vantagens e complexidades das avaliações de impacto
PELGRUM, H. Promoting equity through ICT: what can international assesments contribute to help fight low achievement?. In: KARPATI, A. (Ed.). Promoting equity through ICT in education: projects, problems, prospects. Budapest, Hungarian Ministry of Education, OECD, 2004. PITTMAN, G.; FEINSTEIN, O.; INGRAM, G. Evaluation development effectiveness. New Brunwsick, Transaction Publishers, 2005. PRITCHETT, L. It pays to be ignorant. In: Journal of Economic Policy Reform, v. 5, n. 4, pp. 251-269, 2002. RAVALLION, M. Evaluation in the practice of development. World Bank, 2008. RAWLINGS, L. Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. In: World Bank Research Observer, v. 20 (1), pp. 29-55, 2005. RIVKIN, S. G.; HANUSHEK, E.; KAIN, J. Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, v. 73, n. 2, pp. 417-458, mar. 2005. SANDERS, W.; RIVERS, C. Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. University of Tenesee, 1996. SAVEDOFF, W.; LEVINE, R.; BIRDSALL, N. When will we ever learn? Improving lives through impact evaluation. The Evaluation Gap Working Group, Center for Global Development, Washington DC, 2006. SADOFSKY, S. Utilization of evaluation results: feedback into the action program. In: SHMELZER, J. (Ed.). Learning in action. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966. SCHULBERG, H.; BAKER, F. Program evaluation models and the implementation of re- search findings. In: American Journal of Public Health, 1968. SKOUFIAS, E. Progresa and its impact on the welfare of rural households in Mexico. In: International Food Policy Research, Washington DC, 2005. SWEET, R.; MEATES, A. ICT and low achievers: what does PISA tell us?. In: KARPATI, A. (Ed.). Promoting equity through ICT in education: projects, problems, prospects. Budapest, Hungarian Ministry of Education, OECD, 2004. 91