Banking on Climate Change

Page 78

Case Study:

Beyond China — Japanese Banks' Addiction to Coal

Japan’s three largest banks, MUFG, Mizuho, and SMBC Group,

than most new coal projects in Japan.114 This plant is planned in

These three banks’ financing of coal is in stark contrast to their

are fueling a coal power boom in Japan and abroad. In the

addition to the controversial Nghi Son 2, a 1.2 GW coal power

peers and their own endorsement of the TCFD.120 While the

remote countryside of southern Japan, a 1.2-gigawatt (GW)

plant in Vietnam that is being constructed by Korea Electric

banks adopted new coal power policies in the last year, they

coal-fired power plant known as Nishioki No Yama is being

Power Company (KEPCO) and Marubeni.

developed by J-POWER, Japan’s largest coal plant developer

of this project is currently the subject of an OECD complaint.116

catastrophe.121 With the growing impacts of climate change,

and a major recipient of financing from all three banks.109 It

Standard Chartered appears to have walked away from Nghi

including in Japan — where heavy rainfall, landslides, and

is estimated that this plant will emit 7.9 million tons of CO2

Son 2 prior to financial close due to the carbon intensity of the

extreme heat in 2018 killed approximately 300 people —

once completed, and it is only one among 50 new coal power

project.

the banks’ financing of coal power expansion constitutes a

115

The banks’ funding

117

projects in Japan that have been planned since 2012, including

lack any meaningful safeguards against financing climate

significant reputational and financial risk, including a material

While five projects comprising six

As these cases illustrate, MUFG, Mizuho, and SMBC Group are

risk of stranded assets given the drastic decline in the cost

units have recently been cancelled or switched to a different

facilitating the expansion of coal power globally, with no signs

of renewables and storage technology.122 The banks need to

fuel source, 15 GW of coal-fired power capacity remain in the

of the rapid phase-out that’s needed in order to achieve the

adopt a rapid transition plan away from coal and carbon-

pipeline, 6.4 GW of which are not yet under construction.111

Paris Agreement goals. This report card found that between

intensive sectors more broadly, and their largest investors —

If all of these projects are completed, Japan will be more

2016 and 2018, these three banks provided a combined $7.4

BlackRock and the Government Pension Investment Fund of

dependent on coal than on renewables.112 Most of these

billion in loans and underwriting services to 30 top global coal

Japan — should ensure this happens as quickly as possible.123

domestic coal power projects are being financed by Japan’s

power producers, including J-POWER and KEPCO. Research

three megabanks.113

published in December 2018 also found that MUFG, Mizuho,

three plants in Tokyo Bay.

110

and SMBC Group were the first-, second-, and fourth-largest MUFG, Mizuho, and SMBC Group also provide significant

global lenders to the top 120 international coal developers

funding to coal power projects overseas, notably in Indonesia

between 2016 and September 2018.118 Mizuho has been

and Vietnam. All three banks are expected to fund Van Phong

the leading lender and underwriter to 20 companies rapidly

1, a 1.3 GW supercritical coal plant in Vietnam sponsored by

developing coal power in Japan, providing nearly twice as

Sumitomo Corporation, which is expected to produce SO2,

much financing as MUFG or SMBC Group.119

NOx, and particulate matter emissions at least five times more

78

B A N K I N G

O N

C L I M A T E

C H A N G E

2 0 1 9


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.