
4 minute read
4.3 Guidelines and Procedures
by FirstAmAZ
engineers, or other Persons as deemed necessary to perform the review. The Board may include the compensation of such Persons in the Association's annual operating budget.
4.3 Guidelines and Procedures
Advertisement
a. Design Guidelines. Declarant may prepare Design Guidelines containing general provisions applicable to all of Anthem and all of the Properties, respectively, as well as specific provisions which vary within the Anthem
Country Club Community. Any portion of the Design Guidelines specific to the
Properties may not be in derogation of the architectural, design, and construction standards and guidelines promulgated for all of Anthem pursuant to the Community Covenant.
The Design Guidelines are intended to provide guidance to Owners and Builders regarding matters of particular concern to the Reviewer in considering applications. The Design Guidelines are not the exclusive basis for decisions of the Reviewer, and compliance with the Design Guidelines does not guarantee approval of any application.
Declarant shall have sole and full authority to amend the Design Guidelines specific to the Properties as long as it owns any portion of the Properties or has a right to expand the Properties pursuant to Section 9.1, notwithstanding a delegation of reviewing authority, unless Declarant also delegates the power to amend. Upon termination of Declarant's right to amend, the LEC shall have the authority to amend the Design Guidelines specific to the Properties with the Board's and the Council's consent. Any amendments to the Design Guidelines shall be prospective only and shall not require modifications to or removal of structures previously approved once the approved construction or modification has commenced. Subject to the Community-Wide Standard, there shall be no other limitation on the scope of amendments to the Design Guidelines, and such amendments may remove requirements previously imposed or otherwise make the Design Guidelines less restrictive.
The Reviewer shall make the Design Guidelines available to Owners and Builders who seek to engage in development or construction within the Properties. In Declarant's sale discretion, the Design Guidelines may be Recorded, in which event the Recorded version, as it may unilaterally be amended from time to time, shall control in the event of any dispute as to which version of the Design Guidelines was in effect at any particular time.
b. Procedures Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Design Guidelines, no activities shall commence on any portion of the Properties until an application for approval has been submitted to and approved by the Reviewer. Such application shall be in the form required by the Reviewer and
Page 21
shall include information required under the Design Guidelines, such as plans and specifications showing site layout, structural design, exterior elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, drainage, exterior lighting, irrigation, and other features of proposed construction, as applicable. The Design Guidelines and the Reviewer may require the submission of such additional information as may be reasonably necessary to consider any application.
In reviewing each submission, the Reviewer may consider any factors it deems relevant, including, without limitation, harmony of external design with surrounding structures and environment. Decisions may be based on purely aesthetic considerations. Each Owner acknowledges that determinations as to such matters are purely subjective and opinions may vary as to the desirability and/or attractiveness of particular improvements. The Reviewer shall have the sole discretion to make final, conclusive, and binding determinations on matters of aesthetic judgment and such determinations shall not be subject to review so long as made in good faith and in accordance with the procedures set forth herein.
The Reviewer shall make a determination on each application after receipt of a completed application and all information required by the Reviewer. The Reviewer may permit or require that an application for approval be submitted or considered in stages, in which case, a final decision shall not be required until after the final, required submission stage. The Reviewer may (i) approve the application, with or without conditions; (ii) approve a portion of the application and disapprove other portions; or (iii) disapprove the application.
Reviewer approval shall not constitute approval of or waiver of approvals or reviews by Maricopa County or any other municipality or governmental agency or entity having jurisdiction over architectural or construction matters.
The Reviewer shall notify the applicant in writing of the final determination on any application within 45 days after its receipt of a completed application and all requested information. In the event that the Reviewer fails to respond in a timely manner, approval shall be deemed to have been given, subject to Declarant's right to veto pursuant to Section 4.1. However, no approval, whether expressly granted or deemed granted, shall be inconsistent with the Design Guidelines unless a written variance has been granted pursuant to Section 4.5.
Notice shall be deemed to have been given at the time the envelope containing the response is deposited with the U. S. Postal Service. Personal delivery of such written notice shall, however, be sufficient and shall be deemed to have been given at the time of delivery to the applicant.
Page 22