19 GOLD MERCURY INTERNATIONAL Global Governance: Towards a New Ethic
Written by Nicolas De Santis and Ayca Rodop
Gold Mercury International is an independent global think tank founded in 1961. Our Global Governance Model™ is a uniquely flexible framework to organise world complexity within the 8 major global areas. The model combines public and private approaches to generating policy debate and
new thinking in the context of Global Governance and Visionary Leadership. Since our founding in 1961, our commitment to the promotion of peace and dialogue through trade, cooperation and sustainable practices has captured the attention of statesmen, companies, the media and public opinion
worldwide. The prestigious Gold Mercury Awards for Visionary Leadership exemplify ethical, forward-looking and sustainable decision-making.
Fuerth, L. (2009) Foresight and anticipatory governance. The Institute for Alternative Futures and the Rockefeller Foundation.
Just, R. (2009) “Failed states, dubious rankings”. The New Republic <http://www.tnr.com/ blog/the-plank/failed-statesdubious-rankings>
Rachman, G. (2010). “How the bottom fell out of ‘old’ Davos”. Financial Times http://blogs. ft.com/rachmanblog/category/ financial-crisis/,
Kaldor, M. (2003). “The idea of Global Civil Society”. International Affairs, 79(3): 583-593.
Rosenau, J.N. (1995) Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1(1), pp. 13-43.
Mannazzu, G., De Santis, N. (2009). Anticipatory Governance Framework. Gold Mercury International.
Sen, A. (2004). “Elements of a theory of human rights”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4):315-356.
Nagel, T. (2005). “The problem of global justice”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2): 113-147.
Singer, P. (1972). “Famine, affluence and morality”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(3): 229-243.
To receive our Publications Catalogue please write to: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Publications Catalogue
SOURCES Baylis, J.; Smith, S. (2005) The globalization of world politics, an introduction to international relations. Third edition. Oxford University Press. Beckmann, M.,Pies, I. Sustainability by corporate citizenship—the moral dimension of sustainability. Discussion-paper No.04-12, Research Institute of the Wittenberg-Center for Global Ethics. Bolton, J. (2009) “The key to changing the United Nations System”, in Con UNdrum: The limits of the United Nations and the search for alternatives, edited by Brett D. Schaefer. http://www. globalgovernancewatch.org/ resources/the-key-to-changingthe-united-nations-system De Santis, N. (2009) Corporate Vision® and Anticipatory Governance. Gold Mercury International.
Held, D. ,McGrew, A. (2003) The global transformation reader, Second edition, Cambridge, Polity Press. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., Perraton, J. (1999) Global transformations. Cambridge, Polity Press. Hewson, M.; Sinclair, T.J. (1999) Approaches to global governance theory. State University of New York Press. Hovland, I.,de Vibe, M.; Young, J. (2002) Bridging research and policy: an annotated bibliography. Working paper 174, Overseas Development Institute. http://www.odi.org.uk/ resources/download/150.pdf Judt, T. (2009) What Is Living and What Is Dead in Social Democracy? New York Review of Books, Volume 56, Number 20.http://www.nybooks.com/ articles/23519
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press. Ch. 1, ‘In defence of universal values,’ 34-110. Parekh, B. (2005). “Principles of a global ethic”, in J. Eade & D. O’Byrne (Eds.). Global ethics and civil society. Aldershot, Ashgate: 15-35. Copyright 2011 Gold Mercury International Electronic distribution, reprinting or republication of this report or any part of this report for educational or personal use is authorized by prominently displaying the following sentence, ‘THIS IS A GOLD MERCURY INTERNATIONAL REPORT’ and including the hyperlink www.goldmercury.org immediately before, or at the start of the report. This report (or any part of this report) must not be reproduced for profit
Published on Jan 14, 2014
This paper proposes a holistic return to a dialogue of global ethics, values and morality to change behaviour within global leadership and t...