[38]
On 22 May 2012 the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled (PDF36) that
"It does not appear, from the reading of the documents forming part of your application, that any value will be added to the arguments to be made by the parties legal representatives and thus will not be useful to the court. The application is accordingly refused." [39]
On 18 July 2012, applicant filed an application for leave to
approach the Constitutional Court, for review of the SCA‟s denial of applicants Amicus application (PDF37) arguing that “IF: Supreme Court of Appeals Values endorse EcoFeminist Sustainable Democracy Transparency
TruthSeeking
Problem
Solving:
Applicant
Should
be
Approved as an Amicus Curiae” since “no Primary Party Represents Radical Honesty EcoFeminist Problem Solving Values” [40]
The
Supreme
Court
of
Appeal
have
not
yet
ruled
on
the
applicant‟s 18 July 2012 application for leave to approach the Constitutional Court, for review of SCA‟s denial of applicants Amicus application. [41]
Once again South African media extensively reported upon all
Left vs. Right wing Patriarchal Anthropocentric arguments lodged before the Equality court and later the Supreme Court of Appeal, while totally censoring the reality of an Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security argument having been made in the proceedings,
36 37
issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120522_sca issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120718_sca_815-11
01 8