-
Promote the sharing of knowledge, practices and meanings by using platforms and fostering communities of practice; Reinforce the recognition of prior learning and extend the age of access to training; Provide the needs of unemployed young graduates who cannot find work, the low-skilled unemployed and the graduates long-term unemployed age up 35 and to do the adjustment of training to market needs for this people; Provide mixed solutions to more adults in middle age to improve education, otherwise in two decades people are still in market without qualifications; Continue to improve LLL with flexible pathways with the involvement of political actors and stakeholders especially employers, higher education and vocational education and training and also in providing the training of trainers and teachers constant adaptation of the new realities; Introduce partnership between regional authorities (CIM) and national authorities focus in reduce the deficit qualification and certification of local people and promoting their employability; Recognize the need for increased social skills on young people and promote LLL in formal, informal and non-formal settings, from childhood; Assure the recognition of policy makers and businesses of the importance of promoting training in the workplace more closely, so that young people or adult learners can have a proper training and a tutor to assist them in their training. Open up education through new technologies and promote the acquisition and development of skills throughout life recognizing the benefits for the employability, competitiveness and innovation in Portugal.
-
-
-
-
-
Spain The main outcomes of the Spanish held FORUM includes the policy recommendations and experts’ involvement in the discussions and shaping these recommendations. Turkey We were able to add new perspectives to the Turkish state of play and raised awareness on lifelong learning in Mardin.
1
Rate the overall impact of your FORUM on lifelong learning policy in your region/country (1 "very poor" … to 10 "excellent"). 2
3
4
5
6
6.5 х
7
8
9
10
Explain why you selected this grade: The average score of the overall impact of the organised FORUMS in the different countries is 6.5. The individual scores ranged from 4 to 9, and all partners agree on two main issues: first, that having such a FORUM organised in the country/region is a success of its own, and second, the results are yet to be seen as this is just one step further. Specifically, following are the views of the partners on the FORUMS’ impact: