Canterbury future development research questionnaire analysis report public (ipsos mori 2012 05)

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 1

Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live? Base : All Respondents

Gender Wtd Total (z)

Male (a)

Age

Female (b)

16-24 (c)

Area

25-34 (d)

35-54 (e)

55-64 (f)

Over 65 (g)

Canterbury City (h)

Whitstable (i)

Working status

Herne Bay (j)

Rural areas (k)

Employed (l)

Unemployed (m)

Retired (n)

Ethnicity

Student (uni/ college) (o)

White (p)

Disability

BME (q)

Yes (r)

Unwtd Total

No (s)

Unweighted Total

902

450

452

139

94

291

137

241

234

228

224

216

402

118

294

79

871

28

134

768

902

Weighted Total

902

429

473

192

125*

256

115

215

294

203

221

184

386

132

263

107*

869

29**

117

785

902

Effective Base

806

407

401

128

84

273

131

235

216

210

200

202

354

104

286

74

778

26

123

686

902

Very satisfied

481

238 56%

242 51%

90 47%

61 49%

142 56%

62 54%

125

124 42%

101 50%

130

126

212

73

153

41 39%

465 53%

13 45%

62 53%

419 53%

492 55%

Fairly satisfied

348

165 38%

183 39%

83 43%

54 43%

94 37%

46 40%

71 33%

54

332 38%

15 50%

40 34%

308 39%

341 38%

53%ho 39%gkn

58%c

140

48%zjk

78

39%k

69%zhij

55%o

55%o

58%zo

80 36%

50 27%

154 40%

41 31%

87 33%

7 3%

2 1%

10 3%

7 5%

7 3%

4 3%

29 3%

-

5 4%

24 3%

25 3%

51%zmn

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

29 3%

11 3%

18 4%

6 3%

6 5%

8 3%

5 4%

3 2%

12 4%

Fairly dissatisfied

31

12 3%

19 4%

10 5%

3 2%

7 3%

2 2%

9 4%

14

5%j

2 1%

4 2%

8 2%

7 5%

9 4%

8

7%l

30 3%

2 5%

6 5%

25 3%

30 3%

Very dissatisfied

13

1%as

3 1%

10 2%

2 1%

-

4 2%

-

7

3%zf

4 1%

6 3%

2 1%

2 1%

2 1%

4 3%

7

3%l

-

13 1%

-

5

4%zs

8 1%

14 2%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

829

403

425 90%

173 90%

116 93%

236 92%

108 94%

196 91%

264 90%

179 88%

210

175

366

114 87%

240 91%

96 90%

797 92%

28 95%

102 87%

29 6%

12 6%

3 2%

11 4%

2 2%

16

18

16

11

16

6%l

8 7%

43 5%

2 5%

11

396 84%

161 84%

113 90%

225 88%

180 84%

246 83%

163 80%

104 79%

224 85%

88 82%

754 87%

26 90%

No opinion/ Don't know SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NET SATISFIED

3%jl

92%imr

44

5%afjls

784

87%bimr

94%zb

15 3% 388

91%zb

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s * small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

106

93%zcg

7%zf

5%j

6%j

8 4%

59%h

11

8%zjk

95%zhi

4 2% 206

93%zhi

96%zhi

6 3% 170

92%zhi

95%zm

10 3% 356

92%zmno

8%l

9%zs

91 78%

727

93%r

34 4% 693

88%zr

833 92% 44 5% 789 87%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 2

Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live? Base : All Respondents

Length of residence Wtd Total (z)

Up to one year (a)

1 year up to 5 years (b)

5 years up to 10 years (c)

More than 10 years (d)

Within district of Canterbury (e)

Place of work Elsewhere in Kent (f)

London (g)

Social grade Elsewhere (h)

Home ownership

ABC1 (i)

C2DE (j)

Owner occupier (k)

Type of home

Social renter (l)

Private renter (m)

House (n)

100

Flat (o)

Children in home

Bungalow (p)

Maisonette (q)

Yes (r)

Unwtd Total

No (s)

Unweighted Total

902

40

144

113

605

278

75

18

19

567

335

642

149

737

70

93

1

263

639

902

Weighted Total

902

42*

153

116*

591

271

71*

15*

17*

574

328

658

99*

135

741

76*

83*

1*

273

629

902

Effective Base

806

37

129

99

543

244

68

17

16

513

293

578

87

133

656

62

88

1

231

577

902

Very satisfied

481 53%

29 69%

84 55%

65 56%

303 51%

141 52%

47 66%

9 59%

11 61%

319 55%

162 49%

379 58%

36 37%

59 43%

399 54%

32 41%

50 61%

-

135 50%

346 55%

492 55%

Fairly satisfied

348 39%

12 28%

62 41%

41 35%

232 39%

112 41%

23 32%

6 41%

6 34%

224 39%

124 38%

229 35%

47 47%

70 52%

284 38%

38 50%

25 30%

1 100%

115 42%

233 37%

341 38%

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

29 3%

-

2 2%

2 2%

25 4%

10 4%

-

-

-

14 2%

16 5%

22 3%

7 7%

1 *

22 3%

4 6%

2 2%

-

9 3%

20 3%

25 3%

Fairly dissatisfied

31 3%

1 3%

4 3%

7 6%

19 3%

6 2%

2 2%

-

-

13 2%

19 6%

21 3%

6 6%

5 3%

26 3%

2 2%

4 5%

-

10 4%

22 3%

30 3%

Very dissatisfied

13 1%

-

-

1 1%

12 2%

1 1%

-

-

1 5%

5 1%

8 2%

8 1%

4 4%

1 1%

10 1%

1 1%

2 2%

-

4 1%

9 1%

14 2%

No opinion/ Don't know SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NET SATISFIED

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

829 92%

41 97%

147 96%

106 92%

535 91%

254 93%

70 98%

15 100%

17 95%

543 95%

286 87%

608 92%

83 84%

129 95%

683 92%

69 91%

76 91%

1 100%

250 92%

579 92%

833 92%

44 5%

1 3%

4 3%

8 7%

31 5%

8 3%

2 2%

-

1 5%

18 3%

27 8%

29 4%

9 9%

6 5%

36 5%

3 4%

6 7%

-

14 5%

31 5%

44 5%

784 87%

39 94%

142 93%

98 85%

504 85%

246 91%

68 96%

15 100%

16 90%

525 91%

259 79%

579 88%

74 74%

122 91%

647 87%

67 87%

70 84%

1 100%

236 87%

548 87%

789 87%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S * small base

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 3

Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live? Base : All Respondents

Satisfaction with local area Wtd Total (z)

Satisfied (a)

Dissatisfied (b)

See housing as a Planning for homes as Growth of economy as Support for building in priority priority priority area Support for building in district Yes (c)

No (d)

Yes (e)

No (f)

Yes (g)

No (h)

Support (i)

Oppose (j)

Support (k)

Oppose (l)

Neither/ nor (m)

Development concerns Development plusses Change of opinion Yes (n)

No (o)

Yes (p)

Switch to oppose (r)

No (q)

Switch to support (s)

Unwtd Total

Unweighted Total

902

833

44

130

772

265

637

394

508

421

313

524

202

169

729

173

768

134

373

116

902

Weighted Total

902

829

44*

128

774

247

655

394

508

418

319

526

195

174

730

172

771

131

377

111

902

Effective Base

806

749

37

117

689

241

567

352

454

378

279

466

182

151

650

156

683

123

330

104

902

Very satisfied

481

481

-

58 45%

423 55%

130 53%

351 54%

211 53%

270 53%

232 55%

168 53%

300

103 53%

75 43%

374 51%

107

62%zn

417 54%

64 49%

206 55%

60 54%

492 55%

Fairly satisfied

93

298

53%bmn

58%zb

57%zm

348

348

-

49 39%

298 39%

97 39%

251 38%

159 40%

188 37%

155 37%

118 37%

184 35%

69 35%

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

29

-

-

10

19 2%

8 3%

21 3%

11 3%

18 4%

14 3%

12 4%

17 3%

8 4%

Fairly dissatisfied

31

-

31

9

7%zd

23 3%

9 3%

23 4%

10 3%

21 4%

10 2%

16 5%

17 3%

Very dissatisfied

13

-

13

2 1%

11 1%

4 2%

9 1%

3 1%

10 2%

7 2%

6 2%

8 2%

No opinion/ Don't know SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NET SATISFIED

39%bko 3%ad 3%adm 1%a

42%zb

71%za 29%za

8%zd

-

-

-

-

829

829

-

107 84%

44

-

44

11 8%

784

829

-44 -100%

96 75%

92%bcl 5%ag

87%bchjl s

100%zb

100%zb

100%za

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

721

93%zc

34 4% 688

89%zc

50 29%

293 38%

54 42%

143 38%

36 33%

341 38%

2 1%

22 3%

7 4%

22 3%

7 6%

11 3%

3 2%

25 3%

7%zkm

1 1%

26 4%

6 3%

28 4%

3 3%

11 3%

2 1%

3 2%

11 2%

2 1%

11 1%

2 1%

6 2%

13

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

226 92%

602 92%

370 94%

459 90%

387 93%

286 89%

484 92%

172 88%

12 5%

32 5%

13 3%

31 6%

17 4%

22 7%

25 5%

15

214 87%

570 87%

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s * small base

357

91%zh

427 84%

370

88%j

264 83%

459

87%l

8%zm

157 80%

53%zkl

168

97%zl

4 2% 163

94%zkl

41%zo

10

9%zr

30 3%

2 2%

14 2%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

672 92%

157 91%

710 92%

118 90%

349 93%

96 87%

833 92%

37 5%

8 4%

39 5%

5 4%

17 5%

635 87%

149 87%

671 87%

113 87%

332

88%s

12

11%zr

84 76%

44 5% 789 87%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 4

Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live? Base : All Respondents

Enough employment opportunities

Enough homes Wtd Total (z)

Agree (a)

Disagree (b)

Agree (c)

Disagree (d)

Future development More homes (e)

The same (f)

Option selection

Less homes (g)

A (h)

B (i)

Key factors for option choice

C (j)

D (k)

Greenfield (l)

Job growth (m)

Population growth (n)

Housing (o)

Unwtd Total

Unweighted Total

902

275

396

105

629

244

335

233

145

289

287

75

263

298

154

160

902

Weighted Total

902

282

385

112*

623

232

348

242

145

293

284

77*

268

303

150

156

902

Effective Base

806

243

357

93

559

223

300

202

130

257

258

67

233

264

136

149

902

Very satisfied

481 53%

162 58%

186 48%

75 67%

308 49%

121 52%

195 56%

120 50%

75 52%

160 55%

150 53%

45 59%

145 54%

158 52%

91 60%

73 47%

492 55%

Fairly satisfied

348 39%

94 33%

170 44%

30 27%

256 41%

91 39%

132 38%

99 41%

63 43%

103 35%

113 40%

27 35%

102 38%

120 39%

48 32%

69 44%

341 38%

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

29 3%

9 3%

15 4%

1 1%

24 4%

6 3%

12 3%

9 4%

2 1%

14 5%

7 2%

2 2%

10 4%

9 3%

2 1%

8 5%

25 3%

Fairly dissatisfied

31 3%

13 4%

9 2%

5 4%

26 4%

8 4%

6 2%

13 5%

4 3%

10 3%

10 4%

2 2%

8 3%

11 4%

7 4%

4 3%

30 3%

Very dissatisfied

13 1%

4 1%

4 1%

2 2%

10 2%

5 2%

4 1%

1 1%

2 1%

5 2%

3 1%

1 1%

3 1%

5 2%

3 2%

2 1%

14 2%

No opinion/ Don't know SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NET SATISFIED

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

829 92%

256 91%

357 93%

105 93%

564 90%

212 92%

326 94%

220 91%

138 95%

263 90%

264 93%

72 94%

247 92%

278 92%

139 92%

142 91%

833 92%

44 5%

16 6%

13 3%

7 6%

36 6%

13 6%

10 3%

14 6%

6 4%

15 5%

13 5%

3 3%

11 4%

16 5%

9 6%

6 4%

44 5%

784 87%

240 85%

343 89%

99 88%

527 85%

199 86%

316 91%

206 85%

132 91%

249 85%

250 88%

70 91%

237 88%

261 86%

129 86%

136 88%

789 87%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O * small base

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 5

Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live? Base : All Respondents

Mosaic

Wtd Total (z)

A (a)

B (b)

C (c)

D (d)

E (e)

F (f)

G (g)

High HMO density

H (h)

I (i)

J (j)

K (k)

L (l)

M (m)

Yes (n)

Prospering older Students, Low income, families or Middle aged young singles younger professionals and older and couples families , owner people, some living in living in occupiers in with older rented modest rented larger families, accommodation accommodation accommodation owner in town in urban in urban occupiers in centres areas areas rural areas (p) (q) (r) (s)

No (o)

People approaching Older singles retirement or pensioners and on limited pensioners, incomes, owner living in occupiers of modest rented mid-range accommodation accommodation In urban in urban areas areas (t) (u)

Unwtd Total

Unweighted Total

902

88

24

241

25

99

74

141

16

81

76

6

4

24

811

97

86

165

113

98

340

902

Weighted Total

902

97*

24**

218

27**

95*

70*

146

18**

104*

70*

5**

4**

20**

115*

787

122*

79*

171

124*

89*

314

902

Effective Base

806

75

23

223

21

90

67

127

14

77

66

6

4

22

84

727

91

76

150

96

89

312

902

Very satisfied

481

61

62%ij

13 55%

136

62%zgij

13 50%

51 53%

39 56%

73 50%

7 40%

44 42%

28 41%

3 58%

-

10 49%

42 36%

439

51 42%

32 40%

86 50%

74

60%pq

48 54%

187

492 55%

Fairly satisfied

65

51

75

53%ijnpq

91

Canterbury District Personas

56%zn

60%zpq

348

32 33%

10 42%

69 32%

12 43%

38 40%

25 36%

44%c

4 24%

30 43%

2 42%

2 46%

8 41%

55

292 37%

55 45%

34 43%

44 35%

33 37%

107 34%

341 38%

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

29

1 1%

1 4%

6 3%

1 3%

2 2%

1 2%

5 3%

4 21%

5 5%

2 3%

-

1 27%

-

9

8%zo

20 3%

9

3 4%

6 3%

2 2%

1 2%

8 3%

25 3%

Fairly dissatisfied

31 3%

3 3%

-

5 2%

1 3%

3 3%

3 4%

4 3%

3 15%

2 2%

5

-

1 27%

1 7%

7 6%

25 3%

5 4%

6

4 2%

4 3%

4 4%

8 3%

30 3%

Very dissatisfied

13 1%

-

-

2 1%

-

2 2%

2 2%

1 *

-

2 2%

4

-

-

1 4%

2 2%

11 1%

2 2%

4

1 *

-

2 3%

4 1%

14 2%

No opinion/ Don't know SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NET SATISFIED

39%cou 3%o

-

-

829

93

92%jnq

44 5% 784

87%jnq

-

96%j

23 96%

3 3%

-

90

92%j

23 96%

-

-

-

-

94%j

25 93%

89 93%

64 92%

7 3%

1 3%

5 5%

4 6%

205

198

91%zj

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

24 90%

84

88%j

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q/r/s/t/u * small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

60

86%j

-

48%c

8%c 6%zacg

48%o

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

94%j

11 64%

95 91%

58 83%

5 100%

2 46%

18 90%

97 84%

4 3%

3 15%

5 5%

9

-

1 27%

2 10%

9 8%

49 70%

5 100%

1 20%

16 79%

88 77%

137

133

91%j

9 49%

90

86%j

13%zacg

731

93%zn

36 5% 696

88%zn

7%zu

8%zru 5%zrsu

-

-

106 87%

65 83%

7 6% 99 81%

10

13%zrsu

55 69%

44%u

-

-

161

118

94%q

4 3% 156

92%pq

95%pq

4 3% 114

92%pq

82 91% 6 7% 75

84%q

294

94%pq

12 4% 282

90%zpq

833 92% 44 5% 789 87%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 6

Q.5. Thinking generally, which of the items on this list would you say are most important in making somewhere a good place to live? Base : All Respondents

Gender Wtd Total (z)

Male (a)

Age

Female (b)

16-24 (c)

Area

25-34 (d)

35-54 (e)

55-64 (f)

Over 65 (g)

Canterbury City (h)

Whitstable (i)

Working status

Herne Bay (j)

Rural areas (k)

Employed (l)

Unemployed (m)

Retired (n)

Ethnicity

Student (uni/ college) (o)

White (p)

Disability

BME (q)

Yes (r)

Unwtd Total

No (s)

Unweighted Total

902

450

452

139

94

291

137

241

234

228

224

216

402

118

294

79

871

28

134

768

902

Weighted Total

902

429

473

192

125*

256

115

215

294

203

221

184

386

132

263

107*

869

29**

117

785

902

Effective Base

806

407

401

128

84

273

131

235

216

210

200

202

354

104

286

74

778

26

123

686

902

Arts and cultural activities

125

64 15%

61 13%

23 12%

10 8%

39 15%

18 15%

36

58

20%zij

15 7%

24 11%

28

15%i

55 14%

10 7%

42

16%m

14 13%

124 14%

1 5%

11 10%

114 15%

122 14%

Amount and quality of housing

162 18%

74 17%

89 19%

39 20%

22 18%

45 18%

23 20%

33 15%

60 20%

31 15%

38 17%

33 18%

67 17%

23 17%

46 17%

25 23%

158 18%

5 16%

23 19%

140 18%

166 18%

Better town centres

206

102 24%

104 22%

56

32 25%

55 21%

20 17%

44 20%

74

75

24 11%

33

94 24%

26 20%

49 19%

34

32%n

196 23%

7 25%

20 17%

186 24%

202 22%

Care for the elderly

142

71

71 15%

9 7%

24 10%

25

70

4 4%

Education services and opportunities to learn

262

117 27%

145 31%

62

44

94

32

28%g

31 14%

Facilities for children and young people

217

84 20%

133

42 22%

35

92

18 15%

31 14%

Health services

394

194 45%

201 42%

67 35%

45 36%

86 34%

67

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

289

134 31%

156 33%

78

43

105

25 22%

38 18%

Leisure facilities

166

91

74 16%

48

25%zf

22 17%

48

19%f

12 11%

37 17%

59 20%

Play areas, parks and open spaces

210

92 21%

118 25%

39

58

67

23

20%g

23 11%

Public safety/low crime levels

464

217 51%

247 52%

107 56%

69 55%

56 49%

97 45%

Public transport and roads

353

157 37%

196 41%

84

44%de

38 30%

The countryside and the natural environment

356

176 41%

180 38%

54 28%

38 30%

Other (specify)

4 *

3 1%

1 *

1 1%

-

-

1 1%

Don't know

1 *

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

No answer

2 *

1 *

1 *

-

-

2 1%

14%im

23%jn

16%cdehlos 17% 29%ginr 24%afghn 44%celms 32%fgkn 18%bf 23%gno 51%gn 39%el 40%cio

21%zb

28%za

29%f

14 7% 32%g

40%zfg

20%g

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

35%g 28%fg

34%g

47%zcefg

37%zg 36%zcfg

41%zfg

26%g

134 52% 69 27% 111

43%cd

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s * small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

22%zcde

58%zcde

17%d

32%zcdef

129

60%zcde

25%j

26 9%

37%zhjk

18%j

43

35

39

14 11%

82

140 16%

2 7%

33

110 14%

158 18%

45 22%

65 29%

48 26%

123

47

48 18%

37

35%n

249 29%

12 40%

22 19%

240

253 28%

59

63

45

116

37

38 14%

20 19%

210 24%

6 21%

21 18%

195 25%

223 25%

113 39%

95 47%

91 41%

95

154 40%

40 30%

36 33%

376 43%

18 63%

67

57%zs

328 42%

399 44%

114

68

69

31%k

39 21%

150

46

35%n

44 17%

44

275 32%

13 45%

29 25%

260 33%

279 31%

45

22%k

35 16%

27 15%

25 19%

41 16%

31

29%zln

161 19%

3 9%

18 15%

148 19%

160 18%

77 26%

43 21%

52 24%

37 20%

101

59

32 12%

13 12%

203 23%

6 21%

23 19%

187 24%

199 22%

160 54%

105 52%

113 51%

86 47%

197 51%

74 56%

123 47%

66

61%n

447 52%

13 43%

55 47%

409 52%

456 51%

104

35%zik

50 17%

39%zk

21%zh

29%h

33%k

16%h

29%h

21%zh

25%h 52%zhj

41 11% 32%n 30%zn

39%zn

66 17% 26%no

36%n 28%n

44%zlno

31%zlmo

161

61%zlmo

41%n

28%zs

31%zr

56

107

112 38%

77 38%

103

62 34%

126 33%

42 32%

132

47 44%

341 39%

9 30%

54 46%

299 38%

351 39%

59

95

44%cd

106 36%

65 32%

108

77

158

50 38%

118

45%zo

29 27%

346 40%

10 36%

48 41%

309 39%

365 40%

2 1%

1 *

-

2 1%

1 *

1 *

1 1%

2 1%

-

4 *

-

1 1%

3 *

4 *

-

-

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

-

-

1 *

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

-

1 1%

1 *

1 1%

-

-

2 *

-

1 1%

1 *

2 *

49%zde

52%zcd

50%zde

46%zk

49%zhi

42%i

41%o

50%zlm

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 7

Q.5. Thinking generally, which of the items on this list would you say are most important in making somewhere a good place to live? Base : All Respondents

Length of residence Wtd Total (z)

Up to one year (a)

1 year up to 5 years (b)

5 years up to 10 years (c)

More than 10 years (d)

Within district of Canterbury (e)

Place of work Elsewhere in Kent (f)

London (g)

Social grade Elsewhere (h)

Home ownership

ABC1 (i)

C2DE (j)

Owner occupier (k)

Type of home

Social renter (l)

Private renter (m)

House (n)

100

Flat (o)

Children in home

Bungalow (p)

Maisonette (q)

Yes (r)

Unwtd Total

No (s)

Unweighted Total

902

40

144

113

605

278

75

18

19

567

335

642

149

737

70

93

1

263

639

902

Weighted Total

902

42*

153

116*

591

271

71*

15*

17*

574

328

658

99*

135

741

76*

83*

1*

273

629

902

Effective Base

806

37

129

99

543

244

68

17

16

513

293

578

87

133

656

62

88

1

231

577

902

Arts and cultural activities

125 14%

11 27%

19 13%

15 13%

79 13%

38 14%

10 14%

2 11%

4 23%

100 17%

25 8%

102 15%

5 5%

19 14%

104 14%

13 17%

8 10%

-

25 9%

100 16%

122 14%

Amount and quality of housing

162 18%

10 23%

36 24%

23 20%

94 16%

45 17%

16 23%

2 11%

3 15%

108 19%

54 17%

98 15%

27 27%

36 27%

136 18%

15 20%

12 14%

-

47 17%

115 18%

166 18%

Better town centres

206 23%

10 25%

39 25%

30 26%

127 22%

63 23%

19 26%

2 10%

8 45%

117 20%

89 27%

140 21%

23 23%

41 30%

173 23%

16 22%

15 19%

1 100%

67 25%

139 22%

202 22%

Care for the elderly

142 16%

2 5%

17 11%

12 10%

111 19%

28 10%

10 14%

1 5%

1 5%

77 13%

66 20%

116 18%

18 18%

8 6%

106 14%

7 9%

28 34%

-

20 7%

123 20%

158 18%

Education services and opportunities to learn

262 29%

11 25%

52 34%

33 29%

166 28%

83 31%

25 35%

7 49%

3 16%

179 31%

83 25%

181 28%

26 27%

54 40%

216 29%

31 41%

15 18%

-

109 40%

153 24%

253 28%

Facilities for children and young people

217 24%

8 18%

32 21%

34 30%

142 24%

87 32%

20 28%

4 28%

3 18%

133 23%

84 26%

155 24%

29 29%

31 23%

187 25%

15 20%

14 16%

-

116 42%

101 16%

223 25%

Health services

394 44%

14 33%

63 41%

49 43%

268 45%

111 41%

23 32%

8 53%

7 42%

246 43%

148 45%

321 49%

33 33%

38 28%

316 43%

30 40%

49 59%

-

82 30%

313 50%

399 44%

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

289 32%

15 35%

56 36%

39 34%

179 30%

109 40%

28 39%

3 21%

6 36%

182 32%

107 33%

193 29%

38 39%

56 42%

235 32%

31 41%

23 28%

-

96 35%

194 31%

279 31%

Leisure facilities

166 18%

8 20%

30 20%

13 11%

115 19%

39 14%

16 22%

6 40%

2 13%

102 18%

63 19%

112 17%

26 26%

26 19%

134 18%

17 23%

14 17%

-

54 20%

112 18%

160 18%

Play areas, parks and open spaces

210 23%

9 22%

36 23%

29 25%

136 23%

72 27%

18 25%

2 17%

4 23%

124 22%

86 26%

140 21%

34 34%

32 24%

170 23%

26 34%

14 17%

-

107 39%

103 16%

199 22%

Public safety/low crime levels

464 51%

24 58%

86 56%

59 51%

295 50%

136 50%

39 54%

6 41%

9 52%

302 53%

162 49%

335 51%

50 51%

74 54%

388 52%

32 41%

44 53%

1 100%

138 51%

326 52%

456 51%

Public transport and roads

353 39%

10 23%

65 43%

44 38%

235 40%

97 36%

17 23%

5 31%

5 29%

219 38%

134 41%

261 40%

37 38%

51 38%

283 38%

31 40%

38 46%

1 100%

73 27%

281 45%

351 39%

The countryside and the natural environment

356 40%

16 37%

48 31%

47 41%

245 41%

102 38%

35 49%

8 54%

8 46%

243 42%

113 35%

290 44%

26 26%

36 26%

303 41%

23 30%

29 35%

1 100%

88 32%

268 43%

365 40%

Other (specify)

4 *

1 2%

1 1%

-

2 *

1 *

-

-

-

3 *

1 *

3 *

1 1%

-

3 *

1 2%

-

-

1 *

3 *

4 *

Don't know

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

-

1 *

-

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

No answer

2 *

-

-

-

2 *

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

2 *

-

-

2 *

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

2 *

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S * small base

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 8

Q.5. Thinking generally, which of the items on this list would you say are most important in making somewhere a good place to live? Base : All Respondents

Satisfaction with See housing as a Planning for homes as Growth of economy as Support for building in local area priority priority priority area Support for building in district Development concerns Development plusses Change of opinion Wtd Total (z)

Satisfied (a)

Dissatisfied (b)

Yes (c)

No (d)

Yes (e)

No (f)

Yes (g)

No (h)

Support (i)

Oppose (j)

Support (k)

Oppose (l)

Neither/ nor (m)

Yes (n)

No (o)

Yes (p)

Switch to oppose (r)

No (q)

Switch to support (s)

Unwtd Total

Unweighted Total

902

833

44

130

772

265

637

394

508

421

313

524

202

169

729

173

768

134

373

116

902

Weighted Total

902

829

44*

128

774

247

655

394

508

418

319

526

195

174

730

172

771

131

377

111

902

Effective Base

806

749

37

117

689

241

567

352

454

378

279

466

182

151

650

156

683

123

330

104

902

Arts and cultural activities

125

111 13%

5 12%

18 14%

107 14%

28 11%

97 15%

50 13%

Amount and quality of housing

162

151 18%

7 16%

33

26%zd

129 17%

51 21%

111 17%

Better town centres

206

191 23%

12 28%

29 23%

177 23%

51 21%

155 24%

Care for the elderly

142

129 16%

11 24%

18 14%

125 16%

51

Education services and opportunities to learn

262 29%

239 29%

13 30%

46 36%

216 28%

79 32%

Facilities for children and young people

217

203 25%

8 18%

33 26%

184 24%

56 23%

Health services

394

364 44%

21 48%

53 41%

341 44%

117 47%

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

289

263 32%

12 28%

46 36%

243 31%

90 36%

199 30%

Leisure facilities

166 18%

149 18%

9 21%

22 17%

143 19%

44 18%

122 19%

Play areas, parks and open spaces

210 23%

193 23%

7 15%

28 22%

182 24%

48 19%

Public safety/low crime levels

464

428 52%

22 49%

66 52%

398 51%

106 43%

359

Public transport and roads

353 39%

329 40%

18 41%

56 44%

297 38%

103 42%

250 38%

The countryside and the natural environment

356

311 40%

14%s 18%djls 23%o 16%fg

24%j 44%i 32%h

51%e

21%zf

75 15%

57 14%

41 13%

72 18%

90 18%

99

24%zj

43 13%

87 22%

119 23%

95 23%

70 22%

91 14%

49 12%

93

64 15%

183 28%

125 32%

137 27%

130 31%

160 24%

97 25%

119 24%

112

278 42%

170 43%

224 44%

148

142 28%

77 19%

162 25% 55%ze

20 10%

27 16%

104 14%

21 12%

105 14%

21 16%

55 15%

109

25 13%

26 15%

127 17%

36 21%

141 18%

22 17%

112 21%

50 26%

41 23%

177 24%

29 17%

180 23%

26 20%

58 18%

83 16%

37 19%

21 12%

112 15%

30 17%

124 16%

84 26%

153 29%

56 29%

52 30%

202 28%

60 35%

27%j

64 20%

129 25%

44 23%

42 24%

168 23%

166 40%

142 44%

223 42%

87 44%

82 47%

330 45%

143 34%

101 32%

177 34%

63 32%

48 28%

89 18%

77 18%

62 20%

108

34 17%

91 23%

120 24%

100 24%

77 24%

119 23%

210 53%

254 50%

211 50%

169 53%

282 54%

157 40%

196 39%

161 38%

131 41%

37%zh

18%zg

75 14%

8 7%

122 14%

76

12 11%

166 18%

86 23%

34

202 22%

18 14%

57 15%

25

23%z

158 18%

222 29%

39 30%

97 26%

28 25%

253 28%

48 28%

191 25%

26 20%

89 24%

28 25%

223 25%

65 38%

330 43%

65 49%

170 45%

48 43%

399 44%

225 31%

65 38%

247 32%

42 32%

122 32%

36 33%

279 31%

22 13%

126 17%

40 23%

146 19%

19 15%

71 19%

22 20%

160 18%

55 28%

35 20%

161 22%

49 29%

173 22%

37 28%

78 21%

28 25%

199 22%

94 48%

87 50%

374 51%

90 53%

395 51%

69 53%

204 54%

48 43%

456 51%

202 38%

82 42%

67 39%

296 41%

57 33%

310 40%

43 33%

153 41%

52 47%

351 39%

196 37%

93

64 37%

65

21%zl

20%m

20%s

31%z

329 40%

13 29%

46 36%

103 42%

254 39%

164 42%

192 38%

140 34%

160

304

52 30%

291 38%

50%zp

150 40%

48 43%

365 40%

Other (specify)

4 *

4 *

-

-

4 1%

1 *

3 *

1 *

3 1%

3 1%

1 *

2 *

1 1%

1 *

3 *

1 1%

3 *

1 1%

1 *

-

4 *

Don't know

1 *

1 *

-

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

-

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

No answer

2 *

2 *

-

-

2 *

-

2 *

1 *

1 *

1 *

1 *

1 *

-

1 1%

2 *

-

2 *

-

1 *

-

2 *

40%iop

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s * small base

50%zi

48%zkm

42%zo

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 9

Q.5. Thinking generally, which of the items on this list would you say are most important in making somewhere a good place to live? Base : All Respondents

Enough employment opportunities

Enough homes Wtd Total (z)

Agree (a)

Disagree (b)

Agree (c)

Disagree (d)

Future development More homes (e)

The same (f)

Option selection

Less homes (g)

A (h)

B (i)

Key factors for option choice

C (j)

D (k)

Greenfield (l)

Job growth (m)

Population growth (n)

Housing (o)

Unwtd Total

Unweighted Total

902

275

396

105

629

244

335

233

145

289

287

75

263

298

154

160

902

Weighted Total

902

282

385

112*

623

232

348

242

145

293

284

77*

268

303

150

156

902

Effective Base

806

243

357

93

559

223

300

202

130

257

258

67

233

264

136

149

902

Arts and cultural activities

125 14%

26 9%

57 15%

15 13%

79 13%

30 13%

50 14%

26 11%

19 13%

52 18%

33 12%

11 14%

46 17%

33 11%

23 16%

19 12%

122 14%

Amount and quality of housing

162 18%

50 18%

75 19%

19 17%

121 19%

63 27%

50 14%

34 14%

25 17%

48 16%

68 24%

14 18%

39 15%

54 18%

28 19%

38 25%

166 18%

Better town centres

206 23%

66 23%

81 21%

25 22%

150 24%

47 20%

91 26%

47 19%

28 19%

66 22%

70 25%

18 23%

60 22%

71 23%

40 27%

29 19%

202 22%

Care for the elderly

142 16%

56 20%

53 14%

21 19%

102 16%

42 18%

49 14%

41 17%

28 19%

47 16%

37 13%

12 15%

48 18%

41 14%

25 17%

25 16%

158 18%

Education services and opportunities to learn

262 29%

79 28%

106 28%

30 27%

172 28%

71 31%

110 32%

68 28%

38 26%

80 27%

98 34%

19 24%

82 31%

91 30%

41 27%

45 29%

253 28%

Facilities for children and young people

217 24%

65 23%

92 24%

26 23%

157 25%

62 27%

86 25%

55 23%

25 17%

69 24%

78 27%

19 25%

59 22%

64 21%

37 25%

51 33%

223 25%

Health services

394 44%

127 45%

166 43%

54 48%

264 42%

89 38%

151 43%

121 50%

85 59%

122 42%

111 39%

32 41%

119 45%

118 39%

72 48%

75 48%

399 44%

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

289 32%

79 28%

138 36%

35 31%

213 34%

80 34%

116 33%

72 30%

32 22%

90 31%

104 37%

27 35%

71 26%

118 39%

46 31%

44 28%

279 31%

Leisure facilities

166 18%

56 20%

73 19%

22 19%

113 18%

51 22%

52 15%

42 17%

29 20%

43 15%

52 18%

24 31%

45 17%

66 22%

24 16%

25 16%

160 18%

Play areas, parks and open spaces

210 23%

65 23%

93 24%

34 31%

142 23%

56 24%

77 22%

63 26%

30 20%

67 23%

66 23%

24 31%

70 26%

72 24%

26 18%

40 26%

199 22%

Public safety/low crime levels

464 51%

146 52%

210 55%

60 53%

322 52%

115 49%

190 55%

123 51%

75 52%

157 54%

156 55%

31 41%

129 48%

164 54%

76 51%

85 55%

456 51%

Public transport and roads

353 39%

116 41%

153 40%

50 44%

244 39%

92 40%

135 39%

95 39%

56 39%

116 39%

116 41%

25 32%

101 38%

125 41%

55 37%

59 38%

351 39%

The countryside and the natural environment

134 50%

356 40%

119 42%

142 37%

33 30%

245 39%

76 33%

136 39%

110 46%

66 46%

121 41%

86 30%

33 44%

95 31%

55 37%

60 39%

365 40%

Other (specify)

4 *

1 *

-

-

1 *

1 1%

1 *

2 1%

1 1%

3 1%

-

-

2 1%

1 *

1 1%

-

4 *

Don't know

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

-

-

-

-

1 *

-

-

-

-

1 1%

-

1 *

No answer

2 *

1 *

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

1 1%

1 *

-

-

1 *

1 *

-

-

2 *

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O * small base

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 10

Q.5. Thinking generally, which of the items on this list would you say are most important in making somewhere a good place to live? Base : All Respondents

Mosaic

Wtd Total (z)

A (a)

B (b)

C (c)

E (e)

F (f)

G (g)

H (h)

I (i)

J (j)

K (k)

L (l)

M (m)

Yes (n)

Unweighted Total

902

88

241

25

99

74

141

16

81

76

6

4

Weighted Total

902

97*

24**

218

27**

95*

70*

146

18**

104*

70*

5**

4**

20**

Effective Base

806

75

23

223

21

90

67

127

14

77

66

6

4

22

Arts and cultural activities

125

20

21%j

5 20%

31

14%j

2 7%

9 10%

7 10%

31

3 15%

14 13%

-

-

1 3%

Amount and quality of housing

162

10 11%

3 13%

33 15%

3 12%

14 14%

10 14%

33

5 27%

24

17

-

3 77%

Better town centres

206

14 14%

6 23%

43 20%

3 9%

20 21%

22

40

27%a

2 13%

28 27%

23

3 55%

-

Care for the elderly

142

16

16%i

3 14%

51

23%zgi

3 12%

16

17%i

10 15%

14 10%

4 25%

6 6%

13

18%i

1 28%

Education services and opportunities to learn

262 29%

33 34%

7 27%

53 24%

4 16%

26 27%

23 33%

47 32%

6 32%

31 29%

22 32%

Facilities for children and young people

217 24%

19 20%

4 18%

51 23%

3 11%

31

22 31%

30 21%

5 29%

18 18%

Health services

394

51

52%g

8 31%

47%g

17 62%

39 40%

37

53%g

50 34%

5 28%

46 44%

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

289

24 25%

12 49%

58 26%

8 29%

36 37%

19 27%

45 31%

3 17%

48

Leisure facilities

166 18%

17 18%

4 18%

36 17%

5 19%

16 17%

8 11%

21 14%

3 16%

Play areas, parks and open spaces

210 23%

21 22%

5 22%

41 19%

4 13%

24 25%

19 28%

36 25%

4 25%

Public safety/low crime levels

464

49 51%

15 62%

107 49%

13 47%

50 52%

27 39%

84

57%f

13 75%

Public transport and roads

353 39%

38 38%

8 32%

90 41%

17 63%

35 37%

30 43%

53 36%

The countryside and the natural environment

356

50

15 63%

32

55

14%jq 18%os 23%s 16%gipr

44%gnr 32%co

51%ft

24

D (d)

High HMO density

102

22%a

91

811

97

165

113

98

340

902

787

122*

79*

171

124*

89*

314

902

84

727

91

76

150

96

89

312

902

21 18%

105 13%

16

36

22

6 33%

35

30%zo

127 16%

29

20

36

14 11%

4 20%

33 29%

173 22%

30

26

45

27%s

16 13%

1 23%

3 15%

10 9%

132

11 9%

15

19%p

18 10%

3 55%

1 27%

5 26%

40 35%

222 28%

36 30%

26 33%

18 26%

2 30%

2 50%

12 61%

19 16%

198

24 19%

28 40%

3 58%

1 24%

7 37%

39 33%

356

51 41%

27 38%

3 55%

1 27%

7 35%

54

47%zo

235 30%

29

21

2 29%

1 27%

2 12%

28 24%

31

30%c

18 26%

-

1 23%

5 24%

25 21%

56 53%

37 53%

1 16%

3 73%

9 47%

7 41%

40 39%

27 39%

2 32%

-

23%a

46%zacfg

28%zcfg

25%a 33%ac

29%zcfg

86

Unwtd Total

40

13%q

122 14%

17 18%

47 15%

166 18%

26

63 20%

202 22%

19 15%

13 15%

67

21%zpr

158 18%

54 32%

37 30%

28 31%

80 25%

253 28%

21 27%

35 20%

22 18%

34

82 26%

223 25%

32 40%

57 33%

67

44

45%r

399 44%

51

42%zsu

30 38%

57 33%

32 26%

26 29%

93 30%

279 31%

138 18%

32

23

29%zrtu

25 15%

22 18%

10 11%

52 17%

160 18%

186 24%

36 29%

19 24%

42 24%

25 20%

24 27%

65 21%

199 22%

57 49%

407 52%

69

56%t

41 52%

99

58%t

62 50%

37 41%

156 50%

456 51%

6 31%

47 40%

307 39%

48 39%

29 36%

61 36%

54 44%

36 40%

125 40%

351 39%

321

70

64

39

134

365 40%

17%z

25%z 45%zn

13%q 24%su 25%s

26%zrtu

3 4% 26%su 32%zsu

21%zqtu 21%s

18%q

54%zr

8 9%

29%s

37%zprsu 50%r

141

15 55%

30 32%

38%j

3 18%

26 25%

15 22%

1 16%

2 50%

7 36%

35 30%

41%z

29 24%

18 23%

Other (specify)

4 *

1 1%

-

1 *

-

1 1%

1 1%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4 1%

-

-

-

1 1%

1 1%

2 1%

4 *

Don't know

1 *

-

-

-

1 3%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1 *

-

-

-

1 1%

-

-

1 *

No answer

2 *

-

-

1 *

-

-

-

1 1%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2 *

-

-

1 1%

-

-

1 *

2 *

40%ijpq

51%zeij

103

33%zi

31%a

21%zej

People Prospering approaching older Older singles retirement Students, Low income, families or Middle aged or pensioners and young singles younger professionals and older on limited pensioners, and couples families , owner people, some incomes, owner living in living in occupiers in with older living in occupiers of rented modest rented larger families, modest rented mid-range accommodation accommodation accommodation owner accommodation accommodation in town in urban in urban occupiers in In urban in urban centres areas areas rural areas areas areas (p) (q) (r) (s) (t) (u)

115*

3 4%

24

No (o)

Canterbury District Personas

47%zeij

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q/r/s/t/u * small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

46%ij

41%pq

52%zpq

44%pq

43%pq

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 11

Q.6. Which of the items on this list would you most like to see improved, to make this area a better place to live? Base : All Respondents

Gender Wtd Total (z)

Male (a)

Age

Female (b)

16-24 (c)

Area

25-34 (d)

35-54 (e)

55-64 (f)

Over 65 (g)

Canterbury City (h)

Whitstable (i)

Working status

Herne Bay (j)

Rural areas (k)

Employed (l)

Unemployed (m)

Retired (n)

Ethnicity

Student (uni/ college) (o)

White (p)

Disability

BME (q)

Yes (r)

Unwtd Total

No (s)

Unweighted Total

902

450

452

139

94

291

137

241

234

228

224

216

402

118

294

79

871

28

134

768

902

Weighted Total

902

429

473

192

125*

256

115

215

294

203

221

184

386

132

263

107*

869

29**

117

785

902

Effective Base

806

407

401

128

84

273

131

235

216

210

200

202

354

104

286

74

778

26

123

686

902

Arts and cultural activities

99

50 12%

50 11%

26 13%

20

23 9%

15

13%g

15 7%

49

28

14%jk

10 4%

13 7%

47 12%

15 11%

21 8%

17

Amount and quality of housing

128

46 11%

83

26 13%

18 14%

45

18%z

14 12%

26 12%

53 18%

26 13%

27 12%

22 12%

57 15%

25 19%

32 12%

Better town centres

199

99 23%

100 21%

41 21%

28 22%

48 19%

26 23%

55 26%

49

107

15 7%

28

15%j

77 20%

32 24%

68 26%

Care for the elderly

145

16%cjo

66 15%

79 17%

19 10%

14 11%

37 14%

27

49

23%zcde

38 13%

42

21 9%

45

65

16

57

96 11%

38 9%

58 12%

16 9%

15 12%

33 13%

15 13%

17 8%

22 7%

36

16 7%

22 12%

45 12%

19 14%

22 8%

10 9%

91 11%

55

66 25%

19 18%

16 12%

42

Education services and opportunities to learn

11%gjkn 14%a 22%hjk

17%za

16%g

23%zcde

17%zjk

17%j

53%zhjk 20%zhj 18%zhj

24%zhj

17%o

12%o

22%zmo

95 11%

4 15%

16 14%

83 11%

92 10%

12 11%

126 14%

2 8%

15 13%

113 14%

130 14%

19 18%

196 23%

3 11%

32 27%

167 21%

202 22%

1 3%

23 20%

122 16%

152 17%

4 12%

15 13%

81 10%

100 11%

259 30%

5 18%

36 31%

230 29%

267 30%

7 7%

121 14%

5 16%

17 15%

108 14%

129 14%

16%n

4 4%

144

17%z

Facilities for children and young people

266

113 26%

153 32%

52 27%

42 34%

86

34%g

33 29%

52 24%

79 27%

79

61 27%

47 26%

123

Health services

125

54 13%

72 15%

16 8%

17 14%

39

18

35

34 11%

39

28 13%

25 14%

59

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

256

110 26%

146 31%

54 28%

35 28%

81 32%

35 31%

52 24%

87

84

43 20%

42 23%

108 28%

49

67 25%

23 22%

247 28%

8 29%

37 32%

219 28%

260 29%

Leisure facilities

181

86 20%

95 20%

43 22%

36

28%zfg

51 20%

19 17%

33 15%

69

46

40 18%

25 14%

90

32

38 15%

17 16%

169 19%

9 31%

19 16%

162 21%

170 19%

Play areas, parks and open spaces

188

73 17%

115

39 21%

33

65

25%zg

22 19%

29 13%

70

51

41 19%

26 14%

88

45

37 14%

17 16%

181 21%

7 23%

21 18%

168 21%

180 20%

Public safety/low crime levels

196 22%

81 19%

114 24%

37 19%

33 26%

55 21%

26 23%

45 21%

65 22%

58

40 18%

32 18%

78 20%

39

30%zl

57 22%

20 18%

193 22%

2 6%

32 27%

164 21%

196 22%

Public transport and roads

320

29%agno 14%co 28%jk 20%gknp 21%agkn

24%za

27%g

15%c

16%c

16%c

30%j 24%k 24%k

39%zhjk 19%zh 41%zhjk 22%k 25%k 29%zjk

32%o 15%o

23%zn 23%n

37%zno 24%n 34%zlno

16%o

158 37%

162 34%

66 34%

33 26%

96 38%

54

71 33%

104 35%

76 37%

87

39%k

54 29%

39%m

37 28%

90 34%

35 32%

304 35%

13 44%

42 36%

278 35%

325 36%

The countryside and the natural environment

84 9%

43 10%

41 9%

11 6%

7 6%

23 9%

19

24 11%

24 8%

23 11%

18 8%

19 10%

37 9%

10 7%

32 12%

6 5%

82 9%

3 9%

14 12%

70 9%

90 10%

Other (specify)

17 2%

8 2%

9 2%

3 1%

2 2%

5 2%

3 2%

5 2%

4 1%

3 1%

6 3%

4 2%

8 2%

1 1%

8 3%

-

17 2%

-

3 3%

14 2%

19 2%

2 *

4 1%

3 2%

-

1 *

1 1%

1 *

3 1%

-

27

15 3%

7 4%

9 7%

8 3%

2 2%

16

5 2%

7 3%

Don't know No answer

36%k

6 1% 42

5%bh

6%zb

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s * small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

48%zcdg 17%zcde

7%zef

1 * 20

9%zhi

2 1% 10

6%h

151

42%zno

2 * 16 4%

5 4%

1 * 18 7%

3

3%zln

4 3%

6 1% 41 5%

-

-

1 4%

3 3%

6 1%

6 1%

39 5%

42 5%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 12

Q.6. Which of the items on this list would you most like to see improved, to make this area a better place to live? Base : All Respondents

Length of residence Wtd Total (z)

Up to one year (a)

1 year up to 5 years (b)

5 years up to 10 years (c)

More than 10 years (d)

Within district of Canterbury (e)

Place of work Elsewhere in Kent (f)

London (g)

Social grade Elsewhere (h)

Home ownership

ABC1 (i)

C2DE (j)

Owner occupier (k)

Type of home

Social renter (l)

Private renter (m)

House (n)

100

Flat (o)

Children in home

Bungalow (p)

Maisonette (q)

Yes (r)

Unwtd Total

No (s)

Unweighted Total

902

40

144

113

605

278

75

18

19

567

335

642

149

737

70

93

1

263

639

902

Weighted Total

902

42*

153

116*

591

271

71*

15*

17*

574

328

658

99*

135

741

76*

83*

1*

273

629

902

Effective Base

806

37

129

99

543

244

68

17

16

513

293

578

87

133

656

62

88

1

231

577

902

Arts and cultural activities

99 11%

6 15%

20 13%

11 9%

63 11%

33 12%

7 9%

1 6%

4 21%

51 9%

48 15%

69 11%

11 11%

19 14%

81 11%

11 15%

7 9%

-

23 8%

77 12%

Amount and quality of housing

128 14%

7 17%

17 11%

12 10%

92 16%

42 16%

92 10%

10 14%

-

3 15%

78 14%

51 15%

79 12%

24 25%

23 17%

102 14%

18 24%

8 9%

-

47 17%

81 13%

130 14%

Better town centres

199 22%

5 11%

28 18%

23 20%

143 24%

Care for the elderly

145 16%

4 9%

7 5%

16 14%

118 20%

57 21%

12 17%

4 26%

5 27%

108 19%

91 28%

153 23%

22 22%

23 17%

163 22%

14 18%

22 26%

-

60 22%

139 22%

202 22%

44 16%

9 13%

3 21%

5 27%

82 14%

64 19%

123 19%

14 14%

7 6%

120 16%

8 11%

17 20%

-

35 13%

111 18%

96 11%

3 7%

5 3%

9 8%

152 17%

79 13%

33 12%

8 11%

2 16%

2 14%

49 9%

47 14%

68 10%

21 21%

8 6%

72 10%

15 19%

10 12%

-

37 14%

59 9%

Facilities for children and young people

266 29%

15 35%

27 18%

34 29%

100 11%

190 32%

95 35%

19 26%

3 21%

3 19%

157 27%

109 33%

190 29%

41 42%

32 23%

219 30%

25 33%

21 25%

1 100%

89 33%

177 28%

267 30%

Health services

125 14%

3 7%

10 6%

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

256 28%

13 32%

37 24%

17 15%

95 16%

43 16%

9 13%

4 27%

2 11%

72 13%

53 16%

100 15%

12 12%

13 10%

97 13%

11 14%

17 20%

1 100%

33 12%

93 15%

129 14%

31 27%

175 30%

74 27%

19 27%

4 29%

8 48%

158 27%

99 30%

177 27%

35 35%

44 33%

206 28%

27 36%

22 27%

1 100%

79 29%

177 28%

Leisure facilities

181 20%

6 15%

260 29%

28 18%

34 29%

112 19%

59 22%

17 24%

5 36%

4 24%

111 19%

70 21%

130 20%

23 24%

27 20%

143 19%

24 31%

14 17%

-

67 25%

113 18%

170 19%

Play areas, parks and open spaces

188 21%

Public safety/low crime levels

196 22%

8 19%

17 11%

33 28%

131 22%

66 24%

13 18%

2 12%

4 22%

91 16%

97 30%

129 20%

33 33%

26 19%

153 21%

21 27%

13 16%

1 100%

84 31%

105 17%

180 20%

5 13%

29 19%

18 16%

143 24%

56 20%

11 16%

3 21%

4 24%

104 18%

92 28%

134 20%

38 38%

23 17%

160 22%

18 24%

17 21%

-

57 21%

139 22%

Public transport and roads

196 22%

320 36%

11 25%

56 37%

45 39%

209 35%

105 39%

29 41%

5 31%

6 32%

207 36%

114 35%

246 37%

30 31%

41 30%

276 37%

23 30%

20 24%

-

94 34%

227 36%

325 36%

The countryside and the natural environment

84 9%

1 2%

10 7%

9 8%

64 11%

20 7%

11 15%

2 16%

2 11%

54 9%

31 9%

68 10%

5 5%

10 8%

62 8%

6 7%

16 20%

-

14 5%

70 11%

90 10%

Other (specify)

17 2%

10 2%

6 2%

2 3%

-

-

9 2%

8 3%

11 2%

3 3%

3 2%

13 2%

3 4%

1 1%

-

5 2%

12 2%

19 2%

2 *

2 1%

-

-

-

6 1%

-

2 *

-

3 2%

6 1%

-

-

-

1 *

5 1%

6 1%

29 5%

11 4%

4 5%

-

1 5%

25 4%

18 5%

37 6%

3 3%

3 2%

33 4%

8 10%

-

12 4%

31 5%

42 5%

Education services and opportunities to learn

-

6 4%

1 1%

Don't know

6 1%

1 3%

2 1%

-

No answer

42 5%

2 5%

7 5%

4 4%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S * small base

1 1%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 13

Q.6. Which of the items on this list would you most like to see improved, to make this area a better place to live? Base : All Respondents

Satisfaction with See housing as a Planning for homes as Growth of economy as Support for building in local area priority priority priority area Support for building in district Development concerns Development plusses Change of opinion Wtd Total (z)

Satisfied (a)

Dissatisfied (b)

Yes (c)

No (d)

Yes (e)

No (f)

Yes (g)

No (h)

Support (i)

Oppose (j)

Support (k)

Oppose (l)

Neither/ nor (m)

Yes (n)

No (o)

Yes (p)

Switch to oppose (r)

No (q)

Switch to support (s)

Unwtd Total

Unweighted Total

902

833

44

130

772

265

637

394

508

421

313

524

202

169

729

173

768

134

373

116

902

Weighted Total

902

829

44*

128

774

247

655

394

508

418

319

526

195

174

730

172

771

131

377

111

902

Effective Base

806

749

37

117

689

241

567

352

454

378

279

466

182

151

650

156

683

123

330

104

902

Arts and cultural activities

99

82 10%

Amount and quality of housing

128

107 13%

11 24%

100%zd

-

Better town centres

199

168 20%

19

34 26%

165 21%

50 20%

Care for the elderly

145

133 16%

9 20%

30

115 15%

37 15%

96

77 9%

13

30%za

19 15%

77 10%

Facilities for children and young people

266 29%

238 29%

16 36%

44 34%

Health services

125

112 14%

8 18%

37

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

256

235 28%

11 26%

Leisure facilities

181

161 19%

Play areas, parks and open spaces

188

165 20%

Public safety/low crime levels

196

Public transport and roads

320 36%

The countryside and the natural environment Other (specify)

Education services and opportunities to learn

Don't know No answer

58 11%

42 10%

39 12%

53 13%

75 15%

76

18%zj

94 24%

105 21%

86 20%

109 17%

57 14%

88 17%

30 12%

66 10%

36 9%

222 29%

68 27%

198 30%

89 11%

40 16%

85 13%

43 33%

214 28%

69 28%

187 29%

13 28%

36

28%zd

145 19%

38 15%

143

14 31%

34 26%

155 20%

42 17%

25

56%za

36 28%

160 21%

48 20%

296 36%

15 34%

43 34%

277 36%

84

72 9%

7 17%

13 10%

17 2%

17 2%

-

-

6 1%

6 1%

-

-

6 1%

1 2%

-

11%ae 14%adfjn 22%ar 16%dkr 11%a

14%d 28%h 20%de 21%a

163 22%agikr 20%

9%aikopr

42

5%c

42 5%

9

20%a

42%za

18 14% 128

24%zd

29%zd

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

82 11%

58 11%

23 12%

17 10%

33 10%

89

20 10%

80 25%

107 20%

61

61 15%

54 17%

72 14%

60 12%

40 10%

38 12%

53 10%

120 31%

145 29%

121 29%

97 30%

58 15%

68 13%

58 14%

48 15%

113 22%

127 30%

82 21%

99 20%

146 22%

76 19%

147 22%

73 18%

90 36%

231 35%

71 9%

29 12%

17 2%

6 2%

42

5%zc

18 7%

80 10%

20 15%

48 13%

8 7%

92 10%

33

19%n

115 15%

13 10%

59 16%

11 10%

130 14%

41 24%

169 22%

29 22%

70 18%

38

34%zr

202 22%

118 16%

28 16%

117 15%

29 22%

49 13%

18 17%

152 17%

15%zm

13 7%

82 11%

15 8%

77 10%

19 14%

40 11%

14 13%

100 11%

159 30%

56 29%

49 28%

210 29%

56 33%

231 30%

35 27%

108 29%

30 27%

267 30%

67 13%

35 18%

23 13%

109 15%

17 10%

101 13%

24 19%

53 14%

17 15%

129 14%

80 25%

137 26%

62 32%

55 32%

214 29%

42 25%

217 28%

39 30%

102 27%

35 31%

260 29%

83 20%

60 19%

106 20%

40 21%

34 20%

149 20%

31 18%

160 21%

21 16%

75 20%

24 22%

170 19%

112 22%

76 18%

73 23%

101 19%

57

28 16%

159 22%

30 17%

158 20%

30 23%

75 20%

33

180 20%

123 24%

75 18%

87

96 18%

59

30%zk

39 23%

159 22%

36 21%

160 21%

35 27%

65 17%

34

30%zr

196 22%

139 35%

181 36%

144 35%

115 36%

180 34%

79 41%

58 33%

261 36%

60 35%

272 35%

49 37%

130 35%

48 44%

325 36%

55 8%

31 8%

54 11%

25 6%

47

15%zi

35 7%

34

11 2%

10 3%

7 1%

7 2%

5 2%

11 2%

1 *

5 1%

4 1%

2 *

3 1%

1 *

3 *

17

25 4%

14 4%

29 6%

18 4%

17 5%

31 6%

54

22%zf

7%f

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s * small base

81

12%e

42 11%

74 11% 149 23%

22%e

143

36%zh

27%zi

17%zlm

88 12%

12 7%

18 10%

95 13%

31 18%

157 22%

40

33 19%

29

31%zkm 20%k

29%zkm

15 9%

75 10%

9 5%

63 8%

3 1%

4 2%

15 2%

3 2%

14 2%

-

3 2%

6 1%

4 2%

8 4%

37 5%

17%zkm

6 3%

6 1% 40 5%

22

30%zr

26 7%

14 12%

90 10%

4 3%

8 2%

1 1%

19 2%

-

3 1%

-

17%zp

3 2%

26

7%z

3 3%

6 1% 42 5%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 14

Q.6. Which of the items on this list would you most like to see improved, to make this area a better place to live? Base : All Respondents

Enough employment opportunities

Enough homes Wtd Total (z)

Agree (a)

Disagree (b)

Agree (c)

Disagree (d)

Future development More homes (e)

The same (f)

Option selection

Less homes (g)

A (h)

B (i)

C (j)

Key factors for option choice D (k)

Greenfield (l)

Job growth (m)

Population growth (n)

Housing (o)

Unwtd Total

Unweighted Total

902

275

396

105

629

244

335

233

145

289

287

75

263

298

154

160

902

Weighted Total

902

282

385

112*

623

232

348

242

145

293

284

77*

268

303

150

156

902

Effective Base

806

243

357

93

559

223

300

202

130

257

258

67

233

264

136

149

902

Arts and cultural activities

99 11%

27 10%

50 13%

12 10%

72 12%

19 8%

35 10%

33 14%

23 16%

31 11%

25 9%

7 10%

34 13%

Amount and quality of housing

128 14%

40 14%

72 19%

Better town centres

199 22%

54 19%

92 24%

20 17%

91 15%

50 22%

48 14%

21 9%

18 12%

36 12%

48 17%

14 19%

46 17%

13 12%

153 25%

49 21%

69 20%

62 25%

29 20%

55 19%

70 25%

15 20%

60 22%

Care for the elderly

145 16%

47 17%

67 17%

17 15%

101 16%

32 14%

56 16%

45 18%

29 20%

33 11%

52 18%

7 9%

51 19%

96 11%

29 10%

38 10%

15 14%

68 11%

29 12%

34 10%

26 11%

17 11%

31 10%

32 11%

7 10%

Facilities for children and young people Health services

266 29%

78 28%

126 33%

35 31%

190 30%

74 32%

100 29%

66 27%

28 20%

83 28%

104 37%

125 14%

42 15%

53 14%

16 14%

91 15%

38 17%

40 11%

36 15%

28 20%

33 11%

33 12%

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

256 28%

80 28%

122 32%

18 16%

208 33%

63 27%

104 30%

66 27%

42 29%

78 26%

Leisure facilities

181 20%

59 21%

70 18%

28 25%

121 19%

59 25%

65 19%

41 17%

26 18%

Play areas, parks and open spaces

188 21%

56 20%

77 20%

22 19%

134 21%

40 17%

72 21%

58 24%

Public safety/low crime levels

196 22%

72 25%

85 22%

28 25%

147 24%

56 24%

62 18%

58 24%

Public transport and roads

320 36%

82 29%

152 40%

33 29%

236 38%

79 34%

121 35%

The countryside and the natural environment

84 9%

32 11%

29 8%

9 8%

56 9%

12 5%

Other (specify)

17 2%

4 1%

5 1%

1 1%

11 2%

4 2%

-

-

Education services and opportunities to learn

Don't know

6 1%

1 *

2 *

No answer

42 5%

16 6%

12 3%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

6 6%

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O * small base

3 * 23 4%

8 4%

30 10%

19 12%

15 10%

92 10%

43 14%

7 5%

28 18%

130 14%

75 25%

33 22%

28 18%

202 22%

42 14%

28 19%

20 13%

152 17%

23 8%

41 13%

15 10%

17 11%

100 11%

20 26%

76 28%

99 33%

42 28%

47 30%

267 30%

12 16%

40 15%

37 12%

17 11%

28 18%

129 14%

89 31%

19 25%

72 27%

97 32%

48 32%

35 23%

260 29%

51 18%

65 23%

22 28%

46 17%

70 23%

37 25%

24 16%

170 19%

42 29%

57 20%

46 16%

19 25%

64 24%

59 19%

32 21%

31 20%

180 20%

39 27%

61 21%

52 18%

21 27%

57 21%

66 22%

40 27%

31 20%

196 22%

87 36%

47 32%

93 32%

112 40%

26 34%

83 31%

114 38%

58 39%

57 37%

325 36%

33 10%

28 12%

14 10%

34 12%

19 7%

5 7%

33 12%

18 6%

15 10%

17 11%

90 10%

6 2%

6 3%

3 2%

8 3%

4 1%

1 1%

6 2%

5 2%

3 2%

2 1%

19 2%

5 1%

1 *

2 1%

2 1%

3 1%

-

2 1%

2 1%

-

1 1%

6 1%

14 4%

16 7%

9 6%

20 7%

5 2%

4 5%

14 5%

14 5%

4 3%

5 3%

42 5%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 15

Q.6. Which of the items on this list would you most like to see improved, to make this area a better place to live? Base : All Respondents

Mosaic

Wtd Total (z)

A (a)

B (b)

C (c)

E (e)

F (f)

G (g)

H (h)

I (i)

J (j)

K (k)

L (l)

M (m)

Yes (n)

People Prospering approaching older Older singles retirement Students, Low income, families or Middle aged or pensioners and young singles younger professionals and older on limited pensioners, and couples families , owner people, some incomes, owner living in living in occupiers in with older living in occupiers of rented modest rented larger families, modest rented mid-range accommodation accommodation accommodation owner accommodation accommodation in town in urban in urban occupiers in In urban in urban centres areas areas rural areas areas areas (p) (q) (r) (s) (t) (u)

902

88

241

25

99

74

141

16

81

76

6

4

91

811

97

165

113

98

340

902

902

97*

24**

218

27**

95*

70*

146

18**

104*

70*

5**

4**

20**

115*

787

122*

79*

171

124*

89*

314

902

Effective Base

806

75

23

223

21

90

67

127

14

77

66

6

4

22

84

727

91

76

150

96

89

312

902

99

10 11%

4 17%

19 9%

2 9%

21

3 15%

19

-

-

2 12%

23

25

13 10%

9 10%

27 9%

92 10%

Amount and quality of housing

128

13 14%

7 28%

22 10%

1 6%

Better town centres

199 22%

15 15%

4 18%

46 21%

4 14%

Care for the elderly

145 16%

15 16%

8 34%

37 17%

96 11%

4 5%

3 13%

Facilities for children and young people

266 29%

30 31%

Health services

125 14%

12 13%

Job opportunities/high levels of employment

256

Leisure facilities Play areas, parks and open spaces

11%joq

18%zcj

20%zo

76 10%

22

18%zqu

3 3%

15%qu

28

19%ce

6 34%

13 13%

17

1 27%

2 50%

3 14%

21 18%

108 14%

19 16%

20

35

21%ztu

15 12%

9 10%

30 10%

130 14%

33%zacgi

19 27%

26 18%

3 16%

19 19%

22

31%ag

2 43%

-

7 35%

22 19%

177 22%

22 18%

24

30%rs

31 18%

18 15%

26

78

25%s

202 22%

2 6%

17 18%

14 21%

16 11%

5 30%

15 15%

7 10%

2 32%

-

5 23%

13 11%

133 17%

21 17%

9 11%

25 14%

17 14%

19 21%

54 17%

152 17%

19 9%

2 7%

12 13%

9 13%

14 10%

4 25%

6 6%

13

1 27%

2 46%

5 24%

13 11%

84 11%

11 9%

16

17 10%

6 5%

14

32 10%

100 11%

10 41%

57 26%

5 20%

28 30%

29

41%zcgi

37 25%

4 22%

23 22%

31

45%zcgi

2 43%

-

7 35%

30 26%

236 30%

27 22%

34

42%zpru

47 28%

36 29%

36

40%zpu

85 27%

267 30%

4 18%

32 14%

4 14%

15 15%

11 16%

16 11%

4 22%

13 13%

8 11%

2 43%

-

3 15%

14 12%

112 14%

17 14%

10 12%

21 12%

16 13%

14 16%

46 15%

129 14%

29 30%

9 38%

47 21%

6 22%

29 30%

20 28%

36 25%

6 34%

37

36%c

21 30%

1 27%

3 73%

12 63%

34 30%

222 28%

43

35%u

25 32%

46 27%

35 28%

32

36%u

75 24%

260 29%

181

24

25%c

9 37%

30 14%

2 6%

22

23%c

12 17%

39

27%zc

5 27%

19 18%

10 15%

2 38%

-

5 24%

21 18%

160 20%

24 19%

12 15%

48

28%zqu

26 21%

17 18%

52 17%

170 19%

188 21%

19 20%

5 22%

44 20%

3 10%

18 19%

17 25%

30 21%

4 20%

26 25%

18 26%

1 11%

-

3 13%

18 16%

170 22%

29 24%

19 24%

35 21%

22 18%

20 22%

62 20%

180 20%

Public safety/low crime levels

196

9 10%

6 25%

44

20%a

8 28%

21

18

25%a

21 14%

7 41%

30

24

34%zacg

2 30%

1 27%

6 30%

21 18%

175 22%

37

27

34%zrsu

27 16%

17 14%

23

65 21%

196 22%

Public transport and roads

320 36%

35 36%

14 59%

75 34%

12 43%

40 42%

26 37%

45 31%

6 35%

38 37%

21 29%

2 38%

-

6 31%

39 34%

282 36%

45 37%

23 29%

59 35%

47 37%

32 36%

115 37%

325 36%

The countryside and the natural environment

84

10 10%

3 12%

29

2 7%

8 8%

15%gj

9 6%

2 13%

8 8%

2 3%

-

-

1 6%

7 6%

77 10%

10 8%

2 3%

12 7%

11 9%

12

37

12%q

90 10%

Other (specify)

17 2%

1 1%

-

4 2%

1 3%

4 5%

2 2%

4 3%

-

1 1%

-

-

-

-

3 2%

14 2%

1 1%

-

4 2%

2 2%

2 2%

8 3%

19 2%

6 1%

1 1%

-

1 *

-

1 1%

-

2 1%

-

1 1%

-

-

-

-

1 1%

5 1%

1 1%

-

2 1%

1 1%

-

2 1%

6 1%

7 7%

-

9 4%

3 10%

5 5%

8

4 3%

1 8%

1 1%

2 3%

-

-

2 10%

3 2%

2 3%

4 3%

10 8%

9

14 4%

42 5%

Education services and opportunities to learn

Don't know No answer

28%cu 20%c

22%ags

9%q

42

5%n

13%zgj

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

22%a

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q/r/s/t/u * small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

6 9%

15%j

3 4%

32

14%cu

8 8%

7 9%

86

Unwtd Total

Weighted Total

8 9%

24

No (o)

Canterbury District Personas

Unweighted Total

Arts and cultural activities

24

D (d)

High HMO density

10

11%zcgi

28%ag

24%zcef

18%zaci

-

42

5%zn

30%zrs

25%zstu

20%zprsu

29%s

15%s

26%s

13%q

11%zpru

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 16

Q.7. On this card is a list of things that Canterbury City Council has identified as priorities. Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards? Base : All Respondents

Gender Wtd Total (z)

Male (a)

Age

Female (b)

16-24 (c)

Area

25-34 (d)

35-54 (e)

55-64 (f)

Over 65 (g)

Canterbury City (h)

Whitstable (i)

Working status

Herne Bay (j)

Rural areas (k)

Employed (l)

Unemployed (m)

Retired (n)

Ethnicity

Student (uni/ college) (o)

White (p)

Disability

BME (q)

Yes (r)

Unwtd Total

No (s)

Unweighted Total

902

450

452

139

94

291

137

241

234

228

224

216

402

118

294

79

871

28

134

768

902

Weighted Total

902

429

473

192

125*

256

115

215

294

203

221

184

386

132

263

107*

869

29**

117

785

902

Effective Base

806

407

401

128

84

273

131

235

216

210

200

202

354

104

286

74

778

26

123

686

902

Encouraging greater involvement for local people

120

57 13%

Keeping the district a safe place to live

423

185 43%

Making the district cleaner and greener

200 22%

Planning for the right type and number of homes in the right places

247

Supporting excellent and diverse cultural facilities and activities for residents and visitors Tackling disadvantage

13%i

47%ah

27%cdho

58 6%

33 17%

11 9%

29 11%

22

19%zdeg

25 12%

46

15%i

18 9%

22 12%

55 14%

17 13%

31 12%

16 15%

114 13%

5 17%

13 11%

107 14%

120 13%

115

16%i

238

94 49%

64 51%

113 44%

47 41%

105 49%

112 38%

52%h

83 45%

175 45%

61 46%

124 47%

57 53%

408 47%

14 48%

48 41%

374 48%

423 47%

96 22%

104 22%

51 27%

25 20%

51 20%

24 21%

49 23%

78

39 19%

50 23%

33 18%

82 21%

28 21%

58 22%

27 25%

192 22%

8 27%

24 20%

176 22%

186 21%

128 30%

119 25%

34 18%

21 17%

72

46

73

34%zcd

62 21%

62

72

32%h

51 28%

101 26%

28 22%

97

19 18%

236 27%

10 34%

35 30%

211 27%

265 29%

24 6%

34 7%

12 6%

7 6%

7 6%

15 7%

24 8%

9 5%

12 5%

13 7%

26 7%

5 4%

15 6%

9 8%

55 6%

3 12%

8 7%

50 6%

56 6%

50%a

28%cd

17 7%

40%zcde

26%k

113

34

56%zhk

31%h

37%zlmo

13%gin

47 11%

69 15%

31

16%g

15 12%

38

15 13%

17 8%

54

14 7%

23 10%

25

58

13 10%

23 9%

18

109 13%

5 16%

11 10%

105 13%

108 12%

91

55

37 8%

32

17

26

7 6%

9 4%

39

13%j

17 8%

15 7%

20 11%

48

12 9%

10 4%

22

90 10%

1 3%

4 3%

88

82 9%

Supporting facilities and activities for children and young people

237

102 24%

135 29%

41 21%

48

87

26 23%

35 16%

65 22%

57 28%

55 25%

60

119

50

44 17%

18 17%

235

2 8%

26 22%

211 27%

235 26%

Supporting the growth of the local economy and the number of people in work

394

207

187 40%

76 40%

65 52%

124 48%

44 38%

86 40%

116 39%

96 47%

101 46%

81 44%

185

53 40%

106 40%

43 40%

381 44%

13 44%

42 36%

352 45%

394 44%

Tackling traffic congestion and improving the condition of roads and pavements

464

223 52%

241 51%

69 36%

58 47%

133

68

159 54%

101 50%

116 53%

88 48%

192

65

168

33 30%

453

8 27%

78

386 49%

470 52%

5 1%

6 1%

3 1%

1 1%

4 2%

2 1%

2 1%

2 1%

10 1%

13 1%

Supporting a broad range of sporting and fitness facilities and activities

Other (specify)

116

63 13%

10%bgnr

26%gn

44%br

51%cos

12 1%

13%zb

48%zb

17%zfg

15%g

14%g

10%g

39%zcfg

34%zcfg

52%c

59%c

136

63%zcde

3 2%

2 1%

18%zij

13%i

33%zh

15%n 12%n

31%zno

48%z

50%o

5

3%z

4 1%

38%zno

49%o

64%zlmo

17%n 20%zmn

3 2%

4 2%

1 1%

27%z

52%z

11 1%

67%zs

* 2%

2 1%

11%zr

Don't know

1 *

-

1 *

-

-

-

-

1 *

-

-

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

1

1%s

-

1 *

No answer

1 *

1 *

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

1 *

-

-

1 *

-

1 *

1 *

-

1 *

-

-

1 *

2 *

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s * small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 17

Q.7. On this card is a list of things that Canterbury City Council has identified as priorities. Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards? Base : All Respondents

Length of residence Wtd Total (z)

Up to one year (a)

1 year up to 5 years (b)

5 years up to 10 years (c)

More than 10 years (d)

Within district of Canterbury (e)

Place of work Elsewhere in Kent (f)

London (g)

Social grade Elsewhere (h)

Home ownership

ABC1 (i)

C2DE (j)

Owner occupier (k)

Type of home

Social renter (l)

Private renter (m)

House (n)

100

Flat (o)

Children in home

Bungalow (p)

Maisonette (q)

Yes (r)

Unwtd Total

No (s)

Unweighted Total

902

40

144

113

605

278

75

18

19

567

335

642

149

737

70

93

1

263

639

902

Weighted Total

902

42*

153

116*

591

271

71*

15*

17*

574

328

658

99*

135

741

76*

83*

1*

273

629

902

Effective Base

806

37

129

99

543

244

68

17

16

513

293

578

87

133

656

62

88

1

231

577

902

Encouraging greater involvement for local people

120 13%

3 7%

24 16%

16 14%

78 13%

36 13%

12 17%

2 15%

1 4%

80 14%

40 12%

84 13%

11 11%

23 17%

103 14%

11 15%

6 7%

-

28 10%

92 15%

120 13%

Keeping the district a safe place to live

423 47%

15 37%

75 49%

53 46%

279 47%

127 47%

29 41%

6 43%

10 56%

252 44%

171 52%

304 46%

54 55%

62 45%

340 46%

33 43%

49 58%

1 100%

124 45%

299 47%

423 47%

Making the district cleaner and greener

200 22%

9 21%

37 24%

24 21%

130 22%

55 20%

17 23%

2 11%

6 35%

123 21%

77 24%

158 24%

17 18%

21 16%

159 22%

21 27%

20 24%

-

50 18%

150 24%

186 21%

Planning for the right type and number of homes in the right places

247 27%

4 11%

33 22%

30 26%

179 30%

69 25%

23 32%

5 32%

3 16%

162 28%

85 26%

195 30%

22 22%

29 21%

202 27%

17 23%

27 32%

-

58 21%

189 30%

265 29%

58 6%

5 11%

10 7%

7 6%

36 6%

16 6%

6 8%

-

2 14%

47 8%

12 4%

45 7%

2 2%

10 7%

44 6%

9 12%

6 7%

-

18 7%

41 6%

56 6%

116 13%

9 22%

20 13%

16 14%

70 12%

39 14%

14 19%

2 15%

2 11%

82 14%

34 10%

85 13%

11 12%

18 13%

102 14%

9 12%

4 5%

-

38 14%

78 12%

108 12%

91 10%

7 18%

24 15%

20 17%

41 7%

32 12%

7 10%

3 20%

3 14%

63 11%

28 9%

65 10%

7 7%

19 14%

73 10%

12 16%

5 6%

-

39 14%

52 8%

82 9%

Supporting facilities and activities for children and young people

237 26%

7 17%

35 23%

37 32%

158 27%

86 32%

18 25%

6 40%

5 27%

147 26%

90 27%

171 26%

36 36%

28 21%

208 28%

18 24%

11 13%

-

116 42%

121 19%

235 26%

Supporting the growth of the local economy and the number of people in work

394 44%

21 50%

53 35%

56 49%

264 45%

133 49%

33 47%

7 44%

7 41%

259 45%

135 41%

296 45%

37 38%

59 44%

323 44%

31 40%

39 47%

-

131 48%

263 42%

394 44%

Tackling traffic congestion and improving the condition of roads and pavements

464 51%

16 39%

73 48%

49 42%

325 55%

141 52%

32 45%

6 43%

6 35%

305 53%

159 49%

365 55%

40 41%

56 42%

386 52%

29 38%

48 58%

1 100%

125 46%

339 54%

470 52%

12 1%

2 12%

10 1%

13 1%

Supporting excellent and diverse cultural facilities and activities for residents and visitors Tackling disadvantage Supporting a broad range of sporting and fitness facilities and activities

Other (specify)

* 1%

1 1%

4 4%

6 1%

1 *

-

1 5%

8 1%

4 1%

8 1%

1 1%

2 2%

2 2%

-

-

5 2%

7 1%

Don't know

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

-

-

-

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

-

1 *

-

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

No answer

1 *

-

-

-

1 *

-

-

-

-

-

1 *

1 *

-

1 *

1 *

-

1 1%

-

-

1 *

2 *

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S * small base

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 18

Q.7. On this card is a list of things that Canterbury City Council has identified as priorities. Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards? Base : All Respondents

Satisfaction with See housing as a Planning for homes as Growth of economy as Support for building in local area priority priority priority area Support for building in district Development concerns Development plusses Change of opinion Wtd Total (z)

Satisfied (a)

Dissatisfied (b)

Yes (c)

No (d)

Yes (e)

No (f)

Yes (g)

No (h)

Support (i)

Oppose (j)

Support (k)

Oppose (l)

Neither/ nor (m)

Yes (n)

No (o)

Yes (p)

Switch to oppose (r)

No (q)

Switch to support (s)

Unwtd Total

Unweighted Total

902

833

44

130

772

265

637

394

508

421

313

524

202

169

729

173

768

134

373

116

902

Weighted Total

902

829

44*

128

774

247

655

394

508

418

319

526

195

174

730

172

771

131

377

111

902

Effective Base

806

749

37

117

689

241

567

352

454

378

279

466

182

151

650

156

683

123

330

104

902

Encouraging greater involvement for local people

120

106 13%

8 17%

16 12%

104 13%

19 8%

102

36 9%

84

52 12%

43 13%

68 13%

25 13%

26 15%

95 13%

25 15%

102 13%

18 14%

46 12%

14 13%

120 13%

Keeping the district a safe place to live

423

390 47%

21 47%

62 49%

360 47%

97 39%

326

157 40%

266

199 48%

154 48%

246 47%

91 47%

83 48%

351 48%

72 42%

360 47%

63 48%

183 48%

49 45%

423 47%

Making the district cleaner and greener

200

176 22%aegiko 21%

15 35%

29 22%

171 22%

35 14%

164

56 14%

144

77 19%

80

25%i

103 20%

52

27%k

41 23%

176

24 14%

174 23%

26 19%

82 22%

33 29%

186 21%

Planning for the right type and number of homes in the right places

247

226 27%

12 28%

54

192 25%

100%zf

-

90 23%

157

113 27%

93 29%

152 29%

57 29%

38 22%

200 27%

46 27%

206 27%

41 31%

111 29%

28 25%

265 29%

55 7%

3 6%

8 6%

50 6%

10 4%

48 7%

32 8%

26 5%

32 8%

18 6%

35 7%

9 5%

13 7%

44 6%

14 8%

50 7%

8 6%

23 6%

3 3%

56 6%

116

104 13%

7 15%

12 9%

104 13%

17 7%

99

51 13%

65 13%

49 12%

40 13%

61 12%

29 15%

24 14%

88 12%

28 16%

97 13%

19 14%

36 10%

15 14%

108 12%

91

79 9%

6 13%

11 8%

81 10%

11 4%

81

23 6%

69

39 9%

32 10%

47 9%

21 11%

21 12%

70 10%

21 12%

77 10%

14 11%

30 8%

13 12%

82 9%

89 23%

148

113 27%

74 23%

138 26%

40 21%

58

33%zl

178 24%

59

206 27%

31 24%

90 24%

26 23%

235 26%

73 38%

68 39%

305 42%

89

52%zn

347 45%

47 36%

173 46%

43 39%

394 44%

79 45%

397

67 39%

385 50%

79

206 55%

64 58%

470 52%

Supporting excellent and diverse cultural facilities and activities for residents and visitors Tackling disadvantage Supporting a broad range of sporting and fitness facilities and activities

13%eg

47%eg

27%dfg

58 6%

13%er 10%aeg

42%zd

247

15%ze

50%ze 25%ze

15%ze 12%ze

Supporting facilities and activities for children and young people

237

227

6 13%

32 25%

205 27%

54 22%

183 28%

Supporting the growth of the local economy and the number of people in work

394

370

13 29%

53 41%

341 44%

90 36%

304

394

Tackling traffic congestion and improving the condition of roads and pavements

464

422 51%

23 53%

64 50%

400 52%

109 44%

355

163 41%

10 1%

2 1%

Other (specify)

26%gln

44%ehjn

51%egiop

27%z

45%z

46%ze

54%ze

52%zg 28%zg 31%zg

14%zg

29%zg

-

301

59%zg

205

120 38%

251

189 45%

191

265 50%

49%zj

60%zi

48%zl

118

60%zkm

24%zo

54%zo

61%zp

12 1%

11 1%

1 2%

2 2%

4 1%

8 2%

5 1%

4 1%

5 1%

4 2%

3 2%

1 1%

8 1%

4 3%

4 1%

2 2%

13 1%

1 *

1 *

-

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

-

1 1%

1 *

No answer

1 *

1 *

-

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

2 *

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s * small base

11 1%

34%zn

Don't know

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

10 2%

100%zh

17%zg

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 19

Q.7. On this card is a list of things that Canterbury City Council has identified as priorities. Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards? Base : All Respondents

Enough employment opportunities

Enough homes Wtd Total (z)

Agree (a)

Disagree (b)

Agree (c)

Disagree (d)

Future development More homes (e)

The same (f)

Option selection

Less homes (g)

A (h)

B (i)

Key factors for option choice

C (j)

D (k)

Greenfield (l)

Job growth (m)

Population growth (n)

Housing (o)

Unwtd Total

Unweighted Total

902

275

396

105

629

244

335

233

145

289

287

75

263

298

154

160

902

Weighted Total

902

282

385

112*

623

232

348

242

145

293

284

77*

268

303

150

156

902

Effective Base

806

243

357

93

559

223

300

202

130

257

258

67

233

264

136

149

902

Encouraging greater involvement for local people

120 13%

33 12%

54 14%

15 13%

87 14%

30 13%

43 12%

32 13%

18 13%

47 16%

39 14%

7 9%

33 12%

42 14%

18 12%

24 15%

120 13%

Keeping the district a safe place to live

423 47%

137 48%

185 48%

61 55%

292 47%

108 47%

167 48%

116 48%

73 50%

130 44%

137 48%

32 41%

123 46%

147 48%

69 46%

69 44%

423 47%

Making the district cleaner and greener

200 22%

74 26%

83 22%

24 22%

135 22%

41 18%

78 23%

67 28%

43 29%

68 23%

51 18%

13 18%

73 27%

60 20%

30 20%

33 21%

186 21%

Planning for the right type and number of homes in the right places

247 27%

78 28%

103 27%

36 32%

167 27%

79 34%

82 24%

66 27%

41 28%

90 31%

67 24%

20 27%

77 29%

76 25%

35 23%

49 32%

265 29%

58 6%

11 4%

26 7%

3 3%

38 6%

13 6%

19 6%

19 8%

11 7%

24 8%

12 4%

3 4%

25 9%

17 6%

8 5%

7 4%

56 6%

116 13%

30 11%

48 12%

13 12%

77 12%

35 15%

41 12%

33 14%

16 11%

33 11%

40 14%

13 17%

30 11%

37 12%

25 17%

22 14%

108 12%

91 10%

38 13%

30 8%

16 15%

58 9%

18 8%

34 10%

35 14%

22 15%

23 8%

29 10%

9 12%

23 9%

31 10%

22 15%

12 8%

82 9%

Supporting facilities and activities for children and young people

237 26%

66 23%

113 29%

31 28%

162 26%

80 34%

93 27%

50 21%

27 19%

78 27%

85 30%

22 29%

68 25%

77 25%

43 29%

42 27%

235 26%

Supporting the growth of the local economy and the number of people in work

394 44%

109 39%

175 46%

37 33%

291 47%

91 39%

178 51%

94 39%

60 41%

117 40%

145 51%

29 38%

122 46%

147 49%

61 41%

58 37%

394 44%

Tackling traffic congestion and improving the condition of roads and pavements

464 51%

154 55%

191 50%

53 47%

314 50%

99 43%

183 53%

137 56%

74 51%

163 56%

142 50%

33 44%

142 53%

138 45%

90 60%

83 53%

470 52%

12 1%

13 1%

Supporting excellent and diverse cultural facilities and activities for residents and visitors Tackling disadvantage Supporting a broad range of sporting and fitness facilities and activities

Other (specify)

4 1%

4 1%

3 3%

7 1%

4 2%

1 *

5 2%

3 2%

1 *

2 1%

1 1%

3 1%

6 2%

1 1%

1 1%

Don't know

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 *

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1 *

-

-

1 *

No answer

1 *

1 1%

-

1 1%

1 *

-

1 *

-

1 1%

1 *

-

-

1 *

-

-

1 1%

2 *

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012 Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

*=Less than 0.5 % Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O * small base

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development (FINAL - General Public)

Table 20

Q.7. On this card is a list of things that Canterbury City Council has identified as priorities. Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards? Base : All Respondents

Mosaic

Wtd Total (z)

A (a)

B (b)

C (c)

D (d)

E (e)

F (f)

G (g)

High HMO density

H (h)

I (i)

Unweighted Total

902

88

24

241

25

99

74

141

16

Weighted Total

902

97*

24**

218

27**

95*

70*

146

18**

Effective Base

806

75

23

223

21

90

67

127

Encouraging greater involvement for local people

120

12 12%

4 15%

4 13%

14

13

Keeping the district a safe place to live

423

47

9 39%

50%fg

13 49%

52

54%fg

Making the district cleaner and greener

200 22%

33

34%zcfgj

6 26%

46 21%

4 16%

22 23%

Planning for the right type and number of homes in the right places

247

27%o

26 27%

5 21%

76

12 45%

58

10

10%j

1 5%

16

7%j

1 3%

8 8%

Supporting excellent and diverse cultural facilities and activities for residents and visitors Tackling disadvantage Supporting a broad range of sporting and fitness facilities and activities

13%cju

47%fgrt

6%jq

116

13%ou

91

10%ft

48%f

18 8% 110

35%zegi

K (k)

L (l)

M (m)

Yes (n)

81

76

6

4

24

104*

70*

5**

4**

20**

14

77

66

6

4

22

25

17%cj

4 25%

19

1 27%

1 27%

22 31%

57 39%

10 59%

45 43%

42

60%zfgi

2 29%

10 14%

28 19%

6 32%

28 26%

12 17%

1 16%

20 21%

20 29%

34 24%

5 28%

22 21%

17 24%

4 4%

5

-

6 5%

20

22 15%

-

19

1 7%

15%j

4 15%

22 10%

4 15%

8 8%

14

15%f

3 12%

24

2 6%

6 6%

11%f

J (j)

18%cj

7%j

29%zacegj

1 2%

15

10%j

13%f

No (o)

Canterbury District Personas

People Prospering approaching older Older singles retirement Students, Low income, families or Middle aged or pensioners and young singles younger professionals and older on limited pensioners, and couples families , owner people, some incomes, owner living in living in occupiers in with older living in occupiers of rented modest rented larger families, modest rented mid-range accommodation accommodation accommodation owner accommodation accommodation in town in urban in urban occupiers in In urban in urban centres areas areas rural areas areas areas (p) (q) (r) (s) (t) (u)

Unwtd Total

91

811

97

86

165

113

98

340

902

115*

787

122*

79*

171

124*

89*

314

902

84

727

91

76

150

96

89

312

902

2 9%

18 16%

102 13%

24

15 12%

15 16%

2 50%

11 58%

50 43%

373 47%

56 46%

46

58%rt

66 39%

60 48%

33 37%

52%zrt

423 47%

-

3 15%

29 25%

171 22%

33

27%t

13 16%

34 20%

38

30%zqt

13 14%

67 21%

186 21%

3 55%

1 23%

5 27%

40 35%

207 26%

27 22%

20 26%

40 23%

38 31%

26 29%

96 31%

265 29%

-

-

-

1 6%

11 10%

47 6%

6 5%

-

16

11

19 18%

6 8%

-

-

4 19%

23

20%zo

93 12%

19 15%

6 7%

26 15%

12 10%

16

5 7%

-

-

1 3%

13 11%

78 10%

18

5 6%

22

16

18%cj

16%ef

3 4%

19%qu

15%t

5 7%

29

17%q

10%q

13%t

9%q

13%t

6

7%q

24