SEC 575 DeVry Entire Course Latest
Downloading is very simple, you can download this Course here: http://wiseamerican.us/product/sec-575-devry-entire-course-latest/ Or Contact us at: SUPPORT@WISEAMERICAN.US SEC 575 DeVry Entire Course Latest SEC 575 DeVry Entire Course Latest SEC571 SEC 575 DeVry Week 1 Discussion 1 Latest Jurisdiction over Websites Read Yahoo v. La Lique and Mink v. AAAA Development LLC (Baumer, pp. 44–46), and then discuss the factors that were used to determine whether each court had jurisdiction over non-resident website operators. What business factors should enter into development of commercial websites and decisions about whether to subject a company to long-arm jurisdiction?
SEC 575 DeVry Week 1 Discussion 2 Latest Impact of Technology on the Law All websites are equally accessible on the Internet, no matter where a site's business sponsor is located. Consequently, foreign websites are accessible to people cruising the Internet. Suppose a foreign website sells drugs that are not approved by regulatory agencies for sale to citizens of another country. Do you think that website has a duty to be familiar with drug laws throughout the world? Why or why not? In addition, do you think the owners of the website have committed a crime? Why or why not?
SEC 575 DeVry Week 2 Discussion 1 Latest To Spam or not to Spam You have just graduated and decide that you want to start an Internet business. You have limited capital but need to market your product. Someone suggests that you can purchase 500,000 Internet addresses at an extremely low cost. You have always hated spam but realize that this is a great way to reach a half a million potential customers both quickly and cheaply. You recognize that many, if not most, of the recipients will find your spam message a nuisance. Focusing on the legal issues that you believe affect your actions, discuss what you would do. Read the excerpts of the CAN-SPAM Act, attached.
SEC 575 DeVry Week 2 Discussion 2 Latest Conflicts of Law and the Internet The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from blocking any form of freedom of expression that not does not involve child pornography, terrorism, or other forms that themselves involve a crime.
Many foreign states place restrictions on expression in the name of a greater good. In France, it is a crime to incite racial hatred. Yahoo provides an auction site on the Internet and among the items it has offered were Nazi memorabilia, which are illegal in France. French authorities took Yahoo to court and filed criminal charges against the company. Several organizations, such as the League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism and the League of Jewish Students, successfully sued Yahoo in France and obtained a judgment. A U.S. federal district court judge, however, refused to enforce the judgment and says Yahoo is not bound by French law. Should the speech laws of one country effectively censor what appears on a website owned by citizens of another country? Should a company such as Yahoo that does business in foreign markets be sensitive to the laws and culture of the countries in which it chooses to do business?
SEC 575 DeVry Week 3 Discussion 1 Latest Shrink-wrap. Box-top, and Click-wrap Agreements Shrink-wrap, box-top, and click-wrap agreements are inherent to e-commerce. How you feel about them often depends on whether you are the vendor or purchaser. What are the best practices to assure shrink-wrap, box-top, and click-wrap agreements are legal? What are the best ethical practices that the e-commerce industry should adopt?
SEC 575 DeVry Week 3 Discussion 2 Latest Attribution in an E-Commerce World In a world of one-click acceptance, vendors face real challenges in determining whether the clicker is in fact the offeree to whom the offer is made. What are some steps or procedures vendors can adopt to establish attribution? What happens if a consumer clicks on the wrong button or did not intend to click at all? What legal and ethical defenses should be available to e-commerce customers?
SEC 575 DeVry Week 4 Discussion 1 Latest Eminent Domain—Good or Bad? In June, 2005, the United States Supreme Court in Kelo v. City of New London held that although the city of New London could not take private land simply to confer a private benefit on a particular private party, the takings could be executed pursuant to a carefully considered development plan. The Supreme Court rejected any literal requirement that condemned property be put into use for the public. Rather, it embraced the broader and more natural interpretation of public use as "public purpose." Given the rapid growth of cyber business, is this expansion of eminent domain good or bad? Could the takings be used to help develop high-technology development parks? Or, should we be more concerned with the threat to personal freedom that expanded eminent domain could entail? Does the Supreme Court's interpretation give greater opportunity for misconduct (bribery)?
SEC 575 DeVry Week 4 Discussion 2 Latest Invasions of Privacy in Cyberspace Americans have a high regard for privacy. This regard is codified in the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable search and seizure. Is the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of 1986 sufficient to guarantee our rights to privacy in Internet and other electronic communications? Or, in the aftermath of 9/11 and the war on terror, should we reasonably expect government inroads into privacy and the use of snooping tools such as Carnivore?