1,400.00
1.97% 2.22% 0.69% 0.60%
1,000.00
0.04%
800.00
0.05% 3.01%
600.00
2.98%
200.00
0.00
DOMESTIC
COMMERCIAL
EDUCATION
2015
1,231.64
335.71
62.67
2020
1,344.57
366.49
2024
1,442.32
393.14
MARKETS
OTHER
TOTAL
288.33
118.62
2037
68.42
314.77
129.49
2224
73.39
337.65
138.91
2385
Figure 2. Projection for waste quantities generated by sectors (tons/day).
South Transfer Station
400.00
2.30% 2.42% 5.53% 5.33% 2.15% 2.58% 0.92% 1.13% 0.38%
Source, Emaseo, 2015
0.22% 0.05% 0.49%
Figure 3 shows the profile of waste delivered to the transfer stations for treatment, reuse and final disposal. It is necessary to consider that the presence of small-scale sidewalk recycling operators holds an added value but reduces the recyclable waste registered at the transfer stations. With regard to construction and loulky waste, debris volumes delivered to the two municipal dumps increased by 2.3 times between 2012 and 2015, reflecting a strong growth of real estate constructions (Infographic 8).
57.67% 56.39% 8.57% 9.97%
North Transfer Station
TĂtulo del eje
1,200.00
0.25% 0.16% 4.24% 3.43% 0.83% 0.61% 0.18% 0.21% 1.56% 1.67% 0.88% 0.83% 6.29% 6.23% 0.31% 0.38%
1.Paper 2.Cardboard 3.Compounds (*) 4.Hazardous (batteries) 5.PET Bottles (1) 6.High density plastic (2) 7.Plastic bags (low density) 8.Polypropylene (5) 9.Polythene (6) 10.Inert material (concrete slab, ceramic, soil) 11.Organic from gardens 12.Organic from cooking 13.Waste (diapers, toilet paper) 14.Electronics 15. Textiles 16.Ferrous scrap metal 17.Non-ferrous scrap metal 18. Glass 19.Wood 20.Wood smaller than 1 cm 21.Hospital and medications
Figure 3. Profile of waste in the MDQ Source, Emaseo, 2015
Recycling
2.10%
Waste
2.19%
1,600.00