wHERE SuCCESSFul CAREERS ARE buIlT

The ideal plaCe TO learn

For students with a passion for business, communications, design, information technology, science, engineering, nursing or architecture, INSEARCH provides practical, career-focused university pathway diploma courses.

The majority of INSEARCH diploma courses provide 48 credit points of advanced standing, which is equivalent to one year of study at the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS).

Attend the INSEARCH Information Evening and speak one-on-one with academic staff about our diploma and English courses.

INSEARCH INFORMATION EVENING

TUESdAy 22 SEpTEmbER 2009

CAmpUS ToUR - 5pm

INFoRmATIoN EvENINg STARTS - 6pm

INSEARCH

CpSU House Level 3, 191 Thomas Street Haymarket

Courses commence 6 October 2009 www.insearCh.edu.au

In winning his maiden professional world billiards title Sunday night, the 24year old Pune-born, Bangalore-based Advani became the only Indian to have won a world billiards and snooker crown.

Advani, winner of the IBSF World Snooker Championship (amateur) in 2003, had previously won the IBSF World Billiards title (amateur) in both the time and points format, besides achieving a similar “double” in the Asian Championship.

In 1997, as an 11-year old, Advani first showcased his talent when he defeated his elder brother Shree in the final of the B.S. Sampath Memorial tournament in Bangalore.

The Karnataka State Billiards Association swiftly enrolled him in their junior development program where coach S. Jairaj worked on the basics.

Subsequently, Arvind Savur, arguably one of the finest billiards and snooker player India has produced, took over and nurtured Advani. The two developed a near father-son bonding. Spending many hours and often sleeping overnight at Savur’s Bangalore residence, Advani showed rapid improvement and went on to win titles at the National and international levels.

Savur, currently holidaying in Switzerland, was understandably ecstatic when IANS sought his reactions to Advani’s latest triumph. Savur admitted that he was a bit surprised at the result.

“Honestly, I have no words to describe my happiness at Pankaj winning the pro title. I was a bit surprised at the result, because Mike Russell is undoubtedly one of the greats of modern era. Though I knew that at some point, Pankaj would beat Russell, it still was a surprise, a pleasant one at that, to me,” said Savur.

“I had often told Pankaj that Russell is the player to watch. After all, Pankaj had been beating Geet Sethi consistently and that left just Russell as his main opponent. Pankaj has all the attributes of a champion, though even I am at a loss to explain the sudden dips in his performance levels.

“The major problem has been lack of tournaments worldwide and I am sure that the more of competitive play, the better Pankaj will become. Hopefully, we will get to see a 1000 break from Pankaj sooner than later,” Savur added.

In terms of sheer achievements, Pankaj has exceeded all his peers including India’s first ever world champion Wilson Jones (1958, 1964), Michael Ferreira (1977, 1981, 1983), Sethi (1981, 1987, 2001), Manoj Kothari (1990) and Ashok Shandilya (2002).

Of the lot, only Sethi won the world professional title five times (1992, 1993, 1995, 1998 and 2006) after turning professional in the late 1980s.

The purists would no doubt point out that Pankaj, for all the titles he has won, is still to crack the 1,000-break barrier that is often considered a benchmark for a player. Both Ferreira and Sethi, have crossed the milestone that demands not just consistency, but also intense powers of concentration and ball control.

On the plus side, Pankaj is highly rated for his special ability to extricate himself from difficult situations like he was in against compatriot Dhruv Sitwala in the Leeds semi-finals when he trailed initially by a big margin.

“This is a something very special about Pankaj. So many times in the past, he has bounced back from hopeless positions and this I feel is the hallmark of a true champion. I would certainly rate Pankaj alongside Jones, Ferreira and Geet,” opined Savur.

Well-mannered and impeccably attired, Pankaj idolizes Sethi.

“I would like to be like Geet Sethi on and off the table,” Advani said.

The Advani family moved to Bangalore from Kuwait in 1990 after a three-year stay and it was not long before the brothers took to cuesport during the period when the city witnessed a boom in pool parlours.

For what he is, Pankaj attributes all credit to his mother, Kajal, who brought up her sons after her husband, Arjun, passed away in 1992.

“My mother is everything to me and I am what I am today only because of her,” he had said in 2003 soon after winning the World snooker crown in China.

Pakistan’s unwillingness to act is atrocious: Chidambaram

HOME MINISTER P. Chidambaram has said that Pakistan’s unwillingness to prosecute the mastermind of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack Hafiz Saeed is “atrocious”.

“(While) covering up is a very strong word, there is for some strange reason (an) unwillingness to take investigation forward (by Pakistan),” Chidambaram told private news channel NDTV.

“In the face of this evidence, to let him off, i think, is atrocious...”

The attack on Mumbai Nov 26, 2008, by ten terrorists left 170 people dead. India holds Lashkar-e-Toiba chief Hafiz Saeed responsible for orchestrating the carnage.

The home minister’s statement comes after Pakistan last week trashed the sixth and latest dossier India gave as being a “rehash” of earlier information on Hafiz Saeed and which Pakistan deemed as inadequate to start a prosecution.

The home minister said that India had shared this dossier with 16 other countries, whose nationals had died in the Mumbai attacks that lasted over 60 hours.

Chidambaram, who leaves for the US Monday on a four-day visit, said he will take up the matter with the Obama administration.

“Yes, so they (the US) know what we have. If there is an opportunity, I will take them through the dossier to point out that there is enough evidence to continue the case against Hafiz Saeed,” he said.

Revealing details of what India had given in the dossiers, Chidambaram said: “We know when (lone surviving terrorist Ajmal Amir) Kasab first met Hafiz Saeed and where. We know what Hafiz Saeed told the trainees. We know at least a couple of places where the training took place and that Hafez visited those training camps”.

Further, India has said Hafiz Saeed had also given the terrorists aliases as well as tested their skills.

“We know that he (Saeed) was accompanied by a person described as major general sahib. Hafiz Saeed told this person to set up 10 targets. Kasab fired at target number 4,” said Chidambaram.

He added that Saeed had also made the “farewell call” and issued the “final instructions” to the 10 terrorists in the Mumbai attacks.

“So, all this is known. Places, approximate dates, names, visits by Hafiz Saeed. On face of this evidence, how does a prosecutor say that ‘I have no leads to investigation’?” Chidambaram asked.

On the identity of the ‘major general saheb’, Chidambaram said that it is not clear whether he was a serving or retired army officer.

To the question whether it was just a nickname, he said: “Very unlikely. A major general should be a major general somewhere.”

When asked if Hafiz Saeed’s link to a person with connections to army refuted Pakistan’s claims that the Mumbai attack was by non-state actors, Chidambaram said that could only be revealed by further investigation.

“We have never ruled out state actors even though Pakistan has said that only non-state actors were involved. We have not accepted this distinction between state and non-state because both operated from Pakistani soil,” he said.

The Pakistani refusal, he added, was inexplicable in the light of its assurances to “common friendly countries” and to the Indian Prime Minister that it will “spare no effort to prosecute the perpetrators of

Continued on page 56