193
water is even colder than it. Its air is so pleasant. Hence this should not be its motion. On the contrary, it should be of that mountain of fire which is called the sun. And it had to be the fire due to it’s that much motion. And this argument (proof), so clear, is deterrent to make this motion of the sun on which depends the rising and setting of the planets related to the earth, Because if it were to be related to the earth, it means it would revolve a thousand miles or so, per hour. And such a fast and forceful tuning, can it be connived at? If you would say this transformation is fit to the moon although its orbit is so small but even then the length of it somewhat less than the twelfth part of it comes to nearly two and a quarter thousand miles per hour. Then as to why this clear and so forceful motion didn’t make it hot? My statement: This, too, is the creation of the modern astronomy in which the heavenly existence is not accepted. If at all, there is movement in the vacuum of the atmosphere. It was necessary that the moon should have been hot like fire and the light of moon should have been like a severe sunshine. But in our view whatever is in the heavens (skies) is floating in its own orbit. It may be possible that the part which the moon might be floating is cold and the creater, the most powerful and the wise, might have made it so cold that its heat is being equllised by it. And it does not allow the moon to be hot and as is in the narration (the hadith) about the sun that it is being made cold with ice every day. Otherwise on whatever it might have passed over, would have been burned to ashes (it is adapted from Al Tabrani’s Rawah Al Tabrani Un Abi Imam (R.T.U), unto the prophet (S.W.A.S) Argument No. 84 My Statement: The daily motion of the earth that is its turning on its axis is the cause to make everything on it to seek for light and the heat or the repulsion against the attraction of the sun.