[85] Please investigate the following complaints of discrimination by the dominant AnthroCorpocentric patriarchal cultures against the Ecocentric gender balanced Radical Honoursty culture: [85.1] Constitutional Court Registrar: Ms. Martie Stander and Director: Vic Misser, for refusing to process my (A) invocation of minority ecocentric cultural law application for Radical Honesty culture Review of the ‗Kill Boer‘ Hate Speech Negotiated Agreement between Afriforum/TAU-SA and Julius Malema/ANC, stating that the South African AnthroCorpocentric Dominant Cultures ‗Rules of Court‘ are the Supreme Law of the Land; If or when the AnthroCorpocentric Dominant Cultures ‗Rules of Court‘ violate a Minority cultures right to practice their Ecocentric cultural practices, as enshrined in the Constitution Bill of Rights clauses granting citizens from minority cultures, access to courts (S 34), and rights to practice their culture (S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18). (Ref: 9/1/1/1/49) [85.2] (A) SA Press Association: Editor: Mark van der Velden, (B) 702 Radio: Producer: Pheladi Gwangwa, (C) Business Day: Editor: Peter Bruce, (D) Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis, (E) Die Burger: Editor: Bun Booyens, (F) Cape Argus: Editor: Chris Witfield, (G) The Citizen: Editor: Martin Williams, (H) City Press: Editor: Ferial Haffajee, (I) Mail and Guardian: Editor: Nic Dawes, (J) ENews: Producer: Patrick Conroy, (K) Cape Times: Editor: Alide Dasnois, (L) Rapport: Editor: Bokkie Gerber; (M) Sunday Times: Editor: Ray Hartley, (N) Sunday Independent: Editor: Makhudu Sefara: editors for discrimination against the EcoCentric Gender Balanced Radical Honoursty culture, in that they believe that the fact that a South African citizen member of the Radical Honoursty culture, has been unable to find a lawyer to represent her, as a member of the Radical Honoursty culture, for the past ten years, and in a current case before the Constitutional Court, is ―not news‖? [86] Alternatively, please confirm whether the SA Human Rights Commission endorse the CRL Rights Commission Rulings – as endorsed by the failure of CRL Rights Commission Chairman Mabuza‘s failure to address my appeal and overturn them – authorizing: A.
the SA Legal establishment‘s endorsement of the denial of cultural legal representation, and access to courts, to members of the Radical Honesty culture, and (b) the South African Media‘s discrimination against Members of the Radical Honesty culture, by refusing to report the fact that a South African citizen member of the Radical Honesty culture, has been unable to find a lawyer to represent her, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, for the past ten years, and in a current case before the Constitutional Court.
25