The Independent Daily at Duke University
The Chronicle
10 | WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2009 the chronicle commentaries
Cardea program levels the playing field It’s no secret that a cutthroat world of pre-med large portion of incoming courses and admissions. students arrive at Duke as Starting this semester, “pre-med.” And it’s also not the new program will take a surprise that four years 18 freshmen and provide later, the students that are them with mentorship and still considerresources for editorial ing medical the next four school comyears. In adprise a significantly smaller dition to taking Chem 20D, group. Many of the students fellows are enrolled in a who drop the pre-med program-specific seminar, track, however, do so not participate in communitybecause of a lack of interest, building programs and but rather because of a lack events, and are offered adof success in notoriously ditional research opportudifficult pre-med “weeder” nities during their time at courses like Chem 31L. Duke. Fortunately, the UniverIn many ways, the Cardea sity has initiated a new pro- experience resembles the gram, the Cardea Fellows, atmosphere of freshman as a way to help ensure that year FOCUS programs; this students from less than stel- is a good thing, as FOCUS is lar high schools can com- a well established, successful pete and succeed in the initiative.
“
onlinecomment
I am not against discussing the atrocities that happen in any war, but a little balance would be helpful in promoting peace so that both sides take some responsibility.
”
—“Grad 1994” commenting on the story “Film keeps Palestine-Israel dialogue ‘alive.’” See more at www.dukechronicle.com.
Letters Policy The Chronicle welcomes submissions in the form of letters to the editor or guest columns. Submissions must include the author’s name, signature, department or class, and for purposes of identification, phone number and local address. Letters should not exceed 325 words; contact the editorial department for information regarding guest columns. The Chronicle will not publish anonymous or form letters or letters that are promotional in nature. The Chronicle reserves the right to edit letters and guest columns for length, clarity and style and the right to withhold letters based on the discretion of the editorial page editor.
Est. 1905
Direct submissions to: E-mail: chronicleletters@duke.edu Editorial Page Department The Chronicle Box 90858, Durham, NC 27708 Phone: (919) 684-2663 Fax: (919) 684-4696
The Chronicle
Inc. 1993
will robinson, Editor Hon Lung Chu, Managing Editor emmeline Zhao, News Editor Gabe Starosta, Sports Editor Michael Naclerio, Photography Editor shuchi Parikh, Editorial Page Editor Michael Blake, Editorial Board Chair alex klein, Online Editor jonathan angier, General Manager Lindsey rupp, University Editor sabreena merchant, Sports Managing Editor julius jones, Local & National Editor jinny cho, Health & Science Editor Glen gutterson, News Photography Editor andrew hibbard, Recess Editor Emily Bray, Editorial Page Managing Editor ashley holmstrom, Wire Editor Charlie Lee, Design Editor chelsea allison, Towerview Editor eugene wang, Recess Managing Editor Chase Olivieri, Multimedia Editor zak kazzaz, Recruitment Chair Taylor Doherty, Sports Recruitment Chair Mary weaver, Operations Manager Barbara starbuck, Production Manager
zachary tracer, University Editor julia love, Features Editor toni wei, Local & National Editor rachna reddy, Health & Science Editor Courtney Douglas, Sports Photography Editor austin boehm, Editorial Page Managing Editor rebecca Wu, Editorial Page Managing Editor naureen khan, Senior Editor swetha sundar, Graphics Editor Ben cohen, Towerview Editor Maddie Lieberberg, Recess Photography Editor Lawson kurtz, Towerview Photography Editor caroline mcgeough, Recruitment Chair Andy Moore, Sports Recruitment Chair CHRISSY BECK, Advertising/Marketing Director REBECCA DICKENSON, Chapel Hill Ad Sales Manager
The Chronicle is published by the Duke Student Publishing Company, Inc., a non-profit corporation independent of Duke University. The opinions expressed in this newspaper are not necessarily those of Duke University, its students, faculty, staff, administration or trustees. Unsigned editorials represent the majority view of the editorial board. Columns, letters and cartoons represent the views of the authors. To reach the Editorial Office at 301 Flowers Building, call 684-2663 or fax 684-4696. To reach the Business Office at 103 West Union Building, call 684-3811. To reach the Advertising Office at 101 West Union Building call 684-3811 or fax 684-8295. Visit The Chronicle Online at http://www.dukechronicle.com. © 2009 The Chronicle, Box 90858, Durham, N.C. 27708. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the prior, written permission of the Business Office. Each individual is entitled to one free copy.
Furthermore, providing students with an even academic footing is a welcome approach to leveling out what can be a rather unbalanced academic terrain on campus. The reality of the situation is that some students come to Duke from elite private schools with sophisticated science labs, while others graduate from high schools that can barely afford up-to-date textbooks, let alone scientific lab equipment. To this end, it is encouraging to see that the University is making a proactive effort to ensure the success of all students. This can be seen not only in the creation of the Cardea Fellows program, but also in the creation of Chemistry 20D,
a course designed to ensure students with less developed science backgrounds can get up to speed with the rigors of a collegiate science course. Although the program is perhaps the University’s first true pre-professional program (it focuses only on those who desire a career in the health care industry), the downsides to such an initiative at a liberal arts school like Duke are outweighed by its potential to improve students’ opportunities for success. Plus, it could be used as a recruiting tool for students from disadvantaged environments who are interested in pursuing a health-centered career, thereby helping to bolster the socioeconomic diversity of matriculating students.
Looking forward, we hope that a successful pilot of the Cardea program will lead to an increase in its size, although too dramatic of an enlargement may result in a loss of its community feel. Constant evaluation of the program, as was carried out for the Baldwin Scholars Program in its initial years, would be helpful to ensure success and efficacy. Overall, the program is a move in the right direction. If a student is talented enough to attend Duke, then medical or any health care profession should be within reach. We commend Lee Baker, Trinity dean of academic affairs, for his work in helping to make this a reality.
No more old boy’s club
“M
en in power.” That was the title of a column written by Steve Saltarelli and published in March in the University of Chicago student newspaper, The Chicago Maroon. The column called for the creation of an eponymous student group to advocate for men’s issues on campus, just like the many groups that advocate for women’s issues at U of C. yousef “There to usher abugharbieh the growing massfast forward es through the university system are a myriad of women’s advocacy organizations, evidenced on our campus by 10 such [Recognized Student Organizations], most notably the Feminist Majority, the National Organization for Women and Women in Business,” writes Saltarelli. “There are zero such male-oriented RSOs, as misleading as the name of the female a cappella troupe Men in Drag is.” Saltarelli’s tone becomes increasingly satirical when he writes, “Many don’t realize that men are in power all around us—in fact, the last 44 presidents have been men.” Readers still unsure of the column’s intent should become fully aware of it when Saltarelli begins to list the activities Men in Power plans to organize for its members: barbecue tutorials, action film screenings and a workshop titled “Protecting What’s Yours: Drafting a Prenuptial Agreement.” Yet, even though Saltarelli’s column is clearly satirical, it wasn’t treated as such. Men from both on and off campus sent Saltarelli e-mails asking how they could be involved in the Men in Power movement, saying they felt like their needs had long been neglected. Saltarelli had touched a nerve. Building off the support he received via e-mail, Saltarelli decided to actually incorporate Men in Power as a student group. At this point in time, Men in Power began to receive attention in national press engines like the Chicago Tribune and Huffington Post, inspiring debate in the blogosphere. Saltarelli even appeared on MSNBC in May. In his interview, Saltarelli admitted that men—in general—are the sex with the disproportionate amount of power in government, business, law, academia and nearly every other professional field, but maintained Men in Power and groups like it are necessary because the balance of power between the sexes is likely to shift in the future.
Today’s CEOs were students 30 years ago, a time when women and minorities did not attend college to nearly the same extent that they do now. He argues that the corporate and governmental leaders of tomorrow are more likely to reflect the demographic diversity of today’s top colleges, where the majority of those enrolled in both undergraduate and graduate programs are women. In contrast to Saltarelli, Foreign Policy writer Reihan Salam celebrates the idea that the economic balance of power will shift between the sexes in the future. In his article “The Death of Macho,” which appeared in the July/Aug. issue of the magazine, he argues that the “era of male dominance is coming to an end,” leaving future men with only two choices: either share economic and political power with women equally or resist it through political manipulation and force. Salam predicts that their choice will shape the course of world politics. Although Salam’s claims that the financial and real estate crises were due to the dominance of the values of “penis competition” on Wall Street are dubious, he is undoubtedly correct when he says the recession has disproportionately impacted men. Job losses have been greatest in male-dominated professions like construction and manufacturing. Those sectors of the economy are unlikely to ever recover to pre-recession levels, and the men previously employed in them are unlikely to find jobs that pay as well. That is particularly true in places like Elkhart, Ind., which had the highest unemployment rate in the nation in June at 16.8 percent, according to the Indiana Bureau of Labor Statistics. Elkhart’s economy primarily relies on RV, automotive parts and musical instrument manufacturing, sectors unlikely to recover soon or perhaps ever. Men without college degrees who once earned nearly $60,000 per year will have to content themselves with far less. Salam asserts that employment prospects are unlikely to ever improve for unskilled men around the world, and that many will likely find themselves without enough money to support a family. Unable to marry, they will on average be more violent, embittered toward authority, and likely to become alcoholic. His argument climaxes when he claims that unemployed men could become a politically and economically destabilizing force. Whether Salam’s predictions will pan out is uncertain. What groups like Men in Power show conclusively, though, is that many men do feel vulnerable in today’s world. And sometimes feeling vulnerable is enough to precipitate irrational action. Yousef AbuGharbieh is a Trinity senior. His column runs every other Wednesday.