HERITAGE GRI CONTENT INDEX

2-1-a Name of the organisation.

2-1-b Ownership and legal form. Heritage Petroleum Company Limited. Heritage is one of the four (4) oil and gas companies within the Trinidad Petroleum Holdings Limited (TPHL) group that is owned by the State - Government of the Republic of Trinidad & Tobago. The Overarching Company Structure is provided on Page 51 of the ESG Report. See Company Profile

2-1-c Location of headquarters.

Our headquarters are located at 9 Queen’s Park West, Port of Spain with operations largely centred in the southern region of Trinidad and the Gulf of Paria, with non-operated assets off Trinidad’s east coast (Refer to Map on Page 11 of the ESG Report). Company Profile 2-1-d Countries of operations. Trinidad & Tobago

2-2-a List of all entities included in our sustainability reporting. This ESG Report includes only the activities of Heritage Petroleum Company Limited.

2-2-b The differences between the list of entities included in our financial reporting and the list included in our sustainability reporting. There are no differences between the entities in our financial reports and in our ESG Report.

2-2-c If the organisation consists of multiple entities, explain the approach used for consolidating the information.

2-3-a The reporting period for, and the frequency of sustainability reporting. This is Heritage’s first ESG Report. The reporting period is October 2020 to September 2021.

Following this initial report, ESG Reporting will be conducted each financial year.

The organisation does not consist of multiple entities.

2-3-b The reporting period for our financial reporting and, if it does not align with the period for its sustainability reporting, explain the reason for this.

2-3-c The publication date of the report or reported information.

2-3-d Contact point for questions about the report or reported information.

2-4-a-i Report restatements of information made from previous reporting periods and explain the reasons for the restatements.

2-4-a-ii Report restatements of information made from previous reporting periods and explain the effect of the restatements.

2-5-a Policy and practice for seeking external assurance, including whether and how the highest governance body and senior executives are involved. The process of obtaining external assurance for Heritage’s ESG Report was conducted through Heritage’s selective tendering process. Companies known to provide independent assurance services for ESG Report within Trinidad & Tobago were registered with Heritage and invited to bid based on predetermined requirements outlined in a Scope of Work. Companies were required to submit proposals through Heritage’s Ariba Supply Chain Management System. Proposals were evaluated for compliance with the Scope of Work and the highest scoring proposal was selected as the external assurance provider. The evaluation was reviewed and approved by Heritage’s HSSE Leader and the Chief Executive Officer before the award of the project to the external assurance provider.

The reporting period is in alignment with our financial reporting period of October to September. This first ESG Report is aligned with our last completed financial year of October 2020 to September 2021.

The publication date of this report is 25th June 2022.

Questions about the report or report information can be directed to esgsustainability@heritage-tt.com or persons can contact the following: Najila Elias–Samlalsingh, Environmental & Regulatory Compliance Manager at Najila.Elias-Samlalsingh@heritage-tt.com or Mikhael Newman, ESG Advisor at Mikhael.Newman@heritage-tt.com.

This is Heritage’s first ESG Report, as such there are no restatements of information made from previous reports.

This is Heritage’s first ESG Report, as such there are no restatements of information made from previous reports.

2-5-b External Assurance of Sustainability Report: Heritage’s ESG Report has been assured in accordance with the AA 1000 Assurance Standard v3 and the International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (ISAE 3000) by DNV Business Assurance USA, Inc. Sustainability & Supply Chain Services. The GRI Standards 2021: Principles for defining report quality: Accuracy; Balance; Clarity; Comparability; Completeness; Sustainability context; Timeliness; Verifiability and the specified GRI indicator standards were also used by the external assurance company. A “moderate level” of assurance has been conducted by DNV based on these standards. DNV is an independent team of sustainability assurance professionals with no relationship or other contracts with Heritage. The Independent Assurance Statement is provided on Page 56 of the ESG Report.

2-6-a Sector(s) in which active. Trinidad and Tobago’s Oil and Gas Sector and Public Sector.

2-6-b-i The organisation’s activities, products, services, and markets served. The organisation’s key activities are exploration and production, fiscalisation and transmission of crude oil for sale. The crude oil produced by Heritage is marketed and sold internationally as our own brand of MOLO Crude, a medium gravity, medium sour crude of Trinidad and Tobago. Heritage Operations

2-6-b-ii The organisation’s supply chain. Our supply chain comprises circa 1470 local vendors–that are grouped into five (5) categories - fenceline/community vendors, strategic vendors, non-strategic vendors, consultants, and no classification assigned. These vendors provide a variety of goods and services that is needed along the life cycle of oil and gas production including – drilling & workover services; civil works; marine services; mechanical services; electrical & instrumentation services; IT services; environmental services; freelance services; consultancy services and provision of all oil and gas materials. Heritage engages vendors from approximately 32 locations across Trinidad both within and outside of our fenceline communities and 12 regional and international vendors. In 2020/2021, Heritage has had approximately TT $1.1 BN in Supply Chain Spend. We are committed to ensuring that our vendors maintain high standards through our Supplier Registration and Performance Management, Sourcing and Contract Management Processes through SAP Ariba Strategic Sourcing Suite (e-Procurement).

2-6-b-iii The entities downstream from the organisation and their activities.

2-6-c Relevant business relationships.

2-6-d Describe significant changes in 2-6-a, 2-6-b, and 2-6-c compared to the previous reporting period.

2-7-a Report the total number of employees, and a breakdown of this total by gender and by region.

2-7-b Report the total number of permanent, temporary, non-guaranteed hours, full-time and part-time employees, and a breakdown of each total by gender and by region Paria Fuel Trading Company (“Paria”) is the entity downstream of Heritage responsible for the storage, handling, and export of Heritage’s MOLO crude. Paria is one of the four (4) companies within the TPHL group owned by the Government of the Republic of Trinidad & Tobago. Heritage’s crude oil is transported via our crude oil pipeline transmission network to Paria’s terminal in Pointe-a-Pierre, Trinidad. At the terminal, the crude is stored and subsequently delivered to the purchasers onto vessels they have chartered. Heritage pays a handling fee for the use of the terminal at Pointe-a-Pierre.

The crude is sold on a free on-board basis and as such Heritage has no control or information on the final destination of cargo. Heritage currently has business relationships with seventeen (17) Joint Ventures (JV) and thirty-nine (39) Lease Operatorships where risks and capital are shared in the exploration and production of oil. ESG Report Page 19.

This is Heritage’s first ESG Report, as such there are no changes from previous reports.

Refer to page 43 of ESG Report.

- Total number of Females: 190 - Total number of Males: 272 Information on employees by region is not applicable as employees are not grouped by region within Trinidad and Tobago.

- Total Number Females: 137 - Total Number Males: 211

- Total Number Females: 8 - Total Number Males: 6

- Total Number Females: 45 - Total Number Males: 55 There are no employees engaged directly with Heritage on a part-time basis. Information on employees by region is not applicable as employees are not grouped by region within Trinidad.

2-7-c Describe the methodologies and assumptions used to compile the data.

2-7-d Report contextual information necessary to understand the data reported under 2-7-a and 2-7-b. The Human Resources team maintains its database of employees’ basic data that is updated on monthly basis on new hires and employee movements, this is now being maintained on the Company’s Human Resources Information System SAP SuccessFactors.

All Heritage employees are located in Trinidad & Tobago.

2-7-e Describe significant fluctuations in the number of employees during the reporting period and between reporting periods.

2-8-a Report the total number of workers who are not employees and whose work is controlled by the organisation and describe-

i. the most common types of worker and their contractual relationship with the organisation,

ii. the type of work they perform.

2-8-b Describe the methodologies and assumptions used to compile the data, including whether the number of workers who are not employees is reported: i. in head count, full-time equivalent (FTE), or using another methodology ii. at the end of the reporting period, as an average across the reporting period, or using another methodology There was an overall 17% increase in the number of employees over the fiscal year 2019/2020 to 2020/2021 i.e., 383 to 462 (inclusive of short-term contracts). This is based on the Organisation’s recruitment drive to fill vacancies in the organisation’s structure.

Heritage is a major provider of third-party contracts across the value chain and provides circa 4000 jobs for persons through third-party contractors (Refer to page 43 ESG Report). The type of work is varied and includes: • Civil Works • Drilling & Workover Services • Marine Services • Mechanical Services • Electrical & Instrumentation Services • Environmental Services • Consultancy Services • Special Projects • IT Services • Freelance Services

The number of workers who are not employees provided is an estimation across the reporting period, as actual number of workers for the reporting period is not available. In the next ESG Report, the number of workers will be calculated utilising one of the methodologies prescribed in this requirement.

2-8-c Describe significant fluctuations in the number of workers who are not employees during the reporting period and between reporting periods. This information is unavailable as it is currently not tracked by Heritage. In preparation for the next ESG Report, Heritage is working towards being able to understand the exact number of workers who are not employees. In subsequent reports, fluctuations in the number of workers during the reporting period and between reporting periods can be completed.

2-9-a Describe the governance structure, including committees of the highest governance body. Heritage’s governance structure, including committees of the highest governance body is provided on Pages 50 - 53. Heritage Board of Directors and Leadership Team

2-9-b List the committees of the highest governance body that are responsible for decision making on and overseeing the management of the organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people. The five (5) committees are outlined on Pages 52 and 53 of the ESG Report.

2-9-c Describe the composition of the highest governance body and its committees by: i. executive and non-executive members; ii. independence; iii. tenure of members on the governance body; iv. number of other significant positions and commitments held by each member, and the nature of the commitments; v. gender; vi. under-represented social groups; vii. competencies relevant to the impacts of the organisation; viii. stakeholder representation. The composition of Heritage’s highest governance body and its committees is outlined in Pages 50 – 53 of the ESG Report. All board members are non-executive and independent. The tenure of each member is two (2) years and is renewable by Corporation Sole, the Ministry of Finance of Trinidad & Tobago. Our Board Members

2-10-a Describe the nomination and selection processes for the highest governance body and its committees. The Board of Directors is appointed by the Shareholder, which is the Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago and the Corporation Sole.

2-10-b Describe the criteria used for nominating and selecting highest governance body members, including whether and how the following are taken into consideration: i. views of stakeholders (including shareholders); ii. diversity; iii. independence; iv. competencies relevant to the impacts of the organisation The Board of Directors is appointed by the Shareholder, which is the Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago and the Corporation Sole. The Shareholder is fully responsible for selection of the Board of Directors and sets the criteria for selection.

2-11-a Report whether the chair of the highest governance body is also a senior executive in the organisation No, the Chairman of the Board is not a senior executive or member of the Executive Management in Heritage.

2-11-b if the chair is also a senior executive, explain their function within the organisation’s management, the reasons for this arrangement, and how conflicts of interest are prevented and mitigated. Not applicable because the Chairman of the Board is not a senior executive or member of the Executive Management.

2-12-a

2-12-b Describe the role of the highest governance body and of senior executives in developing, approving, and updating the organisation’s purpose, value or mission statements, strategies, policies, and goals related to sustainable development

Describe the role of the highest governance body in overseeing the organisation’s due diligence and other processes to identify and manage the organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people, including: i. whether and how the highest governance body engages with stakeholders to support these processes; ii. how the highest governance body considers the outcomes of these processes; Among its primary responsibilities, the Board oversees Heritage’s strategic and business planning processes, monitors corporate performance, and assesses the integrity and effectiveness of our internal controls, legal procedures, ethics, and compliance programs. Beyond these core responsibilities, the Board is also responsible for establishing and maintaining the most effective leadership structure for the Company as well as overseeing the Executive Management.

2-12-c Describe the role of the highest governance body in reviewing the effectiveness of the organisation’s processes as described in 2-12b, and report the frequency of this review. Effectiveness yet to be tested due to official Organisation Strategy being less than a year old and not within the reporting period for this ESG Report.

2-13-a Describe how the highest governance body delegates responsibility for managing the organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people, including:

i. whether it has appointed any senior executives with responsibility for the management of impacts; Responsibility for managing the organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment and people falls with the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The CEO in turn ensures that the organisational structure is tailored to ensure that members of the executive management hold responsibilities for managing the organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people. At Heritage, the responsibilities lie with the following positions: 1. Environment – HSSE Leader.

ii. whether it has delegated responsibility for the management of impacts to other employees. 2. Economy – Chief Financial Officer. 3. People – Human Resources Leader & Corporate Communications Manager. Heritage Leadership

2-13-b Describe the process and frequency for senior executives or other employees to report back to the highest governance body on the management of the organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people. Reporting to the Board of Directors on the management of the organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment and people is conducted monthly, through the respective Board Sub-Committee Meetings.

2-14-a

2-14-b Report whether the highest governance body is responsible for reviewing and approving the reported information, including the organisation’s material topics, and if so, describe the process for reviewing and approving the information. If the highest governance body is not responsible for reviewing and approving the reported information, including the organisation’s material topics, explain the reason for this. Heritage’s highest governance body, its Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving the reported information, including the organisation’s material topics. The reported information will be presented to the Board of Directors by the Chief Executive Officer for approval.

Not applicable because the Board of Directors is responsible.

2-15-a Describe the processes for the highest governance body to ensure that conflicts of interest are prevented and mitigated.

Report whether conflicts of interest are disclosed to stakeholders, including, at a minimum, conflicts of interest relating to: The process for prevention and mitigation of conflicts of interest for the Board of Directors are outlined in TPHL Conflict of Interest Policy and administrated through the Heritage administration Conflict of Interest Form.

All new hires are formally onboarded and go through a HSSE, HR and administrative induction. As part of this process persons are required to complete Conflict of Interest Form and Confidentiality Non-Disclosure Form.

2-15-b

i. cross-board membership; ii. cross-shareholding with suppliers and other stakeholders; iii. existence of controlling shareholders; iv. related parties, their relationships, transactions, and outstanding balances.

2-16-a Describe whether and how critical concerns are communicated to the highest governance body;

2-16-b Report the total number and the nature of critical concerns that were communicated to the highest governance body during the reporting period. The disclosures required and the reporting of conflicts of interest to key stakeholders are outlined in the TPHL Conflict of Interest Policy.

Critical concerns are communicated to the highest governance body through the TPHL Whistleblower Policy.

During the reporting period, there were two (2) complaints reported through the system established by the TPHL Whistleblower Policy. Both complaints were investigated, and sufficient evidence was not found to substantiate claims.

2-17-a Report measures taken to advance the collective knowledge, skills, and experience of the highest governance body on sustainable development. At present, the Board of Directors does not have significant collective knowledge, skills, and experience in sustainable development. The Board of Directors have, however, shown keen interest in advancing their knowledge and as such training and development will be looked at as an intervention.

2-18-a Describe the processes for evaluating the performance of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of the organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people The processes for evaluating the performance of the Board of Directors is outlined in the State Enterprise Performance Monitoring Manual.

2-18-b Report whether the evaluations are independent or not, and the frequency of the evaluations; Board members have an annual performance appraisal report as outlined in the State Enterprise Performance Monitoring Manual - Under Ministry of Finance and is carried out by Corporate Secretary, Management and CEO.

2-18-c Describe actions taken in response to the evaluations, including changes to the composition of the highest governance body and organisational practices.

2-19-a Describe the remuneration policies for members of the highest governance body and senior executives, including: i. fixed pay and variable pay; ii. sign-on bonuses or recruitment incentive payments; iii. termination payments; iv. clawbacks; v. retirement benefits.

2-19-b Describe how the remuneration policies for members of the highest governance body and senior executives relate to their objectives and performance in relation to the management of the organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people. Actions in response to the evaluations are governed by State Enterprise Performance Monitoring Manual - Under Corporation Sole, Ministry of Finance. Any actions required in response to the evaluation is determined by the Corporation Sole.

For the Board of Directors, aspects of remuneration are outlined in State Enterprise Performance Monitoring Manual, Pages 18 – 21. Remuneration for Executive Management comprises fixed pay with retirement benefits, allowances for housing and travelling, and bonuses. It is in alignment with industry standards. Heritage’s approach to remuneration is aligned to the industry standards. This information is considered competitive and sensitive to the company and will not be published.

For the Board of Directors, aspects of remuneration in relation to their objectives and performance are outlined in State Enterprise Performance Monitoring Manual, Pages 18 – 21. Remuneration for Executive Management comprises fixed pay with retirement benefits, allowances for housing and travelling, and bonuses. It is in alignment with industry standards. Heritage’s approach to remuneration is aligned to the industry standards. This information is considered competitive and sensitive to the company and will not be published.

2-20-a Describe the process for designing its remuneration policies and for determining remuneration, including: i. whether independent highest governance body members or an independent remuneration committee oversees the process for determining remuneration; ii. how the views of stakeholders (including shareholders) regarding remuneration are sought and taken into consideration; iii. whether remuneration consultants are involved in determining remuneration and, if so, whether they are independent of the organisation, its highest governance body and senior executives;

2-20-b Report the results of votes of stakeholders (including shareholders) on remuneration policies and proposals, if applicable

2-21-a Report the ratio of the annual total compensation for the organisation’s highestpaid individual to the median annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual); The process for designing remuneration is done at the executive management and board level and is aligned to the State Enterprise Performance Monitoring Manual which will include the Line Ministry and HR Sub-Committee. Policy Board Fees and Allowances for State Enterprises are determined by the Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago State Enterprise Performance Monitoring Manual – Pages 18-21.

Not applicable as votes of stakeholders (including shareholders) on remuneration policies and proposals are not completed.

It is not standard process that compensation ratios are published as this information is considered sensitive and competitive to the company.

2-21-b

2-21-c Report the ratio of the percentage increase in annual total compensation for the organisation’s highest-paid individual to the median percentage increase in annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual). It is not standard process that compensation ratios are published as this information is considered sensitive and competitive to the company.

Report contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled. It is not standard process that compensation ratios are published as this information is considered sensitive and competitive to the company.

2-22-a Report a statement from the highest governance body or most senior executive of the organisation about the relevance of sustainable development to the organisation and its strategy for contributing to sustainable development. A statement from the Chief Executive Officer is provided in ESG Report on Page 7.

Describe its policy commitments for responsible business conduct, including:

2-23-a i. the authoritative intergovernmental instruments that the commitments reference; ii. whether the commitments stipulate conducting due diligence; iii. whether the commitments stipulate applying the precautionary principle; iv. whether the commitments stipulate respecting human rights;

Describe its specific policy commitment to respect human rights, including: The requirements are outlined in the TPHL Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Policy.

2-23-b i. the internationally recognized human rights that the commitment covers; the categories of stakeholders, including atrisk or vulnerable groups, that the organisation gives particular attention to in the commitment; The requirements are outlined in the TPHL Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Policy.

2-23-c

2-23-d Provide links to the policy commitments if publicly available, or, if the policy commitments are not publicly available, explain the reason for this;

Report the level at which each of the policy commitments was approved within the organisation, including whether this is the most senior level; The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Policy is publicly available on the TPHL Website via this link: https://trinidadpetroleum.co.tt/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/tphlgp05-code-ofethics-policy-final-executed.pdf

The policy commitment was approved by the Chairman of the TPHL Board of Directors.

2-23-e Report the extent to which the policy commitments apply to the organisation’s activities and to its business relationships; The policy commitments are applicable to all employees, directors and related third party companies affiliated with Heritage and the TPHL group.

2-23-f Describe how the policy commitments are communicated to workers, business partners, and other relevant parties.

The Policy requirements were communicated to employees via email through Corporate Communications.

2-24-a Describe how it embeds each of its policy commitments for responsible business conduct throughout its activities and business relationships, including:

i. how it allocates responsibility to implement the commitments across different levels within the organisation;

ii. how it integrates the commitments into organisational strategies, operational policies, and operational procedures;

iii. how it implements its commitments with and through its business relationships;

iv. training that the organisation provides on implementing the commitments. The requirements are outlined in the TPHL Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Policy.

2-25-a Describe the commitments to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts that the organisation identifies it has caused or contributed to;

2-25-b Describe its approach to identify and address grievances, including the grievance mechanisms that the organisation has established or participates in;

2-25-c Describe other processes by which the organisation provides for or cooperates in the remediation of negative impacts that it identifies it has caused or contributed to The process is transparent. It is aligned with the procedures - Performance Management Policy and Progressive Disciplinary Policy and provides feedback along all major milestones.

The process is transparent. It is aligned with the procedures - Performance Management Policy and Progressive Disciplinary Policy and provides feedback along all major milestones.

The process is transparent. It is aligned with the procedures - Performance Management Policy and Progressive Disciplinary Policy and provides feedback along all major milestones.

2-25-d Describe how the stakeholders who are the intended users of the grievance mechanisms are involved in the design, review, operation, and improvement of these mechanisms; The process is transparent. It is aligned with the procedures - Performance Management Policy and Progressive Disciplinary Policy and provides feedback along all major milestones.

2-25-e Describe how the organisation tracks the effectiveness of the grievance mechanisms and other remediation processes, and report examples of their effectiveness, including stakeholder feedback. The process is transparent. It is aligned with the procedures - Performance Management Policy and Progressive Disciplinary Policy and provides feedback along all major milestones.

2-26-a Describe the mechanisms for individuals to:

i. seek advice on implementing the organisation’s policies and practices for responsible business conduct; ii. raise concerns about the organisation’s business conduct. Individuals can seek advice or raise concerns through the following mechanisms: Internal Audit Department. TPHL Whistleblower policy. Directly to the Group Chief Audit Executive. Line Managers and Members of Executive Leadership. Chairman of the Board Audit and Risk Sub-Committee.

2-27-a Report the total number of significant instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations during the reporting period, and a breakdown of this total by: i. instances for which fines were incurred; ii. instances for which non-monetary sanctions were incurred There are no significant instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations during the reporting period.

2-27-b

Report the total number and the monetary value of fines for instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations that were paid during the reporting period, and a breakdown of this total by: i. fines for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in the current reporting period; ii. fines for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in previous reporting periods. 2-27-c Describe the significant instances of noncompliance.

2-27-d Describe how it has determined significant instances of non-compliance.

2-28-a Report industry associations, other membership associations, and national or international advocacy organisations in which it participates in a significant role. Heritage maintains memberships to multiple industry associations; these associations are provided on Page 20 of the ESG Report.

There are no significant instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations during the reporting period.

There are no significant instances of non-compliance for the reporting period.

No significant instances of non-compliance during the reporting period were determined.

2-29-a Describe its approach to engaging with stakeholders, including:

i. the categories of stakeholders it engages with, and how they are identified;

ii. the purpose of the stakeholder engagement;

iii. how the organisation seeks to ensure meaningful engagement with stakeholders. Heritage engages in a wide cross section of stakeholder including employees, government, investment analysts, lenders, partners, contractors, suppliers, special advisors, industry associations, energy chambers, universities and our neighbouring communities. It is through proactive engagement with key stakeholders that we obtain diverse feedback and insights that help us to identify sustainability risks and opportunities and prioritise key ESG disclosures and initiatives.

The ESG Report provides further details of Heritage’s Stakeholder engagement on Pages 20 and 39 to 43.

2-30-a Report the percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements;

2-30-b For employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements, report whether the organisation determines their working conditions and terms of employment based on collective bargaining agreements that cover its other employees or based on collective bargaining agreements from other organisations.

201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed.

201-2 Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to climate change. Heritage’s employees are not covered by collective bargaining agreements. There is no labour agreement between a union representing employees and Heritage as the employer. Employee conditions and benefits are developed by Heritage Management and approved by the Board of Directors and the Corporation Sole.

Not applicable. There are no employees covered by collective bargaining agreements. Working conditions and terms of employment are based on the same process.

We generated revenues from customers of TT$6,827 million (US$1,011 million) and TT$4,740 million (US$702 million) for the years ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, respectively. Our economic value distributed comprised of Cost of sales TT$4,419 million (US$654 million), Tax expenses TT$1,272 million (US$188 million), Net Finance costs TT$242 million (US$36 million), Administrative expenses TT$179 million (US$27 million), and other expenses netting TT$32 million (US$5 million). Our operating profit was TT$2,197 million (US$325 million) and TT$1,258 million (US$186 million) for the years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Operating profit as a percentage of revenues was 32% and 27% for the years ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, respectively. Our profit for the period reached TT$683 million (US$101 million) and TT$1,018 million (US$151 million) for the years ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, respectively. No formal of evaluation of financial implications and other risk and opportunities due to climate change. Climate related risks were all identified in the GHG Emissions Inventory in Heritage for 2019, 2020 and 2021 to Heritage’s Leadership, the GHG Reduction Assessment prepared in 2020 and the Energy Transition Framework in 2021. It is included in the Risk Registers of Land, Midstream Offshore and Facilities and Property Management. These registers were created in the fiscal year of 2021/2022 and would not have existed in the reporting year. The requirement of this section is planned for the next ESG Report (2021/2022).

201-3 Defined benefit plan obligations and other retirement plans

201-4 Financial assistance received from government

Flaring Describe actions taken to: manage flaring and venting and the effectiveness of actions taken. Heritage is currently developing strategies to improve the carbon intensity of its operations. One such strategy is material reduction in our methane emissions through gathering and transport of associated gas that is currently being vented. The company has published an Expression of Interest (EOI) seeking partners to propose innovative approaches to achieving this objective. The EOI was published on 3rd April 2022. EOI for Methane Recovery - Heritage Petroleum Company Ltd. Please note, the information included in the ESG is for what was done in 2020/2021 which was to identify the sources and the main contributors. This fiscal year, the Company is now working on the studies for the venting.

Heritage provides a deferred annuity plans as part of its benefits package to its employees. In the deferred annuity plan, the employees contribute 5% and Heritage contributes 10% of the employee’s base salary. In deferred annuities, the employee contributes to the individual annuity to which he/ she owns, and Heritage contributes to the corporate annuity which Heritage owns on the employees’ behalf. The annuity enrolment is mandatory based on Heritage’s terms and conditions of employment. The employees’ individual annuity gives each employee the choice of three (3) funds into which to invest the contributions into. The funds range from aggressive to balance to conservative portfolios. Government assistance was granted in the form of the SPT waiver. The total waiver amount was TT$1,043,179,179.00 for the period July 1st to June 30th 2021.

Material topic area - climate adaptation, resilience, and transition Describe policies, commitments, and actions of the organization to prevent or mitigate the impacts of the transition to a low-carbon economy on workers and local communities. • Report the level and function within the organization that has been assigned responsibility for managing risks and opportunities due to climate change. • Describe the board’s oversight in managing risks and opportunities due to climate change. • Report whether responsibility to manage climate change-related impacts is linked to performance assessments or incentive mechanisms, including in the remuneration policies for highest governance body members and senior executives. • Describe the climate change-related scenarios used to assess the resilience of the organization’s strategy, including a 2°C or lower scenario.” Climate related risks were all identified in the GHG Emissions Inventory in Heritage for 2019, 2020 and 2021 to Heritage’s Leadership, the GHG Reduction Assessment prepared in 2020 and the Energy Transition Framework in 2021.

Please note, the information included in the ESG is for what was done in 2020/2021 which was to identify the sources and the main contributors. This fiscal year, the Company has appointed a Green Agenda Team to further define what Heritage’s GHG Agenda and climate change actions will be.

202-1 Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage

202-2 Proportion of senior management hired from the local community.

204-1 Proportion of spending on local suppliers For the reporting period of 2020 to 2021, 92.7% of Heritage’s spend was to local suppliers with 7.3% to international suppliers. In the context of Heritage, local is defined as within the boundaries of Trinidad and Tobago.

The minimum wage of $17.50 is governed by the Minimum Wage Act that pertains to workers/positions in certain sectors of the economy. Heritage is part of the Local Energy Industry, which is a specialised market within which salaries, benefits, allowances are influenced by other variables including market conditions resulting in Heritage employees being paid above the minimum wage. However, to maintain Heritage’s competitive advantage, the ratios of standard entry level wage cannot be publicly disclosed. Local Community is defined as all of Trinidad and Tobago. Senior Managers is defined as the Executive Management Team at Heritage. Based on this definition 100% of our Senior Managers are from the local community.

3.3 Management of material topics The reporting organization shall report how it manages anti-corruption using Disclosure 3-3 in GRI 3: Material Topics 2021. Anti-corruption is managed as per the process outlined in the Anti-Bribery, Corruption and Fraud Policy at the TPHL level.

205-1 Operations assessed for risks related to corruption. Heritage’s Enterprise Risk Management Framework assesses the risks related to corruption to the company within the Legal and Supply Chain Management Risk Registers. Requirement for mitigation of bribery, corruption and fraud is outlined in the TPHL AntiBribery, Anti-Corruption and Fraud Policy.

205-2 Communication and training about anticorruption policies and procedures.

205-3 Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken

207-1 Approach to tax

207-2 Tax governance, control, and risk management. 1% of employees received formal training, all Directors have received formal training, soft rollout to all employees and key contractors. The break down and categorisation of formal training provided below. Director: 11 Leadership: 11 employees Managers: 13 employees Analysts/Other: 8 employees

No incidents of corruption.

The company operates within the various tax legislations of Trinidad and Tobago. Tax legislation are periodically reviewed to be in alignment with Finance Act (annually) to ensure tax practices are consistent with the laws as there are regular reviews of various legislations. Furthermore, tax payments are effected in compliance with the various tax legislations, ensuring all liabilities and deadlines are met (payments and returns). The Chief Financial Officer is the executive level position within the organisation responsible for compliance with the respective tax legislation and the implementation of any tax strategies. The approach to tax is embedded through compliance with the various legislations and risks are identified, managed, and monitored through Training and Audit Review. Compliance with the tax governance and control framework is evaluated through engagement of external tax experts (Ernst and Young). The assurance process for disclosures on tax is done through external review via audits.

207-3 Stakeholder engagement and management of concerns related to tax. Heritage engages the Board of Inland Revenue on multiple matters including the payment of taxes under the respective legislation and seeking tax clearances as and when required.

207-4 Country-by-country reporting

302-1 Energy consumption within the organisation.

302-2 Energy consumption outside of the organisation.

302-3 Energy intensity.

302-4 Reduction of energy consumption.

302-5 Reductions in energy requirements of products and services.

303-1 Interactions with water as a shared resource. Like all oil and gas companies we use water in key aspects of our operations. Drawing from local water wells, we use it in waterflooding, steam flooding, fire systems and industrial use and we also supply to local communities for potable use.

Heritage is locally operated and therefore pays taxes within Trinidad & Tobago. Total tax payments made for FY 2021: TT$2,024,541,706.35

Energy is consumed by Heritage in the form of electricity and combustion of diesel and natural gas. Electricity is used primarily to power our administrative buildings and our onshore production facilities. Diesel and natural gas are used to power our offshore facilities. Energy Consumption through-out Heritage was as follows: Electricity 2021 - 62,665.29 MWh 2020 - 42,359.52 MWh Fuel Combustion (Stationery Sources) 2021 - 3,328,440.19 MMBTU 2020 - 3,153,375.47 MMBTU Fuel Combustion (Mobile Sources) 2021 - 204,067.11 MMBTU 2020 - 763,573.32 MMBTU

Energy consumption outside of the organisation is not accounted for.

Energy intensity was not calculated for the reporting period, however, will be considered in future reports.

Reduction of energy consumption has been considered as part of Heritage’s Energy Transition Framework.

Information not available as energy reduction initiatives did not commence within the reporting period.

303-2 Management of water discharge-related impacts.

303-3 Water withdrawal.

303-4 Water discharge.

303-5 Water consumption.

305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions.

305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions. Water discharges from our operations are currently managed via the Water Pollution Rules, 2019 where water pollution permits have been issued to Heritage for three (3) facilities, the Point Fortin Central Tank Farm, Pt. Ligoure Tank Farm and Guayaguayare Tank Farms. Produced water discharges into the environment are managed by the Water Pollution Permits that was issued under the Water Pollution Rules, 2019 by the Environmental Management Authority. Produced water is also treated at Los Bajos Water Treatment Plant. Water is drawn from local water wells for use in waterflooding, steam flooding, fire systems, industrial use and local communities for potable use. Total Volume of Water Abstracted from Wells: 2020 – 2021 - 1,025,373m3 . Heritage has two (2) main sources of water discharges produced and process water discharges. Effluent is managed as per the effluent management process outlined in page 34 of the ESG Report. Water drawn from wells is consumed by Heritage and for domestic supply to the neighbouring communities. In 2020, Heritage consumed 512,484 m3 and the neighbouring communities consumed 679,388m3 for a total water consumption of 1,191,872 m3 . In 2021, Heritage consumed 607,886m3 and the neighbouring communities consumed 848,646m3 for a total water consumption of 1,456,532 m3 .

Direct Scope 1 GHG emissions were as follows: 2021 - 5,002,925.70 tCO2e. 2020 - 5,150,088.20 tCO2e. Indirect Scope 2 GHG emissions were as follows: a. 2021 - 30,842.47 tCO2e. b. 2020 - 26,682.26 tCO2e.

305-3 Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions.

305-4 GHG emissions intensity.

305-5 Reduction of GHG emissions.

305-6 Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS).

305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulphur oxides (SOX), and other significant air emissions.

307-1 Non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations.

308-1 New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria. A total of nineteen (19) Suppliers were screened utilising Heritage’s supplier questionnaire.

Indirect Scope 3 GHG emissions were as follows:

Purchased Goods – 24.92 tCO2e. Wastewater Treatment – 2213.38 tCO2e. Employee Commuting – 1,965.13 tCO2e.

Purchased Goods – 112.52 tCO2e. Wastewater Treatment – 2213.38 tCO2e. Employee Commuting – 1,946.55 tCO2e. Total Heritage GHG Intensity: 2020 – 0.507 tCO2e/bbl 2021 – 0.511 tCO2e/bbl Information provided in the ESG Report pgs (30-31, 33, 35-37) and Energy Transition Framework Emissions of ozone-depleting substances were not calculated during the reported period. Heritage has to evaluate the risk of emissions of ozone-depleting substances from its operations prior to quantifying and disclosing. In addition to Carbon Dioxide, other significant emissions of concern are Methane and Nitrous Oxide.

No existing non-compliance with environmental laws.

308-2 Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken. Instances of negative environmental impacts in the supply chain were not recorded within the reporting period as this was not part of the supply chain process. With the launch of the Ariba Online Registration Tool in July 2020, Heritage has been able to reduce the risk for potential human error as well as reduce cycle time for processing applications. As we continue to interface regularly with the varying features of the online tool, we can now conduct sanction checks on suppliers which upholds the company’s compliance to legislation as well as protect the brand. It also allows the company to select the market’s best for the provision of goods and services via an effective and S.M.A.R.T. (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-bound) evaluation process. Issuance and processing of invitations to bid are done guaranteeing timely project execution, and the conducting of E-Auctions in a timely manner adds to the bottom-line. It has also created the opportunity for improved supplier performance and relationship management. Moving forward, to foster continuous improvement and assuage negative impacts, the SCM Leadership aims to conduct assessment of the online tool, its processes, and procedures to mitigate any potential risks and close gaps. Furthermore, training for SCM Personnel, its suppliers and relevant stakeholders is a key component to our action plan for enhance efficiency and performance.

401-1 New employee hires and employee turnover. In 2020/2021, Heritage hired 35 new permanent and fixed term employees. The employee turnover rate was 4.0%.

401-2

Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees. 401-3 Parental leave.

403-1 Occupational health and safety management system The Occupational, Health and Safety Management System is part of the company’s Operating Management System (OMS) The OMS is an integrated management system which enables us to have a systematic approach to how we manage our business with respect to safety, risk and operational integrity. Page 26 of the ESG Report provides further information on the OMS.

Housing Allowance, Motor Vehicle Allowance and Retirement Benefits are benefits provided to full-time employees.

Parental leave benefits for Heritage employees are in alignment with industry best practice.

403-2 Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation.

403-3 Occupational health services

403-4 Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational health and safety.

403-5 Worker training on occupational health and safety.

403-6 Promotion of worker health. The processes for hazard identification and risk assessment are outlined in Heritage’s Control of Work Procedure and incident investigation is outlined in the Incident Management Procedure. Both Control of Work and Incident Management are elements of the OMS. See pages 26 of the ESG Report. The requirements for Occupation Health are outlined in Sub-element 4.4 – Health and Industrial Hygiene of the OMS. Heritage also has a dedicated team that identifies and addresses the risk associated with occupational health. Processes including the Behavioural Based Safety Programme, HSSE Committees, Near Miss Reporting, Self-Verification checks and Leadership Site Field Assessment. All employees and contractors are given the opportunity for participation, consultation and communication on occupation health and safety issues. Metrics for worker participation in occupational health and safety is provided on Page 28 of the ESG Report. HSSE Training is a continuously ongoing process within Heritage which includes employee and contractor induction as well as training on the systems and process for occupational health and safety at work including: • HSSE Induction. • Permit to Work. • Task Based Risk Assessment. • Enterprise Risk Management. In 2020/2021, Heritage outlined its minimum requirements for training for employees and contractor workers. Implementation of this procedure will be reported in future reports. The requirements for Occupational Health are outlined in Sub-element 4.4 – Health and Industrial Hygiene of the OMS. Heritage also has a dedicated team that identifies and addresses the risk associated with occupational health. During 2020/2021, Heritage focused on outlining the procedures for promotion of worker health. The procedures developed to accomplish this are: 1. Fatigue Management. 2. Fit for Work. 3. Benzene Management. 4. Drug, Alcohol and Substance Abuse.

403-7 Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships.

403-8 Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system.

403-9 Work-related injuries 403-10 Work-related ill health GRI 404 - Training and Education 2016

404-1 Average hours of training per year per employee

Gender: Male - 36.3/Female - 25.1

Support - 37.5 Technical/Administrative - 28.3 Managerial - 47.7 Lead - 16.9 Team Lead - 29.4 Supervisory - 53.2 Professional - 25.4 Senior Professional - 34.1 Senior Technical - 9.4 Executive Leadership - 6

Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships are managed through the Risk Management Framework. Risks linked to business relationships are documented in the Operational Business Unit’s and HSSE Risk Registers. Employees and contarctors are covered by Trinidad & Tobago’s Occupational Safety and Health Act, 2004. Additionally, Heritage has an operating Management System, see page 26 in ESG Report. HSSE Performance Metrics – See page 28 in ESG Report. HSSE Performance Metrics – See page 28 in ESG Report.

404-2 Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs

404-3 Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews

413-1 Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs

413-2 Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities As a new organisation the primary focus has been on start-up initiatives and the implementation of SAP (all modules), although there has been some training intervention. Currently training information is not in SuccessFactors (Excel sheets are maintained). The Learning module in SuccessFactors will be utilized in the upcoming fiscal year. The Employee Assistance Program (EAP) continues to be utilised by employees and their dependents. Transition plan for retirees is not required at this time. Programmes will be aligned to needs assessment and organisational initiatives. FY 2020/2021 - training executed were aligned to activities identified from personal development plans: Negotiation Skills, Project Management, Supervisory Management, IFRS fundamentals, ISO 45001: 2018 Lead Auditor, ISO 14001: 2015 Lead Auditor, Root Cause Analysis, measurement of hazardous substances, Security Management and Administration, Advanced Oil & Gas Project Economics, Evaluation and Financial Modeling, Creative Problem-Solving and Analytical Thinking, Communication Strategies, Microsoft Excel, Mastering Contracts, Auditing the Human Resources Function, Cyber Security & Data Privacy, Quality Assurance Improvement Program (QAIP), Masterclass on Machine Lubrication and Reliability, Sand Control Techniques, Masterclass on Advanced Spare Parts and Inventory Management - Risk & Reliability aligned spare parts model, CAT 1 Vibration Analysis Training and Certification Examination course, Mediation Skills and Certified Mediator Practical Skills Workshops, Certified Reliability Engineer (CRE), Technical Report Writing, Professional Certificate in Operations Management, Understanding ISO/ IEC 17025:2017: General Requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, ISO 19011: 2018 Internal Auditing for Laboratories and Understanding Risks and Opportunities for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. FY 2019/2020 - 97% of employees with completed year-end reviews. FY 2020/2021 - 98% of employees with completed year-end reviews.

The company has developed and engaged a database of community groups and leaders. There is information sharing and engagement on needs and recommendations for engagement. Currently, there is a Community Engagement survey in development. For more information on engagement exercises see page 40-41 of the ESG Report.

The company engages in the following which can potentially have negative impacts on local communities:

• drilling and workovers. • transportation of crude oil via pipeline. • maintenance activities.