The case for theHuman Rights Act

Page 101

Legal and constitutional considerations

Similarly to Scotland and Wales, the Northern Ireland Assembly and Northern Irish Ministers cannot legislate or do any act which is incompatible with Convention rights.191 The Northern Ireland Assembly also has no powers to amend the HRA.192 Similarly to Scotland though, in practice it is likely that any amendment or repeal of the HRA would require the consent of Northern Ireland Assembly with a Sewell motion for the same reasons.

Considerations particular to Northern Ireland

In relation to Northern Ireland, further legal implications arise beyond those for Scotland and Wales. The Good Friday Agreement states that:

‘The British government will complete incorporation into Northern Ireland law of the European Convention on Human Rights, with direct access to the courts, and remedies for breach of the Convention, including power for the courts to overrule Assembly legislation on grounds of inconsistency.’193

As a result, any decision to repeal the HRA, or to amend the HRA and/or enact a UK Bill of Rights covering Northern Ireland in a way which diminished existing human rights protections, would be likely to breach the Good Friday Agreement. Further it may put the UK in 191

Section 6(2)(c) and 24(1) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998.

192

Section 7(1)(b) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998.

193

Paragraph 2, Rights, Safeguards and Equality of Opportunity: Human Rights in the Multi-Party Agreement, Good Friday Agreement.

101


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.