abstract The analyst's discourse is the opposite of the mas ter one, as say Lacan in the 17 Seminar. It is the dismissal discourse of the master significants, of the S1, of the imperative law which alienates the subject. In this discourse the analyst, as object a, is the agent that transforms a hysterical patient in producer of significants of his own particulari ty, that is, the analyst who is present like an object that makes speak, promoting the tum of the discourses, as teach us Antonio Quinet, in the Seminar about the clinic of the discourses. It is what I intend to illustrate through pieces of a case ofmine thatshows us the typical intrasubjective phenomena of the obsessive neurosis.
keywords discourse, mysterisation, neurosis, obsessive, desire
Stylus
Rio de janeiro
n. 7
p.l?l-183
out 2003
183