April 3 2017

Page 2

OPINION

GOT OPINIONS? We want to hear them. COLLEGIAN-OPINION@CSUFRESNO.EDU MONDAY, APRIL 3, 2017

2

ASI ELECTIONS

Students vote ‘no.’ Now what? By Amber Carpenter @shutupambs

Thursday afternoon, after months of campaigning from Student Involvement and other campus organizations, students voted against the Bold New U fee referendum – meaning they also voted against student fee increases for future Fresno State students and against the construction of a new facility on campus. The news arrives as a double-edged sword – it’s not completely unheard of to have a new facility on campus that showcases new technology, but it seemed unfair for current students to make financial decisions for students who haven’t yet even decided to attend the university. This “no” vote could be considered a huge loss for Student Involvement. Fresno State Student Involvement and Student Affairs spearheaded the effort to inform and reinforce the need for the new student union on campus. Not only could this be considered a monetary loss – between the #BoldNewU swag, the many informational student forums and the time spent lobbying with students for a vote in favor of the new facility – but also a loss of morale. The way campus organizations championed the project was problematic in nature – insinuating that students should vote in favor of constructing the new student union, citing the lack of financial responsibility that they will personally experience and placing that same responsibility on future students. Even throughout the week of ASI elections, representatives from Student Involvement were still strong in their effort, handing out stickers to students in favor of the #BoldNewU, next to the voting station.

Christian Ortuno • The Collegian

Fresno State students, faculty and staff watch as the ASI election results are announced at the Pavilion in the USU on March. 30, 2017.

Even those who voted against the new student union were shocked at the loss, especially because the referendum flopped by nearly 600 votes. This is shocking, considering the amount of student backing the Bold New U project appeared to have. So what do organizations like Student Involvement or campus institutions like Student Affairs do after a decision like this? The rejected referendum should not be considered a pipe dream. Those in favor of the new facility saw an opportunity to grow the campus and worked hard to make it a reality. However, the marketing of the facility as a need and not a want was misleading – and could have caused the loss. If students have outgrown the current facility and there is a genuine need for a new union on campus, efforts should be made to accommodate

either the renovation or construction of a new building. Selling the new student union project as “it’ll be their problem and not yours,” may seem beneficial in theory, but in regards to the vote, didn’t fly for the majority of the student population. All hope is not lost for a Bold New U, but it would be wise of Student Involvement to take a look at these results and the decision of students and consider other needs first – needs that include a more diverse staff, classroom upgrades and increased safety are among the first to come to mind. The Student Recreation Center, a building on campus financed by student fees – the same fees that would go towards the construction on the new student union – is falling apart before our eyes. In a letter to the editor published in Oct 2016, a Fresno

State student cited almost 15 machines as “out of order.” Shouldn’t we address these needs before a brand new building is built? However, there’s no telling whether or not this vote was merely a formality. In a year or two, it’s probable that the Bold New U will not be an option, but a fee increase and facility implemented on students without their vote. If or when the time comes when students don’t have the opportunity to vote, it would be in the best interest of students and faculty if campus needs are tended to initially, and then private funds are raised in order to ensure minimal fees to the students eventually paying for the new student union. Fresno State administrators were already willing to raise more than 10 million dollars for a new union, why not challenge that as much as possible and raise even more, thus reducing fees for future students? That’s where the voices of students come in – it is our responsibility as students at this university to challenge administrators to minimize student fees as much as possible. The referendum vote is not enough. We must hold administrators accountable to keep student fees as low as possible, especially in the wake of the Bold New U results. Eventually, a day will come when the student population has truly outgrown the current USU – and the university should be able to provide a place that facilitates student growth without the dramatic increase of fees. At the end of the day, students used their voices and it was bold for administrators to leave the decision up to students, considering the investments of time and money on the account of Student Involvement.

Jordan Bradley • The Collegian

THE COLLEGIAN The Collegian is a student-run publication that serves the Fresno State community. Views expressed in The Collegian do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff or university. fresnostate.edu/collegian

The Collegian California State University, Fresno 5201 N. Maple Ave., M/S SA42 Fresno, CA 93740-8027 News Line: (559) 278-5732 Business Line: (559) 278-5735 Advertising Line: (559) 278-8179

Executive Editor Managing Editor Visuals Editor News Editor Assistant News Editor Opinion Editor Arts & Entertianment Editor Sports Editor Assistant Sports Editor Staff Photographer Staff Photographer Design Editor Copy Editor

Diana Giraldo Staff Writer Cresencio Rodriguez Delgado Staff Writer Khone Saysamongdy Staff Writer Chueyee Yang Staff Writer Razmik Cañas Staff Writer Amber Carpenter Staff Writer Marina McElwee Webmaster Daniel Gligich Digital Media Manager Jenna Wilson Multimedia Journalist Megan Trindad Multimedia Journalist Christian Ortuno Social Media Director Juan Alvarez Social Media Reporter Alvaro Lozano Cartoonist

Selina Falcon Rebeca Flores Francisco De Leon Eric Zamora Richard Thistle Nugesse Ghebrendrias Khushpreet Sran Claire Cavanaugh Alan Alvarez Daniel Avalos Jessica Johnson Hayley Salazar Jordan Bradley

Co-General Sales Manager Co-General Sales Manager Special Projects Art Director Assistant Art Director Distribution Manager Accountancy Assistant General Manager Financial Manager Advertising Faculty Adviser Editorial Faculty Adviser MCJ Department Chair

Joseph Houlihan Erik Ucelo Haruka Naoi Casey Supple Kong Thao Abdallah Abdelhamid Megan Motsenbocker Rich Marshall Cheryl Carlson Jan Edwards George Hostetter Dr. Katherine Adams

Each member of the campus community is permitted one copy of The Collegian. Subscriptions are available for $25, on a semester basis. Staff positions at The Collegian are open to students of all majors. All content Copyright © 2017 The Collegian. Letters to the Editor (collegian@csufresno.edu): All letters submitted to The Collegian should be between 250-500 words in length, must be type-written, and must be accompanied by a full name and phone number to verify content. The Collegian reserves the right to edit all material for length, content, spelling and grammar, as well as the right to refuse publication of any material submitted. All material submitted to The Collegian becomes property of The Collegian.


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.