2 minute read
Pleix-Quip
reinsurer appetites wane. • Often, insureds don’t keep pace with the impact of volatility and changes in their operating environment which means that their valuations are inaccurate and out of date. Some businesses will erroneously insure for the market value of their premises rather than considering what it will cost to rebuild at today’s prices. It may also be that a business has changed its operating model and as such its exposures have changed, but it is still using previous, outdated valuations that are irrelevant to the changed business circumstances – for example holding more stock on premises to counter supply chain vulnerabilities, or the very nature of the business has changed, as we saw happen during the pandemic. Consider for example office premises that now have retail or manufacturing tenants and what this means for the declared risks on site.
Preventing underinsurance
Advertisement
Underinsurance is a potential financial pitfall that can be avoided by setting the correct sum insured on all policy sections of your cover, conducting proper valuations and engaging with a professional risk advisor or broker to get the balance right. “For your Buildings, Machinery, and Plant we recommend that you undertake regular replacement valuations, considering the impact of new replacement cost, VAT, inflation and exchange rate fluctuations. These valuations should include the actual cost of rebuilding or replacing any of these items at today’s costs including demolition, clearing costs, professional fees and any other improvements to the property insured. An expert broker in the field would be able to arrange a professional reinstatement valuation that will allow you to be better informed of the true replacement value of these items,” Clayton explains. On average, 43% of business interruption insurance is underinsured by 53%, according to the Chartered Institute of Loss Adjusters (CILA). “One of the reasons for this is that the selected maximum indemnity period turns out to be far shorter than the actual period of disruption caused by accidental property damage. It is worth considering an increase in your maximum indemnity period to reflect the true extent of disruption, including allowing for an increased time for reinstatement,” says Clayton. “It is also becoming more relevant but more challenging to insure loss of profit or revenue during an interruption that results from a customer or supplier incident, as supply chains become more fragile. It is well worth the effort to engage with a risk advisor who specialises in the field to understand and map out the true extent of supply chain risks your business could potentially face to mitigate and transfer the risks,” he adds. Don’t let underinsurance scupper your business’ ability to recover from a major event. The interconnectivity of traditional and emerging risks demands a more holistic approach. “Fact-based will be well worth the effort to engage with an expert broker to comprehensively identify, evaluate, quantify and mitigate risk with a solutions-based management approach that takes a long-term view and collaborates with all roleplayers throughout your business value chain.” Better decisions start when you are better informed of the risks you are faced with, and their interconnectivity with other factors,” Clayton concludes.
