Synergies conference of grasp & republic med (12 3 2015, piraeus, greece) by Grasp Med

OPEN DAY - MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE ENERGY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND METHODS FOR A SUSTAINABLE FRAMEWORK OF BUILDINGS REFURBISHMENT 20th March 2014 Piraeus Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Piraeus

Co-organised by the projects:

March 2015

Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.

Summary....................................................................................................................................... 2

Description of implemented activities ......................................................................................... 3

Concluding Remarks ................................................................................................................... 11

ANNEX I - Agenda ............................................................................................................................... 12 ANNEX II - Invitation ........................................................................................................................... 17 ANNEX III - Participantsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; list ................................................................................................................ 19 ANNEX IV - Presentations ................................................................................................................... 32

1. Summary The present document constitutes the Activity Report for the 2nd Open Day Event that took place in Piraeus in the 12th of March 2015. The event was organized by the Municipality of Piraeus in cooperation with its external experts and the University of Patras, within the framework of the Projects “REPUBLIC-MED: REtrofitting PUBLic spaces in Intelligent MEDiterranean Cities” and “GRASP: GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector“. The Open Day Event was foreseen by the 2nd Work package: “Information, awareness raising and capitalization”, phase 2.2 “Open days” and aimed at raising awareness on efficient technical studies for better implementation of innovative technologies. The target group of the participants was mechanics, civil mechanics, architects, energy auditors etc. coming from public and private sectors. The organized event involved the following speakers coming from public and private sector: Dr. Yorgos Stephanedes Dr. George Stavrakakis Prof. Katja Hanzic Mr. Dimitris Tsiamitros Mr. Tassos Sidiropoulos Mr. Dimitrios Koubogiannis Prof. Dimitrios Stimoniaris Mr. Konstantinos Kyriakopoulos Dr. Constantinos Balaras Dr. Giovanni Scaramuzzo Dr. Panagiotis Zervas Dr. Ioannis Pappas

The Open Day was attended by more than 80 persons and the event was successfully organized, fulfilling the purpose of its implementation as stated in the Project’s content. The Open Day focused on the presentation of the synergetic projects, the proposed indicators and methods for effective and affordable retrofit works in public sector and the integration of projects findings into a smart 2

public procurement. The final part of the Open Day included discussion among the speakers and the participants, as well as indications regarding future directions. This report was created within the framework of the Project “REPUBLIC-MED: REtrofitting PUBLic spaces in Intelligent MEDiterranean Cities”. The Project, as part of the MED Programme, is cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund and National Funds. The present document is the input for the activity 2.2 – Open Days, on behalf of the Municipality of Piraeus, implemented by KiNNO Consultants Ltd. It is noted that the videos and the photos of the event have been submitted as a different deliverable.

2. Description of implemented activities The title of the Open Day organized in the 20th of March 2014 was “OPEN DAY - MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE ENERGY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND METHODS FOR A SUSTAINABLE FRAMEWORK OF BUILDINGS REFURBISHMENT”. The event was hosted by Piraeus Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Piraeus and started at 09.00 pm with the registration of the attendees who were 80, coming from public and private sector. The event was co-organized with the University of Patras in the framework of GRASP project. The coordinator of the event was Mr. Ioannis Pittas, Head of Department of Electrical Division of Mechanical-Electrical of the Municipality of Piraeus, who also made the introduction of the Open Day. The themes that were presented and analyzed by the speakers were the following: Introduction- Welcome speech presentation of Piraeus strategy and scope of the event Mr. Petros Kokkalis – Executive Councilor of the Department of European and National Resources, Directorate of Planning and Development of Municipality of Piraeus Professor Yorgos J. Stephanedes – Project Coordinator of GRASP and Director of the Environmental and Transportation Engineering Division, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras

Presentation of Synergetic Projects - REPUBLIC-MED – Dr. George M. Stavrakakis - COEFFICIENT – Ms. Maršenka Marksel - MARIE – Mr. Tassos Sidiropoulos - REMIDA – Mr. Theodoros Patsoules - BIOFOSS – Mr. Konstantinos Kyriakopoulos - PEEBPE – Prof. Dimitrios Stimoniaris - GRASP – Prof. Yorgos J. Stephanedes

Framework of proposed plan in the new MED programme - Introduction to the framework, User needs, Framework objective, MED objectives relative to the framework, Cohesion between the proposed framework and the goals of the new MED programme, Professor Yorgos J. Stephanedes Framework of synergy: Suggesting new indicators and methods for effective and affordable retrofit works in public sector - Energy upgrading of buildings, Bioclimatic upgrading of exterior areas, Dr. George Stavrakakis Best practices in bioclimatic upgrading of urban open spaces: The case of Peristeri, Dr. Ioannis Pappas Indicative Renewable Energy Sources Systems Strategy/Business Planning in Municipalities – Optimal Decision Making, Dr. Panagiotis Zervas Estimation of Embodied Energy and Embodied CO2 in the Electro-Mechanical Installations of Urban Hellenic Dwellings, Assist. Prof. Dimitrios Koubogiannis Building Diagnosis for Supporting Decision Making and Energy Performance Indicator Tracking Schemes for the Continuous Optimization of Residential Building Stock Refurbishment, Dr. Constantinos Balaras

Integration of projects findings into a smart public procurement -

Key performance indicators (KPIs) and objectives of a retrofit project, Dr. George Stavrakakis & Prof. Yorgos Stephanedes 4

Exemplary study methods to estimate KPIs and to identify best retrofit solutions, Dr. George Stavrakakis & Prof. Yorgos Stephanedes Supporting SMEs in energy efficiency and RES market in MED, Prof. Katja Hanzic Project monitoring: Ex-ante/ex-post monitoring of KPIs, Mr.Dimitris Tsiamitros

Discussion and future directions More specifically, the Open day- MED/EU Synergies Conference started with the welcome speech by the Executive Councilor of the Department of European and National Resources, Directorate of Planning and Development of Municipality of Piraeus, Mr. Petros Kokkalis who presented the strategy of Piraeus regarding its priorities and focus, as well as the involvement of the Municipality in projects. In addition the Executive Councilor of the Department of European and National Resources made a presentation of REPUBLIC MED project and referred to the climate change and the indicators that are used in order to be calculated. He also stressed out that the objective of the Municipality is to participate in projects that enhance an integrated urban development, aiming at becoming an international maritime and tourism centre. He also mentioned the paradox that the city of Piraeus presents the largest rate of unemployment, although its main source of revenues is tourism and maritime, the key sectors of Greek economy. Finally, he said that it is very important to create new job opportunities through the retrofitting of the public spaces and buildings, as it is proposed in the framework of REPUBLIC MED project. Following the welcome speech, Dr. Yorgos Stefanedes reffered to the objective of the MED/EU Synergies Conference and pointed out the importance of the co-operation among the projects and the right way to achieve the foreseen results. The European Union has as priority not only the implementation of the projects but the synergies and the cooperation among different projects. The objective is to choose specific themes and results of different projects and create something new, like the indicators that would be presented in the framework of the 2nd Open Day. The aim of all cooperating projects is to increase energy efficiency and decrease the carbon footprint of buildings and open spaces. The main section of the Open Day started with the presentation of the projects that have the opportunity to create synergies within their implementation. More specifically, the projects are the following (the detailed presentations of the projects are attached to the Activity Report): REPUBLIC-MED ď&#x192; REtrofitting PUBLic spaces in Intelligent MEDiterranean Cities

The project focuses on the development and experimentation of a new methodology for conducting complete techno-economical studies towards the refurbishment of public buildings and open spaces (public spaces). COEFFICIENT  COllaborative framework for energy EFFICIENT SME systems The aim is to to establish collaborative framework among SME and R&D organizations in achieving energy efficiency in manufacture and logistic sector. MARIE  Mediterranean Building Rethinking for Energy Efficiency Improvement The aim of MARIE project is to build up capacities in the Mediterranean region with a view to enhancing the energy performance of buildings. REMIDA The project aims at developing new EE and RES solutions in Mediterranean cities, through the strengthening of the local energy policy and strategy and the promotion of a smart management of energy supply and demand. BIOFOSS The aim of the project is to protect the environment through the promotion of biomass for substitution of fossil fuels in heating and power generation PEEBPE  Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings & Protection of the Environment The project focuses on proposing possible interventions in these buildings in order to cover a significant part of their consumption with environmentally-friendly or renewable energy technologies. GRASP  GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector The objective of GRASP is to increase the potential of MED Smart cities in organizing and developing Smart and Green e-Procurement processes with a focus on renewable energy sources and energy efficient solutions. The 2nd part of the Open Day was dedicated to the framework of the synergy among the proposed projects and Dr. Stefanedes along with Dr. Stavrakakis made an introduction to the framework, the objectives of MED programme relative to the framework, the cohesion between the proposed framework and the goals of the new MED programme. Dr. Stefanedes presented the new MED Programme, the identified priority axis, the objectives, with special indication of the axis that applies to the theme of the synergetic projects. In addition, he mentioned the type of projects that will be funded and more specifically the modules that will be included in the new proposals. Finally he 6

pointed out that the projectsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; representatives have to take into consideration the special accomplishments that each one can describe based on past expertise. Dr. Stavrakakis moved on with the proposal of new indicators and methods that could lead to efficient retrofit projects in public sector. More specifically, his presentation focused on Preparation considerations of retrofit works in public spaces Major retrofits of buildings and Retrofits in open spaces The main section of this session hosted the speeches of invited speakers as they are presented in the following section of the report. Dr. Ioannis Pappas referred to Best practices in bioclimatic upgrading of urban open spaces: The case of Peristeri. His presentation focused on a project that is being implemented by his company, Green Evolution, in the Municipality of Peristeri and more specifically in the Reconstruction of open spaces in the area of Chorafa by applying bioclimatic design. He referred to specific issues that are of major importance and define the success of a project, like the fact that since the beginning, the persons or the organizations that are responsible for the project, it is necessary to have measurable data in order to be able to observe the overall progress. He made a special reference to the material that were used and their characteristics, the steps that were followed to achieve the foreseen results. In addition, he mentioned the indicators that were measured and the respective legislative framework and prerequisites as far as public procurements are concerned. The following speaker was Dr. Panagiotis Zervas and his presentation based on Green Procurement approach that does not refer to the cheapest offer but to the best economic offer (environmental and life-cycle-cost performance). He presented a tool that is used for the calculation of the life cycle cost of specific offers and the way a body could select the best offer regarding an investment. He mentioned a series of indicators that we have to take into consideration when evaluating an offer and gave examples in order to apply the methodology in practice. Mr. Dimitrios Koubogiannis, from the Department of Energy Technology Engineering of the Technological Educational Institute of Athens, talked about the Estimation of Embodied Energy and Embodied CO2 in the Electro-Mechanical Installations of Urban Hellenic Dwellings. His presentation included the following sections:

Introduction to EE & ECO2 Motivation & Aim The building case studies Material & Mass Analysis Embodied Energy Analysis Presentation of Results Ongoing & Future Research

The final invited speaker was Dr. Constantinos Balaras, from the National Observatory of Athens, who referred to Building Diagnosis for Supporting Decision Making and Energy Performance Indicator Tracking Schemes for the Continuous Optimization of Residential Building Stock Refurbishment. He focused on statistical data regarding energy performance of buildings and the tools and methodologies that are used for building diagnosis and the identification of buildings’ needs, like TOBUS, INVESTIMMO, EPIQR and XENIOS. The 2nd part of his presentation referred to Energy and Climate Change - The ERA of EPBD & EU Directives NZEBs - Challenges & Opportunities. More specifically, he talked about the EU Directive on Energy Efficiency, the new EU Targets towards 2030, building typologies and relevant tools like TABULA, the final energy use in dwellings, the role of human factor and some refurbishment scenarios in Hellenic residential building stock.

The following section was dedicated to the Integration of projects findings into a smart public procurement and Dr. Stavrakakis along with Dr. Stefanedes talked about Key performance indicators and objectives of a retrofit project. The first presentation was entitled “Key performance indicators (KPIs) and objectives of retrofit projects” and referred to the target buildings that are schools and offices and to the objectives of retrofitting, which could be the users’ productivity and performance, comfort and air quality, cost savings etc. In addition, the speaker mentioned a series of indicators and their desired levels. More specifically, the indicators were the following: -

Retrofit cost

Depreciation period

Total Annual energy consumption 8

Annual energy consumption of cooling system

Total annual CO2 emissions

Participation of renewable energy sources

During the presentation, the speaker made a special reference to Greece and Law 4122/2013 that is the Greek typical harmonization with 2010/31/EC, the NZEB and the respective barriers. The next section was dedicated to open spaces, the targets of retrofitting and the proposed indicators and their desired levels: -

Ts: Spatially mean value of air temperature in noon of a representative summer day (normally the hottest day) of the year at 1.80 m from the ground.

UHI Intensity: Difference between Ts and temperature of nearby rural environment in the same summer hour.

TCIs: Spatially mean value of a thermal Comfort Index, e.g. PMV, PET, UTCI, in the same summer hour, at 1.80m from the ground.

Tw: Spatially mean value of air temperature in a typical winter day of the year at 1.80m from the ground.

TCIw: Spatially mean value of the thermal comfort index, in the same winter hour, at 1.80m from the ground.

WS: Spatial mean value of wind speed at both winter and summer at 1.80m from the ground.

The following presentation was the â&#x20AC;&#x153;Study methods to estimate KPIs and to identify best retrofit solutionsâ&#x20AC;? and started with the objectives of retrofit project: -

Audits and collection of data

Diagnosis of vulnerabilities in the base-case

Assess the impact of alternative retrofits

Decision-making towards the selection of the best scenario

The speaker referred to the process of audits and data collection that was followed in the framework of REPUBLIC MED project for the selected public buildings and open spaces and more specifically the questionnaire, the climate data processing, the behavior assessment and the software that was used in order to depict the pilot areas. 9

The next speaker was Mrs. Katja Hanžič from the University of Maribor (Faculty of logistics) and her presentation focused on the support offered to SMEs regarding energy efficiency and RES markets in MED area. The proposed solution was the creation of a Living Lab that is an environment in which researchers, developers and end-users co-create, innovative products or services in the shortest possible time according to the needs of end-users and test the idea in the real-life environment. In the framework of CO-EFFICIENT project, the consortium elaborated a desktop research on existing methodologies, approaches and tools for EE and RES, identified key stakeholders, associations, clusters, defined the strategy and the objective of the lab and defined the terms of collaboration, the rules and further modifications. The partners involved key stakeholders in workshops, identified areas with large unused capacities within energy assemblies installed in SMEs, developed analytical tool and indicators in order to improve EE and the use of RES and tested them with 50 SMEs and finally implemented individual consultation to companies in Living Labs. The speaker completed her presentation by offering some interesting information on the case of Slovenia regarding the implementation of the project. The final presentation was made by Mr.Dimitris Tsiamitros, Assistant Professor of the Technological Education Institute of Western Macedonia and was dedicated to “Project monitoring: Ex-ante and expost monitoring of Key Performance Indicators” based on the findings coming from PEEBPE project. The issues that were mentioned were the basic steps for energy upgrade of public buildings, the difficulties of energy upgrade projects, key performance indicators and ways of ex-ante and ex-post monitoring achievement of desired values. The project’s partnership created synergies with GRASP, MARie and BIOFOSS projects and submitted research proposals at ERANETMED and HORIZON 2020 calls. The 3rd section of the Open Day aimed at offering the opportunity to the participants to discuss with the speakers upon issues that were presented and analyzed during the previous sections like the use of technical and financial indicators when it comes to refurbishment and their interpretation, energy management systems, the involvement of unemployed people in energy related projects.

3. Concluding Remarks During the 2nd Open Day organized by the Municipality of Piraeus and the University of Patras the issues that were raised by the invited speakers and the participants covered a wide range of thematic areas related to REPUBLIC MED and GRASP projects. The MED/ EU Synergies Conference focused on the presentation of energy performance indicators and the methods that can be used in order to create a sustainable framework for buildingsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; refurbishments. In addition, the representatives of a series of relevant projects gave their point of view concerning the methods used for retrofitting buildings and open spaces, sharing their experiences and knowledge. The scope was to integrate the projectsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; findings into smart public procurements through the use of the most suitable KPIs. The project REPUBLIC-MED supports through its life cycle and the pilot activities that take place in the participating countiries, the design and elaboration of a new methodology aiming at the implemetation of intergrated techno-financial studies for the energy retroffiting of public spaces. The 1st2nd Open Day constituted a dissemination event on behalf of the Municipality of Piraeus and the University of Patras and the opportunity for the participants to meet each other and have a fruitful communication and co-operation.

ANNEX I - Agenda (Greek and English version)

ANNEX II - Invitation (Greek version)

ANNEX III - Participantsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; list

ANNEX IV - Presentations (electronic file)

The REPUBLIC-MED project

MED/EU Synergies Conference REPUBLIC-MED 2nd Open Day Dr. G.M. Stavrakakis

Motivation Design for compliance â&#x20AC;&#x201C; National BES tools Disregarding energy behaviour

The ground floor and the first floor is stone (rubble) wall, while the second floor is a brick wall. The ground floor and the first floor include some coated surfaces surrounding the openings. The openings frames are synthetic double glazing with spacing 12mm, while the ratio of frame/glazing is 20%/80%. 12

250

200

Actual electricity consumption (PPC data)

150

6 4

Simulated electricity consumption

100

Divergence (%)

Dec

Oct

Nov

Sep

Jul

Aug

Jun

Apr

May

Mar

Jan

Feb

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Prediction inaccuracies, especially during summer for cooling purposes.

Motivation

Urban Sprawl => Urban Heat Island

Project overall concept

Design for reliable predictions Methods thatBuildings respond to new Open spaces forinteractions directives -requirements - Indoor-outdoor UHI assessment implementation - - Energy Plans behaviour to introduce New insights on urban approach to Optimization -

Pilotpolicy applications Retrofit technologies makers environmental planning

Training seminars

Design for compliance

Enrich design for compliance Accounting for external microclimate effects Accounting for behaviour Optimization=> Possibilities in costoptimal minimum requirements Train the stakeholders

Consortium and implementation phases REVIEW OF INNOVATIVE METHODS

Ongoing policies

Innovative simulation tools for BEP analysis

Successes and failures of current study methods

Innovative simulation tools for UHI impact analysis

Desk-research level

CURRENT CONTEXT ANALYSIS

POOL OF STAKEHOLDERS

Scientists

Engineers

Dissemination level

PILOT ACTIONS

NOVEL METHODOLOGIES

Applications to five pilot sites in each partner Country

Innovative impact assessment simulation tools

Evaluation of benefits on decision-making and policy planning

Integration of decisionmaking schemes

OUTREACHING STAKEHOLDERS

Open days

Workshops

Training seminars

Technical meetings

Questionnaire surveys

Website Social media

Development level

Application level

Public authorities Energy services providers Policy makers

General public

Result 1: National energy & environmental performance study methods

Result 2: Public-buildings typologies in Piraeus and strategic selection of pilot buildings

Result 3: Open-spaces typologies in Piraeus and strategic selection of pilot sites

Result 4: REPUBLIC-MED decision-making methodology Audits and participatory processes Climate data hourly recordings of a reference year

Inputs to the field model

Execution of improved BES=> Calculation of indicators

Inputs to the BES tool

Geometry Systems Thermal zones Envelope properties

Execution of field model=> climate data contours near building/hour

systemsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; operation schedules

Parametric analysis using technologiesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; inventories

Decision-making (multicriteria)

Result 5: Questionnaire forms and implementation instructions

Ongoing results: Pilot applications

5-year Climate-data time-series

ENVI-met

ď&#x192;&#x2DC; Kallergi building

800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0

5-year Climatedata time-series

ENVI-met

ď&#x192;&#x2DC; Karpathou square

E+ KENAK

Ongoing evaluation activities  Evaluation of accuracy: Comparison with traditional methods and with actual data (energy bills and measurements)  Evaluation of applicability: Required resources, computational time, and answer the question “Does it worth the work burden?”: Comparison of cost-indicators produced by the REPUBLIC-MED and the traditional approaches.

 Evaluation of acceptability by stakeholders: Share the aspects of REPUBLIC-MED approach with cycles of potential users and ask them to evaluate/recommend, e.g. stakeholder consultation.

Expected outcomes  Improved diagnostics of vulnerabilities (e.g. hot-spots analysis) and design of mitigation and retrofit strategies and plans  Contribute to local/regional authorities urban-planning activities  Recommendations on calculation approaches  Reliable compliance with directives, e.g. 2010/31/EC  Contribution to green and smart public procurements through the introduction of novel Key Performance Indicators and Methods

ΕΥΧΑΡΙΣΤΩ ΠΟΛΥ Project technical coordinator Dr. George M. Stavrakakis Chemical Engineer, PhD, MSc

Division of Development Programmes Centre for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving (CRES) Email address: gstavr@cres.gr Postal address: 19th km, Marathonos Av., GR-19009, Pikermi, Attiki, Greece Tel.: +30 210 6603372 Fax: +30 210 6603303

www.republic-med.eu

COllaborative framework for energy EFFICIENT SME systems Maršenka Marksel University of Maribor, Faculty of logistics

12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

Project CO-EFFICIENT COllaborative framework for energy EFFICIENT SME systems EU programme MEDITERAN: â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Axe 1: Strengthening innovation capacities â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Objective 1.1: Dissemination of innovative technologies and know-how Duration: 1. 1. 2013 - 30. 6. 2015

Aim:

to establish collaborative framework among SME and R&D organizations in achieving energy efficiency in manufacture and logistic sector.

What seems to be the problem?  Manufacture and logistics sector: 1/3 energy consumption in Mediterranean.  Most of enterprises are SME with numerous of different problems.  Most of enterprises are SMEs and are facing different business problems − − − − − − −

lack of financial and human resources, lack of knowledge, lack of ICT support, no economies of scale, low efficiency high average cost. Weak communication and coordination between the R&D sector and SMEs.

 SME innovate in different way as large enterprises.

Objectives  To establish permanent collaborative framework for energy efficiency and use of renewable resources linking SMEs, the R&D sector, as well as other institutional stakeholders in the Mediterranean area.  To set-up of a living lab environment, active in all partner countries in which SMEs as final users and R&D organisations as the main developers will collaborate to develop new solutions for better use of energy in production and operations.  Two thematic areas 

Transport (Transport Living Lab)



Production processes (Production Living Lab)

Added value and expected impacts  Innovation in and for SMEs  Knowledge management, transfer  Implementation and customization of available technologies in SMEs  To encourage SMEs to communicate their business problems related to the energy efficiency and use of renewable resources to partners, R&D organisations and stakeholders and to develop customized solutions.

Partnership ITL CNA Modena SATA

AFT

Valenciaport CIERVAL

UM RRA Mura

RDA Slavonia and Baranja CfEO

Non partner structures

Cluster PACA Logistique (FR)

1. ASCER - Spanish Ceramic Tile Manufacturers' Association (ES)

Ministry of Economic Development and Technology (SI)

2. Transport Association, GZS - Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SI)

Public Agency for Technology of the Republic of Slovenia – TIA (SI)

3. Energy Efficiency Cluster (HR)

Croatian Employers' Association - Regional Office Osijek (HR)

10.

Cluster Logistique Rhône-Alpes (FR)

4. Agricultural Equipment Cluster (HR) 5. OZS - Chamber of craft and small business of Slovenia (SI)

Key results CO-EFFICIENT Framework

eServices (Transport)

Analytical tool (production)

CO-EFFICIENT portal & Knowledge database

CO-EFFICIENT framework for energy efficiency



Updating of the CO-EFFICIENT portal & database;



Transfer of best practices;



Searching for project ideas;



Set-up of living labs and pilots in the MED region.

Living labs International Living Lab- transport

Co-development and testing of eServices

International Living Labâ&#x20AC;&#x201C; production processes Co-development and testing of Analytical tool

5 pilots (1 per country)

1 pilot (transport) 5 SME

1 R&D

1 Ass. of SME or cluster

1 pilot (production) 3 SME

1 R&D

1 Ass. of SME or cluster

eServices for SMEs 1. “Logistic Service Manager” – provides logistics optimization by combining the transport demand of several companies (transport consolidation) 2. “Document Data Extraction ” - enables paperless operation by transforming paper version of documents into digital versions. 3. “Distributed Planning” - management of the network of subcontractors (SMEs) in the supply chain - joint procurement of services

http://coefficient-project.eu/eservices/eservices

Lessons learned • • • • • • •

60% of vehicles belong to the most polluting classes: EURO 0, EURO 2, EURO 1. Lack of internationalization processes and logistics outsourcing – no new markets, no new logistics solutions Customer do not have possibility to control whole transport process Customers select transport provider based on lower price, time and flexibility Low use of advanced technologies (ex. Information flow management (ERP, CRM) Low investments in ICT Poor integration between transport and manufacturing information systems.

SMEs needs The analysis of the transport sector reveals the following SMEs needs: • Creation of strategic partnership and development of collaborative logistics, in order to enter in new potential areas of interest and develop innovative projects; • Improvement of the transport services in terms of flexibility and quality; • Improvement of the supply chain management; • Investment in innovation and advanced technologies; • Recognizing the strategic role of logistics

CO-EFFICIENT contribution •

Foster the business network – better integration between SMEs

•

Access to advance ICT tools: • • • •

Foster logistic and transport optimisation Reduce logistics cost Improve level of customer services Improve level of customer satisfaction

Analytical tool designed to support SMEs in the identification of key production processes and operations that could be more energy efficient 1. SMEs analysis 2. Analytical tool development 3. Testing of the tool beta version 4. Analytical tool operational

Analytical tool • • • •

To identify key areas for improvement of energy efficiency Analytical tool is based of Key Performance Indicators measuring energy consumption and energy cost In the final version of tool 25 KPI will be included and it will be tested on 50 SME‘s The toll will be self-learning and so, it will be constantly improved by more SME’s using it.

Analytical tool (questionnaire)

Analytical tool (KPI)

Analytical tool â&#x20AC;&#x201C; best practice and solutions

Key areas for improvement •

Awareness: energy accounting system, analyze actual energy cost, energy management system – involvement of energy manager

•

Monitoring: Monitor energy consumption (metering devices), central supervision system on weekly consumption

•

Maintenance: Innovative software applications for maintenance planning and management

•

Adjustment: adjust control windows and ventilation, shut down devices, set appropriate temperatures for cooling and heating, schedule the operation of individual devices

•

Improvement: Exploiting the wasted heat, Enforce thermal insulation, Install photovoltaic and solar panels, Centralize heating and air conditioning controls

•

Replacement: lighting solutions, heating and hot water solutions, old machine tool engines, entire production machines

•

Economics: Participate in purchasing groups, Optimization of energy purchase contracts, White certificates

CO-EFFICIENT portal & Knowledge database

http://coefficient-project.eu/knowledgedatabase/index

CO-EFFICIENT portal & Knowledge database

Future challenge

Sustainability of collaborative frameworkâ&#x20AC;Ś?

http://www.coefficient-project.eu/

Maršenka Marksel marsenka.marksel@um.si University of v Maribor, Faculty of Logistics

MED Strategic Project MARIE (Mediterranean Building Rethinking for Energy Efficiency Improvement)

Presented by: Anastasios Sidiropoulos - Director of Programmes Department â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia

GRASP Synergies Meeting Piraeus - Greece, 12 March 2015

The MARIE Project – Basic Data Project Acronym: MARIE  “MediterrΑnean Building Rethinking for Energy Efficiency Improvement” “to promote the principles of energy efficiency in buildings implementation”  A Strategic Project of the 2007‐2013 MED Programme  

 

Project Start: April 2011 Project End: December 2014 MARIE Project Web-site: http://www.marie-medstrategic.eu MARIE Platform: http://www.marieapp.eu

MARIE Project Partners

23 Partners from 9 European countries from the MED area (Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, Slovenia, Greece, Malta, Cyprus, Montenegro)

Lead Partner: Government of Catalonia, Department of Territory and Sustainability a population of ~ 30 millions of inhabitants

Why a MED Project in Energy Efficiency? 

The achievement of EU2020 energy efficiency objectives in EU Med countries will depend on the strategic investments in Med space of European funds



The energy consumption trend in MED regions buildings is higher than the EU average and against the EU2020 targets



Considering the difficulties for MED countries to reach in 2020 the EU objectives, the 23 MARIE partners have agreed to work together in developing the Mediterranean Building Energy Efficiency Improvement Strategy (MEDBEES) in order to intensify, motivate and facilitate the public and private efforts to that direction

Conclusions From Data Compiled So Far (1) 1)

The MARIE Zone building stock is large: > 10 million buildings and > 30 million homes

The building stock is ancient & energy inefficient: majority of buildings constructed before 1980, without insulation, and prior to inclusion of effective energy efficiency criteria in building regulations

In residential buildings, final energy consumption varies from 90 kWh/mÂ˛ to 150 kWh/mÂ˛ (useful area) and space heating is always the most significant energy requirement varying from 40% to 65% of total consumption

Conclusions From Data Compiled So Far (2) 4)

30 - 40% of the people living in Med regions spend more for heating than for rent!

The current energy efficiency refurbishment rates in the MARIE regions ranges from 0.12% to 0.26%. This rate is 2-3 times lower than the average energy refurbishment rate in north-western EU countries. This very slow refurbishment rate in the Med area further demonstrates the need for urgent policy action

MARIE Project Basic Goals 

“to promote the principles of energy efficiency in buildings implementation in the MED area by building a new Energy Renovation Strategy (MEDBEES) around the Mediterranean”



“to establish the socio‐economic conditions for energy efficiency improvement in the Med building stock in the framework of EU policy objectives, overcoming barriers and creating sustainable development opportunities in the MED area”

MARIE Specific Objectives 

Adaptation & update of integrated urban and regional regulations for sustainable energy renovation of existing buildings



Innovation of financing models for energy renovation of existing buildings, based on public‐private synergies and the integration of funding sources



The improvement and innovation in the supply of materials, products and services adapted to the current needs of energy renovation of existing buildings

The MEDBEE Strategy ď&#x192;ź

ď&#x192;ź

In order to achieve these objectives it has been defined a MARIE strategy: the Mediterranean Building Energy Efficiency Strategy (MEDBEES), comprising 5 Strategic Lines and 14 Strategic Measures

Each Strategic Measure is associated with one or more MARIE Pilot Actions to define and validate their content & suitability

The MEDBEES Construction Process

(2011-2012) ď&#x192;ź

(2012-2014)

2014

2014-2020

The final Document of MEDBEES will be addressed to policy makers and public and private organizations from all the MED regions, cities and countries that are working to improve energy renovation in buildings

The MEDBEE Strategy 5 STRATEGIC LINES Strategic Line 1:

DEVISING TOOLS FOR ENERGY RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS

Strategic Line 2:

MARKET ACTIVATION FOR ENERGY RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS

Strategic Line 3:

COMPETITIVENESS AND INNOVATION IN BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Strategic Line 4:

BUILDINGS’ ENERGY EFFICIENCY PUBLIC GOVERNANCE

Strategic Line 5:

ECONOMIC RESOURCES FOR ENERGY RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS

MARIE Pilot Action 2.1: Third Party Financing Mechanisms Scope of PA 2.1.: “To test and evaluate innovative financial mechanisms for energy conservation investments in buildings of the Med area, based on: - the Third Party Financing (TPF) approach -the Involvement of Energy Service Companies (ESCOs)” Goal of PA 2.1.: “To identify & select appropriate buildings of the Med area in order to increase the energy efficiency via refurbishment and creating sustainable & long-term financing mechanisms for energy conservation investments in buildings”

MARIE Pilot Action 2.1 – The Case of ANKO Selection of Buildings 



2 buildings in the Western Macedonia Region finally selected for the implementation of PA 2.1: 

The Hospital of “Mpodosakeio” (Ptolemaida)



The Administrative Building of West Macedonia Region (ZEP Kozani)

2 different types of buildings: offices building and hospital

The Hospital of “Mpodosakeio”

The Administrative Building of West Macedonia Region

The Hospital of “Mpodosakeio”   

     

Ptolemaida 20,000 m² 5 floors (Α Basement-Β Basement) Α, Β, C: Floors Flat roof Built after 1980 24-hours operation No refurbishment Heating: District heating All documents available (Construction License, Building Contract, Drawings, Electricity and heating bills for the last 3 years)

The Administrative Building of West Macedonia Region         

ZEP Kozani 11,200 m2 3 floors & basement Tilt roof Built after 2000 No refurbishment 7.00-17.00 operational hours Heating: District heating All documents available (Construction License, Building Contract, Drawings, Electricity and heating bills for the last 3 years)

MARIE Pilot Action 2.1 – Implementation Steps (1)  Preliminary energy audits to the 2 selected buildings  Cost/benefit analysis of possible investment solutions to the 2 selected buildings  Setting up of the specifications of the Call for the selection of an Energy Service Company (ESCO)  Eligibility criteria: only ESCOs registered in the Greek Registry for ESCOs (www.escoregistry.gr), maintained by the competent Department of the Ministry of Environment Energy and Climate Change

 Tender Procedure for ESCO selection  Signing of Contract: 26th June 2014

MARIE Pilot Action 2.1 – Implementation Steps (2) Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) for Energy Saving Interventions in the Public Buildings in the WM Region-Greece  Identification of the energy saving potential and the relative energy savings in the selected buildings – Feasibility study for the whole building, for each one building, and specifically for the measures that are going to be implemented, in accordance with the specifications that are going to be set in the EPC contract model  Identification of the technical characteristics of the EPC contract and of its Annexes  Implementation of the proposed measures in accordance to the procedures that had been set in the EPC contract model

MARIE Pilot Action 2.1 – Implementation Steps (3)

 Operation of the installed equipment  Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) issued for the 2 selected buildings

PA 2.1 – The Hospital of “Mpodosakeio” (1) Renovation of the Old Low Efficiency Lighting System  Focus on the corridors of 3 hospital clinics where the lights are operational 8,760 hours / year  60 low efficiency TL-D T8 fluorescent lamps 58W with magnetic type ballasts were replaced with corresponding LED type Philips “Master LEDtube, PERF 1500mm 31W/865 T8”

PA 2.1 – The Hospital of “Mpodosakeio” (2)  Detailed measurements of the illuminance and the electricity consumption were conducted before and after the works

 The illuminance was increased due to the new lamps by 49.7% (from 193 lux to 384 lux)

PA 2.1 – The Hospital of “Mpodosakeio” (3)  The electricity consumption was reduced due to the installation of the new lamps by 16,293.6 kWh on a yearly basis

 The savings per year are estimated at: 16,293.6 kWh X 0.128 €/kWh = 2,085.6 €

PA 2.1 – The Administrative Building of WM Region (1) Renovation of the External Road Low Efficiency Lighting System:

 After thorough examination of the building’s energy consumption… …the surrounding area lighting system was chosen for the energy conservation measures

PA 2.1 – The Administrative Building of WM Region (2)  14 High Pressure Na lights with 250W lamps were replaced with Power LED type “700mA, 4000Κ power 110W – 13720lm, Disano / 3282 Rolle T3”

PA 2.1 – The Administrative Building of WM Region (3)  Detailed measurements of the luminous flux and the electricity consumption were conducted before and after the works  The luminous flux remained the same after the installation of the outdoor lights (from 61 lux to 59 lux)

PA 2.1 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; The Administrative Building of WM Region (4) ď&#x192;ź The lighting result of the new lights is considerably better in respect to the old Na lights due to the exceptional operational characteristics of the led technology

PA 2.1 – The Administrative Building of WM Region (5)

 The electricity consumption was reduced due to the installation of the new outdoor lights by 8,623.81 kWh on a yearly basis

 The savings per year are estimated at: 8,623.81 kWh X 0.13175 €/kWh = 1,136.2 €

Achievements - Agreements – Synergies so far… (1) 

Support of MARIE project from European parliament by including it in its Report [2013/2038(INI)/8.5.2013] concerning the implementation and impact of the energy efficiency measures under Cohesion Policy)



New Regional Operational Programme of W. Macedonia Region (2014-2020) – endorsement of MARIE project (MEDBEE Strategy) in the Thematic Priority 4 (Supporting the shift

towards a low-carbon economy in all sectors) 

Adoption of Ljubljana Declaration – responding to challenges regarding energy efficiency and renewable energy in Mediterranean buildings (MARIE, ELIH-MED, PROFORBIOMED)

Achievements - Agreements – Synergies so far… (2) 

Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between MARIE, GRASP & PEEBRE E.U. projects



Providing information to the Ministry of Environment, Energy & Climate Change concerning MARIE objectives and achievements

Thank you for your attention! For more info please contact: Anastasios Sidiropoulos Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia S.A. - ANKO 1-3, Fon Karagianni str., 50100 Kozani-GREECE www.anko.gr tsidiropoulos@anko.gr Tel. 0030 24610 24022 Fax. 0030 24610 38628

ΔΗΜΟΤΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΗ ΤΗΛΕΘΕΡΜΑΝΣΗΣ ΕΥΡΥΤΕΡΗΣ ΠΕΡΙΟΧΗΣ ΑΜΥΝΤΑΙΟΥ (District Heating Company of Amyndeo – DHCA)

District Heating of Amyndeo – BioFoss Kiriakopoulos Konstantinos Dipl.,M.Sc. Electrical Eng.

12.03.2015

PROJECT BioFoss Protection of the environment through the promotion of biomass for substitution of fossil fuels in heating and power generation

Large scale – District Heating Systems

Domestic Heating– Energy efficiency of Buildings

501.902,00€

District Heating Company

Technological Educational Institute partners

Municipality of Bitola

What is District Heating District heating : supply of heating and hot water in a set of buildings from a central heating plant

Conventional heating systems: the heat source is located in the house area

CHPâ&#x20AC;&#x201C; District Heating

District Heating system of Amyndeo District Heating System Fuel CHP plant (ppc)

ΔΕΤΕΠΑ

Chp in Amindeo ppc (2 x 300 - 25 MW) Conventional (Lignite) (Heat Producer - Provider, Supplying company)

Distributor (Authorization by Regulatory Authority for Energy) (Municipal Company) (Installation – operation – maintance of system) Περίοδος

Αγορά ΔΕΗ Mwh

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011-2012

30.442 30.074 32.930 40.960 45.495

2012-2013

37032

District Heating system of Amyndeo

1. CHP PLANT (ppc installations)

2. Pump Station

3. Transmission Pipelines

District Heating system of Amyndeo

4. Distribution Network

5. Heating substation

District Heating system of Amyndeo

25 MWth => 35 MWth 400 m3/h => 600 m3/h 1200 m3

19,6 km 25 MWth

30 km => 44 km

Cost of whole system

Distribution Network: 6,47 m € Pump Station: 1,15 m € Heating Plant reconstructions: 2,8 m € Transmission Pipelines: 3,44 m € . Heating substations: 2,88 m € TOTAL:

16,74 m€

17% 38%

21% 7%

17% Δίκτυα Διανομής:

Αντλιοστάσιο:

Μετασκευές ΑΗΣ:

Αγωγός Μεταφοράς:

Θερμικοί Υποσταθμοί:

Why District Heating  Primary energy savings - optimal resource utilization  Great savings comparedσεtoσχέση oil heating(50%) Μεγάλη οικονομία με θέρμανση -πετρελαίου  Cleanτη environment "erasing chimneys“  Reducing oil imports - foreign currency savings

 Local economy Development – reduction of unemployment  Safe and clean facilities (no flame - chimney) - quiet – odorless  Maintenance-free for the consumer

Pollution Reduction Εκπομπές αερίου ρύπου (tn) CO2

SO2

13.261,90

2,95

CO2 18.945,57

SO2 4,22

NOx

2,41 10,06 0,81 Εκπομπές αερίου ρύπου (tn) CO 3,45

NOx 14,38

HC 1,15

Σωματίδια 1,21 Σωματίδια 1,72

District Heating Systems

PROJECT BioFoss WP/ Action Code WP/ Action Title WP 1

Management & Coordination

Action 1.1

Preparation Activities

Action 1.2 Action 1.3

Start

End

Cost

07/11/2014

30/01/2016

50.000,00 €

Programme management

07/11/2014

30/01/2016

46.000,00 €

Verification of expenditure

07/11/2014

30/01/2016

3.000,00 €

Action 1.4

Steering Committee meetings

07/11/2014

30/01/2016

1.000,00 €

Action 1.5

Title

WP 2

Information & Publicity

07/11/2014

30/11/2015

33.000,00 €

Action 2.1

Communication plan

07/11/2014

28/02/2015

1.500,00 €

Action 2.2

web site development

07/11/2014

30/06/2015

5.000,00 €

Action 2.3

Newsletters

07/11/2014

30/11/2015

8.700,00 €

Action 2.4

Material for promotion (printed, e-content, etc)

07/11/2014

30/11/2015

6.800,00 €

Action 2.5

Conferences

01/01/2015

30/11/2015

11.000,00 €

WP 3

Study of Biomass unit installation for district heating purposes or CHP Master plan regarding biomass availability - quality and cost- supply chain of biomass - assesment of required energy in district heating Study of thermal potential biomass technologies for heat or CHP production for district heating - design of all main and auxiliary unitssttudy - sitingof- the detailed cost Feasibility - economic project - tender documentation - preparation of authorizations and supportingon studies Workshop biomass availiability and quality in the joint administrative territory of Amyntaio and Bitola Study visit Austria in energy of agency of Upper Styria and HolzCluster Styria (Austria) and TUEindhoven-The Netherlands Identification of local buildings’ energy efficiency

01/12/2014

30/12/2015

135.204,00 €

01/01/2015

30/05/2015

28.000,00 €

01/03/2015

30/09/2015

53.000,00 €

01/06/2015

30/10/2015

39.000,00 €

01/10/2015

30/12/2015

1.404,00 €

01/12/2014

28/02/2015

13.800,00 €

01/01/2015

30/12/2015

69.198,00 €

Energy profiling (heat losses, thermal bridges, etc) of selected local buildings, Statistical projection of results in the total number of buildings of the area Identification of barriers regarding the utilization for space heating heating in house holds Preparation of a guide to serve as a decision making tool for the utilization of biomass for house hold and public building heating purposes Workshop on the role of biomass in space heating in the cross border region Title

01/01/2015

30/10/2015

38.250,00 €

01/01/2015

30/10/2015

11.000,00 €

01/01/2015

30/10/2015

16.800,00 €

01/10/2015

30/12/2015

3.148,00 €

01/01/2015

30/12/2015

24.500,00 €

01/01/2015

30/07/2015

8.750,00 €

01/01/2015

30/10/2015

13.888,00 €

01/08/2015

30/12/2015

1.862,00 €

Action 5.4

Identification of economic potential and reinforcement of local economic growth Introduction and development of the Cluster concept and engagement of key stake holders Evaluation of the economic benefits regarding the use of biomass in public buildings workshop on the role that biomass can play to the economic development of the region Title

Action 5.5

Title

WP 6

Pilot installation of CHP biomass units in public buildings Pilot biomass installation at High school of lechovo

01/01/2015

30/11/2015

190.000,00 €

Action 6.1

01/01/2015

30/09/2015

65.000,00 €

Action 6.2

Pilot biomass installation in the Bitola sport center

01/01/2015

30/09/2015

69.000,00 €

Action 6.3

Mini portable pellet lines

01/01/2015

30/09/2015

47.000,00 €

Action 6.4

Technical evaluation and testing of the installed units, and auditing of the pilot installation impact in the local society Title

01/05/2015

30/11/2015

9.000,00 €

Action 3.1 Action 3.2 Action 3.3 Action 3.4 Action 3.5 WP 4 Action 4.1 Action 4.2 Action 4.3 Action 4.4 Action 4.5 WP 5 Action 5.1 Action 5.2 Action 5.3

Action 6.5

502.000,00€ 235.000€

183.500€ 83.500€

Biomass in District Heating systems

1ο Senario PPC CHP 25 MW (35MW with the help of Heating tanks) Power Increase at 50 MW to cover additional housing, extraurban applications (greenhouses, industrial plants) or very nearby settlements 2ο Senario Lignite Reduction

Large scale biomass unit installation for district heating purposes

PPC Boiler reconstruction Conversion in Biomass Boiler

3ο Senario Installation of small scale biomass district heating systems in settlements of Amindeon

Biomass in District Heating systems

ΔΗΜΟΤΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΗ ΤΗΛΕΘΕΡΜΑΝΣΗΣ ΕΥΡΥΤΕΡΗΣ ΠΕΡΙΟΧΗΣ ΑΜΥΝΤΑΙΟΥ (District Heating Company of Amyndeo – DHCA)

THANK YOU Kiriakopoulos Konstantinos Dipl.,M.Sc. Electrical Eng.

Stimoniaris Dimitrios Scientific Responsible Technological Education Institute (TΕΙ) of Western Macedonia December 2014 PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

INTRODUCTION  The idea

Presentation Overview

 The Project  The implementation  The results  The conclusions

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

The special local characteristics / features

The idea

   

major climatological problems environmental burden the region’s contribution to the 20-20-20 the expertise of the Regional Authority of West Macedonia and the Laboratory of the ΤΕΙWM  the capabilities of INTERREGs  the need for cooperation with other partners and authorities

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

Buildings in the EU

The idea

Residences, public buildings, commercial buildings, etc.:  the largest energy consumer  the largest source of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the EU  approximately 40% of the total energy consumption

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

The Public Buildings in Greece

The idea

 typically large (schools, hospitals, city halls, local government buildings…)  in a large proportion old (historical, protected)  with problems at the building shell, with old E/Μ equipment, badly constructed, badly maintained  absence of energy management systems  lack of interest are: EXTREMELY ENERGY CONSUMING 5

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

“Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings and Protection of the Environment” (PEEBPE)

IPA Cross-Border Program «Greece – F.Y.R.O.M. 2007 – 2013»

The Project

Greece:

• ΤΕΙ of Western Macedonia • Municipality of Prespes

F.Y.R.O.M.: • Resen Municipality • ARCHAM Association Bitola Budget: 674.999 € Duration: 22/02/2013 - 21/02/201 (24 Months) 6

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

“Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings and Protection of the Environment” (PEEBPE)

Two main actions:

The Project

 Energy audits in fifty (50) public

buildings (25 + 25)

 The energy upgrade of three (3) of

them (2 + 1)

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

1st Main Action: The equipment

The implementation

 Establishment of joint working groups  Taking measurements under difficult (several times) conditions 8

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

1st Main Action: The energy audits procedure

The implementation

Conducting in-situ measurements 9

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

1st Main Action: The energy audits results in the 50 buildings

The Results

 Development of 50 studies  Buildings Plans / Designs development  Issuance of Energy Certificates (in 25)  Issuance of an Energy Audit Guide (in Slavic) 10

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

1st Main Action: The energy audits results in the buildings

The Results

Energy footprint in the EU 11

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

1st Main Action: The energy audits results in the buildings 350 300

The Results

250 200 150

Κατανάλωση αναφοράς σε kwh/m2

100 50

Υπάρχουσα κατάσταση σε kwh/m2

The consumption in kwh/m2 in 32 buildings 12

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

1st Main Action:

The energy audits results in the buildings 160 140

The Results

120 100

80 60

40 20 0

κόστος αναβάθμισης σε €/m2 εξοικονόμηση σε € ανα χίλια € κόστους

Upgrade cost and savings 13

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

1st Main Action:

The energy audits results in the buildings 35 30

The Results

25 20

Υπάρχουσα κατάσταση σε €

15 10

Κατανάλωση αναφοράς σε €

5 0

Προτεινόμενη κατανάλωση σε €

The actual consumption, the reference consumption and the suggested consumption of the buildings 14

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

1st Main Action:

The energy audits results in the buildings

The Results

Upgrade cost of the 32 buildings at the Α-Α+ level (heating mainly): ……... 5,3m € Saving ……………………..……. 508 thousand €/year

Depreciation Time……………………….…. 10,3 years (Ministry Values)

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

2nd Main Action: Energy Upgrade of three buildings

The Implementation Elementary School Agios Germanos Kindergarten Agios Germanos

Gymnasium Resen 16

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

2nd Main Action: Energy Upgrade of the Elementary School in Agios Germanos

The Implementation

External insulation installation 17

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

2nd Main Action: Energy Upgrade of the Kindergarten in Agios Germanos

The Implementation

Insulation installation 18

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

2nd Main Action: Energy Upgrade of the three buildings

The Implementation

Renovation of the heating system 19

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

2nd Main Action: The results of the energy upgrades in the buildings

The Results

Initial Classification of the Elementary School 20

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

2nd Main Action: The results of the energy upgrades in the buildings

The Results

Final Classification of the Elementary School 21

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

2nd Main Action: The results of the energy audits in the buildings

Upgrade Cost of the 2 buildings (Tender): …………………………….... 172.000€

The results Actual Upgrade Cost of the 2 buildings (Contracting Work): …………………………….... 130.000€ Saving ……………………..… 17.800€/year Energy consumption reduction…….85% Depreciation Time……………………….……. 7,3 years 22

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

Organization of the 1st International Conference BEE-RES “Building Energy Efficiency - Renewable Energy Sources”

Other actions

Images of the conference 23

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

Dissemination of the results

Other actions

Conducting of eight (8) Seminars and Workshops 24

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

TES-S Construction

Other actions

Autonomous thermal and electrical energy management system (TES-S) 25

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

Approved ΙΝΤERREG (BIOFOSS):

 Study on the biomass contribution in the district heating system in Amyntaio

Other actions

 Energy audit in 10 public buildings in Amyntaio and Lechovo.

 Pellet production unit and cogeneration boiler in an Elementary School in Lechovo.

BIOFOSS Budget 501.902€ Commencement: December 2014 26

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

Horizon 2020 (ENERGY PLAN):

Other actions

“Training of technical services in European Municipalities on the preparation of tender documents for energy upgrades of public buildings” Partners:  TTZ-Bremerhaven (Germany)  BioAzul (Spain)  Municipality of Argos Orestiko  ΤΕΙ of Western Macedonia

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

EranetMED

2ο “BUILDINGS ENERGY EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES”

Other actions

Partners: TEI of Western Macedonia Companies and research entities (Italy) University of Patras ITU (Turkey) VIKO (Turkey)

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

Memorandum of Understanding (MoU): Common actions

1) Strategic MED  MARie

Project synergies

http://www.marie-medstrategic.eu/en.html 2) MED  GRASP

http://www.grasp-med.eu/ 3) INTERREG  PEEBPE http://peebpe.eu/

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

BEST PRACTICE PROJECT – PEEBPE Makedonia Palace Thessaloniki - 8-9 May 2014

Awards

1st European Conference on Territorial Cooperation – Greek EU Presidency 2014 30

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

The conclusion

The opinion of the project team

is considered a really good practice since it makes us:

 scientifically wiser  economically richer and

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

The conclusion  socially proud

The opinion of the project team since the children of both schools will spend a warmer winter this year!!

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

The new challenge

Next step

 The accumulated experience in building energy saving (more than 150)  The main research field of the laboratory and of the project team, which is the “smart electricity grids”  The continuous and increasing interest of the society and the authorities for further reduction of the building energy consumption lead us………..

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

The new challenge To the combination of the two major contemporary challenges:

Next step

Energy saving and smart grids.

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

On behalf of the team

…thank you very much

PEEBPE: “Μια καλή πρακτική”

Framework of synergy: Suggesting new indicators and methods for effective and affordable retrofit works in the public sector

MED/EU Synergies Conference REPUBLIC-MED 2nd Open Day Dr. G.M. Stavrakakis

Preparation considerations of retrofit works in public spaces  Specification of the target group and beneficiaries of a retrofit project  Legislation and regulatory framework  Specification of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that reflect beneficiaries’ satisfaction and economic criteria  Objectives and goals: Desired levels of KPIs based on users’ preferences and regulatory framework

 Success criteria of project ex-post stage: Commissioning and project monitoring

Major retrofits of buildings  Definition of users’ preferences according to building type and use  Which are the energy and environmental KPIs that need to be estimated in the study stage?  Which are the desired levels of KPIs for major retrofits? Balancing users’ preferences, social, productivity and cost criteria and regulatory framework  Which is the approach to estimate KPIs? Audits and Participatory Processes?  How to organize the commissioning stage? What kind of monitoring and for how long?

Retrofits in open spaces  Definition of inhabitants’ preferences in physical and social terms  Which are the environmental KPIs that need to be estimated in the study stage, e.g. Urban Heat Island KPIs

 Which are the desired levels of KPIs?  Which is the approach to estimate KPIs? Audits and Participatory Processes?  How to organize the commissioning stage? What kind of monitoring and for how long?

ΕΥΧΑΡΙΣΤΩ ΠΟΛΥ Project technical coordinator Dr. George M. Stavrakakis Chemical Engineer, PhD, MSc

www.republic-med.eu

Βέλτιστες Πρακτικές Στη Βιοκλιματική Αναβάθμιση Αστικών Ανοικτών Χώρων Η Περίπτωση του Περιστερίου

Dr Ιωάννης Παππάς Co-Founder & CEO, Green Evolution AE Μηχ/γος Μηχ/κος, EuR.E.M.

ΔΕΙΚΤΕΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΑΠΟΔΟΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ ΒΙΩΣΙΜΟ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΑΝΑΚΑΙΝΙΣΗΣ ΚΤΙΡΙΩΝ , ΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ, 12/03/15, ΕΒΕΠ, ΠΕΙΡΑΙΑΣ

Η προς μελέτη περιοχή, σαν συμπαγής ενότητα, η οποία εξετάζεται στην βιοκλιματική μελέτη και προβλέπεται να καρπωθεί τα άμεσα αποτελέσματα της βιοκλιματικής ανάπλασης, έχει συνολική έκταση 120.000m2 περίπου και αποτελεί ενιαίο τμήμα αστικού ιστού του Δήμου Περιστερίου. Τα επιδιωκόμενα περιβαλλοντολογικά οφέλη – που παρουσιάζονται στην συνοδεύουσα βιοκλιματική μελέτη,- θα προκύψουν από παρέμβαση σε περιοχή συνολικού εμβαδού 28.085m2 προσεκτικά επιλεγμένη έτσι ώστε με την γεωμετρία της στον χώρο, να περικλείει και να επηρεάζει άμεσα τον μεγαλύτερο δυνατόν χώρο.

Ευχαριστώ Πολύ !

www.green-evolution.eu

Καρνεάδου 20 16346, Ηλιούπολη

info@green-evolution.eu /greenevolutionsa ΔΕΙΚΤΕΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΑΠΟΔΟΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ ΒΙΩΣΙΜΟ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΑΝΑΚΑΙΝΙΣΗΣ ΚΤΙΡΙΩΝ , ΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ, 12/03/15, ΕΒΕΠ, ΠΕΙΡΑΙΑΣ

+210 9942800

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙΟ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΩΝ MED/ΕΕ “ΔΕΙΚΤΕΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΑΠΟΔΟΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ ΒΙΩΣΙΜΟ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΑΝΑΚΑΙΝΙΣΗΣ ΚΤΗΡΙΩΝ”

“Ενδεικτική στρατηγική/επιχειρηματικός σχεδιασμός για συστήματα ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας σε Δήμους – Βέλτιστη λήψη αποφάσεων” Δρ. Παναγιώτης Ζέρβας Δ/ντης Έρευνας & Ανάπτυξης

GRASP GReen στρατηγική/επιχειρηματικός procurement And Smart city suPport σχεδιασμός in the energy sector Ενδεικτική για

συστήματα ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας σε Δήμους – Βέλτιστη λήψη αποφάσεων

Βασικές τεχνολογίες ΑΠΕ:  Φωτοβολταϊκά

 Αιολικά  Βιομάζα  Μικρά Υδροηλεκτρικά

Διαστασιολόγηση Τεχνολογιών ΑΠΕ σε κτίρια

GRASP GReenστρατηγική/επιχειρηματικός procurement And Smart city suPport in theσχεδιασμός energy sector Ενδεικτική για συστήματα ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας σε Δήμους – Βέλτιστη λήψη αποφάσεων

Green Procurement Approach BEST ECONOMIC OFFER CHEAPEST OFFER

(ENVIRONMENTAL AND LCC PERFORMANCE)

GP procedure flow chart Performance sheet no

Minimum criteria fulfilled?

Calculation tool disqualification

yes

Award criteria: Total number of target points

LCC

cost-/performance ratio

Choosing the best economic offer

Χρήση Λογισμικού Οικονομοτεχνικής αποτίμησης ενεργειακών επενδύσεων Αποτελέσματα IRR (Εσωτερικός δείκτης απόδοσης) WACC (Μεσοσταθμικό κόστος κεφαλαίου) NPV (Καθαρή παρούσα αξία) NPV στο WACC ROI (Απόδοση επένδυσης €/€) ROR (Μεσοσταθμική απόδοση εσόδων) Περίοδος αποπληρωμής (έτη) Αποπληθωρισμένη περίοδος αποπληρωμής (έτη) Σταθμισμένο κόστος ηλεκτρικής ενέργειας (συμπεριλαμβανομένων παγίων - μέσο) Καθαρό κόστος ηλεκτρικής ενέργειας (συμπεριλαμβανομένων Λειτ. Κόστους & Κόστους Συντ. - μέσο) Κόστος ανάπτυξης € EXTRA Συνολικό κόστος επένδυσης € 100,0% Δανεισμός € 44,0% Επιχορήγηση € 0,0% Ίδια κεφάλαια € 56,0%

Τιμή 37,7% 2,5% € 1.156.995 € 1.081.897 4,74 68% 3 3 € 58,14 € 20,36 €0 € 360.000 € 158.400 €0 € 201.600

Μονάδες

Σε χρήση

Συνολικά 1ος Χρόνος Έναρξη λειτουργίας Ωφέλιμος χρόνος ζωής Επέκταση λειτουργίας Οικονομικές παράμετροι Πληθωρισμός

έτη έτη

2012 2012 25 5

%/έτος % % % των εσόδων

2,0% 2,0% 26,0% 0,00%

Δανεισμός Leasing Επιχορήγηση Ίδια κεφάλαια

% επί του κεφαλαίου επένδυσης % επί του κεφαλαίου επένδυσης % επί του κεφαλαίου επένδυσης % επί του κεφαλαίου επένδυσης

44,0% 0,0% 0,0% 56,0%

Επιτόκιο Περίοδος

% έτη % επί του καθαρού εισοδήματος

4,4% 6 6,0%

Αύξηση κόστους συντ.& λειτουργίας Ποσοστιαία μεταβολή Φορολόγηση Φόρος υπέρ ΟΤΑ Σχήμα χρηματοδότησης

Δάνειο

Νόμιμα αποθεματικά Έσοδα Εγκατεστημένη Ισχύς Παραγωγή Περίοδος μέγιστης παραγωγής Ετήσια απόπτωση απόδοσης Χαρακτηριστικά τιμών πώλησης Τιμή πώλησης MWh (FIT) Συντελεστής αύξησης FIT Διάρκεια επένδυσης

kWp MWh/MWp έτη %/έτος

200 2.000 5 0,40%

€/MWh %/έτος έτη

350,00 € 0,0% 20 - €

€ /kWp € MM έτη

1.800 360.000 1

Κόστη Κόστος επένδυσης/kWp Συνολικό Κόστος επένδυσης Χρόνος μέχρι την έναρξη Λειτουργικά έξοδα Τύπος Τίμη Περίοδος απόσβεσης

€/kWp/yr έτη

€40 10

ANNUAL CASH FLOWS

60.000 40.000

Euro [€]

20.000 0 0

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

-20.000 -40.000 -60.000 -80.000 year

Free Cash Flow

Discounted Cash Flow

FINANCIAL PARAMETRES IN 5 YEAR PERIODS

35,00% 30,00% 25,00% 20,00% 15,00% 10,00% 5,00% 0,00%

350.000 € 300.000 € 250.000 € 200.000 € 150.000 € 100.000 € 50.000 € 0€ 5

years IRR

NPV

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Σας ευχαριστώ πολύ για την προσοχή σας ! ! !

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Ατμοσφαιρική διασπορά

Απορρόφηση

Ανακλώμενη από τα σύννεφα

Άμεση Διάχυτη Ανακλώμενη από το έδαφος

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Ήλιος

V I

Ολική ηλιακή ακτινοβολία σε οριζόντιο επίπεδο (GSI)

Μοντέλο Νευρωνικών Δικτύων – Μοντέλο “αποσύνθεσης”

Ολική ηλιακή ακτινοβολία σε κεκλιμένο επίπεδο (GSIT)

Δεδομένα τόπου, αστρονομικά δεδομένα, κλίση φωτοβολταϊκής συστοιχίας

Φωτοβολταϊκή συστοιχία

PVOut=f(GSIT,Tamb)

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Τυπική καμπύλη Α/Γ

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Τί είναι η Βιομάζα;

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Κύριες τεχνολογίες παραγωγής ηλεκτρικής ενέργειας από Βιομάζα:  Αεριοποίηση  Αναερόβια Ζύμωση

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Τεχνολογία Αεριοποίησης Αυτόθερμη Αεριοποίηση

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Μονάδες Συμπαραγωγής Θερμότητας & Ηλεκτρισμού

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Υβριδικά Συστήματα ΑΠΕ

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Αρχιτεκτονική Συστήματος Control system

Measurement devices Communications network - Cable: (RS-232;RS-485;Ethernet) - Radio frequency: (GSM/GPRS, Wifi, WIMAX) - Optical fibre - PLC distribution lines

Control software

Internet

Users 26

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Παρακολούθηση πολλαπλών κτιρίων

Διεσπαρμένη Παραγωγή –ΑΠΕ – Παρακολούθηση & Καταγραφή

GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Παρακολούθηση πολλαπλών κτιρίων

Διαστασιολόγηση Τεχνολογιών ΑΠΕ σε κτίρια GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Ενδεικτικά Ποιοτικά Χαρακτηριστικά Λαμπτήρων

Τύπος Λαμπτήρων (ονομαστικά Watt και τύπος)

Ονομαστική Ισχύς (Watt)

Ισχύς κυκλωμάτων (συνολική ισχύς λαμπτήρων και κυκλωμάτων σε Watt)

Απόδοση (Lm/Watt)

Απόπτωση Διάρκεια απόδοσης ζωής (%/1000h) (ώρες)

Νατρίου υψηλής πίεσης 150 W

150

170

102,9

Ατμών Υδραργύρου 250 W

250

271

52,4

5,0%

8000

Μεταλλικών αλογονιδίων 250 W

250

269,5

72,3

6000

Φθορισμού 18W

56,2

26,0%

7000

LED

100

0,3%

60000

5,0% 24000-32000

Διαστασιολόγηση Τεχνολογιών ΑΠΕ σε κτίρια GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Χρήση Λογισμικού HOMER

Διαστασιολόγηση Τεχνολογιών ΑΠΕ σε κτίρια GRASP GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

Estimation of Embodied Energy and Embodied CO2 in the Electro-Mechanical Installations of Urban Hellenic Dwellings Dimitrios Koubogiannis Department of Energy Technology Engineering Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Greece

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

OUTLINE • • • • • • •

Introduction to EE & ECO2 Motivation & Aim The building case studies Material & Mass Analysis Embodied Energy Analysis Presentation of Results Ongoing & Future Research

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

INTRODUCTION •

Total Energy involved in the Life Cycle of a building : - Operational Energy (OE): for heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting, operation of appliances and equipment. - Embodied Energy (EE): energy consumed for the excavation, machining, construction, transportation, manufacturing and disposal activities of the building materials and equipment.

•

During building life cycle Initial Stage (building construction)  Initial Embodied Energy (IEE)  Indirect EE: extraction of materials and manufacturing (cradle to factory gate)  Direct EE: transport on-site (factory to construction site), on-site construction and assembly Operation stage (building operation)  Operational Energy: heating, cooling, lighting, ventilation, appliances, equipment  Recurring EE: refurbishment and maintenance Final stage (building demolition)  Embodied Energy: demolition, waste and disposal / recycling of materials

•

Companion concept: embodied CO2 emissions (ECO2): the amount of CO2 emitted to the atmosphere due to the EE consumption. Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

MOTIVATION & AIM  

•

  

Buildings are responsible for about the 40% of the total energy consumption in Europe and about a third of the total energy related CO2 emissions. Main legislative instrument: EPBD recast (2010/31/EC) on the energy performance of buildings. Focus towards Near Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) by the end of the decade, i.e. buildings with very high energy performance, while the nearly zero (or very low) amount of energy required should be covered to a very significant extent by energy from RES (on-site or nearby). Life Cycle Zero Energy Building (LC-ZEB): the building where the primary energy used in the building in operation plus the energy embodied within its constituent materials and systems, including energy generating ones, over the life cycle of the building is equal to or less than the energy produced by RES within the building over their lifetime (Hernandez and Kenny, 2010). Assess building energy consumption and environmental impact during its life-cycle, instead of only its operational period of time. Building Embodied Energy (EE) and Embodied CO2 (ECO2) become increasingly important data for the overall analysis. Such data could also be considered to assess future policies or various energy conservation measures implemented in existing buildings.

AIM: Material analysis and estimation of the Initial stage Indirect EE of the basic materials and equipment of typical urban Hellenic residential buildings. (Hernandez, P. and P. Kenny. 2010. From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB). Energy and Buildings, 42: 815-821).

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

CATEGORIZATION OF … BUILDINGS • Building construction depends on: - type and use (residential, office, hospital, hotel, etc), - climatic zone (in Greece: A, B, C, D). • Hellenic residential building typologies are categorized according to their date of construction in the following periods (Dascalaki et al. 2011) : (a) pre-1980 (b) during 1981-2000 (c) during 2001-2010 (d) after 2010 (EPBD implementation in Greece, Dascalaki et al. 2012). BUILDING MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT • Construction Materials (CM) set consisting of subsets of either finished products or raw materials (materials for bearing the structure, masonry–coatings, flooring, integration and insulation, heat protection, waterproof, soundproof, etc). • Electro-Mechanical Installations (EMI) set consisting of materials and equipment for space heating, hydraulic and hot water network, cooling, ventilation, fire protection, electrical and lighting installations, automation systems.

Dascalaki, E.G., Droutsa, K.G., Balaras, C.A. and S. Kontoyiannidis. 2011. Building Typologies as a Tool for Assessing the Energy Performance of Residential Buildings – A Case Study for the Hellenic Building Stock, Energy & Buildings, 43(12): 3400-3409. Dascalaki, E.G., Balaras, C.A., Gaglia, A.G., Droutsa, K.G. and S. Kontoyiannidis. 2012. Energy Performance of Buildings - EPBD in Greece, Energy Policy, 45: 469–477.

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

THE BUILDING CASE STUDIES •

Two representative buildings were selected, constructed after 2000 and located in climatic zone B (Koubogiannis et al. 2013 and 2014). Both have a single-pipe hydronic central heating system connected to room space radiators.

Multi-Family Dwelling (MFD): 3-story building, each floor being an apartment, with ground floor and a basement, having a total floor area of 435.6 m2. Natural gas steel boiler of 34.8 kW connected to the city natural gas network. Single-Family Dwelling (SFD) : 2-story building (mezonette), with a total floor area of 152 m2. Oil-fired cast-iron boiler with a heating capacity of 26.7 kW coupled to a metallic oil tank. •

For domestic hot water production, both buildings include triple-energy hot water storage tanks (that use either central heating system or solar power or electricity).

•

An energy audit was performed in both buildings. The corresponding technical reports, drawings and detailed data concerning EMI were released by two different professional engineering offices. Koubogiannis, D.G, Daskalaki A. and C.A. Balaras. 2013. A contribution to Building Lifecycle Analysis: Embodied energy analysis of mechanical installations for a typical urban Greek dwelling. 3rd International Exergy, Life Cycle Assessment, and Sustainability Workshop & Symposium (ELCAS3), 7-9 July, Nisyros–Greece. Koubogiannis, D.G., Lavoutas A., Lekkas A. and C.A. Balaras. 2014. Estimation of Embodied CO2 in Electro-Mechanical Installations for an Urban Hellenic Dwelling. International Conference on Buildings Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Sources 2014 (BEE RES 2014), 1-3 June, Kozani–Greece

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

MATERIAL & MASS ANALYSIS (METHODOLOGY) •

EMI Set was divided into 4 Groups: 1. Space Heating (SH) (boiler, oil burner, fuel tank, flue gas exhaust, pump, radiators, pipe network, expansion tank, valves, and other components like magnesium anode, thermostats, deaerators, etc).

2. Hydraulic and Hot Water (HHW)

(solar collectors, hot water storage tank, support base, various fittings and

accessories, hot water pipe network).

3. Air Conditioning (AC)

(split unit heat pumps, evaporator, fan, motor, support materials, condenser, compressor, fan, motor, four-way valve, connecting pipes, support and drainage materials).

4. Electrical (EL) (control panels, cables, pipes and wall plugs for SH, for HW and for the lighting network).

•

Material analysis is described by the sequence: EMI Set  Groups (SH, HW, AC, EL)  Items (e.g. boiler, radiators, etc)  sub-items  (e.g. burner breakdown)  …  bitems  constitutive single materials (steel, iron, copper, aluminum, glass, etc).

•

Mass analysis: (a) weighting of individual components, (b) obtained by the manufacturer manuals and commercial leaflets (accessed on the internet or by personal communication), (c) [Mass]=[Volume]*[material-density], where volume was estimated using data extracted from technical reports and drawings (e.g. floor plans were used to determine the length of piping) (d) logical engineering assumptions and estimations whenever needed.

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

MATERIAL ANALYSIS (EXAMPLES)

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

TOOLS FOR EE & ECO2 ANALYSIS • • •

Embodied Energy [MJ] = mass [kg]*EE coefficient [MJ/kg] Embodied CO2 [kg] = mass [kg]*ECO2 coefficient [kgCO2/kg] MATERIALS’ DATABASE: … EE & ECO2 coefficients … to account for the extraction and manufacturing of materials (e.g. of 1 kg of aluminum). EE coefficients are nationally dependent. No national database exists in Greece! Available databases in the literature. UK database (Hammond and Jones, 2008) was used. Aluminium has the higher EE coefficient, the “synthetic” materials (PP, rubber, …, PEF) have high EE values, while copper, brass, …, glass have relatively lower EE values.

•

EE coefficient (MJ/kg)

200

UK database 150 100 50 0

ECO2 coeff. (kgCO2/kg)

•

UK database 6

Materials

Hammond, G.P and C.I. Jones. 2008. Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE) Version 1.6a. Sustainable Energy Research Team, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath. Available from: http://perigordvacance.typepad.com/files/inventoryofcarbonandenergy.pdf (accessed on 27/03/2014).

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

Mass analysis of SH Group to its major Items 50 45,5 45 SFD

MFD

35 30,6 % mass

25 20

18,5

20,4 17,6

15 9,39,5

5,3 5 0

1,6

4,1

3,9 2,2

1,70,9

1,21,1

0,40,4

- Radiators dominate - Next is boiler for SFD, pipes for MFD - No tank in MFD

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

Mass analysis of SH+HHW Group to materials

- Steel dominates w.r.t. mass due to the radiators (and steel boiler in MFD) -Copper is 2nd in MFD due to the pipes - Cast-iron is 2nd in SFD due to the cast-iron boiler in SFD and smaller circuit of pipes Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

EE analysis of SH+HHW Group to materials

-Steel dominates w.r.t. EE due to the large quantity, although low EE-coef. -Copper is 2nd even in SFD due to its high EE-coef. -EE list is different than mass (Aluminum:11 8 in SFD, 43 in MFD, Plastic: 75 in SFD, 1110 in MFD, both have high EE-coef.) Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

Mass & EE analysis for the Groups of EMI Set Building typology EMI Set Groups SH HHW AC EL Total

SFD Mass [%] 54.90 15.18 18.62 11.30 1305.4 kg (8.6 kg/m2)

EE [%] 45.2 19.1 20.2 15.5 64006.2 MJ (421 MJ/ m2)

MFD Mass [%] 70.16 29.84 0.00 0.00 1679.5 kg (3.856 kg/m2)

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

EE [%] 70.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 74425.8 MJ 170.8 (MJ/m2)

REPLACEMENT OF THE BOILER-BURNER SET ECO2 (kgCO2) EE (kWh/m2) Item

• • •

MFD

SFD

MFD

SFD

Burner

0.7

2.3

Boiler

438

373

3.9

9.5

Burner+Boiler

494

434

4.6

11.8

Assessment of energy conservation measures, for example, the replacement of an oil-fired boiler in old SFD central heating installation with a new units. Such a replacement would result to 17% annual operational thermal energy savings and 335.6 ktCO2 savings for the entire Hellenic SFD stock, which results to an estimation of about 19.6 kWh/m2 annual energy savings and 625.4 ktCO2 annual savings per SFD (Balaras et al. 2007). According to the present study the EE of the SFD boiler-burner set is 11.8kWh/m2 and its ECO2 is 434kgCO2. The total EE and ECO2 involved in the replacement is doubled (to account for both oldunit-output/new-unit-input): EErepl=23.6kWh/m2 and ECO2repl=868kgCO2. Thus, the operational energy savings would compensate EErepl (EPBT) in about 14.5 months (or about over two heating seasons) and ECO2repl (CO2PT) in about 16.7 months. Balaras, C.A., Gaglia A.G., Georgopoulou E., Mirasgedis S., Saraﬁdis Y. and D.P. Lalas. 2007. European residential buildings and empirical assessment of the Hellenic building stock, energy consumption, emissions and potential energy savings, Building and Environment, 42: 1298–1314.

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

CONCLUSIONS  A methodology for Material, EE & ECO2 analysis was proposed and applied to electromechanical installations of SFD/MFD.  Aim: to initiate the derivation of practical benchmark values for Hellenic buildings.  Prevailing materials in terms of mass are generally the same, but normalized material quantities have different values for the two investigated building typologies (SFD and MFD).  EE values (using international databases), provide initial guidance: • For life cycle assessment evaluation of buildings • For assessing common energy conservation measures (e.g. the annual operational energy savings due to the replacement of oil-fired boilers with more energy efficient units would account for EE in relatively short time frames).

ONGOING & FUTURE RESEARCH • • • •

Repetition & extension of the present analysis for a number of different Hellenic building typologies. COMPONENTS’ DATABASE: EE values … to account for the manufacturing of components (e.g. of a boiler). Not existing! Address relevant issues for building construction materials. Long-term goal: Derive suitable benchmarks in order to facilitate the development of a Hellenic database for EE or ECO2 . Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

Thank you ! Questions please â&#x20AC;Ś

Open Day, MED/EU Synergies Conference, 12 March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

Building Diagnosis for Supporting Decision Making and Energy Performance Indicator Tracking Schemes for the Continuous Optimization of Residential Building Stock Refurbishment Costas A. Balaras, Elena G. Dascalaki costas@noa.gr

edask@noa.gr

Group Energy Conservation, Institute for Environmental Research & Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, Greece Group Energy conservation www.energycon.org

Institute for Environmental Research & Sustainable Development www.meteo.noa.gr

www.facebook.com/GRoupEnergyConservation National Observatory of Athens www.noa.gr

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

Final Energy Consumption: 1104.5 Mtoe Buildings: 437.9 Mtoe (39.6%) Residential: 289.2 Mtoe (26.2%) Non-Residential: 148.7 Mtoe (13.5%)

Final Energy Consumption: 17.13 Mtoe Buildings: 7.27 Mtoe (42.4%) Residential : 5.04 Mtoe (29.4%) Non-Residential: 2.23 Mtoe (13.0%)

Source: Eurostat pocketbooks, 2014

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

Final Energy Consumption: 1104.5 Mtoe Buildings: 437.9 Mtoe (39.6%) Residential: 289.2 Mtoe (26.2%) Non-Residential: 148.7 Mtoe (13.5%)

Final Energy Consumption: 17.13 Mtoe Buildings: 7.27 Mtoe (42.4%) Residential : 5.04 Mtoe (29.4%) Non-Residential: 2.23 Mtoe (13.0%)

Source: Eurostat pocketbooks, 2014

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

TOBUS

INVESTIMMO EPIQR

Deterioration & lifespan of different building elements, environmental impact (e.g. use of natural resources, pollutants) and indicators, quality of life, total value of building

XENIOS

Diagnosis, Deterioration of building elements, Retrofit scenarios, Assessment of IEQ & Energy, Cost of refurbishment

www.meteo.noa.gr/xenios

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

? INITIAL EVALUATION

INITIAL PHASE

DETAILED EVALUATION

PROJECT PHASE

WORKS DEFINITION

PREPARATION PHASE

WORKS PHASE

FINAL PHASE

The building is broken down to 50 structural and functional elements, with one or more types. For each element, common deteriorations are grouped in four diagnosis codes; “a” (best condition, no retrofit action needed) to code “d” (worst condition, replacement is necessary). Each code is associated with specific renovation or refurbishment works. MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

SOFTWARE DOES NOT DECIDE FOR THE EXPERT IT FACILITATES THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS TO IDENTIFY PRIORITIES, ESTIMATE COST MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

ERBAD - European Residential

BDAG - Building Deterioration

Building Audits Database

Assessment Guidelines

350 residential building audits

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4523.3442

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2688.3361

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

BEIG - Building Environmental Impact  Practical recommendations on how to preserve natural Guidelines

resources & reduce environmental impact  Overview of general environmental aspects for building Construction, Operation, Renovation & Demolition  Common building materials for each element-works  Raw material & building’s waste quantities  Environmental impact indicators http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.5047.6320

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

Challenges & Opportunities How can we quantify them ?

Calculations Simulations

Energy Balance Sheets

Operational Energy Performance Database

EU Directive on Energy Efficiency (27/2012) Establishes a common framework of measures for the promotion of energy efficiency within the Union in order to ensure the achievement of the Union’s 2020 20% headline target on energy efficiency and to pave the way for further energy efficiency improvements beyond that date.

New EU Targets towards 2030 •

40% Reduce greenhouse gas emissions, against 1990 levels

•

27% Increase share of RES in EU energy mixture, against 17% currently (not binding at national level)

•

27% Improve energy efficiency in the EU (not binding at national level)

Adopt 'Flexible' Energy & Climate Targets for 2030 ... Reconsider after Dec 2015 at climate negotiations in Paris (UN Climate Change) and depending on progress at 2020

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs)

Residential

HIGH POTENTIAL

Offices/Commercial

Hotels

#1. Thermal insulation of external walls #13. Solar collectors for sanitary hot water production #3. Weather proofing (sealing) of openings #4. Double glazing #5. Maintenance of central heating installations #14. Energy efficient lamps #2. Thermal insulation of roof #6. Replacement of inefficient oil-boilers #12. Replacement of old and inefficient local AC units #8. Temperature balance controls for central space heating #9. Space thermostats #7. Replacement of inefficient oil-boilers with gas-boilers #10. External shading #11. Ceiling fans

ECM

Health Care

Schools

#1. Thermal insulation of external walls #2. Thermal insulation of roof #3. Double glazing #4. Maintenance of central heating installations #5. Replacement of inefficient oil-boilers #6. Replacement of oil- boilers with gas-boilers #7. Temperature balance controls for central space heating #8. Space thermostats #9. External shading #10. Ceiling fans #11: Night ventilation. #12: Solar collectors for sanitary hot water #13: Energy efficient lamps. #14: BMS - Building Management System.

O/C 54.1 10.9 46.9 137.5 49.2 16.4 26.0 18.4 49.6 488.5 53.9 15.3 713.1 815.1

Total CO2 emissions savings in (kt) 3573.6 2709.7 1712.2 1539.2 951.4 817.3 549.6 438.6 240.9 156.8 146.9 144.0 78.2 93.0

CO2 emissions savings (kt) H S HC 48.7 54.0 52.8 12.0 9.5 10.5 21.1 21.6 26.6 59.5 23.4 34.8 23.1 23.5 29.6 5.4 -18.7 5.7 9.0 7.5 2.6 6.3 5.3 21.1 21.6 26.6 292.9 28.3 38.8 ---133.4 1.5 45.9 369.0 148.2 106.2 423.5 -59.7

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

ACTUAL energy consumption

ACTUAL operating conditions

TYPE OF SYSTEMS & PERFORMANCE of installations BREAKDOWN OF REFURBISHED BUILDINGS (Size - Age)

ACTUAL PERFORMANCE of ECMs

TOOLS & Theoretical Models for handling the building stock Are they reliable ?

ACTUAL performance of national plans & strategies for energy conservation in residential buildings Do we monitor ?

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

Energy Performance Indicator Tracking Schemes for the Continuous Optimisation of Refurbishment Processes in European Housing Stocks

www.episcope.eu

ENERGY & BUILDINGS

BUILDING TYPOLOGIES

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

Energy Performance Indicator Tracking Schemes for the Continuous Optimisation of Refurbishment Processes in European Housing Stocks

http://webtool.building-typology.eu/webtool/tabula.html?c=all

EPISCOPE WEBTOOL New & Updated versions to be released soon http://episcope.eu/building-typology/webtool

EPISCOPE BROCHURES New & Updated versions http://episcope.eu/communication/download/

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

Energy Performance Indicator Tracking Schemes for the Continuous Optimisation of Refurbishment Processes in European Housing Stocks

www.episcope.eu Closing the gap between DESIGN - BUILT - REFURBISH - OPERATE building performance National Pilot Actions

Indicators for rates of refurbishment National building typologies www.building-typology.eu

Indicators for the effectiveness of ECMs

Realistic models for assessing ECMs

Tool Methodology for continuous monitoring of energy performance

Realistic assessment of potential energy savings

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

Final Energy Consumption (Space Heating & DHW) use only one energy carrier source for space heating or space heating and DHW

SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING (1,874 dwellings)

MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING (7,139 dwellings)

“Rebound” effect

more evident for calculated low-EUI (i.e. dwellings with good energy performance)

actual > calculated

“Prebound” effect actual < calculated

more evident for calculated high-EUI (i.e. dwellings with poor energy performance)

Adaptation Factors f(Actual/Calculated)

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

Adaptation Factors f(Actual/Calculated)

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

BUILDING ENVELOPE

HEATING SYSTEMS & DHW

 

   

Double Glazing Thermal insulation

Adaptation Factors f(After/Before)

Oil to Natural gas Oil to Heat pumps Replace burner Solar collectors

PEU: Primary Energy Use; HDDR: Reference values; HDDA: Actual period of consumption

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE - Energy Performance Indicators and Methods for a Sustainable Framework of Buildings Refurbishment, Piraeus, 12 March 2015

CO2 emissions: 12.3Mt (2005) -4% of 2005=11.8Mt (2020), -30% of 2005=8.6Mt (2030) Final energy: 5 Mtoe (2012) Savings 469ktoe (2016), 1933ktoe (cumulative 2015-20) (1% for 2014 & 2015, 1.25% for 2016 & 2017, 1.5% for 2018, 2019, 2020)

EinB2014 - 3rd International Conference “ENERGY in BUILDINGS 2014”

It is time to

Join efforts to unleash the potential of energy conservation in buildings Determine the path forward (What data & data architecture do we need? How is this achieved? How can we best communicate with stakeholders?)

EinB2014 - 3rd International Conference â&#x20AC;&#x153;ENERGY in BUILDINGS 2014â&#x20AC;?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) and objectives of retrofit projects

MED/EU Synergies Conference REPUBLIC-MED 2nd Open Day Dr. G.M. Stavrakakis

Buildings: Target groups School building

Teachers’ productivity Students’ performance Comfort and Air quality Efficient and affordable energy retrofit and management

- Students’ performance - Comfort and Indoor Air Quality (IAQ)

- Comfort and IAQ

Buildings: Target groups Office building

Workersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; productivity High quality services Comfort and Air quality Efficient and affordable energy retrofit and management - Energy-related cost savings

- Comfort and IAQ

- Comfort and IAQ - High-quality service

Buildings: Key Performance Indicators

…AND comfort and IAQ indicators

Buildings: Desired levels of KPIs for major retrofits Description

Measurable Index (Units)

Objective to achieve

Retrofit cost (construction)

(€)

Minimization

Depreciation period

(Number of years)

Minimization

Total annual energy consumption indicator

(KWh/m²/year or MJ/m²/year)

Minimization

Annual energy consumption indicator of heating systems

(KWh/m²/year or MJ/m²/year)

Minimization

Annual energy consumption indicator of cooling systems

(KWh/m²/year or MJ/m²/year)

Minimization

Total annual CO2 emissions

(kg/m²/year)

Minimization

Participation of renewable energy sources

(%)

Maximization

Criteria

Buildings: Desired levels of KPIs for major retrofits Greek case: Law 4122/2013 (Greek “typical” harmonization with 2010/31/EC) Target value of Energy class: “B” Based on TOTEE 2010 national directive

REPUBLIC-MED: Definition of “B” class based on the national calculation tool KENAK

…As long as it is techno-economically feasible.

Buildings: Desired levels of KPIs towards NZEB Greek case: Law 4122/2013 (Greek “typical” harmonization with 2010/31/EC) NZEB: Highly energy-efficient building. The nearly zero or very low energy demand should be covered in a high amount by Renewable Energy Sources (RES), produced on-site or nearby.

Barriers  No definition of NZEB levels  244/2012 to estimate cost-optimal minimum requirements not yet applied REPUBLIC-MED: Definition of NZEB based on previous experience (literature review in progress)

Open spaces: Target groups “Reduce my house cooling loads”

“It’s very cold here in winters”

“It’s too hot in summer”

“I need fresh air”

Open spaces: Urban Heat Island “The Urban Heat Island is the most obvious climatic manifestation of urbanization” Landsberg, 1981 Causes:

Reduced potential convective for heat evapotranspiration removal due to the reduction Trapping of Decreased long-wave short and radiative long-wave heat radiation loss due in areas to Increased Anthropogenic storage heat of released sensible heat from in fuel the combustion construction of wind speed between reduced sky-view buildings materials Urban Heat Island Effect factors

Open spaces: Key performance indicators  Ts: Spatially mean value of air temperature in noon of a representative summer day (normally the hottest day) of the year at 1.80 m from the ground.  UHI Intensity: Difference between Ts and temperature of nearby rural environment in the same summer hour.  TCIs: Spatially mean value of a thermal Comfort Index, e.g. PMV, PET, UTCI, in the same summer hour, at 1.80m from the ground.  Tw: Spatially mean value of air temperature in a typical winter day of the year at 1.80m from the ground.  TCIw: Spatially mean value of the thermal comfort index, in the same winter hour, at 1.80m from the ground.  WS: Spatial mean value of wind speed at both winter and summer at 1.80m from the ground.

Open spaces: Desired levels of KPIs Formulated and operating space KPI

Goal of retrofit

Description

UHI intensity

Minimization

Minimize UHI intensity

Minimization

Minimize, ideally Ts_before-Ts_after>1.5C

TCIs

Reduce by 15%

Improve thermal comfort levels by at least 15%

At least no change

Increase or at least not reduce winter temperature

TCIw

At least no change

Improve or at least not deteriorate winter thermal comfort

Retain wind speed below 5m/s

Depending on whether the space is windy or not, ensure wind speed below discomfort levels throughout the domain

Desired change

It depends

Open spaces: Desired levels of KPIs Semi-formulated and green space KPI

Goal of retrofit

Description

UHI intensity

Minimization

Minimize UHI intensity

Minimization

Minimize summer temperature

TCIs

Reduce

Improve thermal comfort levels

At least no change

Increase or at least not reduce winter temperature

TCIw

At least no change

Improve or at least not deteriorate winter thermal comfort

Retain wind speed below 5m/s

Depending on whether the space is windy or not, ensure wind speed below discomfort levels throughout the domain

Desired change

It depends

Open spaces: Desired levels of KPIs Unformulated green space KPI

Goal of retrofit

Description

UHI intensity

Minimize if exists

Minimize UHI intensity if exists

Reduce or at least no change

The project should not cause increased summer temperature

TCIs

Reduce or at least no change

The project should not cause discomfort of visitors

At least no change

Increase or at least not reduce winter temperature

TCIw

At least no change

Improve or at least not deteriorate winter thermal comfort

Retain wind speed below 5m/s

Depending on whether the space is windy or not, ensure wind speed below discomfort levels throughout the domain

Desired change

It depends

Open spaces: Call for tenders example

KPI

Goal of retrofit

Award/evaluation criteria

UHI intensity

Minimization

Simulation methodology (give advantage to those who account for most critical physical phenomena)

TCIs

Reduce

Validation (give advantage to those who validate models with measurements)

At least no change

Use a cost/benefit ranking indicator, e.g. DTs/Investment.

TCIw

At least no change

Promote monitoring procedures proposed at the commissioning stage.

Retain wind speed below 5m/s

ΕΥΧΑΡΙΣΤΩ ΠΟΛΥ Project technical coordinator Dr. George M. Stavrakakis Chemical Engineer, PhD, MSc

www.republic-med.eu

Study methods to estimate KPIs and to identify best retrofit solutions

MED/EU Synergies Conference REPUBLIC-MED 2nd Open Day Dr. G.M. Stavrakakis

Retrofit project objective  Audits and collection of data  Diagnosis of vulnerabilities in the base-case  Assess the impact of alternative retrofits  Decision-making towards the selection of the best scenario

Buildings: Audits and collection of data Collection of:  Well-known data collected during building energy audits

+  Building surroundings: urban morphology, ground materials, neighbouring buildings technical data, vegetation  Climate data from the nearest meteo station  Interviews: Users’ behaviours, operation schedules of building systems

Buildings: Questionnaire surveys

Buildings: Climate data processing Climate parameter

Days of the month

January

1 Jan V1

3 Jan …..

4 Jan ……

……… …..

01.00 02.00 ……… 10.00 …….. 23.00 February

1 Feb

2 Feb

3 Feb

…..

28 Feb

00.00

…..

……

….

…..

……

…..

…….. Vj

……. …..

31 Jan V31

Average

Typical day in January

00.00

2 Jan

ΣVj/No. of days

Typical day of each month: Hourly timeseries of climate parameters Microclimate model

Buildings: Climate data processing Average values

Most critical variables: -Realistic temperature corrects heating/cooling loads - Realistic wind speed corrects U value

DEFAULT NEW REALISTIC CLIMATE VALUES CLIMATE VALUES NORMALLY USED

12 Typical days but in the vicinity of the building

Buildings: Behaviour assessment INTERVIEWS -Building manager - Workers - Technicians - Security NEW DEFAULT REALISTIC OPERATION OPERATION PATTERNS PATTERNS Set-points Building schedules Within occupied hours After hours Realistic systemsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; operation patterns for each typical day

Buildings: Coupled simulation approach NEW REALISTIC SYSTEMS OPERATION PATTERNS

NEW REALISTIC CLIMATE VALUES

BES

Energy and cost indicators

Open spaces: Audits and collection of data External space data: - Geometry: Topographic diagram of the wider area (e.g. 1km from the open space) - Ground materials: Thermophysical properties (Uvalues, albedo, etc.) - Neighbouring buildings materials properties - Vegetation: Kind of trees, size, shape and location - Vehiclesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; kinds and passing rates estimation - Hourly climate data series of reference year(s)

Open spaces: Climate data processing Temperature

Days of the month

June

………

……..

…….

Average

00.00

…..

……

…..

V30

ΣVj/No. of days

July

1 Feb

2 Feb

3 Feb

…..

28 Feb

00.00

…..

……

….

…..

……

…..

01.00 02.00

……… 10.00 …….. 23.00 ΣVj/No. of days

Focus on 10.0018.00 of the last 5year summers. Estimate the statistical hottest day of the year.

Open space: Model setup Incoming wind climate conditions (T, RH, VEL, etc.) of the hottest day Ground materials properties (e.g. albedo) Building materials properties

CO emissions from traffic

Vegetation properties

Open space: Example Water surface

KPI

Goal of retrofit

Social

Sports activities Walking Children grounds

Minimization

TCIs

Reduce

At least no change

TCIw

At least no change

Open space: Example Summer temperature

DTsâ&#x2020;&#x201C;=0.7

Open space: Example Summer thermal comfort (PMV)

DPMVsâ&#x2020;&#x201C;=0.3

Open space: Example Winter temperature

DTwâ&#x2020;&#x2018;=0.3

Open space: Example Winter thermal comfort

DPMVwâ&#x2020;&#x2018;=0.3

Decision-making tool

Τιμές δεικτών που υπολογίστηκαν με χρήση της μεθόδου αποτίμησης

Vi/Vmax

Επιβολή προτεραιοτήτων

F  1  .  2  PMV  3  Ci  4 CO 2  5   .  6   .  7  

Ιεράρχηση εναλλακτικών λύσεων

ΕΥΧΑΡΙΣΤΩ ΠΟΛΥ Project technical coordinator Dr. George M. Stavrakakis Chemical Engineer, PhD, MSc

www.republic-med.eu

Supporting SMEs in energy efficiency and RES markets in MED Katja HanĹžiÄ? University of Maribor, Faculty of logistics

12th March 2015, Piraeus, Greece

What seems to be the problem? SMEs are much slower when it comes to adopting energy efficient solutions – why? • organisational, financial and technological obstacles, • not enough communication and coordination between the R&D sector and SMEs, • lack of resources – –

•

financial and human resources ICT support

slow adoption of new technologies

Proposed solutions:  innovation in and for SMEs,  knowledge management

 implementation and customisation of available technologies in SMEs.

How? ď&#x192;&#x2DC; To set-up of a living lab environment ď&#x192;&#x2DC; active in all partner countries ď&#x192;&#x2DC; in which SMEs as final users and R&D organisations as the main developers will collaborate to develop new solutions for better use of energy in production and operations.

What is Living Lab? LL is an environment in which:

 researchers, developers and end-users  co-create  innovative products or services  in the shortest possible time  according to the needs of end-users and

 test the idea in the real-life environment (a city, a region, a country, an industry or a supply chain)

Living Lab definition • Living Labs usually exploit opportunities of modern ICT. • Cooperation of all stakeholders  users, companies, ICT providers, developers, government organizations, universities, and other involved institutions • Can be seen as “a large, broadly conceptualized laboratory”

ICT infrastructure

Collaboration technologies

Users

Companies Policy makers Co-creation of innovation

ICT Providers

Internet

Universities

Web 2.0

How to start? General guidelines – LEADERS approach t

1. Localise and identify your stakeholders 2. Establish a Living Lab PPP (Public Private Partnership)

3. Assess the relevance of « cross border » issues 4. Deploy an ICT infrastructure 5. Establish a local and/or « cross border » PPPP community (PPP+People) 6. Run one or more User Driven, Open Innovation pilots 7. Summarise and evaluate the results

Approach implemented â&#x20AC;&#x201C; business model CANVAS

Connect • Find people and organizations with positive innovation attitude • Find complementary skilled people to cover the diversity of innovation process • Form knowledge base of stakeholder‘s competencies and expertise • Use web portal to share information • Use social networks to enable formation of sub networks • Prepare and sign the Memorandum of understanding (MOU) to define and understand the obligations of the involved stakeholders

Plan • Push stakeholder to define a problem/opportunity (User Driven definition) • Define strategy, goals, objectives and expectations • Define performance indicators for LL process evaluation • Define time frame • Determine commitments and leadership, resources • Plan how to establish trust among network members and engage them • Identify and form knowledge base of best practice cases

Communicate and Support • Define network sponsorship/financing • Determine role of meetings, workshops and seminars • Define key knowledge and information input • Define external expertise needed • Determine required ICT support • Use dissemination activities (conferences, newsletters) to extend partnership network and share experiences

Act and Manage • Conduct workshop to engage stakeholders in the process of finding the solution • Develop or use an existing solution • Present the solution process to stakeholders

• Perform on-site training of stakeholders • Run one or more User Driven, Open Innovation pilots • Test the solution‘s compliance with defined goals and objectives • Measure performance indicators • Review responsibilities and commitments of stakeholders

Improve • Evaluate the process based on performance indicators, goals and objectives • Push stakeholders to generate ideas for improvement of the process • Evaluate contribution and consolidate network of stakeholders • Expand network of stakeholders based on identified knowledge gaps • Consolidate knowledge database • Summarize the results

From theory to practice 1) Desktop research on existing methodologies, approaches, and tools for energy efficiency improvement and use of renewable resources in production and operations list of ESCOs in each country) 2) Identification of key stakeholders, associations, clusters (and SMEs) and identification of key added values for each participant 3) definition of the strategy, aims, and objectives of the living lab;

4) definition of terms of collaboration, ownership of resulting tools, rules for use and further modifications

From theory to practice 5) Via workshops, conferences, in-company visits, one-on-one meetings, consultations and interviews involve key stakeholders and SMEs 6) identify areas with large unused capacities within the energy assemblies installed in SMEs; identify typical areas with potentials for improved maintenance and management, identify areas for instalment of renewable resources

From theory to practice 7) Joint development of analytical tool and indicators for improved energy efficiency and use of renewable resources in production processes (SMEs closely collaborate in the process) 8) Testing of the beta version of the analytical tool on a panel of 50 SMEs to test its quality and relevance;

9) Design of final version of analytical tool 10) Individual consultations and advice to SMEs in Living Labs on improving energy efficiency and use of renewable resources

Case - Slovenia  10 companies involved  SMEs from different production sectors:      

agro food industry manufacturing and production activities powder metallurgy publishing civil engineering planning and design printing activities

Case - Slovenia Living lab funding members Transport     

Slovenian Logistics Association (coordinator) Chamber of craft and small business of Slovenia, Slovenian Chamber of Commerce - Section for Transport University of Maribor - Faculty of Logistics Kobal transporti

Energy efficiency    

University of Maribor – Faculty of Energy Technology (coordinator) E-Prihodnost Klimaterm project Rosenbauer

Key areas for energy efficiency improvement − − − − − − − − −

pumps electric drives compress air drying process lighting energy management solar energy air energy HVAC …

http://www.coefficient-project.eu/

Katja HanĹžiÄ? Katja.Hanzic@um.si University of Maribor, Faculty of Logistics

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Project monitoring: Ex-ante and ex-post monitoring of Key Performance Indicators Dimitris Tsiamitros TEIWM, Assist. Prof.

12 March 2015

 Findings of the PEEBPE project.  Basic Steps for energy upgrade of public buildings.  Difficulties of energy upgrade projects.  Key performance indicators.

 Ways for ex-ante and ex-post monitoring and achievement of desired values. Promotion Promotion of of Energy Energy Efficiency Efficiency in in Buildings Buildings -- Protection Protection of of the the Environment Environment Dimitrios Stimoniaris Tsiamitros Dimitrios

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Findings of the PEEBPE project

12 March 2015

Five work packages: WP1: Project Management WP2: Information and Publicity

(www.peebpe.eu)

WP3: Public Buildings Energy Audits WP4: Energy Upgrade of 3 Public Buildings WP5: Establishment of Regional Energy Efficiency Centers

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Findings of the PEEBPE project

12 March 2015

Project duration and budget: Greece: Duration: 22/02/2013 – 21/02/2015 Budget: 456.760,00 Euro

(www.peebpe.eu)

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Duration: 13/08/2013 – 12/02/2015 Budget: 218.239,00 Euro Total: Duration: 22/02/2013 – 21/02/2015 Budget: 674.999,00 Euro

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Findings of the PEEBPE project

12 March 2015

Key for success: Preliminary Work Preliminary study of some buildings before proposal submission (May 2012) November-December 2012 (Three months

(www.peebpe.eu)

before official start date): Energy Audit of the two public buildings in Prespes that are submitted to energy upgrade by joint teams. Timetable and budget reform in order to adjust to partners current needs.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

12 March 2015

Findings of the PEEBPE project

Results of preliminary work:

(www.peebpe.eu)

Better programming of the energy audits

Adjustment of the measurements and energy audit procedures to the special characteristics of the area’s buildings.

of the remaining buildings. The early energy audits of the two buildings in Prespes contributed to the better planning of the energy upgrade studies-procurement.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Findings of the PEEBPE project

12 March 2015

Cooperation between partners: Constant contact. Accurate and ON-TIME implementation of the JTS instructions. Close cooperation with the Payment Authority (different legislation frameworks for

(www.peebpe.eu)

each partner) Exploitation of the perfect relations between

Prespes and Resen municipalities Exploitation of the relations between the two Regions. Exploitation of the TEIWM experience in

implementing Interreg projects.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Findings of the PEEBPE project

12 March 2015

The interdisciplinary nature of the project led to: Follow-up proposals at the 3rd call GreeceFYROM IPA-Cross Border Programme 2007-

(www.peebpe.eu)

2013. BioFoss proposal approval (District heating of Amyntaio, Bitola municipality) Greece-Turkey Bilateral Research & Technology cooperation – SEEMBEET project-Istanbul Technical University (ITU).

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Findings of the PEEBPE project

12 March 2015

Also, interdisciplinary nature of the project led to:

Synergy with GRASP, MARie ( newsletter, common events, etc)

(www.peebpe.eu) Synergy between BIOFOSS and GRASP. Submission of Research proposals at ERANETMED and HORIZON2020 calls.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Basic Steps for energy upgrade of public buildings.

12 March 2015

 Energy audit of the public building  unofficial Energy Efficiency Certificate, proposals for its energy upgrade and observations on possible

problems on the operation of the building. - Important for the sustainability of the project  based on measurements for reliability.

Development of the call for tender with certain techno-economic criteria-specifications. Implementation of the energy upgrades interventions, supervision of the works and operation monitoring.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

12 March 2015

 The two first steps require newly-introduced

Difficulties of energy upgrade projects.

technical skills and special equipment. Luck of resources for the education of the personnel.

 Luck of available economic sources by the municipalities to cover the expenses of external expertise. E.g.: EEC for a typical public building of 5.000 m2 = 1 €/m2. Together with preparation

of the call for tender documents:20.000 €. New energy efficient technologies, such as heat pumps, KNX devices, monitoring devices, etc,

not included in the technical specifications of procurements. New materials database and consequently e-procurement procedures are necessary (GRASP).

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Key performance indicators

12 March 2015

 Operation cost should be drastically reduced after the refurbishment of a public building. This cost consists mainly of the cost for heating or

cooling and the consumption of electricity.  Pay-back time (depreciation period) of the proposed interventions is determined by

the previous indicator-the estimation of the operation cost decrease and the implementation cost of the applied measures.  Very important especially when the cost of the project is covered by the regular budget of the public organization or by an ESCO.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

12 March 2015

The requirement for reliability during monitoring

Ways for exante and expost monitoring and achievement of desired values of KPIs

of these indicators imposes the need for accuracy of the building energy audit ď&#x192;¨ As many measurements as possible (thermal conductance measurements, measurements of the efficiency of the heating systems, electricity

consumption recording by energy analyzer, etc). Measurements only during cold weather and energy upgrade measures only during summer

period necessitate careful time-table scheduling. Furthermore, procedures for public buildings are unpredictable and time-consuming.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

12 March 2015

The future operation cost must be very carefully

Ways for exante and expost monitoring and achievement of desired values of KPIs

estimated a-priori, especially for Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) and include a very good prediction of the variation of the fuel-prices. E.g. Comparison between electricity and diesel as a fuel for heating. A few years ago in Northern

Greece air-water heat pumps were considered the best solution for heating, after the increase in the tax over oil price. However, the increase in electricity prices due to EU-commitments of the

Greek state and great decrease of the oil-price due to the tax decrease and the decrease in oil prices internationally â&#x20AC;&#x201C; changed this situation.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

12 March 2015

Hybrid and dynamic-programmable

Ways for exante and expost monitoring and achievement of desired values of KPIs 14

systems: such as combined fuel systems for heating-DHW- cooling and electricity production, home automation systems ď&#x192;¨ compensate potential variations in fuel prices, as well as that they are programmable.

If proper monitoring devices are applied, after implementing energy saving measures, adjustments in the operation of Home Automation Systems and hybrid power

generation systems can be made to further improve energy efficiency.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Ways for exante and expost monitoring and achievement of desired values of KPIs 15

12 March 2015

Since the first indicator is very difficult to predict, the second indicator forces ESCOs or public organizations to adopt smart and inexpensive solutions that have the maximum impact in the decrease of the future operation cost and therefore a small payback time.

This measure however is not so important if the energy upgrade of the building is covered by an EU-funded project

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

Ways for exante and expost monitoring and achievement of desired values of KPIs

12 March 2015

The selected project and the selected energy saving technologies should a-priori carry with them interdisciplinary nature or added-

value. E.g.: Home Automation Systems, such as KNX or smart-thermostatically controlled electric devices

will be used in the future by the Distribution System Operators (DSOs) for demand-side management (peak-shaving) and consequently they will bring extra income to their owners. Furthermore, such installed smart energy saving measures can attract synergies to other projects (smart grids projects).

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE Peiraias, Greece

12 March 2015

Energy efficiency projects with organizations or

Ways for exante and expost monitoring and achievement of desired values of KPIs

municipalities that have experience in similar actions increase the possibility of success and reliability during project implementation, since for example many public buildings do not have permits or architectural plans. Thus a well-prepared municipality on

these issues can facilitate the project. Strong social interest buildings (schools, hospitals, universities) is an important criterion

that can give boost and guarantee the successive implementation of the project, also in terms of monitoring after the implementation.

Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment Dimitrios Tsiamitros

Energy Efficiency in Buildings-Smart Electricity Grids:

They have to walk side-by-side • Solar power: Attractive for zero-emission buildings (e.g. in combination with heat-pumps) Obstacle: PV integration to the local distribution grid is hindered by technical restrictions imposed by DSOs. Solution: New control scheme of local distribution grid or new type of contracts between DSOs and PV power suppliers (smart grid). • Home Automation Systems could contribute greatly to energy saving in buildings (e.g. KNX).

Drawback – They are quite expensive – not included in public procurement. Solution: If they are used for demand-side management in the smart grid (e.g. peak shaving), they can bring added value to the owner and extra income, reduce the pay-back time and make them more attractive. Conclusion:The parts (DGs, energy storage-EVs) and the control system of the future grid should be compatible to Buildings Energy Efficiency Tech. PEEBPE - Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Buildings - Protection of the Environment BIOFOSS - Protection of the environment through the promotion of biomass for substitution of fossil fuels in heating and power

REPUBLIC-MED: REtrofitting PUBLic spaces in Intelligent MEDiterranean Cities GRASP: GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

ΑΝΟΙΧΤΗ ΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙΟ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΩΝ MED/ΕΕ

REPUBLIC-MED: REtrofitting PUBLic spaces in Intelligent MEDiterranean Cities GRASP: GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector

"ΔΕΙΚΤΕΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΑΠΟΔΟΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ OPEN DAY ΒΙΩΣΙΜΟ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΑΝΑΚΑΙΝΙΣΗΣ ΚΤΙΡΙΩΝ"

MED/EU SYNERGIES CONFERENCE 12 Μαρτίου 2015, Πειραιάς, Ελλάδα

"ENERGY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND METHODS FOR A ΤΟΠΟΣ ΣΥΝΑΝΤΗΣΗΣ SUSTAINABLE FRAMEWORK OF BUILDINGS REFURBISHMENT" Εμπορικό και Βιομηχανικό Επιμελητήριο Πειραιά 12 March Piraeus, Λουδοβίκου 1, Πλ. 2015, Οδησσού, 185Greece 31, ΠΕΙΡΑΙΑΣ 09.00-09.15 Εγγραφές

MEETING VENUE

Piraeus Chamber of Commerce and Industry 09.15-09.30 Καλωσόρισμα 1 Loudovikou St., Odissou Sq., Piraeus

κος Πέτρος Κόκκαλης – Εντεταλμένος Δημοτικός Σύμβουλος Τμήματος Αξιοποίησης Ευρωπαϊκών 09.00-09.15 Registration και Εθνικών Πόρων, Δ/νσης Προγραμματισμού και Ανάπτυξης του Δήμου Πειραιά Καθηγητής Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης – Συντονιστής έργου GRASP και Διευθυντής 09.15-09.30 Welcome του Τομέα Τεχνολογίας του Περιβάλλοντος και Συγκοινωνιών, Τμήμα Πολιτικών Mr. Petros Kokkalis – Executive Councilor of the Department of European and Μηχανικών, Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών National Resources, Directorate of Planning and Development of Municipality of Piraeus ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 1: ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΕΣ ΕΡΓΩΝ Professor Yorgos Stephanedes – Project Coordinator of GRASP and Director Συντονιστής τηςJ.ενότητας: Ι. Πίττας, προϊστάμενος του τμήματος ηλεκτρολογικού, of the Environmental and Transportation Engineering Division, Department of Δ/νση Μηχανολογικού-Ηλεκτρολογικού του Δήμου Πειραιά Civil Engineering, University of Patras

09.30-11.00 Παρουσίαση Συνεργειών Έργων

REPUBLIC-MED – Δρ. Γεώργιος Σταυρακάκης / COEFFICIENT – κα Maršenka SYNERGETIC PROJECTS Marksel / MARIE – κοςSESSION Τάσος1:Σιδηρόπουλος / REMIDA – κος Θεόδωρος Coordinator: I. Pittas, Head of Department of Electrical Division of MechanicalΠατσουλές / BIOFOSS – κος Κωνσταντίνος Κυριακόπουλος / PEEBPE – Καθ. Electrical of the Municipality of Piraeus Δημήτριος Στημονιάρης / GRASP – Καθ. Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης

09.30-11.00 Presentation of Synergetic Projects ΔΙΑΛΕΙΜΜΑ

REPUBLIC-MED – Dr. George M. Stavrakakis / COEFFICIENT – Ms. Maršenka Marksel / MARIE – Mr. Tassos Sidiropoulos / REMIDA – Mr. Theodoros Patsoules / ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 2: ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΟΛΙΚΗΣ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΣ BIOFOSS – Mr. Konstantinos Kyriakopoulos / PEEBPE – Prof. Dimitrios Stimoniaris / GRASP – Prof. Yorgos J. Stephanedes

11.20-11.40 Πλαίσιο προτεινόμενου σχεδίου στο νέο πρόγραμμα MED

Εισαγωγή στο πλαίσιο, Ανάγκες χρηστών, COFFEE BREAK Στόχοι πλαισίου, Στόχοι του προγράμματος MED σχετικοί με το πλαίσιο, Συνοχή μεταξύ του προτεινόμενου πλαισίου και των στόχων του νέου προγράμματος MED, Καθ. Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης SESSION 2: FRAMEWORK OF OVERALL SYNERGY

11.20-11.40 Framework of proposed plan in the new MED programme

Introduction to the framework, User needs, Framework objective, MED objectives relative to the framework, Cohesion between the proposed

www.republic-med.eu

www.grasp-med.eu

www.republic-med.eu

www.grasp-med.eu

REPUBLIC-MED: REtrofitting PUBLic spaces in Intelligent MEDiterranean Cities GRASP: GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector framework and the goals of the new MED programme, Prof. Yorgos J. Stephanedes

ΑΝΟΙΧΤΗ ΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ Framework of synergy: SuggestingMED/ΕΕ new indicators ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙΟ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΩΝ

11.40-11.50 and methods for effective and affordable retrofit works in public sector "ΔΕΙΚΤΕΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΑΠΟΔΟΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ Energy upgrading of buildings, Bioclimatic upgrading of exterior areas, Dr. ΒΙΩΣΙΜΟ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΑΝΑΚΑΙΝΙΣΗΣ ΚΤΙΡΙΩΝ" George Stavrakakis

12 Μαρτίου 2015, Πειραιάς, Ελλάδα 11.50-13.00 Invited Speakers Best practices in bioclimatic upgrading of urban open spaces: The case ΤΟΠΟΣ ΣΥΝΑΝΤΗΣΗΣ of Peristeri, Dr. Ioannis Pappas IndicativeΕμπορικό Renewable Energy Sources Systems Strategy/Business και Βιομηχανικό Επιμελητήριο Πειραιά Planning Λουδοβίκου in Municipalities Optimal Decision 1, Πλ.– Οδησσού, 185 31, Making, ΠΕΙΡΑΙΑΣDr. Panagiotis Zervas Estimation of Embodied Energy and Embodied CO2 in the Electro09.00-09.15 Εγγραφές Mechanical Installations of Urban Hellenic Dwellings, Assist. Prof. Dimitrios Koubogiannis 09.15-09.30 Καλωσόρισμα Building Diagnosis for Supporting Decision Making and Energy κος Performance Πέτρος Κόκκαλης – Εντεταλμένος Δημοτικός for Σύμβουλος Τμήματος Indicator Tracking Schemes the Continuous Αξιοποίησης Ευρωπαϊκών και Εθνικών Building Πόρων, Δ/νσης και Optimization of Residential Stock Προγραμματισμού Refurbishment, Dr. Ανάπτυξης του Δήμου Πειραιά Constantinos Balaras Καθηγητής Στεφανίδης – Συντονιστής EnergyΓεώργιος and mobility improvements in έργου smart GRASP cities, και Dr. Διευθυντής Giovanni του Τομέα Τεχνολογίας του Simic Περιβάλλοντος και Συγκοινωνιών, Τμήμα Πολιτικών Scaramuzzo, Mr. Ivan Μηχανικών, Πατρών in smart cities, Mr. Diego Broock Hijar Energy Πανεπιστήμιο building refurbishment CCS ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 1: ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΕΣ ΕΡΓΩΝ LUNCH BREAK Συντονιστής της ενότητας: Ι. Πίττας, προϊστάμενος του τμήματος ηλεκτρολογικού, Δ/νση Μηχανολογικού-Ηλεκτρολογικού του Δήμου Πειραιά

14.00-16.00 Integration of projects findings into a smart public procurement 09.30-11.00 Παρουσίαση Συνεργειών Έργων

Key performance indicatorsΣταυρακάκης (KPIs) and objectives of a retrofit project, Dr. REPUBLIC-MED – Δρ. Γεώργιος / COEFFICIENT – κα Maršenka George Stavrakakis Prof. Yorgos Stephanedes Marksel / MARIE – κος &Τάσος Σιδηρόπουλος / REMIDA – κος Θεόδωρος Exemplary study methods to estimate KPIs and to identify best retrofit Πατσουλές / BIOFOSS – κος Κωνσταντίνος Κυριακόπουλος / PEEBPE – Καθ. solutions, Dr. George Stavrakakis Prof. Yorgos Stephanedes Δημήτριος Στημονιάρης / GRASP – Καθ.&Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης Supporting SMEs in energy efficiency and RES market in MED, Prof. Katja Hanzic ΔΙΑΛΕΙΜΜΑ Project monitoring: Ex-ante/ex-post monitoring of KPIs, Mr.Dimitris Tsiamitros ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 2: ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΟΛΙΚΗΣ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΣ COFFEE BREAK

11.20-11.40 Πλαίσιο προτεινόμενου σχεδίου στο νέο πρόγραμμα MED

Εισαγωγή στο πλαίσιο, Ανάγκες χρηστών, Στόχοι πλαισίου, Στόχοι του SESSION 3: ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION προγράμματος MED σχετικοί με το πλαίσιο, Συνοχή μεταξύ του προτεινόμενου πλαισίου και των στόχων 16.20-17.20 Discussion του νέου προγράμματος MED, Καθ. Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης Prof. Yorgos Stephanedes, Dr. George Stavrakakis, Prof. Katja Hanzic, Mr. Dimitris Tsiamitros, Mr. Tassos Sidiropoulos, Mr. Dimitrios Koubogiannis, Prof. Dimitrios Stimoniaris, Mr. Konstantinos Kyriakopoulos, Dr. Constantinos Balaras, Dr. Giovanni Scaramuzzo, Mr. Ivan Simic, Mr. Diego Broock Hijar

17.20-17.30 Future directions www.republic-med.eu www.republic-med.eu

www.grasp-med.eu www.grasp-med.eu

REPUBLIC-MED: REtrofitting PUBLic spaces in Intelligent MEDiterranean Cities GRASP: GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector REPUBLIC-MED: REtrofitting PUBLic spaces in Intelligent MEDiterranean Cities GRASP: GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector ΑΝΟΙΧΤΗ ΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ

ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙΟ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΩΝ MED/ΕΕ

ΑΝΟΙΧΤΗ ΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ "ΔΕΙΚΤΕΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΑΠΟΔΟΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙΟ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΩΝ MED/ΕΕ ΒΙΩΣΙΜΟ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΑΝΑΚΑΙΝΙΣΗΣ ΚΤΙΡΙΩΝ" "ΔΕΙΚΤΕΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΑΠΟΔΟΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ 12 Μαρτίου 2015, Πειραιάς, Ελλάδα ΒΙΩΣΙΜΟ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΑΝΑΚΑΙΝΙΣΗΣ ΚΤΙΡΙΩΝ" ΤΟΠΟΣ ΣΥΝΑΝΤΗΣΗΣ

12 Μαρτίου 2015, Πειραιάς, Ελλάδα Εμπορικό και Βιομηχανικό Επιμελητήριο Πειραιά ΣΥΝΑΝΤΗΣΗΣ ΛουδοβίκουΤΟΠΟΣ 1, Πλ. Οδησσού, 185 31, ΠΕΙΡΑΙΑΣ Εμπορικό και Βιομηχανικό Επιμελητήριο Πειραιά 09.00-09.15 Εγγραφές Λουδοβίκου 1, Πλ. Οδησσού, 185 31, ΠΕΙΡΑΙΑΣ 09.15-09.30 Καλωσόρισμα 09.00-09.15 Εγγραφές

κος Πέτρος Κόκκαλης – Εντεταλμένος Δημοτικός Σύμβουλος Τμήματος 09.15-09.30 Καλωσόρισμα Αξιοποίησης Ευρωπαϊκών και Εθνικών Πόρων, Δ/νσης Προγραμματισμού και Ανάπτυξης του Δήμου Πειραιά κος Πέτρος Κόκκαλης – Εντεταλμένος Δημοτικός Σύμβουλος Τμήματος Καθηγητής Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης – Συντονιστής έργου GRASP και Διευθυντής Αξιοποίησης Ευρωπαϊκών και Εθνικών Πόρων, Δ/νσης Προγραμματισμού και του Τομέα Τεχνολογίας του Περιβάλλοντος και Συγκοινωνιών, Τμήμα Πολιτικών Ανάπτυξης Δήμου Πειραιά Μηχανικών,του Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών Καθηγητής Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης – Συντονιστής έργου GRASP και Διευθυντής του Τομέα Τεχνολογίας του Περιβάλλοντος και Συγκοινωνιών, Τμήμα Πολιτικών ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 1: ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΕΣ ΕΡΓΩΝ Μηχανικών, Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών

Συντονιστής της ενότητας: Ι. Πίττας, προϊστάμενος του τμήματος ηλεκτρολογικού, Δ/νση Μηχανολογικού-Ηλεκτρολογικού του Δήμου Πειραιά ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 1: ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΕΣ ΕΡΓΩΝ Συντονιστής της ενότητας: Ι.Συνεργειών Πίττας, προϊστάμενος 09.30-11.00 Παρουσίαση Έργων του τμήματος ηλεκτρολογικού, Δ/νση Μηχανολογικού-Ηλεκτρολογικού Δήμου Πειραιά REPUBLIC-MED – Δρ. Γεώργιος Σταυρακάκης / του COEFFICIENT – κα Maršenka

Marksel / MARIE – κος Τάσος Σιδηρόπουλος / REMIDA – κος Θεόδωρος 09.30-11.00 Παρουσίαση Συνεργειών Έργων Πατσουλές / BIOFOSS – κος Κωνσταντίνος Κυριακόπουλος / PEEBPE – Καθ. REPUBLIC-MED – Δρ. Γεώργιος / Στεφανίδης COEFFICIENT – κα Maršenka Δημήτριος Στημονιάρης / GRASP Σταυρακάκης – Καθ. Γεώργιος Marksel / MARIE – κος Τάσος Σιδηρόπουλος / REMIDA – κος Θεόδωρος Πατσουλές / BIOFOSS – κος Κωνσταντίνος ΔΙΑΛΕΙΜΜΑ Κυριακόπουλος / PEEBPE – Καθ. Δημήτριος Στημονιάρης / GRASP – Καθ. Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 2: ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΟΛΙΚΗΣ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΙΜΜΑ

11.20-11.40 Πλαίσιο προτεινόμενου σχεδίου στο νέο πρόγραμμα MED

ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 2: ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΟΛΙΚΗΣ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΣ Εισαγωγή στο πλαίσιο, Ανάγκες χρηστών, Στόχοι πλαισίου, Στόχοι του προγράμματος MED σχετικοί με το πλαίσιο, Συνοχή μεταξύ του προτεινόμενου 11.20-11.40 Πλαίσιο προτεινόμενου σχεδίου στο νέο πρόγραμμα MED πλαισίου και των στόχων του νέου προγράμματος MED, Εισαγωγή στο πλαίσιο, Ανάγκες χρηστών, Στόχοι πλαισίου, Στόχοι του Καθ. Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης προγράμματος MED σχετικοί με το πλαίσιο, Συνοχή μεταξύ του προτεινόμενου πλαισίου και των στόχων του νέου προγράμματος MED, Καθ. Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης

www.republic-med.eu

www.grasp-med.eu

www.republic-med.eu

www.grasp-med.eu

REPUBLIC-MED: REtrofitting PUBLic spaces in Intelligent MEDiterranean Cities GRASP: GReen procurement And Smart city suPport in the energy sector 11.40-11.50 Πλαίσιο συνέργειας: Προτείνοντας νέους δείκτες και μεθόδους για αποτελεσματικά και προσιτά έργα αναβάθμισης στο ΑΝΟΙΧΤΗ ΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ δημόσιο τομέα

ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙΟ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΩΝ MED/ΕΕ

Ενεργειακή αναβάθμιση κτιρίων, Βιοκλιματική αναβάθμιση εξωτερικών χώρων, Δρ. Γεώργιος Σταυρακάκης

"ΔΕΙΚΤΕΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΑΠΟΔΟΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ 11.50-13.00 ΒΙΩΣΙΜΟ Προσκεκλημένοι ομιλητές ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΑΝΑΚΑΙΝΙΣΗΣ ΚΤΙΡΙΩΝ" Βέλτιστες πρακτικές στη βιοκλιματική αναβάθμιση αστικών ανοικτών 12 Μαρτίου 2015, Πειραιάς, Ελλάδα χώρων: Η περίπτωση του Περιστερίου, Δρ. Ιωάννης Παππάς Ενδεικτική στρατηγική/επιχειρηματικός σχεδιασμός για συστήματα ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας Δήμους – Βέλτιστη λήψη αποφάσεων, ΤΟΠΟΣ σε ΣΥΝΑΝΤΗΣΗΣ Δρ. Παναγιώτης Ζέρβας και Βιομηχανικό Πειραιά CO2 στις Εκτίμηση Εμπορικό ενσωματωμένης ενέργειας Επιμελητήριο και ενσωματωμένου Λουδοβίκου 1, Πλ. Οδησσού, 185 31, ΠΕΙΡΑΙΑΣ ηλεκτρομηχανικές εγκαταστάσεις των αστικών ελληνικών κατοικιών, Επίκουρος Καθηγητής Δημήτριος Κουμπογιάννης – ΤΕΙ Αθήνας 09.00-09.15 Εγγραφές Διαγνωστικές επιθεωρήσεις κτιρίων για την λήψη αποφάσεων και Διαδικασίες παρακολούθησης των δεικτών ενεργειακής αποδοτικότητας 09.15-09.30 για την Καλωσόρισμα συνεχή βελτιστοποίηση των ανακαινίσεων του κτιριακού αποθέματος κατοικιών, Δρ. Κωνσταντίνος Μπαλαράς κος Πέτρος Κόκκαλης – Εντεταλμένος Δημοτικός Σύμβουλος Τμήματος Βελτιώσεις στους τομείς της ενέργειας και των μεταφορών σε έξυπνες Αξιοποίησης Ευρωπαϊκών και Εθνικών Πόρων, Δ/νσης Προγραμματισμού και πόλεις, Δρ. Giovanni Scaramuzzo, κος Ivan Simic Ανάπτυξης του Δήμου Πειραιά Ενεργειακή αποκατάσταση κτιρίων σε έξυπνες πόλεις, κος Diego Broock Καθηγητής Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης – Συντονιστής έργου GRASP και Διευθυντής Hijar - CCS του Τομέα Τεχνολογίας του Περιβάλλοντος και Συγκοινωνιών, Τμήμα Πολιτικών Μηχανικών, Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών ΕΛΑΦΡΥ ΓΕΥΜΑ ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΕΣ ΕΡΓΩΝ έργων σε μια έξυπνη 14.00-16.00 Ενσωμάτωση των 1:αποτελεσμάτων Συντονιστής της ενότητας: Ι. Πίττας, προϊστάμενος του τμήματος ηλεκτρολογικού, πρότυπη προκήρυξη Δ/νση Μηχανολογικού-Ηλεκτρολογικού του Δήμου Πειραιά

Βασικοί δείκτες απόδοσης (KPIs) και στόχοι ενός έργου αναβάθμισης, Δρ. 09.30-11.00 Παρουσίαση&Συνεργειών Έργων Γεώργιος Σταυρακάκης Καθ. Γεώργιος Στεφανίδης REPUBLIC-MED – Δρ. Γεώργιος Σταυρακάκης / COEFFICIENT – κα Maršenka Παραδείγματα μεθόδων μελέτης για την εκτίμηση των KPIs και εντοπισμός Marksel / MARIE – κοςαναβάθμισης, Τάσος Σιδηρόπουλος / REMIDA – κος Θεόδωρος βέλτιστων λύσεων Δρ. Γεώργιος Σταυρακάκης& Καθ. Πατσουλές BIOFOSS – κος Κωνσταντίνος Κυριακόπουλος / PEEBPE – Καθ. Γεώργιος /Στεφανίδης Δημήτριος Στημονιάρης / GRASP – Καθ. Γεώργιος Supporting SMEs in energy efficiency and RESΣτεφανίδης market in MED, Καθ. Katja Hanzic ΔΙΑΛΕΙΜΜΑ Project monitoring: Εκ των προτέρων και εν των υστέρων παρακολούθηση των KPIs, κος Δημήτρης Τσιαμήτρος ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 2: ΠΛΑΙΣΙΟ ΟΛΙΚΗΣ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΙΜΜΑ

11.20-11.40 Πλαίσιο προτεινόμενου σχεδίου στο νέο πρόγραμμα MED

Εισαγωγή στο πλαίσιο, Ανάγκες χρηστών, Στόχοι πλαισίου, Στόχοι του ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ 3: ΣΤΡΟΓΓΥΛΗ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΑ προγράμματος MED σχετικοί με το πλαίσιο, Συνοχή μεταξύ του προτεινόμενου πλαισίου και Συζήτηση των στόχων του νέου προγράμματος MED, 16.20-17.20 Καθ.Γεώργιος ΓεώργιοςΣτεφανίδης, Στεφανίδης Δρ. Γεώργιος Σταυρακάκης, Καθ. Katja Hanzic, κος Καθ. Δημήτριος Τσιαμήτρος, κος Τάσος Σιδηρόπουλος, κος Δημήτριος Κουμπογιάννης, Καθ. Δημήτριος Στημονιάρης, κος Κωνσταντίνος Κυριακόπουλος, Δρ. Κωνσταντίνος Μπαλαράς, Δρ. Giovanni Scaramuzzo, κος Ivan Simic, κος Diego Broock Hijar

17.20-17.30 Μελλοντικές κατευθύνσεις www.republic-med.eu www.republic-med.eu

www.grasp-med.eu www.grasp-med.eu

Video Links: 

http://youtu.be/9QExkGnz71M



http://youtu.be/KFGIVXcMPnM



http://youtu.be/G4CovcNhlps



http://youtu.be/WA0MQii1QB0



http://youtu.be/fkOUqphGN2w



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LP-T83oa80