The Influence of Substrate Temperature during Focused Electron Beam Induced Deposition (FEBID)

Page 1

The Influence of Substrate Temperature during Focused Electron Beam Induced Deposition (FEBID) Jakob Hinum-Wagner1,3, Robert Winkler1, Gerhard Birnstingl2,3, Harald Plank1,2,3 1. Christian Doppler Laboratory DEFINE, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria 2. Graz Centre for Electron Microscopy, 8010 Graz, Austria

3. Institute of Electron Microscopy and Nanoanalysis, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria

Introduction For highest precision and reliability, local precursor coverage is of highest importance, as it determines the incremental growth rate. Recently, it was found that the local beam heating massively influences the local coverage due to reduced residence times of the precursor, which explains previously observed stability problems for larger 3D structures [1] . Based on this motivation, we here turn around the situation and lower the substrate temperature to study the implications on stability and precision. While FEBID at cryogenic temperatures using liquid nitrogen was studied before[2], we here focus on temperatures from room temperature down to 0 °C, which provides a certain level of applicability compared to a much more complicated cryo-setup.

Setup of Peltier Stage We designed, fabricated a variable temperature stage using a Peltier element (Fig. 1). The focus of the stage design was put on the modularity so that in terms of malfunction of the components the exchange is comparably simple. A 30 x 30 mm² Peltier element was used, which allows to cool substrates with a maximum size of 25 x 15 mm. A Pt-1000 was fixed on the surface of the Peltier element and a NTC on the upper module of the bimodular heat sink, which both served as input for the Peltier control unit. To complete the temperature mapping of the stage, an additional NTC sensor and a Pt-1000 were mounted on the lower module of the heat sink and directly attached on the silicon wafer, respectively. temperature step below RT [°C]

30

25

Fit: A*exp(-x/tau) + y0 20

y0 A

5,78382 ± 1,16603 25,06794 ± 4,65033

t1

27,65473 ± 8,4693

Chi-Quadr Reduziert

1,24086

R-Quadrat(COD)

0,98282

Kor. R-Quadrat

0,94846

15

10

5 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

time [min]

The control unit of the Peltier element allows full temperature control with variable heating/cooling rates up to 3 K/s. The stage was tested and optimized in terms of control engineering (PIDT1) for cooling steps from room temperature (RT) down to -5°C, as well as for heating steps from RT up to 45 °C. The timescale on which certain temperature steps below RT can be stabilized is shown in (Fig. 2) for cooling rates of 1 K/s.

Figure 1: Peltier Stage integrated in FIB-SEM Quanta 3D

Figure 2: Temperature steps below RT in dependence of its stabilization time

Experiments with Substrate Temperature Controlled FEBID (STEC-FEBID) 30 kV

5 kV (23,0 ± 0,5)°C

Quasi-1D-pillars were fabricated at 30 kV and 5 kV at substrate temperatures from Step 3: The 3D Nano Thermistor Probe RT down to 1.5 °C (Fig. 3). Below 1.5 °C the precursor solidifies on the substrate, resulting in an amorphous cone-like structure. (1,5 ± 1,0)°C (3,7 ± 1,0)°C

3,0

(14,8 ± 0,5)°C

(9,5 ± 1,0)°C (14,8 ± 0,5)°C

(23,0 ± 0,5)°C

(1,5 ± 1,0)°C

(9,5 ± 1,0)°C

(3,7 ± 1,0)°C

(14,8 ± 0,5)°C

(23 ± 0,5)°C

3,0

acceleration voltage: 30 kV

2,5

acceleration voltage: 5 kV 2,5

(3,7 ± 1,0) °C

height [µm]

2,0

height [µm]

(9,5 ± 1,0) °C

1,5

2,0

1,5

1,0

1,0

0,5

0,5

0,0

0,0 0

5

(1,5± 1,0) °C

10

15

0

20

5

10

15

20

total exposure time [s]

total exposure time [s]

Figure 4: Heights as function of total exposure time at different substrate temperatures 1,8

relative height growth rate variation

(-6,5 ± 1,0) °C

relative height growth rate variation

1,8

acceleration voltage: 30 kV

1,6

1,4

1,2

1,0

1,7

acceleration voltage: 5 kV 1,6 1,5 1,4 1,3 1,2 1,1 1,0 0,9

0

5

10

15

20

25

0

substrate temperature [°C]

5

10

15

20

25

substrate temperature [°C]

Figure 5: Relative height growth rate as a function of temperature

Conclusion Figure 3: Pillar arrays at different substrate Temperatures and acceleration voltage

References [1] Mutunga et al., ACS Nano (2019), DOI:10.1021/acsnano.8b09341 [2] Bresin et al., Nanotechnology 24 (2013), 035301-1 - 035301-7

A massive growth rate increase was observed for a both primary energies when approaching 1.5 °C (Fig. 5), demonstrating the expected growth boost for lower substrate temperatures.

Acknowledgements

Contact Jakob.hinum@felmi-zfe.at robert.winkler@felmi-zfe.at harald.plank@felmi-zfe.at www.felmi-zfe.at (QR-Code)


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.