INSTRUCTOR NOTES: Excellent performance in class, even a3er missing first four sessions due to visa issues…turned in first assignment on 9me. Work was detailed and easy to follow.
34
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Core Curriculum‐ M.Arch
(‐) M‐ M M+ (+)
2
Social and Cultural Context a N/A
3
Ecology and Environment a N/A
4
RepresentaQon a Demonstrated understanding of computer graphics within the context of the language of technical drawings/construc9on documents.
PC 3 PC 4
Combined raQng
Instructor RaQng
Technical Drawing AZ 2010‐11 PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency 1 CriQcal Ground a N/A
PC 2
PC 1
Student: Max Borshchevskiy, entry date: 10/19/09 Instructor: Michael P. Johnson
+
x
PC 6
PC 5
5
Material Facts a Understanding of structural systems, construc9on methods, nature of materials, and sustainable methods and materials as demonstrated in the construc9on documents produced. 6 Integrated PracQce a Demonstrated in construc9on documents mee9ng building code requirements for commercial construc9on.
M x
PC 8
PC 7
7
Personal Competence a A@endance and punctuality. b Completeness of final set of technical drawings c Class par9cipa9on. 8 Design ComposiQon a N/A
x
M x x
Final EvaluaQon (pass/fail) Michael P. Johnson, 3/27/11 INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE + DATE
+
x
Contact hours
Pass 44
INSTRUCTOR NOTES: Good work.
35
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION M.Arch
2
Social and Cultural Context a N/A
3
Ecology and Environment a N/A
4
RepresentaQon a Comple5on of hand and computer drawings that demonstrate understanding of propor5on and scale in the development of architecture.
PC 3 PC 4
Material Facts a N/A
6
Integrated PracQce a N/A
PC 6
PC 5
5
(‐) M‐ M M+ (+)
M x
M x
PC 8
PC 7
7
Personal Competence a A?endance and punctuality. b Completeness of all assignments. c Class par5cipa5on. 8 Design ComposiQon a The student shall complete hand drawn overlay sketches for each building indica5ng their determina5ons and discoveries.
x x x
M
M
x
Final EvaluaQon (pass/fail) Michael P. Johnson, 12/26/10 INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE + DATE
Combined raQng
Instructor RaQng
Propor%on and Scale AZ 2010‐11 PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency 1 CriQcal Ground a The student shall study each of the buildings plans, sec5ons and eleva5ons to determine/ discover their rela5onship prorop5ons and scale as set forth in the historical dogma.
PC 2
PC 1
Student: Max Borshchevskiy, entry date: 10/19/09 Instructor: Michael P. Johnson
Contact hours
Pass 36
INSTRUCTOR NOTES: Good work, you might look again at the Jacobs as the unit system used 2 to 1 varies from the golden sec5on.
36
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORE CURRICULUM ‐ M.Arch
PC 6 PC 7 PC 8
6
Instructor RaSng
(‐) M‐ M M+ (+)
x x x x
including ac1ve and passive hea1ng and cooling, indoor air quality, solar orienta1on, dayligh1ng and ar1ficial ligh1ng, electrical systems, acous1cs, ver1cal transporta1on, and fire protec1on. b Demonstra1on of understanding of how material choices contribute to the architectural work through their characteris1c forms and through the selec1on of intrinsic proper1es of strength, durability, and economy. c Demonstra1on of how alloca1on of resources used in design, construc1on, opera1on, and altera1on of the architectural work balances environmental impact, cost, efficiency, and quality in LEED cer1fied levels. d Demonstrate understanding of the basic principles involved in the appropriate applica1on of building envelope systems and associated assemblies rela1ve to fundamental performance, aesthe1cs, moisture transfer, durability, and energy and material resources.
Integrated PracSce a Demonstra1on of understanding of professional standards related to mechanical engineering such as ASHRAE standard 90.1. 7 Personal Competence a Demonstra1on of problem solving skills and reflec1ve learning. a Punctual aLendance at all class sessions. b Class par1cipa1on. c Comple1on of all assignments and projects. 8 Design ComposiSon Demonstrated understanding of Building Systems
Combined raSng
Building Systems Arizona 2010‐11 PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency 1 CriScal Ground n/a 2 Social and Cultural Context n/a 3 Ecology and Environment a Demonstrate ability to op1mize, conserve, and reuse natural and built resources to reduce the environmental impacts of building construc1on and opera1on. b Demonstrate ability to provide healthful environments for occupants/users. 4 RepresentaSon a Represent understanding and applica1on of building system integra1on through hand or computer drawings. 5 Material Facts a Demonstra1on of understanding the principles of environmental control system design and integra1on
PC 5
PC 4
PC 3
PC 2 PC 1
Student: Max Borshchevskiy; entry date: 10/19/09 Instructor: Michael Barkley, PE, LEED ap
M
M M
x x x
x x x x x x
M M
M pass
Michael Barkley, PE, LEED AP, 4/10/11 INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE + DATE INSTRUCTOR NOTES:
10.5 hrs
37
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORE CURRICULUM ‐ M.Arch
PC 5
PC 4
PC 3
PC 2
PC 1
Student: Max Borshchevskiy; entry date: 10/19/09 Instructor: Kim Hurtado, esq.
Construc)on Contract Prepara)on & Nego)a)on AZ 2010‐11 PERFORMANCE IS RATED AS: (M)=Mastery, (+)=Excellence, (‐)=Deficiency 1 CriScal Ground a n/a 2
Social and Cultural Context a n/a
3
Ecology and Environment a n/a
4
RepresentaSon a n/a
5
Material Facts a n/a
(‐) M‐ M M+ (+)
PC 7
PC 6
6
PC 8
Integrated PracSce a Demonstrate understanding of contract nego2a2on terms and exercising integrity in modifying a contract through class role play of the nego2a2on of selected contract terms. b Demonstrate understanding of how contract terms are used to assist in equitable dispute avoidance and resolu2on during construc2on administra2on through class role play of disputed contract interpreta2on and contract enforcement issues. c Demonstrate ability to objec2vely modify contracts and nego2ate them so that the student's client would be fully informed about the contract terms, using the contract to develop a shared vision for a successful project. 7 Personal Competence a Comple2on of assigned readings prior to each class. b ABendance, ac2ve listening, and engaged class par2cipa2on. c Timely comple2on of prac2cum assignment, with custom modifica2ons 8 Design ComposiSon a N/A
Combined raSng
Instructor RaSng
Kim Hurtado, Esq., 3/20/11 INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE + DATE
M
x x x
M
x x x
Final EvaluaSon (pass/fail)
P
Contact hours
6
INSTRUCTOR NOTES:
38
Review Date: April 26, 2011
M.Arch PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT MAPPING Student: Maxim Borshchevskiy, entry date: 10.19.09 Advisor: Aris Georges
Architectural Prac@ce
Integrated Studies (general educa@on)
Pass/Fail
Subtotals (Hours)
M=Mastery, +=Excellence, ‐=Deficiency
Material Facts
M.Arch Year 2‐ Explora2on‐ AZ 2010‐11; WI 2011 CORE CURRICULUM
CONTACT HOURS (Based on AOendance)
Design Composi@on
Personal Competence
Integrated Prac@ce
Representa@on
Ecology and Environment
Social and Cultural Context
Instructor Ra@ngs
Cri@cal Ground
MASTERY: The level of achievement required for successful comple@on of the Master of Architecture program is described as “mastery” of the Performance Categories. Mastery is determined by faculty review of student work that concludes not only presence, but integra@on of the Categories into a successful whole. Showing how the Performance Categories are interrelated in the work, not just cited, is evidence of mastery. EXCELLENCE: Presence of evidence that the student accomplished considerably more work qualified by the Performance Category as guided by faculty, on the student's ini@a@ve. DEFICIENCY: Absence of evidence that the student accomplished work qualified by the Performance Category, without reason or reasonable explana@on.
PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
STUDIOS
1 2 3
PROJECTS
4
0
5 Box #3‐ Single Family Residence (Henry) AZ
M M M + M M M M
6 7 8
60
+ M M M M + + + + M + + M M M M M
9 Structures Seminar (Brickey) AZ 10 Construc@on Document Technology (Geren) Az 11 Codes (Geren) AZ 12 Structures I (Brickey) AZ CLASSES / SEMINARS
P
60
13 Structures II (Brickey) AZ 14 Construc@on Contracts (Hurtado) AZ 15 Technical Drawing (M. Johnson) AZ 16 Building Systems (Barkley) AZ
M
P P P P P P P P
12 30 24
+ + M M M M
45 43 6 44 11
x x x x x x x
17 18 19 20 21 22
215
ELECTIVES + INDEPENDENT STUDIES 23 Propor@on and Scale (M. Johnson) AZ
M
M
M M
P
36
24 25 26 27 28
AP‐ Russia‐457 hours
PC BALANCE RATING (commiOee/student) (1‐5) OVERALL BALANCE RATING (commiOee)(1‐5)
36
11.58%
311
12%
1=unbalanced; 5=very balanced
REVIEW COMMITTEE SIGNATURES: Tour Hours: 46 Required: 45 Integrated Studies Hours: 99 Total Hours Required: 135 Architectural Prac@ce Hours: 767 Total Hours Required: 700
39
Bibliography: "Design of Slabs-on-ground." In ACI Committee Report: Research in Progress Plain and Reinforced Concrete. Detroit: Aci, 1964. 360R-40. Beadle, Alfred Newman, and Bernard Michael Boyle. Constructions: buildings in Arizona by Alfred Newman Beadle. 2nd ed. Cave Creek, AZ: Gnosis, 2008. "90.1." In Energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings . I-P ed. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2007. -. Foster, Norman. "Architecture and Structure." Architectural Association of Japan, November 1, 1994. - (accessed February 15, 2011). International building code . Falls Church, Va.: International Code Council, 2009. Le Corbusier : le Modulor ; Modulor 2 Peter de Francia and Anna Bostock].. Basel: BirkhaМ €user, 2000. Levy, Matthys, and Mario Salvadori. Why buildings fall down: how structures fail. New York: W.W. Norton, 1992. Onouye, Barry, and Kevin Kane. Statics and strength of materials for architecture and building construction . 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007. Salvadori, Mario. Why buildings stand up: the strength of architecture. New York: Norton, 19901980. The project resource manual: CSI manual of practice. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005. Jodidio, Philip, and Richard Meier. Richard Meier . KoМ€ln: Taschen, 1995.
Biblography Arizona 2010-2011
40
Looking Forward
41
The upcoming Wisconsin season is going to be my final season at Taliesin, The Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture. I believe that I have accomplished a lot since I have started my Masers more than a year ago. I think that it is time now to improve my knowledge of architecture through professional practice. My number one priority for the upcoming season would be to find an internship opportunities for the summer and to prepare myself for professional practice. I would like to focus on architectural practice projects. For my Final Box I will be looking for a middle size project in United States, a competition or an architectural practice project. I am interested in designing a public building, possibly a church or a temple. Building Materials and New American Home are the elective classes I want to take in Wisconsin season. I also want to work on independent study project possibly a research project on contemporary architecture.
Thank you for your attention Sincerely,
Max Borshchevskiy Credits: Graphic Design by Maxim Borshchevskiy Photos by Pranav Naik, Hu Ee Wong, Fil, Maxim Borshchevskiy Special thanks to all of Taliesin.
Looking Forward Arizona 2010-2011
C 2011 MAXIMBORSHCHEVSKIY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
PORTFOLIO CHECKLIST- EXPLORATION PHASE
1. Introductory letter addressed to the Review Committee 2. Table of contents (this means the pages in the portfolio will be numbered) 3. Portfolio selections- what did you do? What did you learn? To include: -All courses and studios selected in the Learning Path, Box project documentation architectural practice, and independent study projects (if applicable), sketches, drawings, musings, journal excerpts, photographs -All instructor evaluations -Reflective self-assessment included with each entry -Current reading list and bibliography (properly cited- use Chicago Manual of Style) -Timesheet documenting Tour, Architectural Practice, and Independent Study hours as applicable 4. Performance Category map- provided by Education Office 5. Disk with copy of current portfolio and timesheets 6. Include this checklist
9/1/09
Š 2009-10 Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture. All Rights Reserved.