WEEKEND
12 December 2008
13
TV & Film
The Day The Earth Stood Still
Frost/Nixon is a tale of the tapes By Rafer Guzmán Newsday
NEW YORK – “Why didn’t you burn the tapes?” That blunt question, not exactly a softball, was the very first posed by British journalist David Frost to former president Richard Nixon on March 23, 1977, the start of an unprecedented series of interviews stretching over 12 days and nearly 29 hours. Broadcast in May of that year, the interviews covered nearly every aspect of Nixon’s presidency in four 90-minute instalments. But it was the first episode – the one dealing with Watergate – that drew 45 million viewers, then the largest television audience in history. Clearly, Americans were still scarred by their long national nightmare. For sheer depth and breadth, the Nixon interviews remain unparalleled in television journalism, and they’ve since become a kind of cottage industry. Nearly 30 years later, in 2006, British playwright Peter Morgan staged Frost/Nixon,a dramatization of the marathon sessions starring Michael Sheen as the journalist and Tony Award winner Frank Langella as the haunted president.On Friday,Universal Pictures will release Ron Howard’s film adaptation,also with Sheen and Langella.Frost himself has published not one but two books on the subject. And for completists, Liberation Entertainment released Frost/Nixon:The Original Watergate Interviews, a DVD of the broadcast with new commentary by Frost,Tuesday. “Obviously, there may never be anything quite like the Nixon interviews again,”Frost said recently, “because he’s the only president who was forced out of office.And he’s the only president who’s been interviewed for 28 and three-quarter hours. And obviously, he’s the only president who came to say what he did.” Frost, sitting with a glass of chardonnay at the bar of a Manhattan hotel one recent weekday afternoon, was referring to the extraordinarily candid apology that Nixon offered during their conversation. Revisiting those gruelling and often contentious talks, Frost – now 69 and properly known as Sir David, a title conferred on him in 1993 – vividly recalled even small details, and no wonder:The interviews were long enough, but the preparations took even longer.
They began in June 1975, when the late Clay Felker, then editor of New York magazine, phoned Frost after a weekend in the Hamptons. Felker had a tip: Talent agent Irving “Swifty” Lazar, famous for representing figures from Humphrey Bogart to Vladimir Nabokov, was handling a book deal for Nixon. Spotting an opening, Frost contacted Lazar and began the delicate process of securing an interview with a man who, to all appearances, would be the last person to grant one.
The pivotal moment came when Frost, abandoning the notes on his clipboard and speaking “from the heart,” as he later put it, suggested that Nixon stop equivocating and apologize to the country. And to the amazement of 45 million viewers, he did
Yet Nixon agreed. He would be paid US$600,000 and receive 20 percent of any profits.The interviews would take place in a rented house in Monarch Bay, Calif.,not far from Nixon’s home in San Clemente.Most important,he would not see the questions beforehand and would give Frost total editorial control. At the time, the Watergate scandal – a knotty string of break-ins, cover-ups and taped phone calls – was well-covered territory. Nixon had resigned in 1974; Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of The Washington Post had released their groundbreaking expose All the President’s Men; and the Senate Watergate Committee had issued its 1,250-page report. But Frost wasn’t satisfied, and he believed the American people felt the same way. “Very few of the questions had been answered,” Frost said.“And he’d never had his account of Watergate tested – and ‘testing the account’ became the key phrase we used.” Both Frost and Nixon prepared for battle by assembling small teams. The journalist relied on Robert Zelnick, a longtime political reporter, and James Reston Jr., an English professor at the University of North Carolina, among others.The former president’s group included speechwriter Ken Kachigian and future 60 Minutes correspondent Diane Sawyer, who served as a liaison between the two camps.As the interviews progressed, it became clear that Frost had become as well-versed in Watergate as Nixon himself. At one point Nixon even says as much, albeit with a pained smile. But the pivotal moment came when Frost, abandoning the notes on his clipboard and speaking “from the heart,”as he later put it, suggested that Nixon stop equivocating and apologize to the country. And to the amazement of 45 million viewers, he did. “I let down my friends,”the president said, dryeyed but clearly emotional.“I let down the country. I let down our system of government.”And later:“I let the American people down, and I have to carry that burden with me for the rest of my life.” For Frost, it was the culmination of years of work; for Americans, it was something much deeper. “I do think we got the truth out of Richard Nixon,” Frost said.“And as to what we got, we got more than we could have hoped.” Watch the trailer
0Director: Scott Dickerson 0Cast: Keanu Reeves, Jennifer Connelly, Kathy Bates, John Cleese, Jaden Smith 0Length: 103 minutes 0Rated M ( for medium level violence) How much you will enjoy The Day the Earth Stood Still will depend on how familiar you are with the original 1951 film. If you consider the original a classic, then the new version will feel more like “The One Hour and Forty-Three Minutes the Earth Stood Still.” If you’ve never seen the first movie, then the bar for the updated version is not so high. The new Day features a wooden Keanu Reeves as Klaatu, a representative for a group of alien civilizations. He has not come in peace. These cosmic buttinskies are upset that we are ruining the planet. The solution is to get rid of any trace of humans. Hope for salvation comes through Dr. Helen Benson (Jennifer Connelly). She’s a scientist. She’s a mum. She’s the last chance to prove humankind is worth a second chance. The reasons the new Day is but a pale copy of the original are too numerous to mention. Here’s just a few: The original film was more than aliens vs. humans. It was released during the era of the Cold War. Tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union were so thick, the end of the world looked near. The movie had a serious message about the end of civilization. The new version is just about nosey intergalactic neighbours taking matters into their own hands. Michael Rennie’s portrayal of Klaatu had an elegance about it. He came across as someone who would listen to reason. That’s why the scenes where he sees the beauty of the human race resonate with hope. Reeves, on the other hand, is stiff, emotionless and cold. It never seems like he is open enough to change his mind about his mission. Director Scott Derrickson opts to go for big special effects in his updated effort rather than use them as a background for the more personal story that drove the original. Derrickson might have gotten away with this ploy if the effects weren’t so mediocre. Klaatu’s way of making his point about the power of the aliens in the first film – that whole Earth-standing-still trick – works because it is so passive-aggressive. Derrickson’s decision to use the Earth standing still as a weapon rather than a warning changes the movie from being a cautionary tale to a standard action movie. But forget about the original movie. Based solely on its own merits, the new version of The Day the Earth Stood Still lacks tension, conflict and a smart script. It ends up being predictable, lacklustre sci-fi fare. Watch the trailer
– By Rick Bentley