Page 1

APPENDIX A FIGURES AND MAPS


Subject Property

Source: USGS Topographic Map, 7.5 Minute, “Stone Mountain”, Georgia Quadrangle

The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

Map Date: 1997

N

Figure 1 Topographic Map 1”=2,000’ Project No: PHI2022


Subject Property

Source: 2009 WetLandMAPS by ChartTiff

Map Date: May 12, 2009

N The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

Figure 2 Wetlands Map 1” = 2,000’

Project No: PHI2022


SUBJECT PROPERTY

Source: USDA-NRCS Soil Survey Map, DeKalb County, GA

Soil Survey Data: Version 6, Dec 14, 2013

N The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

Figure 3 Soil Survey Map As Shown

Project No: PHI2022


Subject Property

Source: http://store.msc.fema.gov/

N The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

Figure 4 FEMA Map As Shown

Project No: PHI2022


Source: ENERCON Field Notes

The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

N

Figure 5 Site Map (Existing) 1”=175’

Project No: PHI2022


Subject Property

Legend: Approximate Subject Property Boundary

N

The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

Figure 6 Site Map (Proposed) As Shown

Project No: PHI2022


SUBJECT PROPERTY

Legend: Source: US EPA Website, http://www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap/georgia.htm

Radon Zone 1 Radon Zone 2 Radon Zone 3

N The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

Figure 7 Georgia Radon Zones Map Not to Scale

Project No: PHI2022


APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS


Picture #1:

View of subject property looking northeast across Rockbridge Road.

Picture #2:

View of the subject property looking west along Rockbridge Road.

Picture #3:

View of stream that runs south to north through the center of the subject property.

Picture #4:

View of the interior undeveloped portion of the subject property.

Villas at Pine Lake, Pine Lake, GA

Photos Taken: March 26, 2014

ENERCON Author: Nathan Parker


Picture #5: View of the unoccupied single-family residence located on the northeast side of the subject property.

Picture #6:

View of the occupied single-family residence located on the southwest of the subject property.

Picture #7: View of trash and tires dumped on the northeast side of the subject property along Aberdeen Road.

Picture #8:

View of transformer located along Poplar Drive on the southwest side of the subject property.

Villas at Pine Lake, Pine Lake, GA

Photos Taken: March 26, 2014

ENERCON Author: Nathan Parker


Picture #9: View of the Rockbridge Road and Aberdeen Drive intersection facing north down Aberdeen Drive.

Picture #10:

View facing west along Rockbridge Road.

Picture #11: View of the Rockbridge Road and Aberdeen Drive intersection facing north down Aberdeen Drive.

Picture #12:

View facing north along Poplar Road.

Villas at Pine Lake, Pine Lake, GA

Photos Taken: March 26, 2014

ENERCON Author: Nathan Parker


Picture #13: View of east adjoining properties.

Picture #14:

View of north adjoining property.

Picture #15: View of west adjoining properties.

Picture #16:

View of shopping center south of subject property. Note: Sentry Cleaners

Villas at Pine Lake, Pine Lake, GA

Photos Taken: March 26, 2014

ENERCON Author: Nathan Parker


Picture #17: View of southwest adjoining Shell Station and New G’s Alterations across Rockbridge Road.

Villas at Pine Lake, Pine Lake, GA

Photos Taken: March 26, 2014

ENERCON Author: Nathan Parker


APPENDIX C HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTATION


Historic Aerial Photographs


Subject Property


Subject Property


Subject Property


Subject Property


Subject Property


Subject Property


Subject Property


Subject Property


Subject Property


Fire Insurance Maps


Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road Stone Mountain, GA 30083 Inquiry Number: 2801063.3 June 23, 2010

Certified Sanborn速 Map Report


Certified Sanborn® Map Report Site Name: Proposed Pine Lake Senior 4678 Rockbridge Road Stone Mountain, GA 30083

Client Name: Enercon Services, Inc. 500 Townpark Lane Kennesaw, GA 30144

EDR Inquiry # 2801063.3

Contact: Jeffrey Griffin

6/23/10

The complete Sanborn Library collection has been searched by EDR, and fire insurance maps covering the target property location provided by Enercon Services, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The certified Sanborn Library search results in this report can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn and entering the certification number. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection.

Certified Sanborn Results: Site Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Cross Street: P.O. # Project: Certification #

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road Stone Mountain, GA 30083 NA PHI1171 B3D9-467D-AF97

UNMAPPED PROPERTY This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found.

Sanborn® Library search results Certification # B3D9-467D-AF97

The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million Sanborn fire insurance maps, which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched:

Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™

Limited Permission To Make Copies Enercon Services, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to THREE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2010 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

2801063 - 3

page 2


Historical Topographic Maps


Subject Property

Source: USGS Topographic Map, 7.5 Minute, “Stone Mountain”, Georgia Quadrangle

Map Date: 1956 revised 1982

N

The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

1956 revised 1982 Topographic Map 1”=2,000’

Project No: PHI2022


Subject Property

Source: USGS Topographic Map, 7.5 Minute, “Stone Mountain”, Georgia Quadrangle

The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

Map Date: 1992

N

1992 Topographic Map 1”=2,000’ Project No: PHI2022


Subject Property

Source: USGS Topographic Map, 7.5 Minute, “Stone Mountain”, Georgia Quadrangle

The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

Map Date: 1997

N

1997 Topographic Map 1”=2,000’ Project No: PHI2022


City Directories


Year

Subject Property Listing

Nearby Properties

1940, 1945, and 1950 1954, 1959, and 1964

No listing for the addresses associated with the subject property.

No listing for Rockbridge Road or Aberdeen Drive.

No significant change from the 1950 city directory.

1966, 1971, and 1973

No significant change from the 1966 city directory.

1974, 1976, and 1981

440 Aberdeen Drive-Residential. 4656 Rockbridge RoadResidential.

1986

No significant change from the 1981 city directory

1991

No significant change from the 1986 city directory.

1996 and 2001

No significant change from the 1991 city directory.

2005-06

4678 Rockbridge RoadResidential. No listing for 440 Aberdeen Drive.

2008-09

No significant changes from the 2005-06 city directory.

Rockbridge Road is listed with residential addresses; however, terminates at 4165. No listing for Aberdeen Drive. Rockbridge Road is listed with residential addresses; however, terminates at 4642. Aberdeen Drive is listed with residential address beginning with 441. Rockbridge Road is listed with residential addresses; however, terminates at 4656 and resumes at 4696. No significant changes on Aberdeen Drive. Sentry Cleaners is listed as one of two commercial tenants at 4687 Rockbridge Road. No other significant changes from the 1981 city directory. Rockbridge Village Shopping Center with multiple tenant suites is listed at 4687 Rockbridge Road. One of the tenants listed is Sentry Cleaners. No other significant changes from the 1986 city directory. No significant changes from the 1991 city directory. American Valet Cleaners and Pelikan, Inc. (Shell) are listed at 4635 Rockbridge Road. No other significant changes from the 2001 city directory. Presidential Valet Cleaners and The Neighborhood Store (Shell) are listed at 4635 Rockbridge Road. No other significant changes from the 2005-06 city directory


APPENDIX D DOCUMENTATION FROM TITLE COMPANY/TITLE PROFESSIONAL


Chain of Title Search For Parcel 1804001016 (Contains entire 5.5 acres)


TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

126 SCEPTRE DRIVE ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75032

TEL: (972) 772-4283 FAX: (972) 772-4283

80 YEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SEARCH THE ATTACHED REPORT IS BEING PROVIDED TO APPLICANT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING LANDOWNER OR PURCHASE DEFENSES WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED. IT IS PROVIDED FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF APPLICANT AND MAY NOT BE USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY REASON. NOTE: THIS SEARCH REPRESENTS SURFACE CONVEYANCES ONLY. TOTAL LIABILITY OF TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMPANY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY.


LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel: 18 040 01 016, Pine Lake District 74A, 4656 Rockbridge Road, Dekalb County, Pine Lake, Georgia.

CURRENT OWNER BBT Investments L.L.C.

DATE 7-27-04 10-6-89

GRANTOR Brian Batzel and wife, Donna Batzel Marie Leach

GRANTEE BBT Investments L.L.C.

10-11-65 Virginia L. Shumake

Brian Batzel and wife, Donna Batzel Marie Leach

8-6-51

Jay E. Rayford

Virginia L. Shumake

10-6-32

R.M. Shields

Jay E. Rayford

Easements: Utility Easement

DOCUMENT TYPE Warranty Deed File No. 1649394 Warranty Deed File No. 6543425 Warranty Deed File No. 3792455 Warranty Deed File No. 1087621 Warranty Deed File No. 02536


Commitment for Title Insurance By Chicago Title Insurance Company


Records of Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations


TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

126 SCEPTRE DRIVE ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75032

TEL: (972) 772-4283 FAX: (972) 772-4283

80 YEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SEARCH THE ATTACHED REPORT IS BEING PROVIDED TO APPLICANT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING LANDOWNER OR PURCHASE DEFENSES WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED. IT IS PROVIDED FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF APPLICANT AND MAY NOT BE USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY REASON. NOTE: THIS SEARCH REPRESENTS SURFACE CONVEYANCES ONLY. TOTAL LIABILITY OF TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMPANY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY.


ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN RESEARCH

AFTER COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH A FINDING THAT NO ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS HAVE BEEN FILED OF PUBLIC RECORD AND THAT IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY RESEARCHED IN THIS REPORT COMPLIES WITH ASTM E 1527-13-SEC. 8.3.4.4 AND SECTION 6.2 THIS REPORT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A.S.T.M. E 1527-13.


Legal Description


APPENDIX E NON-SCOPE TESTING


Lead-based Paint


2014 LBP Sampling by ENERCON


April 14, 2014

Jeff Griffin Enercon 500 Town Park Lane Kennesaw GA

30144

TEL: (770) 919-1930 FAX: (770) 528-0201 RE:

Pine Lake

Dear Jeff Griffin:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received for the analyses presented in following report.

Order No: 1404A06

18 samples on 4/9/2014 2:50:00 PM

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a project Case Narrative. AES’ certifications are as follows: -NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water, soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/13-06/30/14. -AIHA-LAP, LLC Laboratory ID: 100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics), Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal) effective until 09/01/15. These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

Tara Esbeck Project Manager

Page 1 of 7


Page 2 of 7


Page 3 of 7


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project: Lab ID:

Enercon Pine Lake 1404A06

Date:

14-Apr-14

Case Narrative

All samples analyzed per Jeff Griffin 4/10/14

Page 4 of 7


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Lab Order: Client: Project: Matrix: Date Received:

Date:

1404A06 Enercon Pine Lake Paint 4/9/2014 2:50:00 PM

14-Apr-14

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) PAINT

Reporting

Date Analyzed

Result

Units

1404A06-001A

PB 1

0.355

wt%

0.00973

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-002A

PB 2

BRL

wt%

0.0317

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-003A

PB 3

BRL

wt%

0.0781

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-004A

PB 4

BRL

wt%

0.0246

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-005A

PB 5

0.341

wt%

0.00996

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-006A

PB 6

0.0391

wt%

0.00998

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-007A

PB 7

0.0318

wt%

0.00932

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-008A

PB 8

1.42

wt%

0.0912

9.77

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-009A

PB 9

0.0277

wt%

0.0161

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-010A

PB 10

0.166

wt%

0.00940

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-011A

PB 11

1.71

wt%

0.107

11.19

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-012A

PB 12

0.427

wt%

0.00983

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-013A

PB 13

0.0384

wt%

0.00991

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-014A

PB 14

BRL

wt%

0.00950

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-015A

PB 15

BRL

wt%

0.0177

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-016A

PB 16

BRL

wt%

0.00928

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-017A

PB 17

0.0518

wt%

0.00938

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

1404A06-018A

PB 18

BRL

wt%

0.0181

1

04/05/2014

04/11/2014

JS

Qualifiers:

BRL - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit B

Qual

Date

Client Sample ID

Limit

DF

Collected

Laboratory ID

Analyst

DF - Dilution Factor

- Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

Results are blank corrected where applicable

Page 5 of 7


Page 6 of 7


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Enercon Pine Lake 1404A06

Sample ID: MB-189550 SampleType: MBLK Analyte

BatchID: 189550 Client ID: TestCode:

Analyte Lead Sample ID: 1404A06-011AMS SampleType: MS Analyte Lead Sample ID: 1404A06-011AMSD SampleType: MSD Analyte Lead

Client ID: TestCode:

Units: wt% BatchID: 189550

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

RPT Limit

BRL

Sample ID: LCS-189550 SampleType: LCS

14-Apr-14

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT

Result

Lead

Qualifiers:

Date:

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

%REC

Prep Date: 04/10/2014 Analysis Date: 04/11/2014

Low Limit High Limit

RPD Ref Val

Run No: 265358 Seq No: 5590261

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

0.0100 Units: wt% BatchID: 189550

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

0.7122

0.0666

0.7114

SPK Ref Val

%REC 100

Client ID: PB 11 TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

Prep Date: 04/10/2014 Analysis Date: 04/11/2014

Low Limit High Limit 80

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

0.9652

0.0831

0.4794

1.710

%REC -155

Client ID: PB 11 TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

Prep Date: 04/10/2014 Analysis Date: 04/11/2014

Low Limit High Limit 75

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

1.207

0.0911

0.4776

1.710

%REC -105

RPD Ref Val

Run No: 265358 Seq No: 5590270

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual S

Prep Date: 04/10/2014 Analysis Date: 04/11/2014

Low Limit High Limit 75

RPD Limit Qual

125

Units: wt% BatchID: 189550

Result

%RPD

120

Units: wt% BatchID: 189550

Result

RPD Ref Val

Run No: 265358 Seq No: 5590264

125

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

0.9652

22.2

Run No: 265358 Seq No: 5590274 RPD Limit Qual 25

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 7 of 7

S


2010 LBP Sampling by ENERCON


July 06, 2010

Jeff Griffin Enercon 500 Town Park Lane Kennesaw GA

30144

TEL: (770) 528-0200 FAX: (770) 528-0201 RE:

Proposed Pine Lake Senior

Dear Jeff Griffin:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received for the analyses presented in following report.

Order No: 1006P00

12 samples on 6/30/2010 11:30:00 AM

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a project Case Narrative. AESâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; certifications are as follows: -NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water, soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/10-06/30/11. -AIHA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics), Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal) effective until 09/01/11. These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

James Forrest Project Manager

Page 1 of 8


Page 2 of 8


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project: Lab ID:

Enercon Proposed Pine Lake Senior 1006P00

Date:

6-Jul-10

Case Narrative

Metals Analysis by Method PAINT: LCS-131652 recovery for Lead was outside control limits biased high. Target analyte was not detected in the analytical samples, and data is reportable with high bias. Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate analyses were not performed with Batch 131651 due to insufficient sample volume.

Page 3 of 8


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Date:

1006P00 Enercon Proposed Pine Lake Senior Paint 6/30/2010 11:30:00 AM

Lab Order: Client: Project: Matrix: Date Received:

6-Jul-10

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) PAINT

Reporting

Date Analyzed

Result

Units

1006P00-001A

PB-1

BRL

wt%

0.0117

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-002A

PB-2

BRL

wt%

0.00912

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-003A

PB-3

0.127

wt%

0.00922

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-004A

PB-4

0.0257

wt%

0.0142

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-005A

PB-5

0.0455

wt%

0.0199

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-006A

PB-6

0.136

wt%

0.0391

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-007A

PB-7

BRL

wt%

0.00937

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-008A

PB-8

BRL

wt%

0.00994

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-009A

PB-9

0.0432

wt%

0.00958

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-010A

PB-10

BRL

wt%

0.00978

1

06/25/2010

07/02/2010

TA

1006P00-011A

PB-11

BRL

wt%

0.0152

1

06/25/2010

07/01/2010

TA

1006P00-012A

PB-12

BRL

wt%

0.00969

1

06/25/2010

07/01/2010

TA

Qualifiers:

BRL - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit B

- Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

Results are blank corrected where applicable

Page 4 of 8

DF - Dilution Factor

Qual

Date

Client Sample ID

Limit

DF

Collected

Laboratory ID

Analyst


Page 5 of 8


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project: Lab Order:

Date:

Enercon Proposed Pine Lake Senior 1006P00

6-Jul-10

Dates Report

Lab Sample ID

Client Sample ID

Collection Date

Matrix

Test Name

Prep Date

Analysis Date

1006P00-001A

PB-1

6/25/2010 11:15:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-002A

PB-2

6/25/2010 11:45:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-003A

PB-3

6/25/2010 11:45:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-004A

PB-4

6/25/2010 10:00:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-005A

PB-5

6/25/2010 10:30:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-006A

PB-6

6/25/2010 10:30:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-007A

PB-7

6/25/2010 10:30:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-008A

PB-8

6/25/2010 10:00:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-009A

PB-9

6/25/2010 10:15:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-010A

PB-10

6/25/2010 10:10:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

07/01/2010

07/02/2010

1006P00-011A

PB-11

6/25/2010 10:10:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

06/30/2010

07/01/2010

1006P00-012A

PB-12

6/25/2010 10:30:00AM

Paint

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

06/30/2010

07/01/2010

Page 6 of 8

TCLP Date


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Enercon Proposed Pine Lake Senior 1006P00

Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Sample ID: MB-131651 SampleType: MBLK Analyte

Client ID: TestCode:

BatchID: 131651

Analyte Lead Sample ID: LCSD-131651 SampleType: LCSD Analyte Lead

Client ID: TestCode:

Units: wt% BatchID: 131651

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

BRL

Sample ID: LCS-131651 SampleType: LCS

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

0.0100

0

0

%REC 0

Prep Date: 07/01/2010 Analysis Date: 07/02/2010

Low Limit High Limit 0

0

Units: wt% BatchID: 131651

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

0.7217

0.0271

0.726

0

Client ID: TestCode:

6-Jul-10

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT

Result

Lead

Qualifiers:

Date:

%REC 99.4

120

Units: wt% BatchID: 131651

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

0.7399

0.0268

0.7211

0

%REC 103

%RPD

0

0

120

RPD Limit Qual 0 Run No: 175265 Seq No: 3645105

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

0

0

Prep Date: 07/01/2010 Analysis Date: 07/02/2010

Low Limit High Limit 80

RPD Ref Val

Prep Date: 07/01/2010 Analysis Date: 07/02/2010

Low Limit High Limit 80

Run No: 175265 Seq No: 3645103

RPD Limit Qual 0 Run No: 175265 Seq No: 3645106

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

0.7217

2.5

RPD Limit Qual

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Page 7 of 8

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

25


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Enercon Proposed Pine Lake Senior 1006P00

Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Sample ID: MB-131652 SampleType: MBLK Analyte

Client ID: TestCode:

BatchID: 131652

Analyte Lead Sample ID: 1006P00-012AMS SampleType: MS Analyte Lead Sample ID: 1006P00-012AMSD SampleType: MSD Analyte Lead

Client ID: TestCode:

Units: wt% BatchID: 131652

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

BRL

Sample ID: LCS-131652 SampleType: LCS

6-Jul-10

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT

Result

Lead

Qualifiers:

Date:

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

0.0100

0

0

%REC 0

Prep Date: 06/30/2010 Analysis Date: 07/01/2010

Low Limit High Limit 0

0

Units: wt% BatchID: 131652

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

1.030

0.0349

0.71

0

%REC 145

Client ID: PB-12 TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

120

Units: wt% BatchID: 131652

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

0.5021

0.0201

0.4785

0

%REC 105

Client ID: PB-12 TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082)

125

Units: wt% BatchID: 131652

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

0.5185

0.0209

0.4864

0

%REC 107

0

0

125

RPD Limit Qual 0 Run No: 175215 Seq No: 3644104

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

0

0

RPD Limit Qual 0

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

0

0

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

0.5021

3.21

RPD Limit Qual

Run No: 175215 Seq No: 3644109 RPD Limit Qual

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Page 8 of 8

S

Run No: 175215 Seq No: 3644107

Prep Date: 06/30/2010 Analysis Date: 07/01/2010

Low Limit High Limit 75

%RPD

Prep Date: 06/30/2010 Analysis Date: 07/01/2010

Low Limit High Limit 75

RPD Ref Val

Prep Date: 06/30/2010 Analysis Date: 07/01/2010

Low Limit High Limit 80

Run No: 175215 Seq No: 3644102

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

25


Lead in Soils


2014 Limit Lead in Soil Sampling By ENERCON


ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PHASE II REPORTS April 21, 2014 To:

Georgia Department of Community Affairs 60 Executive Park South, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30329-2231

Ladies/Gentlemen: I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in ยง 312.10 of 40 C.F.R. 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property.

_________________ Date

___________________________________ Environmental Professional

We have performed a Limited Lead in Soil Sampling of Proposed Villas at Pine Lake located at 4656 Rockbridge Road in Pine Lake, Georgia, in conformance with our Scope of Services (attached) and the 2014 DCA Environmental Manual, in a professional manner in accordance with the practices, procedures and standards prevailing among nationally recognized first class environmental consulting firms. Any deviations from our Scope of Services is described in the Report. We certify that the Limited Lead in Soil Sampling Report was performed by a qualified Environmental Professional meeting the requirements set forth in 40 C.F.R. ยง 312.10(b).

_________________ Date

___________________________________ Project Manager

_________________ Date

____________________________________ Professional Geologist


April 21, 2014 Mr. Marvin Wilmoth The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC 9349 Waterstone Boulevard Cincinnati, Ohio 45249 Subject:

Limited Lead in Soil Sampling 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083 ENERCON Project No. ENMISC3133

Dear Mr. Wilmoth: Enercon Services, Inc. (ENERCON) is pleased to provide this report of Limited Lead in Soil Sampling for the residential structure located on the southwest portion of the subject property listed above. The work was performed in general accordance with ENERCONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Proposal #MVG-F14-H004, dated April 14, 2014. Field activities were conducted by ENERCON on April 15, 2014.

BACKGROUND According to a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report for the Villas at Pine Lake, performed by ENERCON and dated April 21, 2014, the subject property was previously developed with residential structures from at least 1955 through 2014. The report indicates that two current structures are located on the subject property. An occupied structure is located on the southwest portion of the subject property, and an unoccupied structure is located on the northeastern side of the subject property. Additionally, the historical information reviewed indicated that an additional residential structure and associated buildings had previously existed on the eastern side of the subject property near Aberdeen Drive. A previous Limited Lead in Soil Sampling report dated June 6, 2012, was prepared by ENERCON regarding the residential structures (current and former) that were located on the eastern and northeastern portions of the subject property near Aberdeen Drive. The report stated that lead was observed in the soils at the subject property ranging from 13.8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 177 mg/kg which were below the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GA EPD) Hazardous Sites Response Act (HSRA) Notification Concentration (NC) of 400 mg/kg. The report concluded that the soil on the eastern and northeastern portions of the subject property had not been negatively impacted by the structures. It should be noted that it was not the purpose of the previous report to assess the structure located on southwest portion of the subject property. Since the structure located on the southwest portion of the subject property was reportedly constructed in 1955, paint chip samples were collected from the structure and analyzed for lead at part of the Phase I activities performed by ENERCON. Based on the sampling results, lead based paint (LBP) was identified on the rear screen door of the structure. The LBP sampling was limited and did not represent a lead-based survey conforming to HUD guidelines or requirements.


Limited Lead in Soil Sampling Acworth, Georgia

Legacy at School Street May 27, 2013

SCOPE OF WORK This Scope of Work was designed to assess surficial lead in soils at the subject property, if any, through representative shallow soil sampling. The goal of this assessment was to determine if surficial soil has been impacted by lead from the structure located on the southwest portion of the subject property. Lead in soil sampling is a requirement per the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA) 2014 Environmental Manual. ENERCON performed the following as part of the Limited Lead in Soil Sampling activities: 

Collected four soil samples at a depth of approximately 0.5 to 1.0 inches below ground surface (bgs) for laboratory analysis. The soil was collected as composite samples (3 to 4 subsamples per location) and analyzed for total lead by US EPA Method 6010.

Advanced one additional boring in a previously undeveloped area to a three to five foot depth bgs and collected a soil sample to be used as a representative sample for naturally occurring lead. The sample was also laboratory analyzed by US EPA Method 6010.

Prepare and submit a report of our findings to The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC, along with necessary documentation, conclusions, and results.

SITE DESCRIPTION The Villas at Pine Lake property consists of approximately 5.54 acres located on the north side of Rockbridge Road between Aberdeen Drive and Poplar Road. The parcel is identified by DeKalb County Property Appraisal Number 18 040 01 016 and is addressed at 4656 Rockbridge Road in Pine Lake, County of DeKalb, State of Georgia. The subject property consists primarily of undeveloped, densely wooded land. Two residential structures are located on the subject property. An occupied single-family, one-story residence is located on the southwest portion of the subject property near the Rockbridge Road and Poplar Road intersection, and an unoccupied single-family, one-story residence is located on the northeast portion of the subject property along Aberdeen Drive. The footprint of the property being assessed is shown on the figure in Appendix I.

APPLICABLE STANDARDS Reportable limits for hazardous materials concentrations at the subject property are defined by GA EPD Rules: HSRA, Chapter 391-3-19 (0.03 – 0.05). Soil concentrations listed in the HSRA Chapter 391-3-19, Appendix I are the applicable threshold levels for soil contamination at the subject facility. The HSRA NC for lead is 400 mg/kg.

SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT A total of four soil samples were obtained at the locations shown on the figure in Appendix I. Composite samples (3 to 4 subsamples) were obtained using a dedicated sampling device to collect the samples at a depth of 0.5 to 1.0 inches. Soil samples PbS-1 through PbS-4 were sampled around the perimeter of the structure located on the southwest portion of the subject property. An additional boring, PbS-B, was

Page 2


Limited Lead in Soil Sampling Acworth, Georgia

Legacy at School Street May 27, 2013

collected via a hand auger from a depth of three to five feet bgs and was sampled approximately 150 feet north of the structure where no previous structures were believed to have been located. The soil collected from PbS-B was to be used as a representative sample for naturally occurring lead at the subject property.

Analytical Methods Soil samples selected for analysis were placed in laboratory-prepared jars, labeled, and transported under Chain of Custody control to Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (Pace) in Asheville, North Carolina for total lead analysis by US EPA Method 6010. A copy of the laboratoryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Stipulation of Approval is included in the Appendix III.

Analytical Results Analytical results for the soil samples tested indicate that lead was above laboratory detection limits in all of the samples collected. All of the samples were well below applicable regulatory thresholds. The soil concentrations were compared to representative sample for naturally occurring lead at the subject property. Detected lead concentrations around the residence on the southwest portion of the subject property at a depth of 0.5 to 1.0 inches ranged from 19.2 mg/kg to 51.6 mg/kg, while the naturally occurring lead concentration from a depth of three to five feet bgs was reported to be 11.4 mg/kg. Soil quality data is summarized on Table 1. Analytical data is presented in Appendix III.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS None of the analyzed soil samples were above the established HSRA NCs for lead (400 mg/kg). It is ENERCONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s professional opinion that the lead concentrations detected in the soil samples collected are low enough to be considered naturally occurring. ENERCON concludes that the presence of past structures at the subject property has not negatively impacted the subject property soils. ENERCON recommends no additional assessment or remedial activity pertaining to lead in soils at the subject property.

CLOSURE ENERCON appreciates this opportunity to be of service. Please contact the undersigned at your convenience if you should have any comments or questions relative to this communication. Sincerely, Enercon Services, Inc.

Nathan Parker Project Geologist

Attachments

Chrissy R. Sherman Senior Reviewer

Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III

Figure Table Analytical Report

Page 3


APPENDIX I FIGURE


Source: ENERCON Field Notes

The Villas at Pine Lake, LLC Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

N

Figure 1 Soil Boring Map (Lead in Soils) 1”= 150’

Project No: ENMISC3133


APPENDIX II ANALYTICAL TABLE


Enercon Services, Inc. Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083 TABLE 1: PHASE II - LEAD SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Sample Location

Depth (inches)

Date Sampled

PbS-1 0.5 - 1.0 4/15/2014 PbS-2 0.5 - 1.0 4/15/2014 PbS-3 0.5 - 1.0 4/15/2014 PbS-4 0.5 - 1.0 4/15/2014 PbS-B* 36 - 60 4/15/2014 HSRA Notification Concentrations * Background sample.

Lead (Pb)

milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)

34.4 19.2 25.3 51.6 11.4 400


APPENDIX III LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT


#=CL#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

LIMS USE: FR - NATHAN PARKER LIMS OBJECT ID: 92197617

April 17, 2014

Nathan Parker Enercon Services 500 Townpark Ln Kennesaw, GA 30144

RE: Project: VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD Pace Project No.: 92197617 Dear Nathan Parker: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on April 16, 2014. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report. Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely,

Jon D Bradley jon.bradley@pacelabs.com Project Manager

Enclosures cc: C Sherman

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 1 of 13


#=CP#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

CERTIFICATIONS Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

Charlotte Certification IDs 9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078 North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706 North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342 North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12 South Carolina Certification #: 99006001

Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627 Kentucky UST Certification #: 84 West Virginia Certification #: 357 Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460221

Asheville Certification IDs 2225 Riverside Dr., Asheville, NC 28804 Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648 Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030 North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712

North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40 South Carolina Certification #: 99030001 West Virginia Certification #: 356 Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460222

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 2 of 13


#=AR#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

Sample: PBS-1

Lab ID: 92197617001

Collected: 04/15/14 14:30

Received: 04/16/14 10:00

Matrix: Solid

Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis Parameters 6010 MET ICP Lead Percent Moisture Percent Moisture

Results

Units

Report Limit

DF

Prepared

Analyzed

CAS No.

Qual

Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3050 34.4 mg/kg

0.49

1

0.10

1

04/16/14 15:15 04/17/14 10:50 7439-92-1

R1

Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 19.8 %

04/17/14 15:14

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,

Date: 04/17/2014 04:27 PM

without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 3 of 13


#=AR#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

Sample: PBS-2

Lab ID: 92197617002

Collected: 04/15/14 14:45

Received: 04/16/14 10:00

Matrix: Solid

Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis Parameters 6010 MET ICP Lead Percent Moisture Percent Moisture

Results

Units

Report Limit

DF

Prepared

Analyzed

CAS No.

Qual

Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3050 19.2 mg/kg

0.42

1

0.10

1

04/16/14 15:15 04/17/14 10:58 7439-92-1

Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 18.9 %

04/17/14 15:14

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,

Date: 04/17/2014 04:27 PM

without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 4 of 13


#=AR#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

Sample: PBS-3

Lab ID: 92197617003

Collected: 04/15/14 15:00

Received: 04/16/14 10:00

Matrix: Solid

Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis Parameters 6010 MET ICP Lead Percent Moisture Percent Moisture

Results

Units

Report Limit

DF

Prepared

Analyzed

CAS No.

Qual

Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3050 25.3 mg/kg

0.49

1

0.10

1

04/16/14 15:15 04/17/14 11:01 7439-92-1

Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 25.2 %

04/17/14 15:14

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,

Date: 04/17/2014 04:27 PM

without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 5 of 13


#=AR#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

Sample: PBS-4

Lab ID: 92197617004

Collected: 04/15/14 15:15

Received: 04/16/14 10:00

Matrix: Solid

Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis Parameters 6010 MET ICP Lead Percent Moisture Percent Moisture

Results

Units

Report Limit

DF

Prepared

Analyzed

CAS No.

Qual

Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3050 51.6 mg/kg

0.50

1

0.10

1

04/16/14 15:15 04/17/14 11:04 7439-92-1

Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 22.4 %

04/17/14 15:14

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,

Date: 04/17/2014 04:27 PM

without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 6 of 13


#=AR#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

Sample: PBS-B

Lab ID: 92197617005

Collected: 04/15/14 15:30

Received: 04/16/14 10:00

Matrix: Solid

Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis Parameters 6010 MET ICP Lead Percent Moisture Percent Moisture

Results

Units

Report Limit

DF

Prepared

Analyzed

CAS No.

Qual

Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3050 11.4 mg/kg

0.40

1

0.10

1

04/16/14 15:15 04/17/14 11:07 7439-92-1

Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 19.2 %

04/17/14 15:14

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,

Date: 04/17/2014 04:27 PM

without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 7 of 13


#=QC#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

QC Batch:

MPRP/15712

Analysis Method:

EPA 6010

QC Batch Method:

EPA 3050

Analysis Description:

6010 MET

Associated Lab Samples: METHOD BLANK:

92197617001, 92197617002, 92197617003, 92197617004, 92197617005

1179714

Associated Lab Samples: Parameter

Matrix: Solid

92197617001, 92197617002, 92197617003, 92197617004, 92197617005 Blank Reporting Units Result Limit Analyzed

Lead

mg/kg

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:

1179715

Parameter Lead

ND

Spike Conc.

Units mg/kg

MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:

Parameter Lead

LCS Result

50

34.4

04/17/14 10:43

LCS % Rec 47.9

1179716

92197617001 Units Result mg/kg

0.50

Qualifiers

% Rec Limits 96

Qualifiers

80-120

1179717

MS Spike Conc. 45.1

MSD Spike Conc. 58.8

MS Result 70.0

MSD Result

MS % Rec

86.3

79

MSD % Rec 88

% Rec Limits 75-125

RPD

Qual

21 R1

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,

Date: 04/17/2014 04:27 PM

without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 8 of 13


#=QC#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

QC Batch:

PMST/6472

Analysis Method:

ASTM D2974-87

QC Batch Method:

ASTM D2974-87

Analysis Description:

Dry Weight/Percent Moisture

Associated Lab Samples: SAMPLE DUPLICATE:

92197617001, 92197617002, 92197617003, 92197617004, 92197617005

1180233

Parameter Percent Moisture

Units %

92195888001 Result 43.3

Dup Result

RPD 41.7

Qualifiers 4

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,

Date: 04/17/2014 04:27 PM

without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 9 of 13


#=QL#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

QUALIFIERS Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

DEFINITIONS DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of the sample aliquot, or moisture content. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit. PRL - Pace Reporting Limit. RL - Reporting Limit. S - Surrogate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for each analyte is a combined concentration. Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride. Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. TNI - The NELAC Institute. ANALYTE QUALIFIERS R1

RPD value was outside control limits.

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,

Date: 04/17/2014 04:27 PM

without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 10 of 13


#=CR#

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092

QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Project:

VILLAS AT PINE LAKE - LEAD

Pace Project No.:

92197617

Lab ID

Sample ID

QC Batch Method

QC Batch

Analytical Method

Analytical Batch

92197617001 92197617002 92197617003 92197617004 92197617005

PBS-1 PBS-2 PBS-3 PBS-4 PBS-B

EPA 3050 EPA 3050 EPA 3050 EPA 3050 EPA 3050

MPRP/15712 MPRP/15712 MPRP/15712 MPRP/15712 MPRP/15712

EPA 6010 EPA 6010 EPA 6010 EPA 6010 EPA 6010

ICP/14226 ICP/14226 ICP/14226 ICP/14226 ICP/14226

92197617001 92197617002 92197617003 92197617004 92197617005

PBS-1 PBS-2 PBS-3 PBS-4 PBS-B

ASTM D2974-87 ASTM D2974-87 ASTM D2974-87 ASTM D2974-87 ASTM D2974-87

PMST/6472 PMST/6472 PMST/6472 PMST/6472 PMST/6472

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,

Date: 04/17/2014 04:27 PM

without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Page 11 of 13


Page 12 of 13


Page 13 of 13


2012 Limit Lead in Soil Sampling By ENERCON


June 6, 2012

Mercy Housing Southeast 621 North Avenue, NE Suite A-150 Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Subject:

Limited Lead in Soil Sampling Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, Georgia 30083 ENERCON Project No. ENMISC2675

Enercon Services, Inc. (ENERCON) is pleased to provide this report of Limited Lead in Soil Sampling for the subject property. The work was performed in general accordance with ENERCONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Project Estimate, dated May 14, 2012. Field activities were conducted by ENERCON on May 22, 2012.

BACKGROUND According to the accompanying Phase I ESA report for the proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences property performed by ENERCON and dated June 6, 2012, a single-family residence (constructed circa 1973) is currently located on the northeast side of the site, while the remainder of the property is undeveloped, wooded land. ENERCON obtained 11 paint chip samples and one ceramic tile wall surround sample from the interior and exterior of the existing residential structure during previous Phase I ESA activities. The samples were laboratory analyzed for the presence of lead. Laboratory analytical results indicated that LBP was not present in the collected samples. Aerial photographs reviewed for the years 1939, 1955, 1960, 1966, 1972, 1986, 1989, and 1993 depict an apparent single-family residence with associated structures developed on the east side of the property. These structures were no longer visible by 1999. At the time of the ENERCON site visit, curb cuts associated with a previous driveway were observed along Aberdeen Drive on the east side of the subject property. The observed driveway is believed to be associated with the former structures that were located on the eastern portion of the property. Based upon the pre1978 construction date of the former structures, surficial soil samples were taken from the approximate locations of these structures and analyzed for surficial lead. To be conservative, surficial soil samples were taken from the dripline of the current structure and analyzed for lead. Since lead is naturally-occurring in most subsurface soils, a background soil sample was also


Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences Pine Lake, Georgia

Limited Lead in Soil Sampling Page 2

taken at the subject property in a previously undeveloped area where no structures are known to have existed.

SCOPE OF WORK This Scope of Work was designed to assess surficial lead in soils at the subject property, if any, through representative shallow soil sampling. The goal of this assessment was to determine if surficial soil has been impacted by lead from previous and current structures at the subject property. Lead in soil sampling is a requirement per the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA) 2012 Environmental Manual. ENERCON performed the following as part of the Limited Lead in Soil Sampling activities: 

Collected five soil samples at a depth of approximately 6 inches below ground surface (bgs). The soil was collected as composite samples (3 to 10 subsamples per location) and analyzed for total lead by US EPA Method 6010. Due to extensive vegetation growth (such as leaves and roots) in the areas of the property assessed, composite soil samples were collected from a depth of six inches.

Advanced one additional boring in a previously undeveloped area of the subject property to a three to five foot depth bgs and collected a soil sample to be used as a background concentration for lead. The sample was also laboratory analyzed by U.S. EPA Method 6010.

Prepare and submit a report of our findings to Mercy Housing Southeast, along with necessary documentation, conclusions, and results.

SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences property is located at 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive in Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia. The subject property is located on the northwest side of the intersection of Rockbridge Road and Aberdeen Drive and consists primarily of undeveloped, densely wooded land. A single-family residence is currently located on the northeast side of the subject property along Aberdeen Drive. The property is bordered to the north by single-family residential development; to the east by Aberdeen Drive followed by single-family residential; to the south by Rockbridge Road followed by Rockbridge Village Shopping Center; and to the west by an intermittent stream followed by single-family residential. The footprint of the property being assessed is as shown on the figure in Appendix I.

APPLICABLE STANDARDS Reportable limits for hazardous materials concentrations at the subject property are defined by Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) Rules: Hazardous Sites Response Act (HSRA), Chapter 391-3-19 (0.03 – 0.05). Soil concentrations listed in the HSR Chapter 391-3-


Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences Pine Lake, Georgia

Limited Lead in Soil Sampling Page 3

19, Appendix I are the applicable threshold levels for soil contamination at the subject facility. The HSRA Notification Concentration for lead is 400 mg/kg.

SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT Five soil samples were obtained at the locations shown on the figure in Appendix I. Composite samples (3 to 10 subsamples) were obtained using a sampling device to collect the samples at a depth of approximately 6 inches. Due to extensive vegetation growth (such as leaves and roots) in the areas of the property assessed, composite soil samples were collected from a depth of six inches. Soil samples PSB-1 through PSB-4 were sampled on the eastern property boundary in the approximate areas of the former structures. Soil sample PSB-5 was obtained along the drip line of the existing residential structure. An additional boring, PSB-6, was collected via a hand auger from a depth of three to five feet bgs and was sampled on the southeastern portion of the property where no previous structures were located. The soil sample obtained from soil boring PSB-6 was utilized to determine background concentrations for lead at the subject property. Analytical Methods Soil samples selected for analysis were placed in laboratory-prepared jars, labeled, and transported under Chain of Custody control to Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES) in Atlanta, Georgia for total lead analysis by US EPA Method 6010. A copy of the laboratoryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Stipulation of Approval is included in the Appendix III. Analytical Results Analytical results indicate that lead was detected in all submitted soil samples above laboratory reporting limits. Analytical results are presented on a dry-weight basis. The soil concentrations were compared to background concentrations for lead at the subject property. Lead concentrations ranged from 13.8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 177 mg/kg, while the background lead concentration from a depth of three to five feet bgs was reported to be 15.8 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It should be noted that lead levels in soil in the State of Georgia fluctuate widely and none of the analyzed soil samples were above the established HSRA Notification Concentration for lead (400 mg/kg). Therefore, the lead concentrations detected in the samples collected are low enough to be considered background concentrations. It is ENERCONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s professional opinion that lead in soil at the property does not constitute an REC at this time. ENERCON concludes that the presence of the current structure or the past structures at the subject property have not negatively impacted the subject property soils.


APPENDIX I FIGURE


PSB-2 PSB-5

5/22/2012

Lead: 41.2 mg/kg

5/22/2012

Lead: 16.2 mg/kg

PSB-1 PSB-4

5/22/2012

5/22/2012

Lead: 32.8 mg/kg

Lead: 177 mg/kg

PSB-6* PSB-3

5/22/2012

Lead: 15.8 mg/kg

5/22/2012

Lead: 13.8 mg/kg

Legend: Boring Locations PSB-6*: Soil sample obtained for background mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram Source: Acme Mapper and ENERCON Field Notes

Mercy Housing Southeast Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

Map Date: 2010

N

Figure I Soil Boring Location Map (Lead in Soils) 1”=160’

Project No: ENMISC2675


APPENDIX II ANALYTICAL TABLE


Enercon Services, Inc. Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083 TABLE 1: PHASE II - LEAD SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Sample Location

Depth (inches)

Date Sampled

PSB-1 6 5/22/2012 PSB-2 6 5/22/2012 PSB-3 6 5/22/2012 PSB-4 6 5/22/2012 PSB-5 6 5/22/2012 PSB-6* 36 - 60 5/22/2012 HSRA Notification Concentrations

Lead (Pb)

Milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)

32.8 41.2 13.8 177 16.2 15.8 400

* Background is the background sample.

________ Reviewed By: ________ Prepared By:

Date: _________ Date: _________


APPENDIX III LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT


AES Analytical Environmental Services, Inc., 3785 Presidential Parkway Atlanta, GA 30340 July 3, 2011

Stipulation of Approval for Commercial Laboratory

According to Georgia State Law (O.C.G.A. 12-2-9) Commercial Rules for Commercial Laboratory Accreditation, any person submitting data to EPD prepared by a commercial laboratory shall stipulate that the laboratory is approved (Chapter 391-3-26-.05). The following information is provided as requested. Laboratory

Accredited By: Accreditation ID: Scope:

Effective: Expires:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES) 3785 Presidential Parkway, NE Atlanta, GA 30340 (770) 457-8177 State of Florida, Department of Health, Bureau of Laboratories; Accrediting NELAP Authority E87582 Clean Water Act â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Extractable Organics, General Chemistry, Metals, Microbiology, Pesticides-Herbicides, PCBs, Volatile Oraganics RCRA/CERCLA â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Extractable Organics, General Chemistry, Metals, Pesticides-Herbicides, PCBs, Volatile Organics July 1, 2011 June 30, 2012

Any question regarding this stipulation of approval may be directed to AES at 770 4578177. Thank you for your business and please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Allison Cantrell Director of Client Services Analytical Environmental Services, Inc.


May 24, 2012

Jeff Griffin Enercon 500 Town Park Lane Kennesaw GA

30144

TEL: (770) 919-1930 FAX: (770) 528-0201 RE:

Pine Lake

Dear Jeff Griffin:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received for the analyses presented in following report.

Order No: 1205H62

6

samples on May 22, 2012 1:40 pm

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a project Case Narrative. AESâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; certifications are as follows: -NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water, soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/11-06/30/12. -AIHA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics), Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal) effective until 09/01/13. These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

Kathryn Waters Project Manager

Page 1 of 11


Page 2 of 11


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H62-001

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

METALS, TOTAL

PERCENT MOISTURE

*

Units

BatchID

PBS-1 5/22/2012 11:00:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW3050B) 32.8

5.98

mg/Kg-dry

161810

1

05/23/2012 15:21

TA

22.0

0

wt%

R221813

1

05/22/2012 15:00

AS

D2216

Percent Moisture

Qualifiers:

Reporting Qual Limit

SW6010C

Lead

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 3 of 11


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H62-002

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

METALS, TOTAL

PERCENT MOISTURE

*

Units

BatchID

PBS-2 5/22/2012 11:00:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW3050B) 41.2

6.32

mg/Kg-dry

161810

1

05/23/2012 15:24

TA

23.7

0

wt%

R221813

1

05/22/2012 15:00

AS

D2216

Percent Moisture

Qualifiers:

Reporting Qual Limit

SW6010C

Lead

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 4 of 11


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H62-003

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

METALS, TOTAL

PERCENT MOISTURE

*

Units

BatchID

PBS-3 5/22/2012 11:00:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW3050B) 13.8

6.24

mg/Kg-dry

161810

1

05/23/2012 15:29

TA

20.3

0

wt%

R221813

1

05/22/2012 15:00

AS

D2216

Percent Moisture

Qualifiers:

Reporting Qual Limit

SW6010C

Lead

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 5 of 11


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H62-004

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

METALS, TOTAL

PERCENT MOISTURE

*

Units

BatchID

PBS-4 5/22/2012 11:00:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW3050B) 177

6.33

mg/Kg-dry

161810

1

05/23/2012 15:33

TA

22.2

0

wt%

R221813

1

05/22/2012 15:00

AS

D2216

Percent Moisture

Qualifiers:

Reporting Qual Limit

SW6010C

Lead

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 6 of 11


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H62-005

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

METALS, TOTAL

PERCENT MOISTURE

*

Units

BatchID

PBS-5 5/22/2012 11:00:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW3050B) 16.2

6.19

mg/Kg-dry

161810

1

05/23/2012 15:37

TA

21.5

0

wt%

R221813

1

05/22/2012 15:00

AS

D2216

Percent Moisture

Qualifiers:

Reporting Qual Limit

SW6010C

Lead

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 7 of 11


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H62-006

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

METALS, TOTAL

PERCENT MOISTURE

*

Units

BatchID

PBS-6 5/22/2012 11:00:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW3050B) 15.8

5.53

mg/Kg-dry

161810

1

05/23/2012 14:55

TA

14.8

0

wt%

R221813

1

05/22/2012 15:00

AS

D2216

Percent Moisture

Qualifiers:

Reporting Qual Limit

SW6010C

Lead

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 8 of 11


Page 9 of 11


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project: Lab Order:

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H62

24-May-12

Dates Report

Lab Sample ID

Client Sample ID

Collection Date

Matrix

Test Name

1205H62-001A

PBS-1

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

TOTAL METALS BY ICP

1205H62-001A

PBS-1

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

PERCENT MOISTURE

1205H62-002A

PBS-2

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

TOTAL METALS BY ICP

1205H62-002A

PBS-2

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

PERCENT MOISTURE

1205H62-003A

PBS-3

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

TOTAL METALS BY ICP

1205H62-003A

PBS-3

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

PERCENT MOISTURE

1205H62-004A

PBS-4

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

TOTAL METALS BY ICP

1205H62-004A

PBS-4

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

PERCENT MOISTURE

1205H62-005A

PBS-5

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

TOTAL METALS BY ICP

1205H62-005A

PBS-5

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

PERCENT MOISTURE

1205H62-006A

PBS-6

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

TOTAL METALS BY ICP

1205H62-006A

PBS-6

5/22/2012 11:00:00AM

Soil

PERCENT MOISTURE

TCLP Date

Prep Date

Analysis Date

05/22/2012

05/23/2012 05/22/2012

05/22/2012

05/23/2012 05/22/2012

05/22/2012

05/23/2012 05/22/2012

05/22/2012

05/23/2012 05/22/2012

05/22/2012

05/23/2012 05/22/2012

05/22/2012

05/23/2012 05/22/2012

Page 10 of 11


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H62

Sample ID: MB-161810 SampleType: MBLK Analyte

BatchID: 161810 Client ID: TestCode:

METALS, TOTAL

Analyte Lead Sample ID: 1205H62-006AMS SampleType: MS Analyte Lead Sample ID: 1205H62-006AMSD SampleType: MSD Analyte Lead

Client ID: TestCode:

Units: mg/Kg BatchID: 161810

SW6010C

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

5.00

0

0

METALS, TOTAL

SW6010C

BRL

Sample ID: LCS-161810 SampleType: LCS

24-May-12

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT

Result

Lead

Qualifiers:

Date:

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

48.71

5.00

50

0

0

%REC 97.4

0

Low Limit High Limit 80

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

64.51

5.51

55.14

15.77

%REC 88.4

120

125

Units: mg/Kg-dry BatchID: 161810

SW6010C

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

63.56

5.52

55.18

15.77

%REC 86.6

%RPD

0

0

125

RPD Limit Qual 0 Run No: 221820 Seq No: 4640060

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

0

0

RPD Limit Qual 0 Run No: 221820 Seq No: 4640065

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

0

0

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

Low Limit High Limit 75

RPD Ref Val

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

Low Limit High Limit 75

Run No: 221820 Seq No: 4640061

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

Units: mg/Kg-dry BatchID: 161810

SW6010C

Result

Client ID: PBS-6 TestCode: METALS, TOTAL

0

Low Limit High Limit

Units: mg/Kg BatchID: 161810

Result

Client ID: PBS-6 TestCode: METALS, TOTAL

%REC

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

64.51

1.48

RPD Limit Qual 0 Run No: 221820 Seq No: 4640066 RPD Limit Qual 20

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 11 of 11


Lead in Water (Not Applicable)


Asbestos


2014 Asbestos Sampling by ENERCON


Page 1 of 9


ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Bulk Sample Summary Report

Lab Code 102082-0 14-Apr-14

Client Name:

Enercon

AES Job Number:

1404A05

Project Name:

Pine Lake

Project Number:

PH12022

Client ID

CT 1

AES ID

Location

Asbestos Mineral Percentage CH AM CR AN TR AC

Comments

1404A05 -001A

Rear Bathroom Ceiling

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Ceiling Texture. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -001A

Rear Bathroom Ceiling

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall Tape

1404A05 -001A

Rear Bathroom Ceiling

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Wallboard

1404A05 -002A

Rear Bathroom Ceiling

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Ceiling Texture. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -002A

Rear Bathroom Ceiling

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall Tape

1404A05 -002A

Rear Bathroom Ceiling

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Wallboard

Layer: 1 CT 1

Layer: 2 CT 1

Layer: 3 CT 2

Layer: 1 CT 2

Layer: 2 CT 2

Layer: 3

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets. ND = None Detected AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993. These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume. PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content. This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .

Microanalyst:

QC Analyst:

Elena Ivanova

Yelena Khanina Page 2 of 9


ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Bulk Sample Summary Report

Lab Code 102082-0 14-Apr-14

Client Name:

Enercon

AES Job Number:

1404A05

Project Name:

Pine Lake

Project Number:

PH12022

Client ID

CT 3

AES ID

Location

Asbestos Mineral Percentage CH AM CR AN TR AC

Comments

1404A05 -003A

Kitchen Ceiling

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Ceiling Texture. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -004A

Kitchen Ceiling

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Ceiling Texture. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -005A

Stairwell to Basement

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall mud. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -005A

Stairwell to Basement

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall Tape

1404A05 -005A

Stairwell to Basement

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Wallboard

1404A05 -006A

Front Bedroom

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall Tape. Paint included as binder

Layer: 1 CT 4

Layer: 1 WB 1

Layer: 1 WB 1

Layer: 2 WB 1

Layer: 3 WB 2

Layer: 1

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets. ND = None Detected AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993. These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume. PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content. This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .

Microanalyst:

QC Analyst:

Elena Ivanova

Yelena Khanina Page 3 of 9


ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Bulk Sample Summary Report

Lab Code 102082-0 14-Apr-14

Client Name:

Enercon

AES Job Number:

1404A05

Project Name:

Pine Lake

Project Number:

PH12022

Client ID

WB 2

AES ID

Location

Asbestos Mineral Percentage CH AM CR AN TR AC

Comments

1404A05 -006A

Front Bedroom

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Wallboard

1404A05 -007A

Kitchen

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall mud. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -007A

Kitchen

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall Tape

1404A05 -007A

Kitchen

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Wallboard

1404A05 -008A

Kitchen

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall mud. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -008A

Kitchen

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall Tape

Layer: 2 WB 3

Layer: 1 WB 3

Layer: 2 WB 3

Layer: 3 WB 4

Layer: 1 WB 4

Layer: 2

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets. ND = None Detected AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993. These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume. PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content. This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .

Microanalyst:

QC Analyst:

Elena Ivanova

Yelena Khanina Page 4 of 9


ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Bulk Sample Summary Report

Lab Code 102082-0 14-Apr-14

Client Name:

Enercon

AES Job Number:

1404A05

Project Name:

Pine Lake

Project Number:

PH12022

Client ID

WB 4

AES ID

Location

Asbestos Mineral Percentage CH AM CR AN TR AC

Comments

1404A05 -008A

Kitchen

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Wallboard

1404A05 -009A

Rear Bedroom

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall Tape

1404A05 -009A

Rear Bedroom

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Wallboard

1404A05 -010A

Rear Bathroom

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall mud. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -010A

Rear Bathroom

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Drywall Tape

1404A05 -010A

Rear Bathroom

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Wallboard

Layer: 3 WB 5

Layer: 1 WB 5

Layer: 2 WB 6

Layer: 1 WB 6

Layer: 2 WB 6

Layer: 3

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets. ND = None Detected AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993. These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume. PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content. This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .

Microanalyst:

QC Analyst:

Elena Ivanova

Yelena Khanina Page 5 of 9


ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Bulk Sample Summary Report

Lab Code 102082-0 14-Apr-14

Client Name:

Enercon

AES Job Number:

1404A05

Project Name:

Pine Lake

Project Number:

PH12022

Client ID

WG 1

AES ID

Location

Asbestos Mineral Percentage CH AM CR AN TR AC

Comments

1404A05 -011A

Basement Window (Front)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Glazing. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -012A

Basement Window (Rear)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Glazing. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -013A

Basement Window (Rear)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Glazing. Paint included as binder

1404A05 -014A

Duct Foil (Basement)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Duct Foil with glue

1404A05 -015A

Carpet Ext Wall

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Caulk

1404A05 -016A

Kitchen, Top Layer (Blk)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Floor Tile with glue. Latex included as resilient

Layer: 1 WG 2

Layer: 1 WG 3

Layer: 1 DF 1

Layer: 1 CT

Layer: 1 VCT 1

Layer: 1

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets. ND = None Detected AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993. These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume. PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content. This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .

Microanalyst:

QC Analyst:

Elena Ivanova

Yelena Khanina Page 6 of 9


ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Bulk Sample Summary Report

Lab Code 102082-0 14-Apr-14

Client Name:

Enercon

AES Job Number:

1404A05

Project Name:

Pine Lake

Project Number:

PH12022

Client ID

VCT 2

AES ID

Location

Asbestos Mineral Percentage CH AM CR AN TR AC

Comments

1404A05 -017A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Blk)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Padding

1404A05 -017A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Blk)

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Floor Tile

1404A05 -017A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Blk)

3

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Black Mastic

1404A05 -017A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Blk)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Felt

1404A05 -018A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht) w / Foam

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Padding

1404A05 -018A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht) w / Foam

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Floor Tile

Layer: 1 VCT 2

Layer: 2 VCT 2

Layer: 3 VCT 2

Layer: 4 VCT 3

Layer: 1 VCT 3

Layer: 2

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets. ND = None Detected AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993. These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume. PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content. This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .

Microanalyst:

QC Analyst:

Elena Ivanova

Yelena Khanina Page 7 of 9


ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Bulk Sample Summary Report

Lab Code 102082-0 14-Apr-14

Client Name:

Enercon

AES Job Number:

1404A05

Project Name:

Pine Lake

Project Number:

PH12022

Client ID

VCT 3

AES ID

Location

Asbestos Mineral Percentage CH AM CR AN TR AC

Comments

1404A05 -018A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht) w / Foam

3

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Black Mastic

1404A05 -018A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht) w / Foam

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Felt

1404A05 -019A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Padding

1404A05 -019A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht)

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Floor Tile

1404A05 -019A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht)

3

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Black Mastic

1404A05 -020A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Padding

Layer: 3 VCT 3

Layer: 4 VCT 4

Layer: 1 VCT 4

Layer: 2 VCT 4

Layer: 3 VCT 5

Layer: 1

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets. ND = None Detected AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993. These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume. PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content. This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .

Microanalyst:

QC Analyst:

Elena Ivanova

Yelena Khanina Page 8 of 9


ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Bulk Sample Summary Report

Lab Code 102082-0 14-Apr-14

Client Name:

Enercon

AES Job Number:

1404A05

Project Name:

Pine Lake

Project Number:

PH12022

Client ID

VCT 5

AES ID

Location

Asbestos Mineral Percentage CH AM CR AN TR AC

Comments

1404A05 -020A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht)

2

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Floor Tile

1404A05 -020A

Kitchen, Bottom Layer (Wht)

3

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Black Mastic

Layer: 2 VCT 5

Layer: 3

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets. ND = None Detected AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993. These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume. PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content. This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .

Microanalyst:

QC Analyst:

Elena Ivanova

Yelena Khanina Page 9 of 9


2010 Asbestos Sampling by ENERCON


Radon (Not Applicable)


Vapor Encroachment Screening (Not Applicable)


APPENDIX F NOISE ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION


Noise Assessment Report


APPENDIX G REGULATORY SEARCH INFORMATION


Radius Map Report


PHI2022 - Proposed Villas At Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Stone Mountain, GA 30083 Inquiry Number: 3889706.2s March 24, 2014

The EDR Radius Mapâ&#x201E;˘ Report

6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com

FORM-LBF-GON


TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION

PAGE

Executive Summary

ES1

Overview Map

2

Detail Map

3

Map Findings Summary

4

Map Findings

7

Orphan Summary

21

Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking

GR-1

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM GeoCheck - Not Requested

Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,

environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC3889706.2s Page 1


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS

4656 ROCKBRIDGE ROAD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 COORDINATES

Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation:

33.7872000 - 33˚ 47’ 13.92’’ 84.2029000 - 84˚ 12’ 10.44’’ Zone 16 758993.8 3741885.0 959 ft. above sea level

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY

Target Property Map: Most Recent Revision:

33084-G2 STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 1997

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT

Photo Year: Source:

2010 USDA

TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS

The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES

No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases:

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Federal NPL site list NPL

National Priority List

TC3889706.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proposed NPL NPL LIENS

Proposed National Priority List Sites Federal Superfund Liens

Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL

National Priority List Deletions

Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS FEDERAL FACILITY

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Federal Facility Site Information listing

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP

CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS

Corrective Action Report

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF

RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal

Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA-SQG RCRA-CESQG

RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS US INST CONTROL LUCIS

Engineering Controls Sites List Sites with Institutional Controls Land Use Control Information System

Federal ERNS list ERNS

Emergency Response Notification System

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS GA NON-HSI

Non-Hazardous Site Inventory

State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF

Solid Waste Disposal Facilities

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST

Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

State and tribal registered storage tank lists AST

Above Ground Storage Tanks

TC3889706.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INDIAN UST FEMA UST

Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Underground Storage Tank Listing

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries INST CONTROL AUL

Public Record List Uniform Environmental Covenants

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP VCP

Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing Voluntary Cleanup Program site

State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS

Brownfields Public Record List

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS

A Listing of Brownfields Sites

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9 ODI HIST LF SWRCY INDIAN ODI

Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations Open Dump Inventory Historical Landfills Recycling Center Listing Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL DEL SHWS US HIST CDL

Clandestine Drug Labs Delisted Hazardous Site Inventory Listing National Clandestine Laboratory Register

Local Land Records LIENS 2

CERCLA Lien Information

Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS SPILLS SPILLS 90

Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Spills Information SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch

Other Ascertainable Records DOT OPS DOD FUDS CONSENT ROD

Incident and Accident Data Department of Defense Sites Formerly Used Defense Sites Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Records Of Decision

TC3889706.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UMTRA US MINES TRIS TSCA FTTS HIST FTTS SSTS ICIS PADS MLTS RADINFO FINDS RAATS RMP NPDES AIRS TIER 2 INDIAN RESERV SCRD DRYCLEANERS US AIRS COAL ASH DOE US FIN ASSUR LEAD SMELTERS 2020 COR ACTION EPA WATCH LIST Financial Assurance PCB TRANSFORMER COAL ASH COAL ASH EPA PRP

Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Mines Master Index File Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Substances Control Act FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Section 7 Tracking Systems Integrated Compliance Information System PCB Activity Database System Material Licensing Tracking System Radiation Information Database Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Risk Management Plans NPDES Wastewater Permit List Permitted Facility and Emissions Listing Tier 2 Data Listing Indian Reservations State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Financial Assurance Information Lead Smelter Sites 2020 Corrective Action Program List EPA WATCH LIST Financial Assurance Information Listing PCB Transformer Registration Database Coal Ash Disposal Site Listing Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Potentially Responsible Parties

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS

EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP

EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES

Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS RGA LUST RGA LF

Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List

SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS

Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. TC3889706.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Natural Resources’ Hazardous Site Inventory. A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/01/2013 has revealed that there is 1 SHWS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ EAGLE ROCKBRIDGE SHOPPING CENT

Address ________ 4450 ROCKBRIDGE ROAD

Direction / Distance ___________________

Map _____ID

Page _____

W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.463 mi.)

14

20

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Natural Resources’ Confirmed Release List. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/30/2013 has revealed that there are 4 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ FORMER HOGAN’S PINE LAKE BAPTIST CHURCH TEXACO CITGO FOOD MART

Address ________ 4533 ROCKBRIDGE RD 4528 ROCKBRIDGE RD 4513 ROCKBRIDGE RD 4879 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Direction / Distance ___________________

Map _____ID

Page _____

W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.259 mi.) W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.263 mi.) W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.312 mi.) E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.440 mi.)

C10 C11 12 13

15 18 19 20

State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Department of Natural Resources’ Underground Storage Tank Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/01/2013 has revealed that there is 1 UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ KING PETRO INC

Address ________ 4635 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Direction / Distance ___________________

Map _____ID

Page _____

WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.)

B4

11

TC3889706.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/10/2013 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ SENTRY CLEANERS

Address ________ 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Direction / Distance ___________________

Map _____ID

Page _____

SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.005 mi.)

A1

7

DRYCLEANERS: A list of drycleaners in the state. The listing includes drycleaner facilities, that use perchloroethylene, that responded to the Notification of Compliance Status forms. It also includes those businesses that are pick-up stores only and do not conduct dry cleaning on site. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/18/2009 has revealed that there are 2 DRYCLEANERS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ SENTRY CLEANERS PRESIDENTIAL VALET CLEANERS

Address ________ 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD # 14 4635 ROCKBRIDGE RD # C

Direction / Distance ___________________

Map _____ID

Page _____

SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.005 mi.) WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.)

A3 B5

9 13

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS

EDR Exclusive Records EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR US Hist Auto Stat list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 EDR US Hist Auto Stat sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ Not reported Not reported

Address ________ 4599 GARDEN HILLS DR 4546 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Direction / Distance ___________________

Map _____ID

Page _____

SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.)

8 C9

15 15

TC3889706.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR US Hist Cleaners list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 EDR US Hist Cleaners sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ Not reported Not reported Not reported

Address ________ 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD 4635 ROCKBRIDGE RD 4722 GARDEN HILLS DR

Direction / Distance ___________________

Map _____ID

Page _____

SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.005 mi.) WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.) SE 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.)

A2 B6 7

9 14 15

TC3889706.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 20 records. Site Name ____________

Database(s) ____________

7-ELEVEN STORE 1433 #23667 ROCKBRIDGE PARK/CHEMICAL DRUMS PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC TORREY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INE TORREY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INE PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC UKNOWN / SHEEN ON LAKE HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC.

LUST, UST, Financial Assurance CERC-NFRAP SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SPILLS US MINES

TC3889706.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8


0

0

0

0

0

0

EDR Inc.


0

EDR Inc.


MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

Database

Search Distance (Miles)

Target Property

>1

Total Plotted

< 1/8

1/8 - 1/4

1/4 - 1/2

1/2 - 1

0 0 NR

0 0 NR

0 0 NR

0 0 NR

NR NR NR

0 0 0

1.000

0

0

0

0

NR

0

0.500 0.500

0 0

0 0

0 0

NR NR

NR NR

0 0

0

0

0

NR

NR

0

0

0

0

0

NR

0

0

0

0

NR

NR

0

0 0 0

0 0 0

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

0 0 0

0.500 0.500 0.500

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

0 0 0

TP

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

0

0 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

NR NR

1 0

0

0

0

NR

NR

0

0 0

0 0

4 0

NR NR

NR NR

4 0

1

0

NR

NR

NR

1

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Federal NPL site list NPL Proposed NPL NPL LIENS

1.000 1.000 TP

Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS FEDERAL FACILITY

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP

0.500

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS

1.000

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF

0.500

Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA-SQG RCRA-CESQG

0.250 0.250 0.250

Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS US INST CONTROL LUCIS Federal ERNS list ERNS

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS GA NON-HSI

1.000 1.000

State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF

0.500

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST INDIAN LUST

0.500 0.500

State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST

0.250

TC3889706.2s Page 4


MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

Database

Search Distance (Miles)

AST INDIAN UST FEMA UST

0.250 0.250 0.250

Target Property

>1

Total Plotted

< 1/8

1/8 - 1/4

1/4 - 1/2

1/2 - 1

0 0 0

0 0 0

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

0 0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

NR NR

NR NR

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

NR NR

NR NR

0 0

0

0

0

NR

NR

0

0

0

0

NR

NR

0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

NR NR NR NR NR

NR NR NR NR NR

0 0 0 0 0

TP 1.000 TP

NR 0 NR

NR 0 NR

NR 0 NR

NR 0 NR

NR NR NR

0 0 0

TP

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

0

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

0 0 0

1 NR 0 0 0 0

0 NR 0 0 0 0

NR NR 0 0 0 0

NR NR 0 0 0 0

NR NR NR NR NR NR

1 0 0 0 0 0

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries INST CONTROL AUL

0.500 0.500

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP VCP

0.500 0.500

State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS

0.500

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS

0.500

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9 ODI HIST LF SWRCY INDIAN ODI

0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL DEL SHWS US HIST CDL Local Land Records LIENS 2

Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS SPILLS SPILLS 90

TP TP TP

Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR DOT OPS DOD FUDS CONSENT ROD

0.250 TP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

TC3889706.2s Page 5


MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

Database

Search Distance (Miles)

UMTRA US MINES TRIS TSCA FTTS HIST FTTS SSTS ICIS PADS MLTS RADINFO FINDS RAATS RMP NPDES DRYCLEANERS AIRS TIER 2 INDIAN RESERV SCRD DRYCLEANERS US AIRS COAL ASH DOE US FIN ASSUR LEAD SMELTERS 2020 COR ACTION EPA WATCH LIST Financial Assurance PCB TRANSFORMER COAL ASH COAL ASH EPA PRP

0.500 0.250 TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP 0.250 TP TP 1.000 0.500 TP TP TP TP 0.250 TP TP TP 0.500 0.500 TP

Target Property

>1

Total Plotted

< 1/8

1/8 - 1/4

1/4 - 1/2

1/2 - 1

0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 2 NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 0 NR

0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 0 NR

0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR

NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR

NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 3

0 2 0

0 NR NR

0 NR NR

NR NR NR

0 2 3

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

NR NR NR

0 0 0

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS

EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR US Hist Auto Stat EDR US Hist Cleaners

1.000 0.250 0.250

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES

Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS RGA LUST RGA LF

TP TP TP

NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database

TC3889706.2s Page 6


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

A1 SSE < 1/8 0.005 mi. 28 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 970 ft.

MAP FINDINGS

Site

SENTRY CLEANERS 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083

Database(s)

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

RCRA NonGen / NLR FINDS

1000420480 GAD981217011

Site 1 of 3 in cluster A RCRA NonGen / NLR: Date form received by agency: 06/01/2010 Facility name: SENTRY CLEANERS Facility address: 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 EPA ID: GAD981217011 Mailing address: ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 Contact: MANU PATEL Contact address: ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (404) 296-9568 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 04 Land type: Private Classification: Non-Generator Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date:

BROWNLEE SHARON N OWNERSTREET OWNERCITY, WY 99999 Not reported (404) 555-1212 Private Owner Not reported Not reported SENTRY CLEANERS Not reported Not reported US Not reported Private Operator 07/22/1986 Not reported OPERNAME OPERSTREET OPERCITY, WY 99999 Not reported (404) 555-1212 Private Operator Not reported Not reported

Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste:

No

TC3889706.2s Page 7


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

SENTRY CLEANERS (Continued)

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

1000420480

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Recycler of hazardous waste: Transporter of hazardous waste: Treater, storer or disposer of HW: Underground injection activity: On-site burner exemption: Furnace exemption: Used oil fuel burner: Used oil processor: User oil refiner: Used oil fuel marketer to burner: Used oil Specification marketer: Used oil transfer facility: Used oil transporter:

No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Universal Waste Summary: Waste type: Accumulated waste on-site: Generated waste on-site:

Batteries No Not reported

Waste type: Accumulated waste on-site: Generated waste on-site:

Lamps No Not reported

Waste type: Accumulated waste on-site: Generated waste on-site:

Pesticides No Not reported

Waste type: Accumulated waste on-site: Generated waste on-site:

Thermostats No Not reported

Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 07/22/1986 Facility name: SENTRY CLEANERS Classification: Small Quantity Generator Violation Status: Evaluation Action Summary: Evaluation date: Evaluation: Area of violation: Date achieved compliance: Evaluation lead agency:

No violations found

02/26/2009 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Not reported Not reported State

FINDS: Registry ID:

110005672496

Environmental Interest/Information System RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

TC3889706.2s Page 8


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

SENTRY CLEANERS (Continued)

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

1000420480

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

A2 SSE < 1/8 0.005 mi. 28 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 970 ft.

A3 SSE < 1/8 0.005 mi. 28 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 970 ft.

EDR US Hist Cleaners

1015064692 N/A

DRYCLEANERS

S109506259 N/A

4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 Site 2 of 3 in cluster A EDR Historical Cleaners: Name: Year: Address:

SENTRY CLEANERS 2005 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Name: Year: Address:

SENTRY CLEANERS 2006 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Name: Year: Address:

SENTRY CLEANERS 2007 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Name: Year: Address:

SENTRY CLEANERS 2008 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Name: Year: Address:

SENTRY CLEANERS 2009 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Name: Year: Address:

SENTRY CLEANERS 2010 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Name: Year: Address:

SENTRY CLEANERS 2011 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Name: Year: Address:

SENTRY CLEANERS 2012 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD

SENTRY CLEANERS 4687 ROCKBRIDGE RD # 14 STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 Site 3 of 3 in cluster A DRYCLN: County Code: Contact Name: Phone Number: Contact Name: MSA code: MSA desc: CBSA code:

89 Manu Patel 404-296-95 Manu Patel 520 ATLANTA, GA 12060

TC3889706.2s Page 9


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

SENTRY CLEANERS (Continued) CBSA descr: Metro Micro Indicator: CSA code: Csa descr: Census tract: Census block group: Latitude: Longitude: Match level code: Secondary address: Secondary city: Secondary state: Secondary zip10: Secondary carrier route code: Fax number: Toll free number: Web site: Selected SIC code: Selected SIC desc: Primary SIC code: Primary SIC desc: NAICS code: NAICS desc: Location employment size code: Location employment size desc: Actual location employment size: Modeled employment size: Location sales volume code: Location sales volume desc: Actual location sales volume: Corporate sales volume code: Corporate sales volume desc: Actual corporate sales volume: Asset size: Name: Title: Ethnicity code: Infousa id: Site Number: HQ branch code: HQ branch desc: Public company indicator code: Public filing indicator: Individual firm code: Individual firm desc: Year SIC added: Year first appeared in yellow pages: Yellow page code: Transaction date: Call status code: Call status desc: Credit score code: Credit score desc: Actual credit score: Ad size code: Population code: Population desc:

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

S109506259 ATLANTA SPGS, GA 2 122 ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-GAINESVILLE, GA-AL 23204 2 33.786354000000003 -84.202314000000001 0 4687 Rockbridge Rd # 14 Stone Mountain GA 30083-4282 C063 Not reported Not reported Not reported 721201 Cleaners 721201 Cleaners 81232002 Drycleaning & Laundry Svcs A 4-Jan 1 A A Less Than $500,000 60 Not reported Not reported Not reported S Mr Manu Patel Owner Indian 412924722 412924722 9 Single Loc 0 N 2 Firm/Business 199503 1994 18306 199503 N Refusal B+ 85 to 89 88 Regular 1 Less Than 25,000

TC3889706.2s Page 10


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

SENTRY CLEANERS (Continued)

S109506259

Square footage code: Square footage desc: Radial distance from target element: Actnumbus multitenant location: Building num multi tenant: Number of pcs code: Affluent neighborhood location: Big business: Female owner exec: Highincomeexec: Hightechbusiness: Medium size business entrepreneur: Small business entrepreneur: Tertiary address: Tertiary city: Tertiary state: Tertiary zip10: White collar percentage: White collar indicator: Production date: Obsolescence date: Source: Bookno:

B4 WSW < 1/8 0.095 mi. 503 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1013 ft.

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

A 0 - 2,499 . 10+ 95736 0 - 1 PCs Y N N N N N Y Rockbridge Shopping Ctr Stone Mountain GA 30083 29 0 20081202 6/2/2009 infoUSA 13190

KING PETRO INC 4635 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083

UST Financial Assurance

U004117330 N/A

Site 1 of 3 in cluster B Facility: Facility Id: Facility Status: Facility Type: District: Contact Id: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner City: Owner State: Owner Zip: Owner City,St,Zip: Owner Telephone:

10000518 Active Gas Station PIRT 3 55687 KING PETRO INC 4635 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN GA 30083 STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 Not reported

Tanks: Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

1 Currently In Use 12/01/2002

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

1 Installed 12/01/2002

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material:

1 Gas Fiberglass 15000 Fiberglass/Double Walled

TC3889706.2s Page 11


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

KING PETRO INC (Continued)

U004117330

Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

Pressure No 01/01/2003 No 01/01/2003

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

2A Currently In Use 12/01/2002

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

2A Installed 12/01/2002

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

2A Gas Fiberglass 10000 Fiberglass/Double Walled Pressure No 12/01/2003 No 12/01/2003

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

2B Currently In Use 12/01/2002

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

2B Installed 12/01/2002

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

2B Diesel Fiberglass 5000 Fiberglass/Double Walled Pressure No 12/01/2003 No 12/01/2003

GA Financial Assurance 1: Region: Facility ID: Financial Responsiblity:

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

1 10000518 G.U.S.T. Trust Fund

TC3889706.2s Page 12


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

B5 WSW < 1/8 0.095 mi. 503 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1013 ft.

MAP FINDINGS

Site

PRESIDENTIAL VALET CLEANERS 4635 ROCKBRIDGE RD # C STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083

Database(s)

DRYCLEANERS

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

S109506086 N/A

Site 2 of 3 in cluster B DRYCLN: County Code: Contact Name: Phone Number: Contact Name: MSA code: MSA desc: CBSA code: CBSA descr: Metro Micro Indicator: CSA code: Csa descr: Census tract: Census block group: Latitude: Longitude: Match level code: Secondary address: Secondary city: Secondary state: Secondary zip10: Secondary carrier route code: Fax number: Toll free number: Web site: Selected SIC code: Selected SIC desc: Primary SIC code: Primary SIC desc: NAICS code: NAICS desc: Location employment size code: Location employment size desc: Actual location employment size: Modeled employment size: Location sales volume code: Location sales volume desc: Actual location sales volume: Corporate sales volume code: Corporate sales volume desc: Actual corporate sales volume: Asset size: Name: Title: Ethnicity code: Infousa id: Site Number: HQ branch code: HQ branch desc: Public company indicator code: Public filing indicator: Individual firm code: Individual firm desc:

89 Genevieve Jackson 404-508-22 Genevieve Jackson 520 ATLANTA, GA 12060 ATLANTA SPGS, GA 2 122 ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-GAINESVILLE, GA-AL 23204 2 33.786323000000003 -84.205202999999997 0 4635 Rockbridge Rd # C Stone Mountain GA 30083-4242 C063 Not reported Not reported Not reported 721201 Cleaners 721201 Cleaners 81232002 Drycleaning & Laundry Svcs A 4-Jan 2 A A Less Than $500,000 120 Not reported Not reported Not reported S Ms Genevieve Jackson Manager British 626093934 626093934 9 Single Loc 0 N 2 Firm/Business

TC3889706.2s Page 13


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

PRESIDENTIAL VALET CLEANERS (Continued) Year SIC added: Year first appeared in yellow pages: Yellow page code: Transaction date: Call status code: Call status desc: Credit score code: Credit score desc: Actual credit score: Ad size code: Population code: Population desc: Square footage code: Square footage desc: Radial distance from target element: Actnumbus multitenant location: Building num multi tenant: Number of pcs code: Affluent neighborhood location: Big business: Female owner exec: Highincomeexec: Hightechbusiness: Medium size business entrepreneur: Small business entrepreneur: Tertiary address: Tertiary city: Tertiary state: Tertiary zip10: White collar percentage: White collar indicator: Production date: Obsolescence date: Source: Bookno:

B6 WSW < 1/8 0.095 mi. 503 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1013 ft.

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

S109506086

200704 2006 18306 200704 C Complete C 70 to 74 72 Regular 1 Less Than 25,000 A 0 - 2,499 . 4-Feb 1897454 0 - 1 PCs Y N N N N N N Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 29 0 20081202 6/2/2009 infoUSA 13190

EDR US Hist Cleaners 4635 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083

1015064351 N/A

Site 3 of 3 in cluster B EDR Historical Cleaners: Name: Year: Address:

AMERICAN VALET CLEANERS 2006 4635 ROCKBRIDGE RD

TC3889706.2s Page 14


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

7 SE < 1/8 0.117 mi. 618 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 995 ft.

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

Name: Year: Address:

8 SSE 1/8-1/4 0.222 mi. 1173 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1014 ft.

C9 West 1/8-1/4 0.246 mi. 1299 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1023 ft.

C10 West 1/4-1/2 0.259 mi. 1368 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1024 ft.

EDR US Hist Cleaners

1015065220 N/A

EDR US Hist Auto Stat

1015505800 N/A

EDR US Hist Auto Stat

1015504305 N/A

LUST UST Financial Assurance

U003984335 N/A

4722 GARDEN HILLS DR STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083

EDR Historical Cleaners: Name: Year: Address:

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

HILCO VALET CLEANERS 2011 4722 GARDEN HILLS DR HILCO VALET CLEANERS 2012 4722 GARDEN HILLS DR

4599 GARDEN HILLS DR STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083

EDR Historical Auto Stations: Name: MOBILE AUTO TECH Year: 2004 Address: 4599 GARDEN HILLS DR

4546 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 Site 1 of 3 in cluster C EDR Historical Auto Stations: Name: STONE MOUNTAIN HONDA SVC CTR Year: 2010 Address: 4546 ROCKBRIDGE RD

FORMER HOGAN’S 4533 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30088 Site 2 of 3 in cluster C LUST: Facility ID: Leak ID: Description: Cleanup Status: Date Received: Project Officer: Facility: Facility Id: Facility Status: Facility Type: District:

10000276 1 Confirmed Release NFA - No Further Action 10/23/2002 Jones,F. Calvin

10000276 Closed Commercial PIRT 3

TC3889706.2s Page 15


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

FORMER HOGANâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S (Continued) Contact Id: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner City: Owner State: Owner Zip: Owner City,St,Zip: Owner Telephone:

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

U003984335 51526 CARSON W HOGAN SR 2115 HARBINS RD DACULA GA 30019 DACULA, GA 30019 770-339-3527

Tanks: Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T1 Installed Date Unknown Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T1 Removed From Ground 10/23/2002

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

T1 Gas Unknown 6000 Unknown Not reported No Not reported No Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T2 Installed Date Unknown Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T2 Removed From Ground 10/23/2002

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

T2 Gas Unknown 6000 Not reported Not reported No Not reported No Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T3 Installed Date Unknown Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T3 Removed From Ground 10/23/2002

Tank ID: Product1:

T3 Gas

TC3889706.2s Page 16


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

FORMER HOGANâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S (Continued)

U003984335

Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

Unknown 6000 Not reported Not reported No Not reported No Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T4 Installed Date Unknown Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T4 Removed From Ground 10/23/2002

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

T4 Gas Unknown 6000 Not reported Not reported No Not reported No Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T5 Installed Date Unknown Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

T5 Removed From Ground 10/23/2002

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

T5 Used Oil Unknown 300 Not reported Not reported No Not reported No Not reported

GA Financial Assurance 1: Region: Facility ID: Financial Responsiblity:

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

1 10000276 Not Marked

TC3889706.2s Page 17


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

C11 West 1/4-1/2 0.263 mi. 1390 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1025 ft.

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

PINE LAKE BAPTIST CHURCH 4528 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083

LUST UST Financial Assurance

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

U001490945 N/A

Site 3 of 3 in cluster C LUST: Facility ID: Leak ID: Description: Cleanup Status: Date Received: Project Officer:

9044171 1 Confirmed Release NFA -Monitoring Only (MNA) 06/23/1992 Johnson,Undine

Facility: Facility Id: Facility Status: Facility Type: District: Contact Id: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner City: Owner State: Owner Zip: Owner City,St,Zip: Owner Telephone:

9044171 Closed Not Marked PIRT 3 3953 PINE LAKE BAPTIST CHURCH 4528 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN GA 30083 STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 404-292-2100

Tanks: Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

1 Upgrade Repair Not Marked Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

1 Removed From Ground 06/22/1992

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

1 Installed 01/01/1962

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

1 Gas Bare Steel 500 Unknown Not Marked Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

2 Upgrade Repair Not Marked Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

2 Removed From Ground 06/22/1992

TC3889706.2s Page 18


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

PINE LAKE BAPTIST CHURCH (Continued) Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

2 Installed 01/01/1962

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

2 Gas Bare Steel 500 Unknown Not Marked Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

3 Upgrade Repair Not Marked Not reported

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

3 Removed From Ground 06/22/1992

Tank ID: Status: Status Date:

3 Installed 01/01/1962

Tank ID: Product1: Material: Capacity: Pipe Material: Pipe Type: Overfill Protection: Overfill Installed: Tank Exempt From Spill: Date Spill Device Installed:

3 Gas Bare Steel 500 Unknown Not Marked Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported

GA Financial Assurance 1: Region: Facility ID: Financial Responsiblity:

12 West 1/4-1/2 0.312 mi. 1649 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1026 ft.

U001490945

1 9044171 Insurance

TEXACO 4513 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083

LUST: Facility ID: Leak ID: Description: Cleanup Status: Date Received: Project Officer:

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

LUST

S109113662 N/A

4440423 1 Confirmed Release NFA - No Further Action 12/07/1993 Yousif,Ban S

TC3889706.2s Page 19


Map ID Direction Distance Elevation

13 East 1/4-1/2 0.440 mi. 2321 ft. Relative: Higher

MAP FINDINGS

Site

Database(s)

CITGO FOOD MART 4879 ROCKBRIDGE RD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA

Relative: Higher Actual: 992 ft.

1006786420 N/A

SHWS

S103224346 N/A

110013558195

Environmental Interest/Information System GEIMS (Geographic Environmental Information Management System) provides the EPA and Public a single point of access to core data for all facilities and sites regulated or monitored by the EPA and a single system for the reporting of all environmental data.

LUST: Facility ID: Leak ID: Description: Cleanup Status: Date Received: Project Officer:

14 West 1/4-1/2 0.463 mi. 2445 ft.

FINDS LUST

FINDS: Registry ID:

Actual: 1002 ft.

EDR ID Number EPA ID Number

4440432 1 Confirmed Release NFA - No Further Action 06/11/1996 Li,Yonghong June

EAGLE ROCKBRIDGE SHOPPING CENTER 4450 ROCKBRIDGE ROAD STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083

SHWS: Facility Id: Regulated Substances(RS):

10499 Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene-GW/Soil, Tetrachloroethene-GW/Soil, Trichloroethene-GW/Soil RS Released/Threats to Health Env: This site has a known release of Tetrachloroethene in soil at levels exceeding the reportable quantity. This site has unlimited access. The nearest resident individual is less than 300 feet from the area affected by the release. Status of Cleanup Activities: Cleanup activities are being conducted for source materials, soil, and groundwater. GA EPD Dir Determination Re Correction Action: The Director has determined that this site requires corrective action. Owner Name: Food and Gas I, LLC Owner Address: 3970 Rogers Bridge Road Owner City,St,Zip: Duluth, GA 30097-2214 Last Known Property Owner NAME B: Not reported Last Known Property Owner ADDRESS B: Not reported Last Known Property Owner CITY B: Not reported Last Known Property Owner STATE B: Not reported Last Known Property Owner ZIP B: Not reported Last Known Property Owner NAME C: Not reported Last Known Property Owner ADDRESS C: Not reported Last Known Property Owner CITY C: Not reported Last Known Property Owner STATE C: Not reported Last Known Property Owner ZIP C: Not reported Latitude: 33 47’ 15 " N Longitude: 84 12 ’ 41 " W

TC3889706.2s Page 20


Count: 20 records.

ORPHAN SUMMARY

City

EDR ID

Site Name

Site Address

Zip

DEKALB COUNTY STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE MOUNTAIN STONE NOUNTAIM

M300006577 S107667558 S108310640 S108310637 S108310636 S107665943 S107665942 S107665940 S107665938 S104253145 1003867941 S107667554 S107667552 S107667551 S108310635 S107667559 S108895489 S107667928 1006789358 S107667553

HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC. PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF CICI OF GWINNETT, INC. INERT LANDF UKNOWN / SHEEN ON LAKE ROCKBRIDGE PARK/CHEMICAL DRUMS PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC TORREY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INE TORREY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INE 7-ELEVEN STORE 1433 #23667 PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC

LITHONIA / PINE MOUNTAIN QUARR CHRYSTAL LAKE UNIT III S/D LOT HUNTINGTON S/D LOT 9B 1044 ALF HUNTINGTON S/D LOT 5C 6582 ALF HUNTINGTON S/D LOT 5A 1138 ALF HUNTINGTON S/D LOT 68G 1157 AL HUNTINGTON S/D LOT 53G 1047 AL HUNTINGTON S/D LOT 48G 6593 AL HUNTINGTON S/D LOT 11B 1028 AL INSIDE STONE MOUNTAIN STATE PA JCT ROCKBRIDGE RD & WALKER RD LOT 57A WILKINS COVE; 2268 RAM LOT 181A LAKESIDE MANOR WAY; 5 LOT 178 LAKESIDE MANOR WAY; 20 REDAN VALLEY UNIT II S/D LOT 3 REDAN VALLEY UNIT II S/D LOT 3 STONE BREEZE UNIT III S/D LOT STONE BREEZE UNIT III S/D LOTS 4000 STONE MOUNTAIN HWY LOT 182 LAKESIDE MANOR WAY; 54

TC3889706.2s Page 21

* 30083 30083 30083 30083 30083 30083 30083 30088 30088 30088 30088 * * * * 30083 30088

Database(s) US MINES SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SPILLS CERC-NFRAP SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF LUST, UST, Financial Assurance SWF/LF


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78

Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143

EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659

EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418

EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247

EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033

EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774

EPA Region 5 Telephone 312-886-6686

EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4246

EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78

Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-1


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78

Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94

Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 151

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94

Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-2


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75

Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-3


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 12/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 14

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/23/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 12/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 14

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/23/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 11/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 95

Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/02/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 66

Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: Hazardous Site Inventory State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the statesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 49

Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 404-657-8600 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-4


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NON HSI: Non-Hazardous Site Inventory This list was obtained by EDR in 1998 and contains property listings that have reported contamination of soil or groundwater under the Georgia Hazardous Site Response Act (HSRA). These sites were not placed on the Georgia Priority list (Hazardous Site Inventory or HSI) because their hazard evaluation scores did not exceed the threshold levels established for sites posing an imminent threat to health or the environment. Disclaimer provided by Rindt-McDuff Associates - the database information has been obtained from publicly available sources produced by other entities. While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy of the data, RMA does not guarantee the accuracy of the data. No claim is made for the actual existence of pollution at any site. This data does not constitute a legal opinion. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 41

Source: Rindt-McDuff Associates, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 08/21/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-362-2696 Source: Center for GIS, Georgia Institute of Technology Telephone: 404-385-0900 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/19/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2014 Number of Days to Update: 29

Source: Environmental Protection Division Telephone: 404-362-2687 Last EDR Contact: 03/19/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/30/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 11/21/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 90

Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 08/27/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/27/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 66

Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-5


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10

Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 09/12/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 59

Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 29

Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 03/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 42

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 08/27/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49

Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 184

Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks. USTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-6


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 20

Source: Environmental Protection Division Telephone: 404-362-2687 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/30/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

AST: Above Ground Storage Tanks A listing of LP gas tank site locations. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2012 Number of Days to Update: 9

Source: Office of Insurance & Safety Fire Commissioner Telephone: 404-656-5875 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 01/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2014 Number of Days to Update: 42

Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 43

Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 07/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 92

Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 11/21/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 90

Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-7


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 65

Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 271

Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/13/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10

Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 07/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/30/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 129

Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55

Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries AUL: Uniform Environmental Covenants A list of environmental covenants Date of Government Version: 02/07/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 6

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-657-8600 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INST CONTROL: Public Record List Sites on the Public Record Listing that have institutional controls or limitations on use are sites with Risk Reduction Standards of 3, 4, and 5.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-8


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/04/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 6

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-657-8600 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program site Georgiaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Voluntary Remediation Program Act was created to encourage voluntary investigation and remediation of contaminated properties. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2014 Number of Days to Update: 43

Source: DNR Telephone: 404-657-8600 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/16/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27

Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 66

Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Public Record List The Brownfields Public Record lists properties where response actions under the Georgia Hazardous Site Reuse and Redevelopment Act are planned, ongoing or completed. Date of Government Version: 02/04/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 6

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-657-8600 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-9


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/24/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 73

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137

Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

HIST LF: Historical Landfills Landfills that were closed many years ago. Date of Government Version: 01/15/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/06/2004 Number of Days to Update: 17

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-362-2696 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies

SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing A listing of recycling facility locations. Date of Government Version: 01/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 34

Source: Department of Community Affairs Telephone: 404-679-1598 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-10


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/04/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 65

Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/16/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

DEL SHWS: Delisted Hazardous Site Inventory Listing A listing of sites delisted from the Hazardous Site Inventory. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 49

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-657-8636 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009 Number of Days to Update: 131

Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/16/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (â&#x20AC;&#x2122;Superfundâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 15

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 52

Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

SPILLS: Spills Information Oil or Hazardous Material Spills or Releases. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2014 Number of Days to Update: 9

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 706-792-7744 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-11


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2013 Number of Days to Update: 39

Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators RCRAInfo is EPAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42

Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/19/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62

Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 15

Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/23/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-12


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 31

Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74

Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/23/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146

Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 02/25/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28

Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 03/05/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/16/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 44

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 64

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-13


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25

Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-14


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 61

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 107

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 07/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 91

Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/23/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2014 Number of Days to Update: 61

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 11/18/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13

Source: EPA Telephone: (404) 562-9900 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/23/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-15


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 63

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52

Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Biennially

NPDES: NPDES Wastewater Permit List A listing of NPDES wastewater permits issued by the Watershed Protection Branch. Date of Government Version: 01/27/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2011 Number of Days to Update: 8

Source: Department of Natural Resoruces Telephone: 404-362-2680 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner Database A list of drycleaners in the state. The listing includes drycleaner facilities, that use perchloroethylene, that responded to the Notification of Compliance Status forms. It also includes those businesses that are pick-up stores only and do not conduct dry cleaning on site. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/18/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2009 Number of Days to Update: 21

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-363-7000 Last EDR Contact: 02/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

AIRS: Permitted Facility & Emissions Lising A listing of permitted Air facilities and emissions data. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/22/2014 Number of Days to Update: 57

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-363-7000 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-16


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TIER 2: Tier 2 Data Listing A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials and submit a chemical inventory report. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 34

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-656-4852 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/16/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34

Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 04/15/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 72

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Site Listing A listing of coal ash landfills. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2012 Number of Days to Update: 29

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-362-2537 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/12/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-17


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 20

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-362-4892 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/30/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 11/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 72

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/02/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76

Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 30

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-5962 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 30

Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-5962 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 08/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/23/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-18


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/11/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial assurance information listing for solid waste facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 45

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 404-362-2537 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 01/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 13

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies

LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36

Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339

Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: N/A

EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 31

Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 02/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/26/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-19


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A

Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A

Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A

Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations - Cole Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A

Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-20


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners - Cole Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A

Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Georgia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Number of Days to Update: 176

Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies

RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Natural Resources in Georgia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies

RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Environmental Protection Division in Georgia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Number of Days to Update: 176

Source: Environmental Protection Division Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies

OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45

Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/02/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-21


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2012 Number of Days to Update: 40

Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2013 Number of Days to Update: 11

Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/19/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 26

Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/05/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45

Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/09/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 49

Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/30/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually

Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Rextag Strategies Corp. Telephone: (281) 769-2247 U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Associationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s annual survey of hospitals.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-22


GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Child Care Centers Source: Department of Human Resources Telephone: 404-651-5562

Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection.

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC3889706.2s

Page GR-23


File Review Documents


APPENDIX H RECORD OF COMMUNICATION AND INTERVIEWS


User/Applicant Interview


Interview of Owners and Occupants of Neighboring Properties


____________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

April 7, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Mr. Thomas Mohr

Employed With/Title:

BB&T Investments, LLC, Owner

Telephone:

404-250-0397

Re:

Owner Interview

Comments: Mr. Thomas Mohr owner of BB&T Investments, LLC (owner of the subject property), was contacted regarding environmental concerns associated with the subject property. Mr. Mohr indicated that he was unaware of any current or historical environmental concerns with the subject property. Mr. Mohr said he was unaware if the property was on municipal sewer or a private septic; however, he believed that municipal water was provided for the subject property. ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


___________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

March 26, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Ms. Linda Dooley

Title:

Tenant at 4656 Rockbridge Road

Re:

Subject Property Information

Comments: Ms. Linda Dooley, current occupant of the residence located on the southwest portion of the subject, was interviewed during ENERCONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s site visit on March 26, 2014. Ms. Dooley stated that she was unaware of any present or past environmental concerns with the subject property other than a recent sewage backup that had been fixed recently. Ms. Dooley stated that the subject property has remained unchanged since she has been renting at that location. Ms. Dooley indicated she had been a tenant at the subject property for approximately 7 years. ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


___________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

February 3, 2012

Name of Individual Contacted:

Ms. Beverly (last name not provided)

Title:

Renter

Address:

4580 Thomas Jefferson Court

Re:

Subject Property Information

Comments: Ms. Beverly (last name not provided), a renter at 4580 Thomas Jefferson Court (east adjoining property), wast interview concerning the subject property. Ms. Beverly indicated that she had only rented for a few months and that she had seen tires dumped in the driveway of the unoccupied house, but was unaware of any other environmental concerns and had no knowledge of the historical use of the subject property. ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


__________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

March 26, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Mr. Mig Tamang

Title:

Renter

Address:

4579 Thomas Jefferson Court

Re:

Subject Property Information

Comments: Mr. Mig Tamang, a renter at 4579 Thomas Jefferson Court (east adjoining property), was interviewed for information concerning the subject property. Mr. Tamang indicated he had rented for approximately 7 months and was unaware of any environmental conditions or the historical use of the subject property. ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


_____________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

March 26, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Mr and Mrs. Patel

Employed With/Title:

Sentry Cleaners

Re:

Environmental concerns/historical use

Comments: Mr. and Mrs. Patel (first names not provided) of Sentry Cleaners were interviewed for information regarding the previous use of the subject property. Sentry Cleaners is located in the adjoining Rockbridge Shopping Center south of the subject property. Mr. and Mrs. Patel indicated that the subject property currently appears as it did when they first began operation approximately 23 years ago other than a residential structure reportedly being demolished in the mid 1990’s. Mr. Patel noted that Sentry Cleaners was currently a “drop-off only” location and on-site dry cleaning operations have not taken place at the facility in over 13 years. ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


Interview of State and Local Departments


Georgia Environmental Protection Division Northeast District 745 Gaines School Road, Athens GA 30605 Phone: 706-369-6376 â&#x20AC;˘ Fax: 706-369-6398 Judson H. Turner, Director

March 27, 2013 Mr. W. Nathan Parker Enercon wnparker@enercon.com

Re:

GORA Request 4656 Rockbridge Road, Pine Lake, GA 30083

Dear Mr. Parker: We have received your request for records dated March 24, 2104 under the Georgia Open Records Act pertaining to the referenced site. The EPD district offices were unable to locate any records pertaining to this request. You will receive a separate response for the EPD Branch offices. If we may assist you further, you may call at the number above. Sincerely,

Stephanie L. Helmig GORA Coordinator


Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division • Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr • Suite 1152 East • Atlanta • Georgia 30334 (404) 463-1511; Fax (404) 651-8455 Judson H. Turner, Director

Apr i l 10, 2014

W. Nat han Par ker Pr oj ect Geol ogi st 500 Townpar k Lane Kennesaw, Geor gi a 30144

RE:

Open Recor ds Request : 4656 Rockbr i dge Road Pi ne Lake, Geor gi a 30083

Dear Mr . Par ker

Thi s i s i n r esponse t o your r ecent r equest , made under t he Geor gi a Open Recor ds Act ( GORA) r egar di ng i nf or mat i on f r om our f i l es on t he above r ef er enced pr oper t y. A r evi ew of Wat er shed Pr ot ect i on Br anch f i l es i ndi cat es t hat we have no i nf or mat i on concer ni ng t he above r ef er enced pr oper t y l i st ed i n your r equest . For f ur t her assi st ance, pl ease cont act Renee Wal ker at ( 404) 463- 2424 or by emai l r enee_wal ker @dnr . st at e. ga. us or Ci ndy Fedack at t he above number or by emai l cynt hi a_f edack@dnr . st at e. ga. us Si ncer el y,

Renee Wal ker GORA Secr et ar y Rlw


A FDID

B

MM 12

GA

04405

*

State

*

Incident Date

YYYY 2010

Delete

24

10-0087168 Incident Number

Station

*

000

*

Exposure

Check this box to Indicate that the address for this incident is provided on the Wildland Fire Module In Section B "Alternative Location Specification". Use only for Wildland fires.

Location* X

DD 13

Street address Intersection In front of Rear of Adjacent to Directions

4656

*

No Activity

Census Tract

0231

ROCKBRIDGE

Number/Milepost Prefix

Apt./Suite/Room

NFIRS -1 Basic

Change

- 05

RD

Street or Highway

Street Type

Stone Mountain

GA

-

City

State

30083

Suffix

Zip Code

Cross street or directions, as applicable

C

Incident Type * 412 Gas leak (natural

E1

Incident Type

Check boxes if dates are the same as Alarm Date.

gas or LPG)

D

Aid Given or Received *

1 2 3 4 5 N X

Mutual aid received Automatic aid recv. Mutual aid given Automatic aid given Other aid given None

F

Actions Taken *

Midnight is 0000

Date & Times

Alarm

E 2 Shift

& Alarms

Local Option

Month

Day

Hr Min Sec

Year

A

ALARM always required

12

*

13

2010 13:48:00

Shift or Platoon

01 24 Alarms

District

ARRIVAL required, unless canceled or did not arrive Their FDID

Their State

X

Arrival

13

Last Unit Cleared

X

G1

12

13

Resources * Apparatus

G 2 Estimated

Other Additional Action Taken (3)

J 131 161 162 213 215 241 311 331

Property Use*

H1* Casualties Deaths Fire Service Civilian

Detector H2Required for Confined Fires.

1

Detector alerted occupants

2 U

Detector did not alert them Unknown

Structures

Church, place of worship Restaurant or cafeteria Bar/Tavern or nightclub Elementary school or kindergarten High school or junior high College, adult education Care facility for the aged Hospital Playground or park Crops or orchard Forest (timberland) Outdoor storage area Dump or sanitary landfill Open land or field

Fire and Rescue Services

None

Injuries

341 342 361 419 429 439 449 459 464 519 936 938 946 951 960 961 962

H3 N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0

Dollar Losses & Values

Required for all fires if known. Optional for non fires.

None

$

,

000 ,

000

Contents

$

,

000 ,

000

PRE-INCIDENT VALUE:

0001

Special Study Value

Personnel Property

0005

Check box if resource counts include aid received resources.

Outside

124 655 669 807 919 931

LOSSES:

EMS

Additional Action Taken (2)

Special Study ID#

2010 14:50:00

Check this box and skip this section if an Apparatus or Personnel form is used.

Suppression

X X

Special Studies Local Option

Primary Action Taken (1)

Fire-2 Structure-3 Civil Fire Cas.-4 Fire Serv. Cas.-5 EMS-6 HazMat-7 Wildland Fire-8 Apparatus-9 Personnel-10 Arson-11

E3

LAST UNIT CLEARED, required except for wildland fires

Their Incident Number

Incident command

Completed Modules

2010 13:55:00

Controlled

X 81

12

*

CONTROLLED Optional, Except for wildland fires

Optional

Property

$

,

000 ,

000

Contents

$

,

000 ,

000

Hazardous Materials Release None Natural Gas: slow leak, no evauation or HazMat actions Propane gas: <21 lb. tank (as in home BBQ grill) Gasoline: vehicle fuel tank or portable container Kerosene: fuel burning equipment or portable storage Diesel fuel/fuel oil:vehicle fuel tank or portable Household solvents: home/office spill, cleanup only Motor oil: from engine or portable container Paint: from paint cans totaling < 55 gallons HazMat actions required or spill > 55gal., Other: Special Please complete the HazMat form

Clinic,clinic type infirmary Doctor/dentist office Prison or jail, not juvenile 1-or 2-family dwelling Multi-family dwelling Rooming/boarding house Commercial hotel or motel Residential, board and care Dormitory/barracks Food and beverage sales Vacant lot Graded/care for plot of land Lake, river, stream Railroad right of way Other street Highway/divided highway Residential street/driveway

539 579 571 599 615 629 700 819 882 891 981 984

I Mixed Use Property Not Mixed NN 10 Assembly use Education use 20 Medical use 33 Residential use 40 51 Row of stores 53 Enclosed mall 58 Bus. & Residential Office use 59 Industrial use 60 63 Military use 65 Farm use 00 Other mixed use

Household goods,sales,repairs Motor vehicle/boat sales/repair Gas or service station Business office Electric generating plant Laboratory/science lab Manufacturing plant Livestock/poultry storage(barn) Non-residential parking garage Warehouse Construction site Industrial plant yard

Lookup and enter a Property Use code only if you have NOT checked a Property Use box:

Property Use

963

Street or road in commercial area NFIRS-1 Revision 03/11/99

04405

12/13/2010

10-0087168


K1

Person/Entity Involved Local Option

Check This Box if same address as incident location. Then skip the three duplicate address lines.

Mr.,Ms., Mrs. First Name

Number

-

Business name (if applicable)

Area Code

MI

Prefix

Phone Number

Last Name

Suffix

Street or Highway

Street Type

Apt./Suite/Room

Post Office Box

Suffix

City

State

Zip Code

More people involved? Check this box and attach Supplemental Forms (NFIRS-1S) as necessary

K 2 Owner

Same as person involved? Then check this box and skip The rest of this section.

Check this box if same address as incident location. Then skip the three duplicate address lines.

Mr.,Ms., Mrs. First Name

Number

-

Business name (if Applicable)

Local Option

Area Code

MI

Prefix

Last Name

Suffix

Street or Highway

Street Type

Apt./Suite/Room

Post Office Box

Phone Number

Suffix

City

State

L

Zip Code

Remarks Local Option

Q24, B5, HZ19 WERE DISPATCHED TO A REPORTED GAS LEAK AT THE ABOVE LOCATION. Q24 ARRIVED ON SCENE TO FIND NO GAS LEAK AT THAT LOCATION. WATER AND SEWER ON SCENE ADVISED THE CORRECT LOCATION WAS ON ROCKBRIDGE IN STATION 11'S IMMEDIATE. CORRECT LOCATION IS ROCKBRIDGE RD AND PHON DU LAC. Q24 ARRIVED TO FIND A METAL FEEDER LINE RUPTURED BY WATER AND SEWAGE. AGL WAS CALLED TO THE SCENE AND Q24 RETURNED TO SERVICE.

L

Authorization 616 Officer in charge ID

Check Box if same as Officer Member making report ID in charge.

1456

Fire and Rescue Services

PECKRUL, ROBERT W Signature

FOY, MICHAEL C Signature

12

FAO Position or rank

Assignment

Month

Assignment

Month

12

FF1 Position or rank

04405

12/13/2010

13

2010 Year

Day

13 Day

2010 Year

10-0087168


04405 FDID

*

MM 12

GA State

*

DD 13

Incident Date

YYYY 2010

*

24 Station

10-0087168 Incident Number

*

Complete Narrative

000 Exposure

*

Narrative: Q24, B5, HZ19 WERE DISPATCHED TO A REPORTED GAS LEAK AT THE ABOVE LOCATION. Q24 ARRIVED ON SCENE TO FIND NO GAS LEAK AT THAT LOCATION. WATER AND SEWER ON SCENE ADVISED THE CORRECT LOCATION WAS ON ROCKBRIDGE IN STATION 11'S IMMEDIATE. CORRECT LOCATION IS ROCKBRIDGE RD AND PHON DU LAC. Q24 ARRIVED TO FIND A METAL FEEDER LINE RUPTURED BY WATER AND SEWAGE. AGL WAS CALLED TO THE SCENE AND Q24 RETURNED TO SERVICE.

Fire and Rescue Services

04405

12/13/2010

10-0087168


A

04405 FDID

B

*

Apparatus or Resource

MM 12

GA State

*

DD 13

Incident Date

YYYY 2010

Station

*

Date and Times

*

Check if same as alarm date

Month Day

1

ID

Q24

Dispatch Arrival

Type

2

13

ID

Clear Dispatch Arrival

Type ID Type ID Type ID Type ID Type ID Type ID Type ID Type

24

X X X X X

Year

Hour Min

12 12 12

13 13 13

2010 13:48 2010 13:55 2010 14:05

12 12

13 13

2010 13:48 2010 13:55

10-0087168 Incident Number

*

Sent Number of * X People

Delete

000

Change

*

Exposure

Use

NFIRS - 9 Apparatus or Resources

Actions Taken

Check ONE box for each apparatus to indicate its main use at the incident.

Suppression

X

5

EMS

X Other Suppression

X

5

EMS

Clear

Other

Dispatch Arrival

Suppression EMS

Clear

Other

Dispatch

Suppression

Arrival

EMS

Clear

Other

Dispatch

Suppression

Arrival

EMS

Clear

Other

Dispatch

Suppression

Arrival

EMS

Clear

Other

Dispatch

Suppression

Arrival

EMS

Clear

Other

Dispatch

Suppression

Arrival

EMS

Clear

Other

Dispatch

Suppression

Arrival

EMS

Clear

Other

Type of Apparatus or Resources Ground Fire Suppression

Marine Equipment

11 12 13 14 16 17 10

51 Fire boat with pump 52 Boat, no pump 50 Marine apparatus, other

Engine Truck or aerial Quint Tanker & pumper combination Brush truck ARF (Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting) Ground fire suppression, other

Heavy Ground Equipment 21 22 24 20

Dozer or plow Tractor Tanker or tender Heavy equipment, other

Aircraft 41 42 43 40

Aircraft: fixed wing tanker Helitanker Helicopter Aircraft, other

Fire and Rescue Services

Support Equipment 61 Breathing apparatus support 62 Light and air unit 60 Support apparatus, other

Medical & Rescue 71 72 73 75 76 70

Rescue unit Urban Search & rescue unit High angle rescue unit BLS unit ALS unit Medical and rescue unit,other

More Apparatus? Use Additional Sheets Other 91 92 93 94 95 99 00

Mobile command post Chief officer car HazMat unit Type 1 hand crew Type 2 hand crew Privately owned vehicle Other apparatus/resource

NN None UU Undetermined NFIRS-9 Revision 11/17/98

04405

12/13/2010

10-0087168


A FDID

B

*

Apparatus or Resource

MM 12

GA

04405

State

*

Incident Date

ID

13

Clear

Personnel ID

2

*

Month Day Dispatch

Q24

1208 1456 413 611 616

24 Station

Check if same as alarm date

Arrival Type

YYYY 2010

Date and Times

*

Use codes listed below

1

DD 13

X X X

12 12 12 Name

ETUE, TIFFANY FOY, MICHAEL CORBETT, WILLIAM O'KEEFFE, BRIAN PECKRUL, ROBERT

ID Type

Type

Personnel ID

Year

Hours/mins

2010 13:48 2010 13:55 2010 14:05 Rank or Grade FM2 FF2 FAO CAPT FAO

*

Sent Number of X * People

X Other

Attend X

Action Taken

Action Taken

Action Taken

Action Taken

Action Taken

Action Taken

Action Taken

X X X X

Suppression

Attend X

Action Taken

Sent

Action Taken

Suppression

Arrival

EMS

Clear

Other

Rank or Grade

Action Taken

X

Other

Name

List up to 4 actions for each apparatus and each personnel.

EMS

EMS

Dispatch

Actions Taken

Suppression

5

Clear

Rank or Grade

NFIRS - 10 Personnel

Change

Use

Arrival

Name

*

Check ONE box for each apparatus to indicate its main use at the incident.

Sent

X

Delete

000 Exposure

Sent

Dispatch

Personnel ID

ID

13 13 13

10-0087168 Incident Number

Attend X

Action Taken

Action Taken

NFIRS-10 Revision 11/17/98 Fire and Rescue Services

04405

12/13/2010

10-0087168


04405 FDID

*

MM 12

GA State

Fire and Rescue Services

*

DD 13

Incident Date

YYYY 2010

*

24 Station

10-0087168 0000000000 Incident Number

*

Exposure

04405

*

NFIRS - Incident User Fields

12/13/2010

10-0087168


_____________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

April 8, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Mr. James Mims

Employed With/Title:

GA EPD USTM Duty Officer

Telephone:

404-362-2687

Re:

Possible changes or new UST information

Comments: ENERCON contacted Mr. James Mims of the GA EPD for information regulatory status to nearby UST sites. The following is a summary of the information provided by Mr. Mims:     

Kings Petro – No records for in the Corrective Action Folder. Pine Lake Baptist Church – No new releases and a NFA letter dated October 28, 2008. Former Hogan’s – No new releases and a NFA letter dated April 8, 2003. Texaco – No new releases and a NFA letter dated August 5, 1997. No reported facilities located on the subject property.

ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


_____________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

March 4, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Name not provided

Employed With/Title:

DeKalb County Department of Watershed Management- Water and Sewer Department Official

Telephone:

770-621-7272

Re:

Utility information

Comments: ENERCON contacted the DeKalb County Department of Watershed Management â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Water and Sewer Department to confirm that the site was only hooded to the municipal water supply and not the sewer system. The Water and Sewer Department Official confirmed the status of the water and sewer connections.

ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


_____________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

April 8, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Mr. Michael Odom

Employed With/Title:

GA EPD Air Protection Branch

Telephone:

404-363-7096

Re:

Records for nearby drycleaners

Comments: Mr. Michael Odom was contacted to determine if the GA EPD Air Protection Branch had information pertaining to nearby drycleaners. Mr. Michael Odom indicated that the Air Protection branch only had files for Sentry Cleaners located at 4687 Rockbridge Road. Mr. Odom indicated that that facility had reportedly had one dry-to-dry drycleaning machine with condenser was installed at this facility in 1987. The latest inspection of this facility was reportedly conducted in 2001 at which time the 12-month estimated usage of PCE was noted to be 145 gallons. ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


_____________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

April 8, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Ms. Valerie Caldwell

Employed With/Title:

City of Pine Lake Administrator

Telephone:

404-292-4250

Re:

Information regarding stream buffers

Comments: Ms Valerie Caldwell from the City of Pine Lake was contacted regarding stream buffer distances required by the City of Pine Lake. Ms. Caldwell indicated that there was a total buffer of 50 feet. Ms. Caldwell stated that the first 25 feet was required by the State, and the second 25 feet mandated by the City of Pine Lake. Ms. Caldwell stated that she had tried to recently tried to contact the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s stormwater consultant to verify that there was not an additional 25 feet of impervious structure buffer (Ms. Caldwell thought that this may be old information and outdated); however, attempts to reach the consultant were unsuccessful.

ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


_____________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

April 4, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Name Not Given

Employed With/Title:

DeKalb County Department of Watershed Management â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Billing Department Official

Telephone:

404-378-4475

Re:

Water and Sewer Connections

Comments: ENERCON contacted the DeKalb County Department of Watershed Management to determine if the property was connected to the municipal water and sewer system. The billing official stated that the subject property was currently hooked to the municipal water supply, but not the municipal sewer system.

ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


_____________________________________________ Record of Communication Date:

April 8, 2014

Name of Individual Contacted:

Ms. Denise (last name not provided)

Employed With/Title:

DeKalb County Department of Watershed Management â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Engineering Department Official

Telephone:

770-724-1409

Re:

Available water and sewer connections

Comments: Contacted Ms. Denise (last name not provided) with the DeKalb County Department of Watershed Management â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Engineering Department. Ms. Denise indicated that the subject property was available to hood into the municipal water and sewer system, and the Engineering Department had a Map of their utility lines that could be provided.

ENERCON Employee Making Contact: Nathan Parker


APPENDIX I AUTHOR CREDENTIALS, DOCUMENTATION OF QUALIFICATION AS AN “ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL”


Nathan Parker Experience Summary 

Project Geologist in the Kennesaw, Georgia office

Over eight years of remediation and environmental consulting experience

Over eight years of experience of drilling oversight related to remedial investigations

Experience Description Mr. Parker has worked extensively on industrial remediation projects including Georgia Hazardous Sites Response Act (HSRA) sites, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund sites, Voluntary Action Clean-up sites, and Brownfield sites. Using EPA Region 4 standard operating procedures, Mr. Parker has overseen the installation of over 150 monitoring wells, sampled for a range of chemical analysis, provided geological logging, and health and safety oversight for remedial projects. Mr. Parker has worked extensively on petroleum impacted sites throughout Georgia. Additionally, Mr. Parker has worked with municipal and transportation clients performing remedial work at major airports and railway systems. Education and Professional Recognition B.S., Geology, State University of New York at Cortland Geological Field Studies Certificate, University of Buffalo Training/Special Skills OSHA 40-Hour Health and Safety Hazardous Waste Operations Training 8-Hour OSHA Training LPS- Safety Training


Chrissy R. Sherman Experience Summary 

Geosciences and Remediation Lead in the Kennesaw, Georgia office

Over nine years of environmental and due diligence consulting experience

Over seven years of experience in performing environmental assessments and remediation projects at various hazardous waste and petroleum impacted sites

Experience Description Mrs. Sherman provides a variety of functions at ENERCON which includes performing and managing Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, completing Underground Storage Tank (UST) related assessments and remediation, Hazardous Site Response Act (HSRA) assessments and remediation, and asbestos inspection and sampling. For over seven years, Mrs. Sherman has also prepared and managed environmental assessments for projects submitted to the Georgia Department of Community Affairs for clients seeking funding through the HOME Rental Housing Loan and Housing Tax Credit programs. Mrs. Sherman has worked extensively in the environmental arena on a wide array of projects for over nine years. She has also worked in many areas of the Underground Storage Tank and Hazardous Waste Management fields and has gained extensive knowledge of systems and related site conditions that may influence assessment and remediation effectiveness. She has designed, installed, maintained, and monitored numerous remediation systems with varying degrees of contamination. Her project management experience includes soil and groundwater characterization studies, all phases of Environmental Site Assessments, remediation, permitting, hazardous waste management, and a multitude of field activities for commercial and government clients. Responsibilities have included staff oversight and management, preparation and review of technical reports, project cost and scheduling, regulatory compliance oversight, client management, and client development. Education and Professional Recognition Bachelor of Science, Chemical Engineering, Montana State University Training/Special Skills OSHA 40-Hour Health and Safety Hazardous Waste Operations Training 8-Hour OSHA Training EPA/AHERA – Asbestos in Buildings: Inspection and Assessment EPA Lead-based Paint Inspector: Target Housing and Child Occupied Facilities Mold Assessment and Remediation in Buildings Program


Douglas L. Fidler, P.G. Experience Summary •

Professional Geologist with over 20 years experience in environmental business

Over 12 years of highly profitable operations management experience

Project background experience includes a variety of environmental assessments, remedial construction and construction management, risk assessments, groundwater modeling, remedial investigation/feasibility studies and facility audits

Experience Description Mr. Fidler has extensive experience in client management and contract negotiations and has managed over 500 projects ranging in size to $50 million in fees. Prior to joining Enercon Services, Inc., Mr. Fidler was the owner and senior consultant for Southern Environmental Technology, an environmental consulting and construction firm. He assisted other environmental consultants and contractors in performing projects throughout the Southeast where a specific technical and regulatory expertise is required. Mr. Fidler was involved in projects such as: groundwater treatment system evaluations, compliance status investigations under the Georgia EPD Brownfield Program, a CERCLA assessment and corrective action at a former pesticide manufacturer in Florida, and several contaminated soil removal projects. He recently completed projects that included Phase I assessments on large tracts for public agencies such as the U.S. Forestry Service, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, and The Trust for Public Land. Mr. Fidler was also active in the installation of sub-grade vapor barriers in commercial and multifamily residential structures. Mr. Fidler was a Senior Project Manager for the RETEC Group where he was responsible for directing the design team preparing design documents, project specifications and bidding documents for the Atlanta Gas Light Company’s Augusta Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) site. He worked closely with AGL staff to provide an accurate environmental construction cost estimate and made project status presentations to the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD), Atlanta Gas Light management and the Georgia Public Service Commission. The $50 million corrective action design was completed within a year and all permitting and regulatory approvals were secured prior to the start of correction action. The corrective action was completed with relatively few changes and within budget. As a District Manager for Williams Environmental Services, Mr. Fidler managed compliance status investigations at three Atlanta Gas Light Company MGP sites and ten Georgia Power company Substation facilities under the Georgia EPD HSRA Program. He worked with both utilities to identify their respective environmental liabilities and establish programs to minimize negative impacts to their respective operations. Mr. Fidler prepared Compliance Status Reports for other facilities including a landfill, incinerator site, and several dry cleaning operations. For most of these sites, Mr. Fidler prepared the Corrective Action Plans for approval by Georgia EPD. He was the Project Manager and directed the corrective actions at an MGP site and four electrical substations along with many smaller contaminated soil removal projects. Mr. Fidler’s additional experiences include acting as the Project Manager for the RCRA closure of chemical storage tanks, pond closure, and plant demolition at a chemical distribution facility.


Douglas L. Fidler, P.G. Enercon Services, Inc. Page 2 of 2

He functioned as the environmental coordinator for the plant for over four years including the construction of the new plant. He has directed environmental operations including environmental consulting, industrial hygiene, and laboratory divisions and managed several large projects including train derailment corrective actions, landfill investigations, a reservoir assessment, and multi-site underground stage tank programs. As a Senior Hydrogeologist, Mr. Fidler managed and served as project hydrogeologist, safety officer, and sampling manager on many CERCLA projects in Florida and Kentucky. Education and Professional Registrations M.B.A., International Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia M.S., Geophysical Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia B.S., Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia Professional Geologist: Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina


APPENDIX J OWNER ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE


April

10


APPENDIX K PROPERTY LOG AND INFORMATION CHECKLIST


PROPERTY LOG AND INFORMATION CHECKLIST This form MUST be completed by the Qualified Environmental Professional who performed the Phase I and/or Phase II Reports. All entries must be fully documented and explained in the environmental reports. This form, together with all supporting documentation relating to the Phase I, must be submitted to DCA before any application can be accepted for processing. PROPERTY LOG Property Address:

The Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, Georgia 30083

Developer’s Name and Address:

MV Residential Development LLC 9349 Waterstone Boulevard Cinncinnati, Ohio 45249 Marvin Wilmoth

Developer’s e-mail Address:

marvin.wilmoth@mvg.com

Developer’s Telephone Number:

917-331-0136

Qualified Environmental Professional’s’ Name:

Nathan Parker

Qualified Environmental Professional’s’ Telephone Number and e-mail address:

Environmental Consulting Firm’s Name and Address:

Enercon Services, Inc. 500 Townpark Lane Kennesaw, GA 30144

Date Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Completed:

2014Property Log and Information Checklist

770-590-2130 wnparker@enercon.com

DCA HFDD

April 21, 2014

Page 1 of 5


Summary of Phase I Results: ON-SITE The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) found that no further investigation was needed to determine the presence of environmental hazards to the subject property from on-site sources. However, the following additional actions were recommended for the property: 

Asbestos: Chrysotile asbestos was detected in the ceiling texture samples collected from the structure on the northeast portion of the property at a maximum concentration of 2% and in window glazing at <1%. Chrysotile asbestos was detected in the ceiling texture samples, wall board samples, and vinyl floor tiles in the structure on the southwest portion of the property at concentrations ranging from 2% to 3%. Both structures were reported to be demolished to make way for the proposed redevelopment of the property. The Phase I ESA recommends that a full asbestos demolition survey be conducted prior to demolition activities on the subject property. All confirmed ACMs should be abated prior to demolition and properly disposed of in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations.

Lead-Based Paint: Eleven paint chip samples and one ceramic tile sample were collected from the structure on the northeast side of the subject property. No lead-based paint was detected in the collected samples, and the paint was observed to be in good to fair condition. Eighteen paint chip samples were collected from the structure on the southwest portion of the property. Based on the sampling results, LBP was identified on the rear screen door of the structure. Both structures were reported to be demolished to make way for the proposed redevelopment of the property. The Phase I ESA recommends that all painted building materials be assessed and disposed of at the time of demolition in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations.

Lead in Soil: Based on the pre-1978 construction date of the current residential structures located on the subject property and the former residential structure and associated structures which were located on the eastern portion of the subject property, the potential for lead in soils may exist in areas where these structures were located. ENERCON completed two Limited Lead in Soil Sampling Reports (dated June 6, 2012 and April 18, 2014) for the subject property. Lead concentrations in the samples analyzed ranged from 13.8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 177 mg/kg, while two background samples from a depth of three to five feet below ground surface (bgs) were reported to have lead concentrations of 11.4 mg/kg and 15.8 mg/kg. Lead levels in soil in the State of Georgia fluctuate widely and none of the analyzed soil samples were above the established Hazardous Site Response Act (HSRA) Notification Concentrations for lead (400 mg/kg). The Phase I ESA concludes that lead in soil at the property does not constitute an REC at this time. The Phase I ESA states that the presence of the current structures or the past structures at the subject property have not negatively impacted the subject property soils.

 Noise:

An assessment of noise at the subject property was completed by Harry Walls

2014Property Log and Information Checklist

DCA HFDD

Page 2 of 5


Environmental Consulting (HWEC). According to the assessment, three noise assessment locations (NALs) were chosen to assess the subject property. The total day-night average sound level (DNL) at distances of 110 feet north of Rockbridge Road (NAL#1) and 65 feet north of Rockbridge Road (NAL#2) were found to exceed the noise regulations as indicated in The Noise Guidebook (greater than 65 DNL but below 75 DNL). The DNL for distances 230 feet north of Rockbridge Road (NAL#3) and beyond were found to be in compliance. To address the NALs that had DNLs greater than 65 DNL but below 75 DNL, HWEC completed a Noise Mitigation Plan using the HUD Sound Transmission Classification Assessment Tool (STraCAT) calculation for construction materials that would reduce the DNL inside the proposed structures to below 45 DNL. The HWEC assessment concluded that since no outdoor use areas were proposed closer to Rockbridge Road than the NAL#3 location and with the use of construction materials discussed in the Noise Mitigation Plan, the subject property would achieve HUD/DCA noise compliance (less than 45 DNL indoors and less than 65 in outdoor use areas). The Phase I ESA states that based upon the documentation provided in the HWEC Noise Assessment/Mitigation Plan, noise is not anticipate to be a significant concern for the proposed development. OFF-SITE The Phase I ESA found that no further investigation was needed to determine the presence of environmental hazards to the subject property from off-site sources.

2014Property Log and Information Checklist

DCA HFDD

Page 3 of 5


INFORMATION CHECKLIST Check [] any information sources used to perform the Phase I Review. 1.

2.

3.

4.

Overall Property Description __

Building Specifications

_

Zoning or Land Use Maps

_

Aerial Photos (e.g., Sanborn)

__

List of Commercial Tenants On-Site

_

Title History

__

Site Survey

_

Verification of Public Water and Sewer

_

Interviews with Local Fire, Health, Land Use or Environmental Officials

_

Interviews with Builder, and/or Property Manager

_

Review of records of local, state and federal regulatory agencies

_

Review of adjacent properties

__

Other (Specify)

Asbestos _

Dated Building Construction or Rehabilitation Specifications

_

Engineer’s/Consultant’s Asbestos Report

__

Other (Specify)

Polychlorinated Biphenyls __

Utility Transformer Records

_

Site Survey of Transformers

__

Site Soil and Groundwater PCB Test Results

__

Other (Specify)

Radon __

Water Utility Records

__

Gas Utility Records

__

On-Site Radon Test Results

_

Other (Specify) Not Applicable. Structures to be demolished.

2014Property Log and Information Checklist

DCA HFDD

Page 4 of 5


5.

6.

7.

8.

Underground Storage Tanks _

Oil, Motor Fuel and Waste Oil Systems Reports, EPD, LUST & ERNS Records

_

CERCLIS/RCRIS Results of Neighborhood search (within radius of one mile)

__

Site Soil and Groundwater Tests

__

Site Tank Survey

__

Other (Specify)

Waste Sites _

CERCLIS/RCRIS Results of Neighborhood search (within radius of one mile)

_

State EPD site lists for neighborhoods (within radius of one mile)

_

Federal Facilities Docket

_

Site Soil and Groundwater Test Results

__

Other (Specify)

Lead Based Paint _

Lead Paint Survey

__

Certification/Compliance Records

_

Site Soil Test Results

_

Other (Specify) Not Applicable. Structures to be demolished.

Additional Hazards __

Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation Survey

__

Interior Air Test Results

__

Lead in Drinking Water Test Results

__

Mold Inspection Results

_

Other (Specify) Not Applicable. Structures to be demolished.

Checklist completed by:

.

Name (Type or Print):

Nathan Parker

.

Date:

April 21, 2014

.

2014Property Log and Information Checklist

DCA HFDD

Page 5 of 5


APPENDIX L PROOF OF INSURANCE


Client#: 137132

ACORD

14ENERCONSER DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

TM

4/14/2014

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). CONTACT NAME: PHONE (A/C, No, Ext): E-MAIL ADDRESS:

PRODUCER

J. Smith Lanier & Co.-Atlanta 11330 Lakefield Drive Bldg 1, Suite 100 Duluth, GA 30097

FAX (A/C, No):

770 476-1770

770 476-3651

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE

NAIC #

AIG Specialty Insurance Co. INSURER B : Sentinel Insurance Co., LTD INSURER C : Markel Insurance Company INSURER D : Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

26883 11000 38970 19682

INSURER A :

INSURED

Enercon Services, Inc. 500 Town Park Lane Ste. 275 Kennesaw, GA 30144

INSURER E : INSURER F :

COVERAGES

CERTIFICATE NUMBER:

REVISION NUMBER:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR

A

GENERAL LIABILITY

X

POLICY NUMBER

24204154

POLICY EFF POLICY EXP (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)

07/01/2013 07/01/2014

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

X X BI/PD Ded:10000 CLAIMS-MADE

D

ADDL SUBR INSR WVD

TYPE OF INSURANCE

OCCUR

LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence)

$ 1,000,000

MED EXP (Any one person)

$ 25,000

PERSONAL & ADV INJURY

$ 1,000,000

$ 300,000

GENERAL AGGREGATE

$ 2,000,000

GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PROX POLICY LOC JECT

PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG

$ 2,000,000

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident)

$ 1,000,000

BODILY INJURY (Per person)

$

X X

ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS

X

$

20UENJW9053

07/01/2013 07/01/2014

SCHEDULED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS

BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident)

$ $

A

UMBRELLA LIAB

X B

EXCESS LIAB

X

24204393

OCCUR

07/01/2013 07/01/2014

CLAIMS-MADE

DED RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y/N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N N/A (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below

C Professional C Professional A Pollution Liab

EACH OCCURRENCE

$ 1,000,000

AGGREGATE

$ 1,000,000 $

20WEAE9351

07/01/2013 07/01/2014 X

WC STATUTORY LIMITS

E.L. EACH ACCIDENT

OTHER $ 1,000,000

E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000

13EOSE20001 13EOSE20001 24204154

E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 04/18/2013 04/18/2014 $1,000,000 Each Claim 04/18/2013 04/18/2014 $1,000,000 Aggregate 07/01/2013 07/01/2014 $1,000,000

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required)

ENERCON Project #PHI2022, Villas at Pine Lake, 4656 Rockbridge Road, Pine Lake, GA Georgia Housing Finance Authority, Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta are included as Additional Insureds as per written contract with respects to the Auto Liability, General Liability and professional liability policies described above and subject to provisions and limitations of the policy. Excess follows forms. CERTIFICATE HOLDER

CANCELLATION

Georgia Housing Finance Authority and Georgia Department of Community Affairs 60 Executive Park South Atlanta, GA 30329

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

© 1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2010/05)

1 of 1 #S2237148/M2161881

The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

NXJ


APPENDIX M LETTERS OF REFERENCE


2177 Youngman Avenue, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55116 P 763-656-4500 F 763-656-4440 oakgrovecap.com

April 14, 2014 To Whom It May Concern, I am very pleased to write this recommendation on behalf of Enercon Services, Inc. Oak Grove frequently engages Enercon Services, Inc. to provide environmental and property condition reports for our Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and HUD loan applications. I have personally worked with Jeff Watson and his firm on multiple report assignments over the past 8+ years and found their analyses to be comprehensive and meeting mortgage program guidelines. Jeffâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s availability, attention to detail, and ability to meet required deadlines is exemplary. Enerconâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s reports are specific and extremely reliable, and their staff is readily available to respond to our questions throughout the process. Currently, Enercon is an instrumental contributor on the refinance of two seniors housing transactions that entailed the completion of Phase I, Phase II and Property Condition Reports. The projects are located adjacent to a site containing recognized environmental conditions, and Jeffâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s team has provided detailed analyses to mitigate any concerns related to the RECs, to ensure that the projects will be refinanced via the HUD LEAN mortgage program. The example above is but one of many successful partnerships we have enjoyed with Enercon. Consequently, I would highly recommend the firm. Sincerely, Peter Edeburn Peter Edeburn Senior Vice President


APPENDIX N ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION


ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION The undersigned being first duly sworn on oath do certify to the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA)/Georgia Housing and Finance Authority (GHFA) that the statements contained in this certification are true and correct. The undersigned also acknowledge that deviations from the requirements contained in the certification and checklist could result in scoring deductions (Page, Section and/or Appendix numbers must be included for each item). The Villas at Pine Lake

Project Name: Project Location:

4656 Rockbridge Road, Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083 Page/Sec./App.

1. The Phase I Report for the above referenced project has been prepared according to the applicable DCA required format. 2. The Phase I Report and/or update was performed under the supervision of an "Environmental Professional" as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 312.10(b) (hereinafter referred to as an Environmental Professional). Résumés describing the qualifications of all personnel involved with the Phase I environmental site assessment must be included.

2.2

2&H

3. The Environmental Professional is not affiliated with the Owner/developer or a buyer or seller of the project. 4. The Phase I Report and/or update was prepared less than 180 days prior to Application submission and within 30 days of the site reconnaissance. In addition, the date of the Report appears on the cover page of the Report.

Cover & 5.0

5. The Georgia Housing and Finance Authority and DCA have the right to rely upon the Phase I and/or Phase II Report prepared for the property in the same way as the Owner, client and any other authorized users of the Report(s).

2.6

6. The Phase I Report was prepared in accordance with the applicable ASTM and DCA standards. 7. The Environmental Professional employed by the consulting firm has supervised the performance of the Phase I, reviewed, signed and stamped both the Phase I and Phase II Reports (if applicable) and any amendments, addenda and updates thereto. 8. The Environmental Professional has included a comprehensive historical review of the subject property back to 1940 or the property’s first developed use, whichever is earlier.

2.6

2.2

2

C

9. The Phase I includes the professional opinion of the Environmental Professional as to any potential environmental risks and as to any recognized environmental conditions identified during the comprehensive historical review.

I

10. The Environmental Professional has: * Commercial General Liability insurance, total combined single limits of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 in the aggregate;

L

* Professional Errors and Omissions Insurance with limits of $2,000,000.00 each claim and $2,000,000.00 in the aggregate with coverage extended to include third party liability for death, bodily injury, diminution of value of property and property damage.

L

* Pollution Liability Insurance with limits of $2,000,000.00 each claim and $2,000,000.00 in the aggregate.

L

2014 Environmental Certification

DCA HFDD

1


The Villas at Pine Lake

Project Name: Project Location:

4656 Rockbridge Road, Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083 Page/Sec./App.

11. The Georgia Housing and Finance Authority and DCA have been named as 1) additional insureds and 2) certificate holders on the Accord 25 form (the required insurance certificate) for the commercial liability insurance policy.

L

12. A 30 day cancellation period is included on the insurance certificate.

L

13. The Owner Environmental Questionnaire & Disclosure Statement has been completed by the current Owner of the property and included in the Phase I Report.

J

14. The completed Phase I Documentation: DCA Property Log and Information Checklist has been completed by the Environmental Professional and included in the Phase I Report. 15. If required, the HOME and HUD Environmental Questionnaire is completed and included in the Phase I Report (includes projects applying for HOME funds and projects with other HUD funding sources listed, including PBRA). 16. If, in accordance with Section II.B.5.b. of the DCA standards, a noise assessment is required, then the Report includes a noise assessment which was completed in accordance with the HUD Noise Assessment Guidelines (“NAG”) and 24 C.F.R § 51.100 et seq . (applies to all projects, whether or not HUD funds are included in the financial structure).

K

R

5.4 & F

17. In cases of elevated noise levels, the Report includes a noise attentuation plan completed in accordance with the HUD Noise Assessment Guidelines (“NAG”) and 24 C.F.R § 51.100 et seq . (applies to all projects, whether or not HUD funds are included in the financial structure).

F

18. The Environmental Consultant Signature Page has been signed by the Environmental Professional, the Principal of the Consultant, and the Professional Engineer or Professional Geologist and has been stamped by the Professional Engineer or Professional Geologist. The Environmental Consultant Signature Page is included in the Phase I Report and/or Phase II Report.

2

Applicant Signature

Date

Environmental Professional Signature & Stamp

Date

2014 Environmental Certification

DCA HFDD

2


APPENDIX O CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT ON WATER QUALITY


Why are There Contaminants in Drinking Water? As water travels over the land surface or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and radioactive material and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animal or human activity. Drinking water originates from surface water (rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, or reservoirs) and groundwater (springs and wells). Bottled waters are generally from springs, wells, and public water systems. DeKalb County gets all of its water from a surface water source, the Chattahoochee River. In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the EPA and the EPD promulgate regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water supplied by public water systems. The Food and Drug Administration regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water. In cases where contaminants cannot be readily measured, the EPA sets treatment techniques proven to reduce the amounts of contaminants to acceptable levels. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of contaminants. The presence of these contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk.

More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791.

Lead Notice Elevated levels of lead in drinking water can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with water service lines and building plumbing. The Department of Watershed Management is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in building plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for at least 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using the water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791 or at http://epa.gov/safewater/lead.

Drinking Water Quality Report

Fats, Oils and Greases (FOG) The Department of Watershed Management (DWM) crews are in your neighborhood working every day to keep the county’s sewers clean. Help us fight future sewer backups in your neighborhood by following these simple steps:

TM

1

Always pour or scrape cooled grease into a disposable container and discard into your garbage. Never pour oils or grease down the drain or toilet.

2

Soak up remaining oils and grease on surfaces, plates, pots, pans and utensils with a paper towel and throw into your garbage.

3

Before you wash dishes, scrape food scraps, fats, oils and grease into your garbage or compost. Remember, fats include dairy and meats.

4

Use sink strainers to catch any remaining food waste while washing dishes.

For more information on how to prevent water pollution or save water in your home, visit the DWM website: www.dekalbwatershed.com.

Join us for DeKalb County Board of Commissioners Meetings – Regular Meetings second & fourth Tuesdays (broadcast live on Channel 23) @ 9 am. – Committee meetings first & third Tuesdays.

Watch the Board of Commissioners Regular Meeting Re-Broadcast – Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday 9 am & 7 pm.

Copies of this Report To obtain a copy of this report, please visit our website: www.dekalbwatershed.com Para obtener una copia de este reporte en Español, por favor visite: www.dekalbwatershed.com

Important Phone Numbers

Billing/Water Cutoff (8:30 am – 5 pm) 404 - 378 - 4475 Emergency Repair – 24 hours 770 - 270 - 6243 Telecommunications Device for the Deaf 770 - 621 - 7237 Drinking Water Questions/Information 770 - 391 - 6047

Dear DeKalb County Water Customer: The DeKalb County water system continues to meet all of the applicable Safe Drinking Water standards, providing safe and reliable potable water for the people who live, work and play in DeKalb County. I want to thank the Department of Watershed Management for its unyielding commitment to enhancing public health and protecting our environment. In addition, I want to thank our DeKalb businesses and residents for being good stewards of our local waterways, and championing water conservation and pollution prevention programs to preserve our water supply for future generations of DeKalb residents. Our ongoing water quality conservation and pollution prevention efforts play an integral role in defining DeKalb County as the Greenest Urban County in America. DeKalb County was recently recognized with two safety awards presented to the Scott Candler Water Treatment Plant and the Snapfinger Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Scott Candler Water Treatment Plant was awarded the 2012 Georgia Association of Water Professionals Safety Award. This competitive award was the culmination of the superb effort by the facility staff to ensure a safe work environment for all the staff, contractors and visitors. The 2012 WEF Burke Safety Award was presented to the Snapfinger Wastewater Treatment Plant. This award recognizes a municipal or industrial wastewater facility for establishing and maintaining an active and effective safety program. The Board of Commissioners approved a five-year Watershed Capital Improvement Program with more than $1.3 billion in investments in our water and wastewater systems. Several of these projects are underway throughout the county including the Snapfinger Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Phase I Project, Chattahoochee Raw Water Pumping Station Demolition Project, North Shallowford Road Booster Pump Station Project, and the Pole Bridge Creek AWTP Electrical Project. These projects are all included in the ONE DeKalb Works initiative that leverages public spending to put DeKalb citizens back to work. Through public-private partnerships, ONE DeKalb Works also enables the county to create jobs, build hope and address the aging water and sewer lines in our county.   This year’s annual drinking water report highlights the essential partnerships DeKalb County has cultivated with federal and state environmental protection agencies, our businesses and residents in protecting our water resources, and I am proud of the work we continue to do to ensure a sustainable future for all DeKalb County stakeholders. Sincerely,

Burrell Ellis CEO, DeKalb County

2013

DeKalb County


The Consumer Confidence Report DeKalb County Department of Watershed Management provides its customers with high quality, safe drinking water that surpasses the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) requirements. DeKalb County has consistently produced superior quality drinking water. This 2013 Drinking Water Quality Report, also referred to as a Consumer Confidence Report (CCR), provides a detailed account of all the monitoring data gathered from water quality testing during 2012. We are proud to provide the enclosed information. For questions about this report and the quality of DeKalb County drinking water, please call Jody Shoemaker (Senior Chemist, Scott Candler Water Treatment Plant) at 770391-6047 or visit our website at www.dekalbwatershed.com. Public participation in decisions that may affect the quality of drinking water is encouraged and welcomed. The public is invited to attend DeKalb County Board of Commissioners meetings (the schedule is listed on the back of this report). For more information about DeKalb County, please visit the County’s website at www.dekalbcountyga.gov.

The Purpose of this Report The U.S. Congress revised the Safe Drinking Act in 1996, requiring public water systems to send annual CCRs to all of their customers. The DeKalb County Department of Watershed Management supports this effort and is proud to present this CCR. This report is in compliance with the EPA’s National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. Information on these regulations is available on the EPA’s drinking water website at www.epa.gov/safewater, or from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791.

The Source of DeKalb’s Water DeKalb County’s water supply is located on the Chattahoochee River, which is located north of DeKalb County and upstream from the City of Atlanta. Water is treated at the Scott Candler Water Treatment Plant and then distributed to DeKalb County customers. DeKalb County and the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) have completed a source water assessment identifying potential sources of pollution to the Chattahoochee River, your drinking water source. The results of this assessment can be found on the ARC’s website at www.atlantaregional.com/swap or you can request information by mail from: Atlanta Regional Commission, Environmental Planning Division, 40 Courtland Street NE, Atlanta, GA 30303.

Understanding the Water Quality Data The table to the right lists all the regulated drinking water substances that were detected in the DeKalb County Water System during the 2012 calendar year. The presence of these substances in the water does not indicate that the water poses a health risk. In addition to the parameters listed, your drinking water was also tested regularly for other parameters, including approximately 128 organic chemicals and 25 inorganic chemicals. DeKalb County also conducts 457 daily production control tests, 365 days a year.

DeKalb County 2012 Water Quality Data

Understanding the Terms in this Table AL Action Level: The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow. BDL Below Detection Limit. MCL Maximum Contaminant Level: The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best treatment available. MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal: The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety. MRDL Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level: The highest level of a disinfectant (such as chlorine) allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbiological contaminants. MRDLG Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal: The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants. NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Units: Measurement of turbidity. ppm Parts per million: One part per million is equivalent to one minute in two years or one penny in 10 thousand dollars. ppb Parts per billion: One part per billion is equivalent to one minute in 2,000 years or one penny in 10 million dollars. P/A Presence/Absence: Presence/Absence of total coliform; absence of less than 1 colony forming unit per 100 milliliters of drinking water. TT Treatment Technique: A required process that is intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. Other N/A – not applicable; < - less than; ≥ - greater than or equal to.

Regulated Chemicals Tested and Detected DeKalb County Water Chemical

Units Result a

Fluoride Nitrate (as Nitrogen) Chlorine Total Chloramines Total Trihalomethanes (THMs) Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)

ppm ppm ppm ppm ppb ppb

Range of Detections

Highest Level Allowed (MCL)

Ideal Goals (MCLG)

Violation NO NO NO NO NO NO

Chemical

0.2 to 1.1 4.0 4.0 0.6 0.4 to 0.8 10 10 0.6 1.05 to 1.87 MRDL = 4 MRDL = 4 1.54 BDL to 0.09 MRDL = 4 MRDL = 4 <0.04 17 to 59 N/A 80 32 5 to 11 N/A 60 8 2012 Copper and Lead Test Results from Consumer’s Tap DeKalb County Water Highest Level Units 90th Percentile Number of Sites Exceeding AL Range of Detections Allowed (MCL) Ideal Goals (MCLG)

Copper Lead

ppm 0.0 ppb 2.5

NO NO

0 to 0.025 0 0 to 22 1 Other Regulated Parameters and Micro-oganisms DeKalb County Water

Parameter

Units Results

Turbidity (NTU)

NTU

Total Organic carbon (TOC) Total Coliforms

a

AL= 1.3 Zero

AL = 1.3 AL = 15

Violation

Highest Level Allowed (MCL)

Ideal Goals (MCLG)

Violation

0.49 b 100.00%

N/A N/A

N/A N/A

NO NO

RR

1.13 d

1.00 to 1.43

N/A

NO

P/A

0.30% per month BDL to 1.22%

TT = 1NTU TT = percentage of readings <0.3 NTU TT = TOC removal ratio (RR) ≥1c Not more than 5% per month

Zero

NO

Microbial contaminants: includes viruses and bacteria, may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife. Inorganic contaminants: includes salts and metals, naturally occurring or from urban stormwater run-off, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil/gas production, mining, or farming. Pesticides and herbicides: may come from agriculture, urban stormwater run-off, and residential use. Organic chemicals: includes synthetic and volatile chemicals (by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production, and also from gas stations, urban stormwater run-off, and septic systems). Radioactive contaminants: naturally occurring or a result of oil/gas production and mining activities.

aValue

represents the annual average unless otherwise noted.

bValue

Range of Detections

What May be Present in Drinking Water Before it’s Treated

This report includes data collected between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2012 by DeKalb County Watershed Management.

represents the highest level detected.

cTT requires a removal ratio (RR) of 1.0 or higher, calculated quarterly as a running annual average. d

Value represents the lowest removal ratio achieved.

Testing the Quality of Drinking Water Tap water is tested for various water quality parameters to ensure that the water is safe for people to drink. These parameters are selected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD). Testing for these water parameters is required by law. DeKalb County drinking water is tested as often as hourly, 24 hours a day, at the water treatment plant and five days a week throughout the water distribution system. DeKalb County tests its water in full compliance with requirements set by the EPA and the EPD. Tests are performed by, or under, the direct supervision of State-certified operators or laboratory analysts. One of the microorganisms of concern in surface waters is the protozoan, Cryptosporidium, which has never been detected in the DeKalb County drinking water system. The County is working hard to ensure that this protozoan never enters the drinking water system. Ingestion of this protozoan may cause symptoms that include diarrhea, nausea, and/or stomach cramps. DeKalb County regularly monitors your drinking water for Cryptosporidium.


APPENDIX P ENDANGERED SPECIES DOCUMENTATION


April 4, 2014 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 105 Westpark Dr., Suite D Athens, GA 30606 Telephone:706-613-9493 Attention: Ms. Robin Goodloe RE:

Threatened and Endangered Species Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, GA

Ms. Robin Goodloe: Enercon Services, Inc. is in the process of completing an environmental site assessment at the referenced property as part of the Due Diligence and proposed loan requirements for the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA). Therefore, we are asking your office if any threatened and/or endangered species will be impacted by the proposed activities at this property. I have attached a list of threatened and endangered species in Cobb County and in Georgia for your reference. The property is approximately 5.54 acres and is located on the north side of Rockbridge Road between Spruce Drive and Aberdeen Drive in Pine Lake, Georgia. The site is approximately 0.50 miles southeast of downtown Pine Lake. The subject property is bordered by the following: North South East West

- Single-family residences - Commercial development - Single-family residences - Single-family residences

An intermittent creek traverses the center portion of the property. The site has historically consisted of wooded land with some residential development on the southwest and eastern portions of the property. Some of the previous residences on the eastern side of the property were reportedly demolished in the 1970’s. However two single family residences still remain, one located on the southeast side of the property and one on the northeastern side of the property. The existing residences are to be demolished and the wooded area to be cleared to make way for a senior living facility. Two previous inquiries for a portion of this property (eastern half only) were submitted to the USFWS. Copies of these letters are included in this request. An aerial photograph and a copy of the “Stone Mountain, GA” 7.5-minute topographic map (dated 1997) showing the property location are also attached for your reference.


Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this request. My telephone number is 770590-2130 and email address is wnparker@enercon.com. We appreciate your assistance in this matter and thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely,

Nathan Parker Project Geologist

Attachments:

Prior “Threatened & Endangered Species, Wetland” Letters stamped by the USFWS Figure 1 – Aerial Photograph Figure 2 – Topographic Map


Subject Property

Legend: Approximate Property Boundary Map Date: 2011

Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

N

Figure 1 Aerial Map Project No: PHI2022


Subject Property

Map Date: 1997

Proposed Villas at Pine Lake 4656 Rockbridge Road Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia 30083

N

Figure 2 Topographic Map Not to scale

Project No: PHI2022


APPENDIX Q SHPO REVIEW DOCUMENTATION


APPENDIX R ADDITIONAL HOME REQUIREMENTS


HOME and HUD Environmental Questionnaire


HOME and HUD ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE Instructions: The following questionnaire must be completed and included as part of the Phase I Report at Application Submission for HOME/HUD funded Projects, including but not limited to PBRA and NSP. All appropriate documentation, including the Owner Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement, should be used in completing the questionnaire. Part A of this form should be completed by the Applicant, while Part B of this form should be completed by the Environmental Professional and Part C should be completed jointly by the Applicant and the Environmental Professional. Please note that, if this project is funded, the completion of this Questionnaire facilitates DCA’s ability to quickly complete the Request for the Release of Funds Process, which must be submitted to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for approval before DCA can release the HOME funds (See 2014 Qualified Allocation Plan, Threshold Criteria, Section 6, Subsection C (3)). The Comments and Source Documentation categories should be used to detail review findings and list the sources of such findings. Source documentation should clearly list the name of the reference document and the corresponding page number where the information can be located. N/A is not an acceptable response for Part C questions. Tabbing of reference materials is strongly encouraged to expedite the review. Incomplete questionnaires may result in significant delays in the Request for the Release of Funds.

PART A—TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT Project Name: __The Villas at Pine Lake___________________ Project Location Address: ___4656 Rockbridge Road__________________________ City: ______Pine Lake______, County: _DeKalb_______, State: GA_____ Zip: _30072-8320____ Contact person: __Marvin Wilmoth___ Telephone number:__917-331-0136 ______ Estimated Project Costs (from Application): __$14,571,000_______________________________________ Has the project completed a federal environmental review and received a clearance (i.e. 4128)? X_NO__ If so, who performed the review? ____________________________________________________________________ *Make sure to attach it to this document Project site is in a location described as (check all that applies): Central city Suburban Infill urban development New construction Other_______________

_____ __X___ _____ _____

Rehabilitation In developing rural area In undeveloped area

_____ _____ _____

Project Description-should provide location specific information and geographic boundaries, as well as a delineation of all activities included in the overall scope of the project. Also include funding sources. The Villas at Pine Lake is located at 4656 Rockbridge Road, Pine Lake, GA 30072-8320 being all of parcel 18 040 01 016 and consisting of 5.5337 acres. The Villas at Pine Lake is a proposed 96 unit apartment community designed to offer affordable housing to working families in Pine Lake, GA. This development will be the centerpiece of The City of Pine Lake’s 2011 statutory redevelopment plan for downtown revitalization. Development of The Villas at Pine Lake has strong support from the City of Pine Lake and the Housing Authority of DeKalb County. In fact, the site was awarded supplemental funding from DeKalb County in previous years to support its development. The development will consist of 3 three story buildings with a community room for resident activities. The unit mix will be 19 one bedroom/one bath units, 51 two bedroom/two bath units and 26 three bedroom/two bath units. The community space will have an exercise room, computer room and multi2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 1 of 14


purpose/community room. The site will be professionally landscaped and have a gazebo/trellis for our residents. Each unit will have washer/dryer connections and there will also be a laundry room in the clubhouse for resident convenience. The site is located less than a mile from a grocery store, shopping, restaurants and other desirable amenities. This walkable community will be highly visible from Rockbridge Road which is the main thoroughfare. Funding sources for The Villas at Pine Lake include; Georgia Department of Community Affairs HOME Funds, Low Income Housing Tax Credits, and Permanent/Construction Loans.

Planning/Zoning (complete only if new construction) Yes (X )

No ( )

Is the project in compliance or conformance with the local zoning?

Comments: Source Documentation: If no or not applicable, please explain. If yes, provide the following documentation: Attach a zoning map with the project location(s) identified or a letter from the Local Unit of Government or Municipality

Water, Supply, Sanitary Sewers, and Solid Waste Disposal (complete only if new construction) Yes (X ) (X ) (X ) (NA )

No ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

(NA )

( )

Is the site served by an adequate and acceptable water supply Municipal Private sanitary sewers and waste water disposal systems Municipal Private trash collection and solid waste disposal Municipal Private If the water supply is non-municipal, has an acceptable “system” been approved by appropriate authorities and agencies? If the sanitary sewers and waste water disposal systems are non-municipal, has an acceptable “system” been approved by appropriate authorities and agencies?

Comments: The Water, Sewer and Trash are provided by DeKalb county. Source Documentation: Letters from appropriate authorities granting approval if a non-municipal water supply system, sanitary sewer and/or waste water disposal system will be used. Water / Sewer Service Verification Letter

Schools, Parks, Recreation, and Social Services (complete only if new construction) Yes (X ) (X ) (X )

No ( ) ( ) ( )

Will the local school system have the capability to service the potential school age children from the project? Are parks and play spaces available on site or nearby? Will social services be available on site or nearby for residents of the proposed project?

Comments: We believe there is adequate capacity to support the number of children in this development. Source Documentation: Provide approximate distances if the above services are not on the project site. **Does not apply to Senior projects. Rockbridge Elementary - 0.4 miles Pine Lake – 0.5 miles Emergency Health Care, Fire and Police Services (complete only if new construction) Yes ( X) (X ) (X )

No ( ) ( ) ( )

Are emergency health care providers located within reasonable proximity to the proposed project? Are police services located within reasonable proximity to the proposed project? Is fire fighting protection municipal volunteer adequate and equipped to service the project?

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 2 of 14


Comments: DeKalb Medical Center is the nearest Hospital. It is located at 2701 North Decatur Rd. and is approximately 5 Miles away. The projected response time is 12 minutes.

The Pine Lake Police Department is located at 459 Pine Drive which is approximately .4 miles away. The anticipated response time is approximately 1 minute.

DeKalb County Fire Station # 11 is located 6715 Memorial Dr, Stone Mountain, GA 30083 and is approximately 2.4 Miles away. The projected response time is approximately 5 Minutes.

Source Documentation: Provide approximate response times for the above listed services. Emergency Service Estimated DeKalb Medical Center (Ambulance) Pine Lake Police Department DeKalb County Fire Station # 11

Response Time 12 minutes 1 minute 5 Minutes

Source: http://maps.google.com Commercial/Retail and Transportation (complete only if new construction) Yes No (X ) ( ) Are commercial/retail shopping services nearby? Provide approximate distances ( X) ( ) Is the project accessible to employment, shopping and services by public transportation or private vehicle? Specify if whether it is public or private transportation. (X ) ( ) Is the project accessible to employment, shopping and services by public transportation or private vehicle? Specify if whether it is public or private transportation. (X ) ( ) Is adequate public transportation available from the project to these facilities? (X ) ( ) Are the approaches to the project convenient, safe and attractive?

Comments: The Rockbridge Plaza retail center is located on the southern side of Rockbridge Road, approximately 0.1 Miles from the proposed site. It has 8 tenants including: 1. Burlin Dental Associates 2. Graceview Church of Christ 3. Dean’s Convenience Store 4. St Vincent DePaul Thrift Store 5. American Deli and Wings 6. Sentry Dry Cleaners 7. The Melting Pot Beauty Salon 8. Caris Beauty Supply In addition to the Rockbridge Plaza, there are numerous other commercial enterprises within a one mile radius. These are documented on the attached site map. Public Transportation is accessible to the site via MARTA Buses 117 and 118. The aforementioned routes provide access to a variety of employment, shopping, and service opportunities. Source Documentation: Site Photograph Site Map MARTA System Map

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 3 of 14


Nuisances and Hazards (complete only if new construction) Will the project be affected by natural hazards: Yes ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

No (X (X (X (X

) ) ) )

Faults, fracture Wind/sand storm concerns Fire hazard materials Cliffs, bluffs, crevices

Yes ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

No (X ) (X ) (X ) ( )

( )

(X )

( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

(X ) (X ) ( X) (X ) (X ) (X ) ( X) (X ) ( )

( ( ( ( (

) ) ) ) )

(X ) ( X) (X ) (X ) ( )

Slope-failures from rains Poisonous plants, insects, animals Unprotected water bodies Hazardous terrain features

Will the project be affected by built hazards and nuisances: Yes ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

No (X ) ( X) (X ) (X ) (X ) (X ) (X )

( ) ( )

(X ) ( X)

Hazardous street Inadequate screened drainage catchments Dangerous intersection Hazards in vacant lots Through traffic Chemical tank-car terminals Inadequate separation of pedestrian / vehicle traffic Other hazardous chemical storage Childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s play areas located next to freeway or other high traffic way

High-pressure gas or liquid petroleum transmission lines on site Inadequate street lighting Overhead transmission lines Quarries or other excavations Hazardous cargo transportation routes Dumps/sanitary landfills or mining Oil or gas wells Railroad crossing Industrial operations Other (specify): ____________________________

Will the project be affected by any of the following nuisances: ( ( ( ( ( (

) ) ) ) ) )

( X) (X ) (X ) X ) (X ) ( X)

Gas, smoke, fumes Unsightly land uses Odors Front-lawn parking Vibration Abandoned vehicle

Glare from parking area Vermin infestation Vacant/boarded-up buildings Industrial nuisances Other (specify): ____________________________

Comments: We are not aware of the presence of any of the aforementioned nuisances or hazards Source Documentation: If yes, please attach photographs of the hazards or nuisances and an explanation any planned mitigation measures. N/A â&#x20AC;&#x201C; the site is not affected by any of the aforementioned nuisances or hazards. Newspaper Contact Information Name of local newspaper: The Champion Address: 114 New Street, Suite E City: Decatur,

State: GA, 30030

Telephone number: 404-373-7779

Fax number: N/A

Contact name for Classifieds/Legal/Public Notice: Jackie Bryant (404) 373-7779 Ext. 109 Contact email address for Classifieds/Public Notice: LegalAds@dekalbchamp.com OR www.thechampionnewspaper.com/classifieds

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 4 of 14


PART B—TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL Environmental Laws and Authorities Resource Guide Along with the 2014 Environmental Manual, the list that follows is to assist the Environmental Professional in the completion of this Questionnaire. HUD and HOME Environmental Questionnaire Guidance HUD website (www.hud.gov) HUD Handbook 1390.2 (available at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/hudclips/handbooks/cpdh/1390.2/index.cfm) Floodplain Management (24 CFR Part 55) Historic Preservation (36 CFR Part 800) Noise Abatement (24 CFR Part 51 Subpart B) Hazardous Operations (24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C) Airport Hazards (24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D) Protection of Wetlands and Floodplains (E.O. 11990 and E. O. 11988) Toxic Chemicals & Radioactive Materials (§50.3(i)) Other § 50.4 authorities – see HUD website (e.g., endangered species, farmlands protection, flood insurance, environmental justice)

Unique Natural Features and Areas Yes ( ) ( ) ( )

No (X) (X) (X)

Is the site near natural features (i.e., coastal bluffs, waterfalls or cliffs) or near public or private scenic areas? Are other natural resources visible on site or in vicinity? Will any such resources be adversely affected or will they adversely affect the project?

Comments: Based on field observations Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014 Site Suitability, Access, and Compatibility with Surrounding Development Yes ( ) ( ) ( )

No (X) (X) (X)

Has the site been used as a dump, sanitary landfill or mine waste disposal area? Is there paved access to the site? If yes, please explain below Are there other unusual conditions on site? If yes, please explain below

Is there indication of: ( ( ( (

) ) ) )

(X) (X) (X) (X)

distressed vegetation oil/chemical spills waste material/containers abandoned machinery, cars, refrigerators

Yes

No

( ( ( (

) ) ) )

(X) (X) (X) (X)

soil staining, pools of liquid transformers, fill/vent pipes, pipelines drainage structures loose/empty drums, barrels

( ( ( ( ( ( (

) ) ) ) ) ) )

(X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X)

Heavy industry incinerators Power generating plants Cement plants Large parking facilities (1000 or more cars) Heavy traveled highway (6 or more lanes) Oil refineries Other (specify)_______________________

Will the project be unduly influenced by: ( ( ( ( ( ( (

) ) ) ) ) ) )

(X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X)

Building deterioration Transition of land uses Postponed maintenance Incompatible land uses Obsolete public facilities Inadequate off-street parking Are there air pollution generators nearby which would adversely affect the site

Comments: Based on field observations Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 5 of 14


Soil Stability, Erosion, and Drainage Slopes: Not Applicable ____ Yes ( ) (X) ( )

Steep ____

Moderate _X__

Slight ____

No (X) ( ) (X)

Is there evidence of slope erosion or unstable slope conditions on or near the site? Is there evidence of ground subsidence, high water table, or other unusual conditions on the site? Is there any visible evidence of soil problems (foundations cracking or settling, basement flooding, etc.) in the neighborhood of the site? ( ) ( ) Have soil studies or borings been made for the project site or the area? UNKNOWN ( ) (X) Do the soil studies or borings indicate marginal or unsatisfactory soil conditions? UNKNOWN (X) ( ) Is there indication of cross-lot runoff, swales, drainage flows on the property? ( ) (X) Are there visual indications of filled ground? If your answer is Yes, please attach a 79(g) report/analysis. ( ) (X) Are there active rills and gullies on site? ( ) (X) Is a soils report (other than structural) needed? ( ) ( ) Are structural borings or a dynamic soil analysis/geological study needed? Please note: The HUD Land-Planning Data Sheets (79g), Handbooks 4140.3 and 4145.1 should be used for grading, drainage and fill specifications. For more information about these procedures and forms please refer to HUD Handbook 4140.3 (Data Sheet 79G).

Comments: An intermittent stream traverses the center of the property traveling south to north. Additionally some vegetation clearing with an apparent bulldozer was observed on the southeast side of the property which appeared to have been performed in conjunction with a geotechnical study. The above answers are based on field observations and USDA Web Soil Survey of DeKalb County. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014 Wetland Protection Yes (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

No ( ) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X)

( )

(X)

Are there drainage ways, streams, rivers, or coastlines on or near the site? Please provide site map. Is the property located in a wetland? Is an incidental portion of the property within a wetland? Will disturbance of the wetland exceed 1/10th of one acre? Are there ponds, marshes, bogs, swamps or other wetlands on or near the site? Is the project located within a wetland designated on a National Wetlands Inventory map of the Department of the Interior (DOI)? Will proposed construction/landscaping activities disturb the wetland?

If your answer is “Yes” to any of the above listed questions, please attach the following: 1. Wetlands maps for the proposed site; 2. Statement from engineer or architect of record that the proposed construction and/or landscaping activities will not occupy or modify the wetland area; and 3. Documentation from Environmental Professional regarding direct and indirect impacts associated with constructing the project on or near a wetland and proposed mitigation strategies and/or alternative designs. In addition, if you answered “Yes” to the last question, please attach the following: 4. Required notices from the Wetlands Management Requirements (8 step process, see §55.20; not required to be submitted at pre-application, but must be submitted by September 30, 2014).

Comments: The above answers are based on field observations. A Jurisdiction Waters Survey was performed by Corblu Ecology Group, LLC. Corblu delineated a stream near the center of the site and found no other additional streams and found no wetlands on the property. Corblu sketch map of the stream located in Appendix U and Wetlands Map provided in Appendix A. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014 Coastal Barrier Resources Yes ( )

No (X)

( )

(X)

Is the project located within a coastal barrier designated on a current FEMA flood map or Department of Interior coastal barrier resources map? Is the project located within a coastal management zone (CZM)?

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 6 of 14


Georgia’s six coastal counties and five “inland tier” counties include: Chatham, Effingham, Bryan, Liberty, McIntosh, Long, Glynn, Wayne, Brantley, Camden and Charlton counties.

Comments: The property is located in DeKalb County which is not considered a coastal county. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014 Historic Preservation Yes (X) (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

No ( ) ( ) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X)

Has the SHPO been notified of the project and requested to provide comments? Is the subject property/project structure more than 50 years old? Does the Application currently include Historic Tax Credits? Will Historic Tax Credits be applied for? Is the property listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places? Is the property located within or directly adjacent to an historic district? Does the property’s area of potential effects include an historic district or property? If the proposed properties are affected, have you contracted with a Preservation Professional? Has the SHPO been or is being advised of HUD’s finding? Is the project located in any of the following counties: Burke, Chatham, Effingham, Richmond and Screven? If so, Catawba Indian Nation must be consulted as required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act projects.

If your answer is “Yes” to any of the above questions, consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and comply with 36 CFR Part 800. Review DCA’s Environmental Manual for further instructions and provide the following at Application Submission by attaching to this Questionnaire: 1. Documentation from the local SHPO office to determine eligibility. (This may include evidence of the 106 process completion, or any other information pertinent to the property development.); 2. If it is determined that the proposed project will affect historic properties, you must employ a qualified professional or contract with a qualified professional(s) such as a Preservation Professional. Please provide the qualified professional’s documentation. 3. Documentation from the local SHPO office and Preservation Professional that the proposed project development and work scope meets the requirements of the National Register of Historic Places; and 4. A statement from the architect or Preservation Professional of record regarding direct or indirect impacts associated with the property development on the neighborhood and existing buildings, giving the proposed mitigation and or alternatives. 5. Documentation from the local SHPO office and Preservation Professional that the Georgia Historic Preservation Division Environmental Review Form has been submitted. 6. As part of the supporting documentation to DCA, please include the following: Detail site location map of the area in which the development is to occur, one photo of each structure and/or site (house, building, etc.) to be impacted and information on the age of any structures located on the site.

Comments: Based on the information obtained from the GNAHRGIS search, the subject property is not listed on the database. A north adjoining property (a single-family residence located at 445 Aberdeen Drive, Resource ID#19255) was identified in the NAHRGIS database as possibly meeting the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places due to its reported date of construction (1916) and architectural style. It should be noted that the GA HPD was consulted in 2010 as part of a proposed development on the eastern portion of the subject property which only included 3 acres of the current subject property. The GA HPD assigned the proposed development project number HP-100630-015. According to the 2010 letter received from the GA HPD, there are no historic properties or archaeological resources that are listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places which will be affected by the proposed activities at the subject property. The letter stated that any changes to this project would require further review. Since the proposed development now includes the entire 5.5 acres and a structure that is over 50 years old, the GA HPD was consulted and asked to provide comments regarding the proposed demolition of the subject property buildings. An Environmental Review Form for the subject property along with supporting documentation was submitted to the GA HPD for review. The GA HPD has a 30-day review and comment period and a response has not been received as of the date of this report. ENERCON will issue an addendum to this report upon receiving information from the GA HPD. A copy of the 2010 Finding of No Historic Properties Affected Letter from the GA HPD is included in Appendix Q.

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 7 of 14


Tribal Directory Assessment Tool (TDAT) is a web based directory of federally-recognized tribes and their geographic areas of interest. ENERCON reviewed TDAT to identify tribes with a current or ancestral interest in DeKalb County. TDAT shows no federally-recognized tribes with an interest in the area. Supporting documentation from TDAT is located in Appendix Q. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014. SHPO documentation is included in Appendix Q. https://www.gnahrgis.org/gnahrgis/main.do and http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/research/ Floodplain Management Yes ( ) ( )

No (X) (X)

Is an incidental portion of the property within a floodplain? Is the project located within a floodplain designated on a current FEMA flood map? Identify FEMA flood map used to make this finding:

( )

(X)

DeKalb County, Georgia and Incorporated Areas_

Community Name and Number:

DeKalb County, Georgia and Incorporated Areas _

Map Panel Number:

__13089C0087 J____________________________________

Date of Map Panel: __May 16, 2013_______________________________ Will the proposed construction/landscaping activities occupy or modify the floodplain?

If your answer is “Yes” to any of above questions, please attach documentation below to Questionnaire: 1. Floodplain maps for the proposed site; 2. Statement from the engineer or architect of record that proposed construction and/or landscaping activities will not occupy or modify the floodplain; 3. A conditional LOMA or LOMR if it has been provided by FEMA; and 4. Documentation from Environmental Professional regarding direct and indirect impacts associated with constructing the project on or near a floodplain and proposed mitigation strategies and/or alternative designs. In addition, if you answered “Yes” to the last question, please attach the following: 5. Required notices from the Flood Plain Management Requirements (8 step process, see 42 C.F.R. § 55.20) (not required to be submitted at pre-application, but must be submitted by September 30, 2014).

Comments: The answers above are based on the FEMA Map referenced above. Source Documentation: FEMA Map is included in Appendix A. Flood Insurance Yes ( )

No (X)

Is the building located or to be located within a Special Flood Hazard Area identified on a current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)? If your answer is “Yes”, flood insurance protection is required for buildings located or to be located within a Special Flood Hazard Area as a condition of approval of the project. In addition, compliance with § 55.12 and the floodplain management decision-making process (§ 55.20) is required (refer to floodplain management section above). Document the map used to determine Special Flood Hazard Area in above item #17 pertaining to community name and number, map panel number and date of map panel.

Comments: The answers above are based on the FEMA Map referenced above. Source Documentation: FEMA Map is included in Appendix A. Endangered Species Yes No (X) ( ) Has the Department of Interior List of Endangered Species and Critical Habitats been reviewed? ( ) (X) Is the project likely to affect any listed or proposed endangered or threatened species or critical habitats? If your answer is “Yes” to the second question, compliance is required with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, which mandates consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service in order to preserve the species.

Comments: A list of state and federal endangered species for DeKalb County was reviewed online through the US Fish and Wildlife Services website and Georgia Natural Resources website. No endangered species habitats were listed on the subject property. No evidence of endangered species or their habitats was observed on the subject property during site reconnaissance. It should be noted that the USF&WS was consulted in 2010 and 2012 as part of a proposed development on the eastern portion of the subject property which only included 3 acres of the current subject property. According to correspondence received from the 2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 8 of 14


USF&WS on July 16, 2010 and May 31, 2012, federally listed species are not likely to occur on the project site. As the subject property includes additional acreage, the USF&WS was contacted again for consultation. A response has not been received as of the date of this report. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014. A copy of the most recent letter submitted to the USF&WS, along with a copy of the correspondence received from the USF&WS in 2010 and 2012 is included in Appendix P. Endangered Species letter is included in Appendix P. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/index.html and http://www.georgiawildlife.com/node/2722

Wild and Scenic Rivers/Unique Natural Features and Areas Yes (X) ( ) ( )

No ( ) (X) (X)

( )

(X)

Is the project new construction? If so please answer the following questions. Is the site near natural features (i.e., bluffs or cliffs) or public or private scenic areas? Are other natural resources visible on site or in vicinity? Will any such resources be adversely affected or will they adversely affect the project? Is the project site located within one mile of the Chattooga Wild and Scenic River? If so, please provide a map clearly delineating both the project site and the Wild and Scenic River.

Comments: Based on field observations Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014. Clean Air Act Yes No (X) ( ) Is the project located in the Atlanta Metropolitan area or one of the below listed counties? (X) ( ) Is the project in compliance with the air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP)? If the answer is â&#x20AC;&#x153;Yesâ&#x20AC;?, please verify whether the project in compliance with the air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP). (Metro Atlanta (including Barrow, Bartow, Carrol, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Heard, Henry, Newton, Paulding, Putnam, Rockdale, Spalding, Walton), Macon (Bibb, Monroe), Others Catoosa, Walker, Floyd)

Comments: The property is located in DeKalb County in a nonattainment area for all pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014. Farmlands Protection Yes No ( ) (X) question. ( ) (X)

Is the project new construction including acquisition of undeveloped land? If so, please answer the following Is the site or the area where the site is located presently being farmed?

Comments: The site location is not currently being farmed. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014. A copy of the USDA Web soil survey is included in Appendix A. Environmental Justice Yes (X)

No ( )

(X) ( )

( ) (X)

( )

(X)

Does project require any mitigation plans or measures to be taken? If so please list below. Mitigation measures could include excessive noise, any abatement, toxic conditions etc. Is the project new construction? If so please answer the following questions. Is the project located in a predominantly minority and low-income neighborhood? If so, please provide narrative in supporting documentation. Is there an adverse environmental impact caused by the proposed action, or is the proposed action subject to adverse environmental impact?

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 9 of 14


Does the project site or neighborhood suffer from disproportionately adverse environmental effects on minority and low-income populations relative to the community at-large? If your answer is “Yes” to any of the above questions, compliance is required with E.O. 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice. Attach documentation to show that the environmental review considered mitigation or avoidance of adverse impacts from the project to the extent practicable. (See http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/energyenviron/environment/subjects/justice/index.cfm) ( )

(X)

Comments: The property consists primarily of undeveloped wooded land with two single-family residences located on the property. The site is to be cleared for new development. A Noise Mitigation Plan was prepared by Harry Walls Environmental Consulting (HWEC) in order to reduce the DNL inside the proposed structures to below 45 DNL. The HWEC assessment concluded that since no outdoor use areas Source Documentation: Based on field observations and information from the client. Noise Abatement Yes (X)

No ( )

Is the project within 1000 feet of a major road/highway/freeway (i.e. a roadway with an average daily traffic count of 10,000 or greater)? ( ) (X) Is the project within 3000 feet of a railroad? ( ) (X) Is the project within 15 miles of a military airfield? ( ) (X) Is the project within 5 miles of a civil airport? (X) ( ) Is noise a problem on the site and/or is expected to be in the future? Noise is NAL#1: 69.4 dnl, NAL#2: 72.8 dnl, NAL#3: 64.6 dnl. If any of the above are checked “Yes”, please attach the following: 1. A noise assessment conforming to the HUD Noise Assessment Guidelines (NAG) and 24 C.F.R § 51.100 et seq. prepared by the Environmental Professional or other qualified engineering professional (for airports, use the adopted DNL contours). Please refer to the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Noise Guidebook, located at: http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/energyenviron/environment/resources/guidebooks/noise/index.cfm. 2. A noise attenuation plan produced by an engineering professional to describe the proposed mitigation to meet HUD sound guidelines. 3. Attach a map showing the project location and the locations of any relevant roads, railroads, or airports, along with their approximate distance from the project site; (2) If applicable, attach a copy of the Noise Assessment Guidelines worksheets.

Comments: In accordance with DCA requirements, an assessment of noise at the subject property was completed by Harry Walls Environmental Consulting (HWEC). According to the assessment, three noise assessment locations (NALs) were chosen to assess the subject property. The total day-night average sound level (DNL) at distances of 110 feet north of Rockbridge Road (NAL#1) and 65 feet north of Rockbridge Road (NAL#2) were found to exceed the noise regulations as indicated in The Noise Guidebook (greater than 65 DNL but below 75 DNL). The DNL for distances 230 feet north of Rockbridge Road (NAL#3) and beyond were found to be in compliance. To address the NALs that had DNLs greater than 65 DNL but below 75 DNL, HWEC completed a Noise Mitigation Plan using the HUD Sound Transmission Classification Assessment Tool (STraCAT) calculation for construction materials that would reduce the DNL inside the proposed structures to below 45 DNL. The HWEC assessment concluded that since no outdoor use areas were proposed closer to Rockbridge Road than the NAL#3 location and with the use of construction materials discussed in the Noise Mitigation Plan, the subject property would achieve HUD/DCA noise compliance (less than 45 DNL indoors and less than 65 in outdoor use areas). Based upon the documentation provided in the HWEC Noise Assessment/Mitigation Plan, ENERCON does not anticipate noise to be a significant concern for the proposed development. A copy of the Noise Assessment/Mitigation Survey prepared by HWEC is included in Appendix F. Source Documentation: (attach NAG worksheets) ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014. Noise assessment and mitigation plan and map are provided in Appendix F. Explosive and Flammable/Hazardous Industrial Operations Yes ( )

No (X)

Are industrial facilities handling explosive or fire-prone materials such as liquid propane, gasoline or other storage tanks adjacent to or visible from the project site?

(attach ASD worksheets) If your answer is “Yes”, use the HUD Hazards Guide and comply with 24 CFR Part 51, Subpart C (www.hudclips.org). (Is this a duplicate of below Source Documentation?) 2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 10 of 14


Comments: Based on field observations. Source Documentation: If your answer is YES, use HUD Hazards Guide and comply with 24 CFR Part 51, Subpart C and attach Acceptable Separation Distance worksheets from the HUD Hazards Guide. ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014. Hazards and Toxic Chemicals Yes ( )

No (X)

Are industrial facilities handling explosive or fire-prone materials such as liquid propane, gasoline, or other storage tanks visible from or near the project site? ( ) (X) Is the project located near a dump or landfill site? ( ) (X) Is the project near an industry disposing of chemicals or hazardous wastes? ( ) (X) Are there issues that require a special/specific Phase II report before completing the environmental assessment? ( ) (X) Is site listed on an EPA Superfund National Priorities, CERCLA, or equivalent State list? ( ) (X) Is the site located within 3,000 feet of a toxic or solid waste landfill site? ( ) (X) Does the site have an underground storage tank? ( ) (X) Are there any unresolved concerns that could lead to HUD being determined to be a Potential Responsible Party (PRP)? If your answer is “Yes” to any of the above questions, use current techniques by qualified professionals to undertake investigations determined necessary and comply with § 50.3(i). Attach Phase I (ASTM) Report) Documentation from the Environmental Professional, including any applicable mitigation measures, that the project will be located at an acceptable distance from the hazardous site.

Comments: Based on field observations and EDR report. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014. Airport Hazards Yes No ( ) (X) Is the project within 3,000 feet from the end of a runway at a civil airport? ( ) (X) Is the project within 2-1/2 miles from the end of a runway at a military airfield? If your answer is “Yes” to either of the above questions, comply with 24 CFR Part 51, Subpart D.

Comments: Based on field observations. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014. Vapor Intrusion Yes No ( ) (X) Has a Tier I vapor intrusion assessment (VIA) revealed a vapor intrusion condition exists that may present an unacceptable health risk to occupants? If your answer is yes, then additional assessment must be performed according to ASTM E 2600-08 standards.

For more guidance, please refer to ASTM E 2600. Comments: Based on field observations. Source Documentation: ENERCON Phase I ESA dated April 21, 2014.

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 11 of 14


PART C—TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT & ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL COMPLETE ONLY IF PROJECT IS NEW CONSTRUCTION Please answer the below questions. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Alternatives and Project Modifications Considered: Identify other reasonable courses of action that were considered and not selected, such as other sites, design modifications, or other uses of the subject site. Describe the benefits and adverse impacts to the human environment of each alternative and the reasons for rejecting it.

DCA is not looking for actual specific site locations but alternatives and/or project modifications considered, for example, closer to desirables or public transportation. Examples of project modifications may include smaller/larger density, zoning and high rise vs. garden style. A preliminary site plan with two four story buildings was considered. However, this plan was rejected because it placed impervious structures within the 50 feet of the DCA stream buffer located in the central portion of the site.

No Action Alternative: Discuss the benefits and adverse impacts to the human environment of not implementing the preferred alternative.

Discuss why the project site you chose benefits the human environment or discuss alternative would have been is a less desirable location or presented issues like minority concentration. In cases, where an alternative does not apply, list why. The project will have several key benefits for the human environment: • The Villas at Pine Lake will provide working families an affordable opportunity to remain in their existing community in units designed to meet the needs of family households. • The development will attract new households to the City of Pine Lake. • The adopted plan preserves the quality of the environmentally sensitive stream buffers areas. • The adopted plan minimizes noise from Rockbridge Road. • The adopted plan maximizes the open/ natural green space offering pleasant views. .

Mitigation Measures Recommended: Are there feasible ways in which the proposal or its external factors should be modified in order to minimize adverse environmental impacts and restore or enhance environmental quality?

The project proposal incorporates sustainable design into its architecture, site plan, and construction. The project is designed to meet the standards of the NGBS program and will seek formal NGBS certification. Accordingly, there are no recommended modifications to the project as it is currently designed.

Additional Studies Performed: Please identify any additional studies or work performed.

Discuss all mitigation taken or recommended by Environmental professional and your Architect. Additional Studies Performed Ex. Phase II reports

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 12 of 14


ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL: I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the above statements and facts submitted are true, accurate and complete. Signed, sealed and delivered this ___day of _______________, 2014, in the Presence of:

By: Witness

Environmental Professional

Notary Public

Name

My commission Expires on: (Notary Seal)

2014 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire

DCA HFDD

Page 14 of 14


HOME and HUD Questionnaire Supporting Documentation


Proposed Development Map/Rendering


"W 59 6' ' ° 1 00 39 31. N 84° 36' 06 "W 312.71'

PRIVACY WALL

ROCKBRIDG E ROAD 12' DRIVE AIS LE

15

18

9

2

ROCKBRIDG E 7'-6" SUPPLEM ROAD 10' CLEAR SID ENTAL ZONE 15' LANDSC EWALK APE ZONE

5' BIKE LAN E

N 84° 36' 06 "W 80.72'

ABERD EEN DR IVE

10 10

S 8° 46 ' 37" W 433.77'

10 S 8° 46 ' 37" W 110.00'

FIRST F LOOR: 980 FFE

BU BASEM ILDING 3 ENT: 96 9 FFE

38

FIRST F LOOR: 980 FFE

RETENTION

NK

AM BUFF ER

AM BUFF ER

STREA M BA

25' STRE

50' STRE

97 0'

COMMUNITY GREEN AREA

0' 98

N

97 0'

AREA

N 6° 01' 09" E 89.99'

6' LANDSC APE BUFF ER 20' SIDE SETBAC K ADJACE NT TO R1 AND R2 30' MAXI MU 30' FROM M HEIGHT PROPER TY LINE

NORTH

11 BUILDIN G2 BASEM ENT: 96 9 FFE

TRASH

6' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' SIDE SETBAC K ADJACENT TO R1 AND R2 30' MAXIMUM HEIG 30' FROM PROPER HT TY LINE

15

97 0'

FIRST FLO OR: 972' FF E

BUILDING 1

4 BUFFER

5 50' STREAM

970'

2 25' STREAM BUFFER

N 4° 22' 48" E 177.79'

24

STREAM BANK

LOCAL STREET WIT RESIDENTIAL TRE H ATMENT 7' LANDSCAPE ZON 6' CLEAR SIDEWA E LK 9' SUPPLEMEN TAL ZONE

S 81° 52 ' 57" E 293.37'

AMENITY 972' FFE

TOT LOT

LOCAL ST RESIDE REET WITH NT 9' SUPP IAL TREATMEN LE 6' CLEAR MENTAL ZONE T 7' LAND SIDEWALK SCAPE ZO NE

S 81° 52 ' 57" E 161.61'

POOL

10

' 980

SITE 5.54 acres 14

0'

1

30' 60'

Level 1 1" = 60'-0"

120'


8-Step Process for Floodplains and Wetlands


Not Applicable


APPENDIX S OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS


Not Applicable


APPENDIX T PREVIOUS REPORTS


PHASE II REPORT (By: ENERCON dated June 5, 2012)


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION

PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Involved Parties .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Scope of Work Completed .................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 GENERAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Adjacent Properties ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Site Description and Current Land Uses ............................................................................................................. 3 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ......................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Regional Physiographic Conditions .................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Soil Conditions ................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Conditions ............................................................................................................ 4 4.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Previously Completed Environmental Assessments ........................................................................................... 5 4.2 Regulatory Oversight .......................................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION ...................................................................................................................... 5 5.1 Pre-Drilling Site Inspection, Site Access, and Utility Clearance ........................................................................ 5 5.2 Drilling and Sampling ......................................................................................................................................... 5 5.3 Soil Boring Sampling Locations and Analytical Results .................................................................................... 6 5.4 Groundwater Sample Collection and Analysis ................................................................................................... 6 5.5 Boring Completion Activities, Site Restoration .................................................................................................. 7 6.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 8 6.1 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 6.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................... 8 7.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 8.0 PUBLISHED REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 10 APPENDIX A – Figures APPENDIX B – Tables APPENDIX C – Soil Boring Logs APPENDIX D – Laboratory Analytical Results APPENDIX E – Resumes


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences property (subject property) is located at 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive in Pine Lake, DeKalb County, Georgia. The purpose of this Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was to determine if a dry cleaners located on a south adjoining property has impacted soil and/or groundwater at the subject property. This investigation was performed as part of the clientâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s environmental due diligence process. All observations are current as of the dates the soil borings were installed at the subject property (May 22, 2012). Property modification, events, or information made available subsequent to this date are not addressed herein. 1.2 Involved Parties ENERCON was retained by Mercy Housing Southeast to perform a Limited Phase II ESA at the abovereferenced property. 1.3 Scope of Work Completed The scope of work conducted as part of this Limited Phase II ESA included evaluation of the potential for subsurface contamination at the subject property, through representative soil and groundwater sample analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by US EPA Method 8260B. Representative soil and groundwater samples were collected from each boring and analyzed for VOCs. The following provides a summary of the scope of work performed: 1. Preparation of a site specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP). 2. Installation of two soil borings on the subject property to depths of approximately 11 and 15 feet below ground surface (BGS).

The two borings located along the south property line, were

considered the area most likely to be impacted by a potential release from the adjoining dry cleaners. The soils from each boring were field screened visually and with a Mini RAE 2000 Photoionization Detector (PID) to determine the depth ranges with the highest PID readings for the collection of soil samples for laboratory analyses of VOCs. Upon completion of the soil boring, all boreholes were properly abandoned. 3. Collection of a groundwater samples from each of the two borings for laboratory analyses of VOCs.

Page 1


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

4. Transportation of the soil and groundwater samples was under strict chain-of-custody protocol to Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES), 3785 Presidential Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30340 for analysis. 5. Preparation of the Limited Phase II ESA report documenting the completed work and findings.

Note: The scope of this investigation was not intended to fully delineate the extent of any contamination identified in soil and/or groundwater.

Page 2


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

2.0 GENERAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS 2.1 Location The Subject Property consists of approximately 3.055 acres of a larger 5.54-acre parcel located on the north side of Rockbridge Road between Aberdeen Drive and Spruce Drive. The larger parcel is identified by DeKalb County Property Appraisal Number 18 040 01 016 and is addressed at 4656 Rockbridge Road in Pine Lake, County of DeKalb, State of Georgia. The subject property is located on the east side of this parcel and was previously identified by Property Appraisal Numbers 18-040-01-015 (4678 Rockbridge Road) and 18-040-01-071 (440 Aberdeen Drive) in Pine Lake, County of DeKalb, State of Georgia. A location map is provided in Appendix A. 2.2 Adjacent Properties The subject property is bordered to the north by a single-family residential development; to the east by Aberdeen Drive, followed by single-family residential development; to the south by Rockbridge Road, followed by Rockbridge Village Shopping Center; and to the west by an intermittent creek, followed by single-family residential development and Poplar Street. The subject property is located on the west side of the intersection of Rockbridge Road and Aberdeen Drive, approximately 0.50 miles southeast of downtown Pine Lake. 2.3 Site Description and Current Land Uses The subject property is approximately 3.055 and is a portion of the 5.54 acre parcel 18-040-01-016. The subject property consists primarily of undeveloped, densely wooded land. An unoccupied single-story, single-family residence is located on the northeast side of the site along Aberdeen Drive. A Site Plan is included in Appendix A.

Page 3


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3.1 Regional Physiographic Conditions According to U.S.G.S. 7.5-Minute Series Topographic Map, Stone Mountain, Georgia (Map Date: 1992), the surface elevation at the site is approximately 980 feet above mean sea level (MSL). A Topographic Map is provided in Appendix A. 3.2 Soil Conditions According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Web Soil Survey for DeKalb County, Georgia, the subject property soils are classified as Cecil sandy loam (2-6% slopes), Cecil-Urban land complex (2-10% slopes), Pacolet sandy loam (10-15% slopes), and Cartecay silt loam, frequently flooded.

The Cecil series consists of very deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils on ridges and side slopes of the Piedmont uplands. The Pacolet series consists of very deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in residuum weathered mostly from felsic igneous and metamorphic rocks of the Piedmont uplands. The soils along the western perimeter of the site in the area of the intermittent creek are classified as Cartecay soils. The Cartecay series consists of somewhat poorly drained, moderately rapidly permeable soils that formed in thick loamy alluvial sediments. Urban land is defined as areas where 85% or more of the surface is covered with buildings and pavement, or where the native soil has been excavated or mixed with imported soils. 3.3 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Conditions According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Groundwater Atlas of the United StatesSegment Six, the subject property lies within the Piedmont Physiographic Province and the underlying bedrock is classified as Lower Paleozoic and Precambrian granite gneiss and granite.

Bedrock is

estimated to be approximately 15 feet below ground surface, after encountering auger refusal at the same depth in SB-2.

Groundwater flow direction generally follows surface topography downgradient. There may also be underlying, confined aquifers with site-specific groundwater flow directions dependent on interconnectivity of aquifers and continuity of confining layers. Based upon the surface topography, ENERCON assumes that unconfined, surficial groundwater from the subject property flows west towards an intermittent creek which traverses the western perimeter of the site.

Page 4


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

4.0 BACKGROUND 4.1 Previously Completed Environmental Assessments ENERCON has previously completed a Phase I and Limited Phase II ESAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s for the subject property. The Phase I and Phase II site assessment reports were dated July 13, 2010. Both reports were reviewed prior to the completion of this report. The Phase I and Limited Phase II recommended no further investigation of environmental hazards for this area of the subject property. 4.2 Regulatory Oversight The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) Hazardous Site Response Act (HSRA) provides oversight when a regulated substance is discovered in the soil or groundwater. The EPD enforces the regulatory and remediation requirements set forth by the Hazardous Site Response rules 391-3-19 and the Official Code of Georgia Annotated 12-8-90.

5.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 5.1 Pre-Drilling Site Inspection, Site Access, and Utility Clearance Prior to initiating drilling activities, the Georgia Utilities Protection Center, Inc. was notified, in accordance with underground utility notification requirements. In addition, ENERCON conducted a site walk to evaluate the site for underground utility lines, underground structures, and to identify soil boring locations. Soil boring locations were marked based on visual observation, location of sources with the potential to contaminate the subsurface environment, and available topographic data (i.e. the downgradient direction). The soil borings were installed along the southern portion of the subject property. 5.2 Drilling and Sampling Prior to initiating drilling activities, a site specific HASP was prepared by ENERCON for the project. The HASP was reviewed and signed by all field personnel and maintained onsite during completion of field activities. Drilling and sampling equipment was properly decontaminated between sampling events by washing with Alconox detergent solution followed by rinsing with clean water. On May 22, 2012, boring operations were conducted by Geo Lab Inc. of Dacula, Georgia and supervised by ENERCON. Soil borings were advanced using a Geoprobe with 5-foot macro-core samplers to facilitate the collection of the soil samples for field screening, logging, and laboratory analyses. During drilling, collected soils were field screened with a PID over the full depth of the borings. Soil lithology was recorded in the

Page 5


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

field notebook. Soil and groundwater samples were collected in laboratory prepared containers and sent to AES for analysis. 5.3 Soil Boring Sampling Locations and Analytical Results On May 22, 2012, two soil borings were installed (SB-1 and SB-2). The soil borings were completed to depths of approximately 11 and 15 feet BGS to assess any impact to soils at the subject site. The soil borings were completed at various locations across the site to evaluate the potential for subsurface contamination at the subject property. A soil sample from each boring was collected in laboratory prepared containers and sent to AES Inc. for analysis. The soil samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B. A Site Plan showing the locations of the two soil borings is included in Appendix A. Table 1 included in Appendix B shows a summary of the sampling results. Soil boring logs showing the lithology of the soil borings are included in Appendix C. Copies of the laboratory analyses are included in Appendix D. Soil Boring SB-1 (Southwest corner of property near intermittent creek) The soil boring was advanced to approximately 11 feet BGS where bedrock was encountered. Groundwater was encountered in the boring at approximately 10 feet BGS. A soil sample was collected from approximately 5 feet BGS. The soil sample VOC concentrations were below laboratory reporting limits. Soil Boring SB-2 (Southeast corner of property near Rockbridge Rd/Aberdeen Dr intersection) The soil boring was advanced to approximately 15 feet bgs; using a combination of direct push drilling for the first 10 feet and hollow stem augers during the last 5 feet. A soil sample was collected from approximately 5 feet BGS. A concentration of acetone was detected at 0.12 mg/Kg in SB-2. All other concentrations of VOCs analyzed were below laboratory reporting limits. 5.4 Groundwater Sample Collection and Analysis During boring activities, groundwater was encountered in both boring locations. Subsequently, groundwater samples were collected from borings SB-1 and SB-2. The following provides a summary of the analytical results of the groundwater samples collected from the soil borings. The groundwater was collected in laboratory prepared containers and sent to AES, Inc. for analysis. The groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B. Table 2 included in Appendix B shows a summary of the sampling results. Copies of the laboratory analyses are included in Appendix D.

Page 6


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

Groundwater sample SB-1 (Southwest corner of property near intermittent creek) Groundwater was encountered at approximately 10 feet BGS. The VOC concentrations of all the analyzed chemicals of concern were below laboratory detection limits. Groundwater sample SB-2 (Southeast corner of property near Rockbridge Rd/Aberdeen Dr intersection) Groundwater was encountered at approximately 14 feet BGS. The VOC concentrations of all the analyzed chemicals of concern were below laboratory detection limits. 5.5 Boring Completion Activities, Site Restoration Prior to leaving the site, both of the soil borings were properly backfilled with the soil removed during boring drilling activities.

Page 7


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

6.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ENERCON has completed the Limited Phase II ESA activities at the subject site in accordance with the scope of work identified in the letter proposal dated May 15, 2012. 6.1 Conclusions Activities conducted during this Phase II ESA included the installation of two soil borings and the collection of soil and groundwater samples to evaluate whether an adjoining dry cleaners has impacted site soil or groundwater. A soil sample collected from SB-2 had a detectable concentration of acetone at 0.12 mg/Kg. Some soils can have positive results for acetone as a result of using sodium bisulfate for preservation. In soils that contain high levels of organic material, the sodium bisulfate may react with the organic material to produce acetone. The acetone detected in soil boring SB-2 could be a reaction with the sample preservative. Also acetone is a common solvent utilized in cleaning laboratory and sample equipment. The acetone detected within the soil sample from Boring SB-2 is considered insignificant and below any regulatory action levels. The SB-1 soil sample VOC concentrations were below reportable limits. Groundwater samples from both soil boring locations, SB-1 and SB-2, were below reportable limits for all analyzed VOCâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s. Subsequently, the analytical results of all groundwater and soil samples were below state regulatory requirements. 6.2 Recommendations The subject property does not appear to have been impacted by the south adjoining dry cleaning operations. Based on the results of analytical tests of both soil and groundwater at the site, it is ENERCONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s professional opinion that further delineation, investigation, or reporting is not warranted at this time.

Page 8


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

7.0 LIMITATIONS The conclusions presented above are based on the agreed upon scope of work outlined in the above report. Consultant makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of information obtained from others. It is possible that information exists beyond the scope of this investigation. Additional information which was not available to the Consultant at the time of writing the Report may result in modification of the conclusions and recommendations presented. The Services performed by Consultant have been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions. This report is not a legal opinion, buy may under certain circumstances be prepared at the direction of counsel, may be in anticipation of litigation, and may be classified as an attorney client communication or as an attorney-work product.

Page 9


Limited Phase II ESA Report Pine Lake, GA

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences June 5, 2012

8.0 PUBLISHED REFERENCES U.S. Geological Survey Topographic map, 7.5-Minute, “Stone Mountain”, Georgia Quadrangle (dated 1992).

DeKalb County Property Appraiser’s Office, internet search on June 3, 2012 (http://web.co.dekalb.ga.us). General property information

Groundwater Atlas of the United States-Segment 6. General geology information

Acme Mapper, Aerial photograph dated 2010 (www.mapper.acme.com).

Geologic Map of Georgia (1976), Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Geologic and Water Resources Division, Geologic Survey

United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resource Conservation Service. National Cooperative Soil Survey. Web Soil Survey 2.0 [Online WWW]. Available URL: <http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/>

United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Soil Survey Staff. Official Soil Series Descriptions [Online WWW]. Available URL: <http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html>

Page 10


APPENDIX A Figures


SITE

Legend

Figure I – Topographic Map Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, GA

Map Date: 1992

Source:

USGS “Stone Mountain, GA” Topographic Quadrangle 2011

ENERCON Project #: ENMISC2675

JEO

Scale 1”=1,500’


SITE

SB-1

Legend

Figure II – Site Plan Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, GA

- Soil boring Location - Approximate Property Boundary

Source: Acme Mapper, Aerial photograph dated 2010 ENERCON Project #: ENMISC2675

SB-2

JEO

Scale 1”= 400’


SITE

Legend Map Date: 2009

Source:

Acme Mapper

ENERCON Project #: ENMISC2675

JEO

Figure III – Location Map

Scale

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, GA

1”= 450’


SITE

SB-1 @5’ 5/22/12 VOC’s: BRL

SB-2 @5’ 5/22/12 Acetone: 0.12 mg/Kg

Drycleaners

Legend

Figure IV – Soil Quality Map

Boring ID & Depth Date Volatile Organic Compounds

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, GA

mg/Kg - milligrams per kilograms BRL - Below reporting limits - Boring location - Approximate property boundary

Enercon Project #:ENMISC2675

JEO

Scale 1” = 400’


SITE

SB-2 5/22/12 VOC’s: BRL

SB-1 5/22/12 VOC’s: BRL

Drycleaners

Legend Boring ID Date Volatile Organic Compounds ug/L – micrograms per Liter BRL - Below reporting limits - Boring location - Approximate property boundary Assumed Groundwater Flow Enercon Project #:ENMISC2675

JEO

Figure V – Groundwater Quality Map

Scale

Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, GA

1”= 400’


APPENDIX B Tables


Enercon Services, Inc. Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, Georgia 30083 TABLE 1: SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS (Total VOCs)

BRL - Below Reporting Limit N/A - Not applicable HSRA - Hazardous Site Response Act

Acetone

Total VOCs

SB-1 5' 05/22/12 SB-2 5' 05/22/12 HSRA Applicable Levels

Vinyl Chloride

Date Sampled

1,1 Dichloroethene

Depth (ft)

Trichloroethene

Sample Location

Tetrachloroethene

Results in mg/Kg

BRL BRL 0.18

BRL BRL 0.13

BRL BRL 0.36

BRL BRL 0.04

BRL 0.12 2.74

BRL 0.12 N/A

Prepared By: Reviewed By:

JEO DF

Date: 5/31/2012 Date: 6/4/2012


Enercon Services, Inc. Proposed Pine Lake Senior Residences 4678 Rockbridge Road and 440 Aberdeen Drive Pine Lake, Georgia 30083 TABLE 2: GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS (Total VOCs)

N/A - Not Applicable BRL - Below Reporting Limits

Total VOCs

HSRA Applicable Levels

Acetone

05/22/12 05/22/12

Vinyl Chloride

SB-1 SB-2

1,1 Dichloroethene

Date Sampled

Trichloroethene

Sample Location

Tetrachloroethene

Results in ug/L or parts per billion

BRL BRL 70

BRL BRL 200

BRL BRL 1,000

BRL BRL 2.0

BRL BRL 400

BRL BRL N/A

Prepared By:

JEO

Date:

5/31/2012

Reviewed By:

DF

Date:

6/4/2012


APPENDIX C Soil Boring Logs


BORING LOG Client: Mercy Housing Project Name: Proposed Pine Lake Senior Drilling and Sampling Information

Boring Location:

Surface Elevation (ft.)

NA

Start Date:

5/22/2012 Finish Date GeoLab - Edward Waymon John Owens Geoprobe 66DT Direct Push/ Geoprobe

Drilled By: Logged By: Drill Rig Type: Drilling Method:

Total Depth (ft.)

Sheet 1 of 1 Boring ID: SB-1 Use:

Project Location: Pine Lake, GA Project Number: ENMISC2675

Southwest corner of property and east of intermittent creek

11 5/22/2012 Notes:

Sample collected from 0-5' bgs Groundwater at ~10' bgs

Borehole Diameter:

SAMPLE NO.

BLOW COUNT

PID (ppm)

Brown, tan, black clayey Silt, with organics, dry, no odor

OL

60

60

DP

1

NA

0.0

Brown, grey, orange white, tan, sandy Silt, moist , no odor

ML

60

60

DP

2

NA

0.0

DEPTH IN FEET

SAMPLE TYPE

10 ' bgs INCHES RECOVERED

Water Level(s):

INCHES DRIVEN

5ft Macro-core ( 60-inch macro core)

USCS

Sampling Method:

DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Direct push Refusal @ 11'ft bgs

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NT - Not Taken NA - Not Applicable HA - Hand Auger DP - Direct Push Geoprobe bgs- Below ground surface


BORING LOG Client: Mercy Housing Project Name: Proposed Pine Lake Senior Drilling and Sampling Information

Boring Location:

Surface Elevation (ft.)

NA

Start Date:

5/22/2012 Finish Date GeoLab - Edward Waymon John Owens Geoprobe 66DT Direct Push & Hollow Stem Auger/ Geoprobe

Drilled By: Logged By: Drill Rig Type: Drilling Method:

Total Depth (ft.)

Sheet 1 of 1 Boring ID: SB-2 Use:

Project Location: Pine Lake, GA Project Number: ENMISC2675

Southeast of property near intersection of Rockbridge Rd and Aberdeen Dr

15 5/22/2012

Notes:

Sample collected from 0-5' bgs Groundwater at ~15' bgs

Borehole Diameter:

SAMPLE NO.

BLOW COUNT

PID (ppm)

Brown, tan, black Clayey Silt, with organics and sand, dry, no odor

OL

60

60

DP

1

NA

0.0

Orange, tan, white partly micaceous, clayey, sandy, Silt, dry no odor

ML

60

60

DP

2

NA

0.0

DEPTH IN FEET

SAMPLE TYPE

14-15' bgs INCHES RECOVERED

Water Level(s):

INCHES DRIVEN

5 ft Macro-core

USCS

Sampling Method:

DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Refusal @ 11 ft bgs used 2.5' diameter augers to drill to 15' bgs

12 13 14 15

Auger refusal @ 15 ft bgs

16 17 18 19 20 NT - Not Taken NA - Not Applicable HA - Hand Auger DP - Direct Push Geoprobe bgs- Below ground surface


APPENDIX D Laboratory Analytical Results


AES Analytical Environmental Services, Inc., 3785 Presidential Parkway Atlanta, GA 30340 July 3, 2011

Stipulation of Approval for Commercial Laboratory

According to Georgia State Law (O.C.G.A. 12-2-9) Commercial Rules for Commercial Laboratory Accreditation, any person submitting data to EPD prepared by a commercial laboratory shall stipulate that the laboratory is approved (Chapter 391-3-26-.05). The following information is provided as requested. Laboratory

Accredited By: Accreditation ID: Scope:

Effective: Expires:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES) 3785 Presidential Parkway, NE Atlanta, GA 30340 (770) 457-8177 State of Florida, Department of Health, Bureau of Laboratories; Accrediting NELAP Authority E87582 Clean Water Act â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Extractable Organics, General Chemistry, Metals, Microbiology, Pesticides-Herbicides, PCBs, Volatile Oraganics RCRA/CERCLA â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Extractable Organics, General Chemistry, Metals, Pesticides-Herbicides, PCBs, Volatile Organics July 1, 2011 June 30, 2012

Any question regarding this stipulation of approval may be directed to AES at 770 4578177. Thank you for your business and please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Allison Cantrell Director of Client Services Analytical Environmental Services, Inc.


May 24, 2012

John Owens Enercon 500 Town Park Lane Kennesaw GA

30144

TEL: (770) 919-1930 FAX: (770) 528-0201 RE:

Pine Lake

Dear John Owens:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received for the analyses presented in following report.

Order No: 1205H63

2

samples on May 22, 2012 1:40 pm

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a project Case Narrative. AESâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; certifications are as follows: -NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water, soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/11-06/30/12. -AIHA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics), Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal) effective until 09/01/13. These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

Kathryn Waters Project Manager

Page 1 of 12


Page 2 of 12


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H63-001

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Qualifiers:

*

Reporting Qual Limit

SW8260B

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1,2-Dibromoethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Cyclohexane Dibromochloromethane Dichlorodifluoromethane Ethylbenzene Freon-113 Isopropylbenzene m,p-Xylene Methyl acetate Methyl tert-butyl ether Methylcyclohexane Methylene chloride o-Xylene Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Units

BatchID

SB-1 5/22/2012 11:55:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW5035) BRL

0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868

1

05/23/2012 17:48

HS

BRL BRL

0.0062 0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS

BRL BRL

0.0062 0.0062

mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS

BRL

0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868

1

05/23/2012 17:48

HS

BRL BRL BRL

0.0062 0.0062 0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868

1 1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS HS

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

0.0062 0.0062 0.0062 0.0062 0.062 0.012

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868

1 1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS HS HS HS HS

BRL BRL

0.012 0.12

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS

BRL BRL BRL BRL

0.0062 0.0062 0.0062 0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868 161868

1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS HS HS

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

0.012 0.0062 0.0062 0.012 0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868 161868 161868

1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS HS HS HS

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

0.012 0.0062 0.0062 0.0062 0.0062 0.012 0.0062 0.012 0.0062 0.0062 0.0062 0.0062 0.0062 0.012 0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS

mg/Kg-dry

mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 3 of 12


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H63-001

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

PERCENT MOISTURE

*

Units

BatchID

SB-1 5/22/2012 11:55:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW5035) BRL

0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868

1

05/23/2012 17:48

HS

BRL BRL

0.0062 0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS

BRL BRL

0.0062 0.0062

mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS

BRL

0.0062

mg/Kg-dry

161868

1

05/23/2012 17:48

HS

BRL BRL 101

0.0062 0.012 56.5-134

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868

1 1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS HS

87.7 103

71.8-135 77.1-117

%REC %REC

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 17:48 05/23/2012 17:48

HS HS

21.8

0

wt%

R221870

1

05/23/2012 10:30

AS

mg/Kg-dry

mg/Kg-dry %REC

D2216

Percent Moisture

Qualifiers:

Reporting Qual Limit

SW8260B

Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surr: Dibromofluoromethane Surr: Toluene-d8

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 4 of 12


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H63-002

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Qualifiers:

*

Reporting Qual Limit

SW8260B

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1,2-Dibromoethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Cyclohexane Dibromochloromethane Dichlorodifluoromethane Ethylbenzene Freon-113 Isopropylbenzene m,p-Xylene Methyl acetate Methyl tert-butyl ether Methylcyclohexane Methylene chloride o-Xylene Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Units

BatchID

SB-2 5/22/2012 9:20:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW5035) BRL

0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868

1

05/23/2012 18:13

HS

BRL BRL

0.0052 0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS

BRL BRL

0.0052 0.0052

mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS

BRL

0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868

1

05/23/2012 18:13

HS

BRL BRL BRL

0.0052 0.0052 0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868

1 1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS HS

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

0.0052 0.0052 0.0052 0.0052 0.052 0.010

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868

1 1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS HS HS HS HS

BRL 0.12

0.010 0.10

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS

BRL BRL BRL BRL

0.0052 0.0052 0.0052 0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868 161868

1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS HS HS

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

0.010 0.0052 0.0052 0.010 0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868 161868 161868

1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS HS HS HS

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

0.010 0.0052 0.0052 0.0052 0.0052 0.010 0.0052 0.010 0.0052 0.0052 0.0052 0.0052 0.0052 0.0052 0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868 161868

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS

mg/Kg-dry

mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 5 of 12


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H63-002

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

PERCENT MOISTURE

*

Units

BatchID

SB-2 5/22/2012 9:20:00 AM Soil Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW5035) BRL

0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868

1

05/23/2012 18:13

HS

BRL BRL

0.0052 0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS

BRL BRL

0.0052 0.0052

mg/Kg-dry mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS

BRL

0.0052

mg/Kg-dry

161868

1

05/23/2012 18:13

HS

BRL BRL 109

0.0052 0.010 56.5-134

mg/Kg-dry

161868 161868 161868

1 1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS HS

96.4 102

71.8-135 77.1-117

%REC %REC

161868 161868

1 1

05/23/2012 18:13 05/23/2012 18:13

HS HS

20.7

0

wt%

R221870

1

05/23/2012 10:30

AS

mg/Kg-dry

mg/Kg-dry %REC

D2216

Percent Moisture

Qualifiers:

Reporting Qual Limit

SW8260B

Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surr: Dibromofluoromethane Surr: Toluene-d8

24-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 6 of 12


Page 7 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project: Lab Order:

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H63

24-May-12

Dates Report

Lab Sample ID

Client Sample ID

Collection Date

Matrix

Test Name

1205H63-001A

SB-1

5/22/2012 11:55:00AM

Soil

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

1205H63-001B

SB-1

5/22/2012 11:55:00AM

Soil

PERCENT MOISTURE

1205H63-002A

SB-2

5/22/2012 9:20:00AM

Soil

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

1205H63-002B

SB-2

5/22/2012 9:20:00AM

Soil

PERCENT MOISTURE

TCLP Date

Prep Date

Analysis Date

05/23/2012

05/23/2012 05/23/2012

05/23/2012

05/23/2012 05/23/2012

Page 8 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H63

Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Sample ID: MB-161868 SampleType: MBLK Analyte

24-May-12

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT BatchID: 161868 Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Units: mg/Kg BatchID: 161868

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/23/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221832 Seq No: 4641548

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,1-Dichloroethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,1-Dichloroethene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dibromoethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dichloroethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dichloropropane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-Butanone

BRL

0.050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-Hexanone

BRL

0.010

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4-Methyl-2-pentanone

BRL

0.010

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Acetone

BRL

0.10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Benzene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bromodichloromethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bromoform

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bromomethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Carbon disulfide

BRL

0.010

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Carbon tetrachloride

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chlorobenzene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chloroethane

BRL

0.010

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chloroform

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chloromethane

BRL

0.010

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Qualifiers:

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 9 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H63

Sample ID: MB-161868 SampleType: MBLK Analyte

24-May-12

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT BatchID: 161868 Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Units: mg/Kg BatchID: 161868

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/23/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221832 Seq No: 4641548

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Cyclohexane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Dibromochloromethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Dichlorodifluoromethane

BRL

0.010

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Ethylbenzene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Freon-113

BRL

0.010

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Isopropylbenzene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

m,p-Xylene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Methyl acetate

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Methyl tert-butyl ether

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Methylcyclohexane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Methylene chloride

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

o-Xylene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Styrene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Tetrachloroethene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Toluene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Trichloroethene

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Trichlorofluoromethane

BRL

0.0050

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Vinyl chloride

BRL

0.010

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

0.05027

0

0.05

0

101

56.5

134

0

0

0

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane

0.04533

0

0.05

0

90.7

71.8

135

0

0

0

Surr: Toluene-d8

0.05057

0

0.05

0

101

77.1

117

0

0

0

Qualifiers:

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 10 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H63

Sample ID: LCS-161868 SampleType: LCS Analyte

24-May-12

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT BatchID: 161868 Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Units: mg/Kg BatchID: 161868

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/23/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221832 Seq No: 4641549

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

1,1-Dichloroethene

0.06515

0.0050

0.05

0

130

60

140

0

0

0

Benzene

0.06318

0.0050

0.05

0

126

70

130

0

0

0

Chlorobenzene

0.05500

0.0050

0.05

0

110

70

130

0

0

0

Toluene

0.06389

0.0050

0.05

0

128

70

130

0

0

0

Trichloroethene

0.05610

0.0050

0.05

0

112

70

130

0

0

0

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

0.05457

0

0.05

0

109

56.5

134

0

0

0

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane

0.04622

0

0.05

0

92.4

71.8

135

0

0

0

Surr: Toluene-d8

0.05082

0

0.05

0

102

77.1

117

0

0

0

Sample ID: 1205H54-007AMS SampleType: MS Analyte

Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Units: mg/Kg-dry BatchID: 161868

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/23/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221832 Seq No: 4641551

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

1,1-Dichloroethene

0.06949

0.0061

0.0614

0

113

51

159

0

0

0

Benzene

0.06434

0.0061

0.0614

0

105

67.6

139

0

0

0

Chlorobenzene

0.05635

0.0061

0.0614

0

91.8

73.6

135

0

0

0

Toluene

0.06027

0.0061

0.0614

0

98.2

63.5

140

0

0

0

Trichloroethene

0.05862

0.0061

0.0614

0

95.5

67.6

145

0

0

0

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

0.06646

0

0.0614

0

108

56.5

134

0

0

0

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane

0.06003

0

0.0614

0

97.8

71.8

135

0

0

0

Surr: Toluene-d8

0.05932

0

0.0614

0

96.7

77.1

117

0

0

0

Sample ID: 1205H54-007AMSD SampleType: MSD Analyte

Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Units: mg/Kg-dry BatchID: 161868

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/23/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221832 Seq No: 4641552

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

1,1-Dichloroethene

0.07790

0.0061

0.0614

0

127

51

159

0.06949

11.4

25.7

Benzene

0.07328

0.0061

0.0614

0

119

67.6

139

0.06434

13

18.5

Qualifiers:

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 11 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H63

Sample ID: 1205H54-007AMSD SampleType: MSD Analyte

24-May-12

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT BatchID: 161868 Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Units: mg/Kg-dry BatchID: 161868

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/23/2012 Analysis Date: 05/23/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221832 Seq No: 4641552

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

Chlorobenzene

0.06137

0.0061

0.0614

0

100

73.6

135

0.05635

8.53

18.5

Toluene

0.06755

0.0061

0.0614

0

110

63.5

140

0.06027

11.4

18.8

Trichloroethene

0.06432

0.0061

0.0614

0

105

67.6

145

0.05862

9.28

20.7

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

0.06647

0

0.0614

0

108

56.5

134

0.06646

0

0

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane

0.05976

0

0.0614

0

97.4

71.8

135

0.06003

0

0

Surr: Toluene-d8

0.06067

0

0.0614

0

98.9

77.1

117

0.05932

0

0

Qualifiers:

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 12 of 12


May 24, 2012

John Owens Enercon 500 Town Park Lane Kennesaw GA

30144

TEL: (770) 919-1930 FAX: (770) 528-0201 RE:

Pine Lake

Dear John Owens:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received for the analyses presented in following report.

Order No: 1205H64

2

samples on May 22, 2012 1:40 pm

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a project Case Narrative. AESâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; certifications are as follows: -NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water, soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/11-06/30/12. -AIHA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics), Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal) effective until 09/01/13. These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

Kathryn Waters Project Manager

Page 1 of 12


Page 2 of 12


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H64-001

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Qualifiers:

*

Reporting Qual Limit

SW8260B

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1,2-Dibromoethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Cyclohexane Dibromochloromethane Dichlorodifluoromethane Ethylbenzene Freon-113 Isopropylbenzene m,p-Xylene Methyl acetate Methyl tert-butyl ether Methylcyclohexane Methylene chloride o-Xylene Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

23-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Units

BatchID

SB-1 5/22/2012 12:00:00 PM Groundwater Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW5030B) BRL

5.0

ug/L

161834

1

05/23/2012 15:16

SB

BRL BRL

5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB

BRL BRL

5.0 5.0

ug/L ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB

BRL

5.0

ug/L

161834

1

05/23/2012 15:16

SB

BRL BRL BRL

5.0 5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834 161834

1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB SB

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 50 10

ug/L

161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834

1 1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB SB SB SB SB

BRL BRL

10 50

ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB

BRL BRL BRL BRL

5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834 161834 161834

1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB SB SB

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834 161834 161834 161834

1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB SB SB SB

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB

ug/L

ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 3 of 12


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H64-001

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Qualifiers:

*

Reporting Qual Limit

SW8260B

Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surr: Dibromofluoromethane Surr: Toluene-d8

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

23-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Units

BatchID

SB-1 5/22/2012 12:00:00 PM Groundwater Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW5030B) BRL

5.0

ug/L

161834

1

05/23/2012 15:16

SB

BRL BRL

5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB

BRL BRL

5.0 5.0

ug/L ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB

BRL

5.0

ug/L

161834

1

05/23/2012 15:16

SB

BRL BRL 88.8

5.0 2.0 67.4-123

ug/L

161834 161834 161834

1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB SB

97.7 92.3

75.5-128 70-120

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:16 05/23/2012 15:16

SB SB

ug/L

ug/L %REC %REC %REC

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 4 of 12


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H64-002

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Qualifiers:

*

Reporting Qual Limit

SW8260B

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1,2-Dibromoethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Cyclohexane Dibromochloromethane Dichlorodifluoromethane Ethylbenzene Freon-113 Isopropylbenzene m,p-Xylene Methyl acetate Methyl tert-butyl ether Methylcyclohexane Methylene chloride o-Xylene Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

23-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Units

BatchID

SB-2 5/22/2012 10:30:00 AM Groundwater Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW5030B) BRL

5.0

ug/L

161834

1

05/23/2012 15:45

SB

BRL BRL

5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB

BRL BRL

5.0 5.0

ug/L ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB

BRL

5.0

ug/L

161834

1

05/23/2012 15:45

SB

BRL BRL BRL

5.0 5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834 161834

1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB SB

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 50 10

ug/L

161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834

1 1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB SB SB SB SB

BRL BRL

10 50

ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB

BRL BRL BRL BRL

5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834 161834 161834

1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB SB SB

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834 161834 161834 161834

1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB SB SB SB

BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL

10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834 161834

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB

ug/L

ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 5 of 12


Client: Enercon Project Name: Pine Lake Lab ID: 1205H64-002

Client Sample ID: Collection Date: Matrix:

Analyses

Result

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Qualifiers:

*

Reporting Qual Limit

SW8260B

Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surr: Dibromofluoromethane Surr: Toluene-d8

Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

23-May-12

Date:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Units

BatchID

SB-2 5/22/2012 10:30:00 AM Groundwater Dilution Factor

Date Analyzed Analyst

(SW5030B) BRL

5.0

ug/L

161834

1

05/23/2012 15:45

SB

BRL BRL

5.0 5.0

ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB

BRL BRL

5.0 5.0

ug/L ug/L

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB

BRL

5.0

ug/L

161834

1

05/23/2012 15:45

SB

BRL BRL 95.2

5.0 2.0 67.4-123

ug/L

161834 161834 161834

1 1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB SB

93 89.6

75.5-128 70-120

161834 161834

1 1

05/23/2012 15:45 05/23/2012 15:45

SB SB

ug/L

ug/L %REC %REC %REC

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

Narr

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

NC

See case narrative Not confirmed

B

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

<

Less than Result value

>

Greater than Result value

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 6 of 12


Page 7 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project: Lab Order:

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H64

24-May-12

Dates Report

Lab Sample ID

Client Sample ID

Collection Date

Matrix

Test Name

Prep Date

Analysis Date

1205H64-001A

SB-1

5/22/2012 12:00:00PM

Groundwater

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

TCLP Date

05/22/2012

05/23/2012

1205H64-002A

SB-2

5/22/2012 10:30:00AM

Groundwater

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

05/22/2012

05/23/2012

Page 8 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H64

Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Sample ID: MB-161834 SampleType: MBLK Analyte

23-May-12

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT BatchID: 161834 Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Units: ug/L BatchID: 161834

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/22/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221743 Seq No: 4638542

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,1-Dichloroethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,1-Dichloroethene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dibromoethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dichloroethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,2-Dichloropropane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-Butanone

BRL

50

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-Hexanone

BRL

10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4-Methyl-2-pentanone

BRL

10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Acetone

BRL

50

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Benzene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bromodichloromethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bromoform

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bromomethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Carbon disulfide

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Carbon tetrachloride

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chlorobenzene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chloroethane

BRL

10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chloroform

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chloromethane

BRL

10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Qualifiers:

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 9 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H64

Sample ID: MB-161834 SampleType: MBLK Analyte

23-May-12

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT BatchID: 161834 Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Units: ug/L BatchID: 161834

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/22/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221743 Seq No: 4638542

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Cyclohexane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Dibromochloromethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Dichlorodifluoromethane

BRL

10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Ethylbenzene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Freon-113

BRL

10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Isopropylbenzene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

m,p-Xylene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Methyl acetate

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Methyl tert-butyl ether

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Methylcyclohexane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Methylene chloride

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

o-Xylene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Styrene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Tetrachloroethene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Toluene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Trichloroethene

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Trichlorofluoromethane

BRL

5.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Vinyl chloride

BRL

2.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

47.71

0

50

0

95.4

67.4

123

0

0

0

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane

47.02

0

50

0

94

75.5

128

0

0

0

Surr: Toluene-d8

47.00

0

50

0

94

70

120

0

0

0

Qualifiers:

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 10 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H64

Sample ID: LCS-161834 SampleType: LCS

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT BatchID: 161834 Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

1,1-Dichloroethene

48.52

5.0

50

0

97

60

Benzene

47.53

5.0

50

0

95.1

Chlorobenzene

44.44

5.0

50

0

88.9

Toluene

46.75

5.0

50

0

Trichloroethene

Analyte

23-May-12

Units: ug/L BatchID: 161834

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/22/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221743 Seq No: 4638544

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

140

0

0

0

70

130

0

0

0

70

130

0

0

0

93.5

70

130

0

0

0

47.64

5.0

50

0

95.3

70

130

0

0

0

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

50.41

0

50

0

101

67.4

123

0

0

0

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane

45.93

0

50

0

91.9

75.5

128

0

0

0

Surr: Toluene-d8

46.33

0

50

0

92.7

70

120

0

0

0

Sample ID: 1205D97-001AMS SampleType: MS

Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

1,1-Dichloroethene

57.66

5.0

50

0

115

50.1

Benzene

88.79

5.0

50

31.26

115

61.2

Chlorobenzene

54.57

5.0

50

0

109

Toluene

69.77

5.0

50

13.88

Trichloroethene

56.84

5.0

50

0

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

51.95

0

50

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane

47.02

0

50

Surr: Toluene-d8

45.90

0

50

Analyte

Sample ID: 1205D97-001AMSD SampleType: MSD

Units: ug/L BatchID: 161834

SW8260B

SPK Ref Val

%REC

Low Limit High Limit

%RPD

179

0

0

0

150

0

0

0

72.1

140

0

0

0

112

58.7

154

0

0

0

114

68.3

149

0

0

0

0

104

67.4

123

0

0

0

0

94

75.5

128

0

0

0

0

91.8

70

120

0

0

0

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

1,1-Dichloroethene

51.72

5.0

50

0

103

50.1

Benzene

78.91

5.0

50

31.26

95.3

61.2

Qualifiers:

Run No: 221743 Seq No: 4638553

RPD Ref Val

Client ID: TestCode:

Analyte

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/22/2012

Units: ug/L BatchID: 161834

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/22/2012

Low Limit High Limit

RPD Limit Qual

Run No: 221743 Seq No: 4638556

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

179

57.66

10.9

23.3

150

88.79

11.8

19

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 11 of 12


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Client: Project Name: Workorder:

Date:

Enercon Pine Lake 1205H64

Sample ID: 1205D97-001AMSD SampleType: MSD

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT BatchID: 161834 Client ID: TestCode:

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS

Result

RPT Limit

SPK value

SPK Ref Val

Chlorobenzene

48.92

5.0

50

0

97.8

72.1

Toluene

64.09

5.0

50

13.88

100

Trichloroethene

50.87

5.0

50

0

102

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

49.75

0

50

0

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane

47.20

0

50

Surr: Toluene-d8

46.22

0

50

Analyte

Qualifiers:

23-May-12

Units: ug/L BatchID: 161834

SW8260B

%REC

Prep Date: 05/22/2012 Analysis Date: 05/22/2012

Low Limit High Limit

Run No: 221743 Seq No: 4638556

RPD Ref Val

%RPD

RPD Limit Qual

140

54.57

10.9

58.7

154

69.77

8.49

20

68.3

149

56.84

11.1

17.7

99.5

67.4

123

51.95

0

0

0

94.4

75.5

128

47.02

0

0

0

92.4

70

120

45.90

0

0

21.5

>

Greater than Result value

<

Less than Result value

B

BRL

Below reporting limit

E

Estimated (value above quantitation range)

H

Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N

Analyte not NELAC certified

R

RPD outside limits due to matrix

S

Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

J

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

Analyte detected in the associated method blank

Page 12 of 12


APPENDIX E Resumes


Douglas L. Fidler, P.G. Experience Summary •

Professional Geologist with over 20 years experience in environmental business

Over 12 years of highly profitable operations management experience

Project background experience includes a variety of environmental assessments, remedial construction and construction management, risk assessments, groundwater modeling, remedial investigation/feasibility studies and facility audits

Experience Description Mr. Fidler has extensive experience in client management and contract negotiations and has managed over 500 projects ranging in size to $50 million in fees. Prior to joining Enercon Services, Inc., Mr. Fidler was the owner and senior consultant for Southern Environmental Technology, an environmental consulting and construction firm. He assisted other environmental consultants and contractors in performing projects throughout the Southeast where a specific technical and regulatory expertise is required. Mr. Fidler was involved in projects such as: groundwater treatment system evaluations, compliance status investigations under the Georgia EPD Brownfield Program, a CERCLA assessment and corrective action at a former pesticide manufacturer in Florida, and several contaminated soil removal projects. He recently completed projects that included Phase I assessments on large tracts for public agencies such as the U.S. Forestry Service, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, and The Trust for Public Land. Mr. Fidler was also active in the installation of sub-grade vapor barriers in commercial and multifamily residential structures. Mr. Fidler was a Senior Project Manager for the RETEC Group where he was responsible for directing the design team preparing design documents, project specifications and bidding documents for the Atlanta Gas Light Company’s Augusta Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) site. He worked closely with AGL staff to provide an accurate environmental construction cost estimate and made project status presentations to the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD), Atlanta Gas Light management and the Georgia Public Service Commission. The $50 million corrective action design was completed within a year and all permitting and regulatory approvals were secured prior to the start of correction action. The corrective action was completed with relatively few changes and within budget. As a District Manager for Williams Environmental Services, Mr. Fidler managed compliance status investigations at three Atlanta Gas Light Company MGP sites and ten Georgia Power company Substation facilities under the Georgia EPD HSRA Program. He worked with both utilities to identify their respective environmental liabilities and establish programs to minimize negative impacts to their respective operations. Mr. Fidler prepared Compliance Status Reports for other facilities including a landfill, incinerator site, and several dry cleaning operations. For most of these sites, Mr. Fidler prepared the Corrective Action Plans for approval by Georgia EPD. He was the Project Manager and directed the corrective actions at an MGP site and four electrical substations along with many smaller contaminated soil removal projects. Mr. Fidler’s additional experiences include acting as the Project Manager for the RCRA closure of chemical storage tanks, pond closure, and plant demolition at a chemical distribution facility.


Douglas L. Fidler, P.G. Enercon Services, Inc. Page 2 of 2

He functioned as the environmental coordinator for the plant for over four years including the construction of the new plant. He has directed environmental operations including environmental consulting, industrial hygiene, and laboratory divisions and managed several large projects including train derailment corrective actions, landfill investigations, a reservoir assessment, and multi-site underground stage tank programs. As a Senior Hydrogeologist, Mr. Fidler managed and served as project hydrogeologist, safety officer, and sampling manager on many CERCLA projects in Florida and Kentucky. Education and Professional Registrations M.B.A., International Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia M.S., Geophysical Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia B.S., Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia Professional Geologist: Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina


APPENDIX U OTHER


Parcel Information


Page 1 of 1

Property Appraisal Department Property Overview

3/20/2014 12:36:53 PM

Parcel ID:

18 040 01 016

To view map, click on parcel ID number. You may need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader. It is available at

Owner Information Tax District

74A - PINE LK ANX

Zoning

X - UNKNOWN

Jan. 1 st Owner Co-Owner Current Owner Co-Owner

BBT INVESTMENTS LLC

Land Use Land Unit Calculated Acreage Deeded Acreage

101 - Residential 1 family

Neighborhood

9149

Property Class

C3 - COMMERCIAL LOT

BBT INVESTMENTS LLC P O BOX 5083 ROME GA 30162 4656 ROCKBRIDGE RD

Owner Address Property Address

241,322 5.54 5.6

Appeal Status Date Notice Mailed

5/28/2013

Appeal Code Process Code Hearing Date Hearing Time

2013

2012

N - C.O.A. Notice

N - C.O.A. Notice C - Certified from BTA

Assessment Notice To view the notice, you must have Adobe Reader Version 9.4 or greater. You may need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader. It is available at

2013 - Assessment Notice1

2012 - Assessment Notice1

Building Characteristics Year Built Condition Code Quality Grade Air Conditioning Fireplace Stories

Square Footage Basement Area Bsmt Finished Bedrooms Bathrooms

1955 AVERAGE AVERAGE YES 0

1,772 1,450 Sq. Ft. 0 Sq. Ft. 0 1.5

1

Current Appraised & Assessment Value Tax Year

Total Appraised

Taxable Land

Taxable Imp.

Total Taxable

Total Taxable Assessment (40%)

2013

$417,699

$377,937

$39,762

$417,699

$167,080

Sales History Book/Page

Sale Date

Deed Type

Sale Condition

Sale Price

19609 - 00007 18706 - 00432 18706 - 00428 16097 - 00235 05329 - 00182

12/19/2006 4/27/2006 4/27/2006 4/2/2004 10/15/1985

RW - RIGHT OF WAY DEED QC - QUIT CLAIM DEED WD - WARRANTY DEED WD - WARRANTY DEED WD - WARRANTY DEED

9 - PUBLIC UTILITY OR GOVERNMENT 1 - MULTIPLE PARCEL SALE 1 - MULTIPLE PARCEL SALE 1 - MULTIPLE PARCEL SALE 0 - VALID SALE FMV

$2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $169,000.00 $86,000.00

Sales which occurred prior to January 1 of this year were used to establish values for the current year. All sales which take place after January 1 will be considered for next yearâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s valuations. These sales are provided for your convenience and may not have been verified or confirmed by our staff. We reserve the right to edit as needed.

Sales Data Search

Detailed Property Data

Property Tax Data

2013

http://web.co.dekalb.ga.us/propertyappraisal/realDisplay.asp

3/20/2014


99’ 102’

90’

1 03’

90’

104 ’

103 ’

99 ’

100’

100 ’

53 ’

’ 174

91’

100’

100’

99’

ROAD

’ 5 5

466

’ 37 1

’ 21 1

65’

163’

(1)

14

4876

25 9

38

464

75 ’

40

458

454

0 6 ’

(18)

’ 25

’ 21 1

5 ’

(17)

44’

CO 0’ 7 UR 60 T

’ 4 6 6 0 ’

14

191’

15

’ 4 10 457

11 2’

60’ 60’

37

(16)

’ 8 18

2

(2)

(5)

467

26

84’

13 162’

405

(6)

27 473

39 100’ 194 ’

413

(7)

137’

36

’ 50 1

485

1 07’

28 481

88’

100’ 81’

100’ 100’ 75’ 23’ 52’ 60’ 100’

53’21’

99’ 100’

NORTH

125’

164’

100’

4822

35

110’

100’ 100’ 347’

60’

(14)

29

’ 5 9

165’

29’

255’

259’

24 6’

236’

175’

235’ 4806

4814

6

118’

153 ’ 37 ’

86 ’

106’ 99’

99’

100’ 643’

100’ 100’

146’ ’ 1 1 1

4782

05’ 1

5

56’

123’

7

105 ’

99’

100’

W AY ’ 99

5

200’

2 1

4798 4790

4

(3)

480 34

470

(8)

32’ 4 0 ’

’ 8 3

(13)

474

’ 4 14

489

30

(19)

’ 28

41 445

(20)

’ 89

’ 92

3’ 1 1

(149’)

50’

3 75

433’

7

44

12

421

414

7

IDLEWOOD SUBDIVISION, PB 149/103

’ 56

205 ’

156’

302 ’

4

’ 37 1

408

3

(4)

11

429

’ 9 6

’ 7 6 (1)

121’

75’

415

32’ 1

224’ 225’

(3)

108

238’

1 1 5’

8 416

(5) (4)

(3)

9

’ 01 1

4764

8’ 25 ’ 50

2

4643

(2)

7 415

CK HALW I

14 0 ’

14 1’

9

(6)

491

33

484

(15)

200’ 171’

(7)

5’ 1 1

110’

(2)

3

4635

110’

130’

(4) 1 73’

200’

344’ 124’

1

285’

(5) 20’ 80’

4627

40’

(8)

LEAFWOOD MANOR, 106/14

’ 56

4619

100’

(5)

10

200’

(9)

05’ 1

’ 271 00’ 1

128’

12

95’

10

171’

171’

228’ (238’)

3

95’

(6) 1 23’

110’

COURT

6’

11

436

32

123’

50’

437

46’

110’

1 05’

4611

445

50’

12

150 ’

6

10

8

7

(9)

31

(12)

(6)

9

126’

(10)

1 09 ’

234’

(10)

118’

(11)

169’

445

444

STONEBRIDGE 80/93

9

301’

62’

488

19 100’

9 7

246’

4640

18

125’ RA NDA L W O ’ OD 3 3

8 ’

115’

4603

4632

17

1 1 0’

428

11

(11)

7

83’

5 0 13 ’

4624

16

14 8 ’

55 ’

93 ’

B

(13)

(12)

164 ’

100’

145’

144’ 156’

272’

14

436

(14) 112’

100’

100’

204 ’

110’

23

177’

50’

245’

PLUM ORCHARD

(3)

246’

10.8 AC.+ -

20

(15)

(16)

(11)

4616

42

3

452

6

44

’ 0 9

4600

3

12

(12)

HEATHCLIFF

176’

249’

4663

125’

ABERDEEN

(17) 1 1 8’ 1 03’

115’

4655

169 ’

89 ’

50’

100 ’

92’ 92’

439’

’ 5

15

(7)

3

4647

4639

(10) 4608

110’

460

13

(13)

5

4 7’

00’ 1 65’

2

WEDGEWOOD #2

47’

4629

(2)

5

200’+ -

21

43

475

109’

468

14

3

483

9

103’

96’

491

50’

260’

(14)

42 (1) 419’

100’

1

22

AD

81’ 85 ’ 179 ’

114 ’ 77’

N TO HAI RS

104 ’

99’

50’

4

9

90’

114 ’

109

(2)

5

150’

441

24

23

(18) 60’ 72’ 07’ (9) 75’ 1

(19)

20’

100’

RO

11’ 88’

100 ’ 100 ’

105 ’ 100 ’

2’

100 ’ 100 ’

100 ’ 159 ’

6 501

50’

271’

476

RANDALWOOD S/D

67’

120’

100’

180’

168’ 202’

38 ’

189 ’

25’ 100 ’

200 ’ 100 ’

95’

125 ’ 100 ’ 108 ’ 100 ’

91’

100 ’

60 ’ 100 ’

38 ’

20 0’ 191 ’ 97’

109 ’

170 ’

UR T

CO N

100 ’

MA LTO

100 ’

SO

80 ’

390’ 50’

99’

139’

UT

H

100 ’

60’

90’ 100’

106’ 100’

101’

13’

20 0’

20 0’

200 ’

200 ’ 3’

92

105’ 110’

95’

179’ 139’

156 ’

13 0’ 130 ’

105’

105’

90’

87’ 100 ’

162 ’ 40 0’

23 2’

25’ 200 ’

100 ’

484

15

3

375’

’ 55

129’

115’

19

515

9 260’

(1)

WEDGEWOOD #1

141’

4617

130’

100 ’

153’

16 4’

14 5’ 160 ’

160’

111 ’

’ NO 5 8 RT ’ H MA LTO CO UR N T 8

15 0’

20 0’

49 ’

14 0’

115 ’

WA Y

HALW I CK ’ 7

95’

2 5 0 ’

65 HA ’ LW I CK CO UR T

14 5

110’ 135’

182 ’

195 ’

24 0’ 20 0’

116’

26 6’ 164 ’

150’

50 ’

20 0’

16 0 ’

’ 14 7

15’3 5’

16 8’

100’

100’ 103’

102’

5 ’ 14 12 4’

180 ’

232’

101 ’

66 ’

CO 12 5’

112 ’

185 ’

107’

164 ’

’ 14

UR T

96 ’

79 ’

D

112 ’ 18 7’

23 4’

153’

17

90’

120 ’ 100 ’

55’

107’

111’

106’ 100’

100’

95’

100’ 100’ 100’ 98’

86’

157 ’

21 5’

212’ 210’

12 5’

7

14 5’

(5)

2

38’

4609

(20)

270 + ’ -

200’

18 1’

5 ’ 7

14 6’

36 ’

10 0’

E

5 ’ 2

5 ’

R D

10 0’

100’

SA LF OR

8 4

160 ’ 115 ’

4 6’

25’

153’

4 7’ 9 ’ 8

I V

9 ’ 7

25 ’

1 1 2’

100’

496

STELLA GARDENS

107’

367’

1 26’

24

4666

150’

110’

16

342’

50’

(6)

VE DRI

150’

LI MI TS

504

274’

150’

25

448

100’

3’ 23 8’ 25

CI TY

17

20 ’

1

30’

259’

150’

26

4658

100’

SEE 18-40A

LAKE

512

282’ 252’ (16)

21

517

18

88’

120’

27’ 1

PI NE

(17)

31 5’

94 ’

94

(7)

102’

25

150’

0 10 16

19 1’

10 7’

20 0’ 76 ’

206 ’

90’

164 ’

193 ’

12’

36’ 175 + ’ 139 ’

182 ’ + -

0 ’

8

PL U M

85 ’ 81’

110’

110’

DRI VE

125’ 105’

85 ’

55’ 11 4’

150’

71’

23 9’

112’ 110’

154’

14 8 ’

150 ’

15 1

125’

16 6 ’

150 ’

135 ’ 190 ’

124 ’

15 5 ’ ’ LI MI TS

CI TY LA KE

20 0’

E PI N 88 ’ 90’

0’ 34 2 0 0 ’

4

254’ 284’

90’

15

520

100’

LI MI TS

19

(18)

119’

CI TY

5

115’

(19)

525

18 ’

485

95

276’

50’

157’

LAKE

’ 8 2

493

1 33 ’

’ 5 5

480

18

534

398’

486 52 ’

535

69’

PI NE

1

92’

96

176’

251 ’ 250’

234’

(15)

92’

4650

150’

41 40

214’

1 56’

94’

100’

9’ 32

199’

(4)

200’

100’

’ 0

herein.

199’

responsibility for the accuracy of information contained

VE DRI

used for tax purposes only. Dekalb County assumes no

4656

(8)

505

17

’ 40

28

13

274 ’

SPRUCE

This Map was compiled from an aerial survey. It is to be

4678

(19)

252’

92

225’

541

291 ’

1 56’

93

’ 11 2

107

(3)

16

STO NEBRI DGE

29 100’

(8)

89’

5.54 AC(C)

’ 8 2

513

199’ 547

5’ 12

30 100’

125’

453

25’

16

473

5

150’

31

L I MI TS

420

1’ 3 2

3

112’ (20)

(21)

26

100’

126’

27

4601

(21)

440

456

150’

4642

27

120’

123’

3

454’

(9)

91

3

23

100’

150’

4634

150’

4626

150’

4618

150’

150’

4610

144’

CI TY

57

(18)

1 30 ’

542

270’

1 56’

(19)

100’

(22)

(23)

(24)

(25)

(18)

100’

100’

100’

100’

(26)

150’

150’

150’

350’

L AKE

4659

100’

100’

100’

100’

100’

100’

3 PI NE

1 63 ’

494

106

521 (2)

150’

100’

A

116’

3

445

502

1 37 ’

481

294’

(20)

DRI VE

4667

22

(17)

(16)

(15)

WOOD RANDAL

3.9 AC.

107’

150’

(12)

463

(14)

(13)

150’ 100’

32 4602

19

98

220’ 659’

100’

4651

(10)

133’

476

550

465

3

1

(17)

90

99

1 70’

F

120’

5

5 100’

100’

150’

4643

(11)

153’

489

3

3

274’

5

(1)

561

1

5

529

1 56 ’

560

1 80’

70’

97’

21 150’

150’

4635

150’

4627

20

1 05’

510

(16)

105

4

20’+ -

19

4619

(15)

104 497

5

(21)

4703

89

22 144’

’ 21

100’

(12)

123’

100’

18 150’

150’

4611

100’

17

100’

520

103

COURT 100’

100

575

1 64’

2

4704

1 57’

115’

’ 7 2

278’

(35)

5

2 5’

8

1 79’

1

1 31 ’

47

5

39

568

5

131’

1 68’

(25)

545

537

4691

101

505

484

4670

6

7 100’

100’

100’

4662

102

50 ’

117’

1 00’

5

55 ’

68’

’ 0 5

132’

100’

16

(27)

446

4654

8

9

100’

100’

4646

150’

4638

10

11

’ 91

82’ 122’ (28)

488’

3

(1)

(2)

150’

67 12 ’

4630

95’

4683

1 28 ’ (14) 1 73 ’ 45 (13) ’ 79’

231 ’

4603

455’

4622

34’

(11)

99

85’ 100’

100’

(3)

EBERLINE

15

476

(23)

5

8

1 57’

1 1 0’ 4675

(24)

130’

100’

150’

4600

453’

130’

56

43

110’

97

(22)

(4)

150’

14

451’

484

55

E

5

4661

4653

(21)

100’

(5)

150’

13

’ 32 1

97

4614

’ 50

188’

100’

492

72

4606

17 7 ’

(10)

448’

100’

(6)

150’

3

6

132’

119’

129’

100’

(7)

(8) 150’

’ 5

73’

100’

54

120’

(9)

121’

4

94

110’

120’

95’

4645

5 39’

599’ 169’

(1)

(2)

(3)

504

130’

’ ’ 9 94

70’

4

4569

4577

130’

4571

75

4587

76 130’

6

118’

119’

5

193’

52’

77

4’ 4 0’

(4)

95’

4637

(20)

44 4662

COURT

53

2.54 AC(D)

496

105’

95 ’

(19)

PLUM ORCHARD COURT

78

45

1 1 7’

4629

’ 96

’ 55

155’

4567

61

114’

109’

4654

46

1 00 ’

4586

91’

4646

1 00 ’

145’

81

515

80

(12)

120’

5 6 ’

441’

6

1 32’

52

1’ 23

4574 ’ 0 7

468’

43

6

1 00’ 70’

(34)

’ 0 5

583

1 73’ 590

793

1’ 16

46

592

1 73’

40

246’

5

513

504

7

1 57’

47

RO US 79 AY ’

4619

0’

79 1 29’

77 ’

(7)

130’

4568

59’

(6)

80’

84’

(5)

15’

51

4638

4684

42

42 5

(11)

’ 169

124’ 139’

175’

8

108’

24

57’

(13)

48

’ 57

(12)

2

521

(13)

538

4692

1 25 ’

’ 14 5

(8) 524

(14)

(31)

1 05’

512

1’ 8

(9) 6 0 4 ’ 8 ’

(15) 4630

310’ 316’

(8) 1 25’ 1 05 ’ 71’

44

18

1 00’

1 00’

45

8 ’ 64 1

1 00’

789

552

1 72’

1 00’

(33)

1 01 ’

(30)

1 21 ’

204’

546

1 45’ 1 00’

4676

1 52 ’ 4665

14 0’

150’

4553

120’

4552

14

8 0 ’

1 00 ’

’ 55 ’ 80

85

49

1 5’

1 33’

41 4657

0’ 13

108’ 130’

525

1 1 0’ 115’

41

8

1 00’

8

1 00’

527

(29)

519

5

(10)

(16)

5

1 00 ’

40 4649

(7)

4622

50

1 1 0’

40

45’

’ 68

37

4664

13’

’ 6 5

86

4

4616

36 1 07 ’

77

’ 0 8

169’

’ 7 5 1

82 (9)

(10)

(11) 80’

50 ’

551

6

4597

532

87

(14)

1 41 ’

520

(6)

1 1 0 ’

0’ 15

4585

1 (17)30 ’

4656

98 ’

1 1 0’

(18)

4 18

4563

’ 1 21

39

(5)

80 ’

’ 92

84

5

35

4641

E

1 60’

+ 70’ (117’)

E

83

122’

4558

LAN E

1 05 ’

553

N LA

6’ 0 2

93

1 33 ’

(4)

1’

OR CH ARD

(3)

1 26 ’

60

4648

1 00 ’

4633

1 25 ’

20

DRI VE

775

25’

50’

1 00’8

767

(32)

2

1 76’

(1)

4 1 2 02 ’ ’ (28) 6 0 ’

53 ’

38

1 55’

6

8

(2)

5

’ 9 18

39

1 52’

50’ 1 00’

798

8

53’

88

4598

1 08 ’

4640

D

528

536

21

600

790

20’

5

(25)

KE I GH LE Y

1 00 ’

4564

92

1 3’

1 43 ’ (1)

2 2 3 ’

34

1 81 ’ 201 ’

618

77’

8

784

9

757

50’

(1)

(3)

70’ 490’

2’

41

1 00’

50

747

(27)

(26)

1 00 ’

38

4625

1 08’

(24)

(22)

1 20 ’

37

146’

167’

(15)

5

7 14

89

(20)

515

1 00 ’

’ 0 11

1 68 ’

74’

’ 80

4617

’ 5 12

90

4570

36

557

(23)

48

1 50’

1 00’

’ 130

6

4590

91

33

523

1 05’ 83’

25’

626

1 52’

(4)

772

1 49’

731

1 20 ’

5

282’

4576

’ 0 15

65’

(16)

4609

300’

4582

6

’ 30 1

5

95 ’

’ 0 ’ 0 10

+ 197’-

’+ 18 3

5’ 1 1

96

4596

1 34 ’

35

(2)

300’

(19)

28

(21)

33

10

64 ’

24

1 1 0’ + -

95 ’

94’ 1

8

762

1 26’

95’

1 1 1 + ’ -

(18)

4628

32

1.5 AC + -

1 45’

93’

+ ’8 16

175’

1 45 ’

163’ + -

(17)

4572

’ 5

650’

516

1 04 ’

531

(4)

22

(2)

610

(3)

1 08’

739

C

23

(5)

92’

1 45’ 4781

8

420’

4618

27

4601

559

1 34 ’

(16)

18

232 ’ + -

(17’)

29

(20)

(6)

50’

9 754

’ 21

471 ’

6

1 00’

1 1 0’

2

13’

230’

11

4773

3’ 26

’ 25 1

1 41 ’ 224’

10

1 05’

49

53 ’

524

26 1 1 3’

13

(15)

(8)

642

1 56’

4765

9’

’ 29 1

(10)

69’

709

’ 15

34

2.9 AC.

30

4610

5

60’ + -

2 19 ’

11

2 2 0 ’

3’ 16 8’ 14

5

31

111’

4 16

4

160’

(14)

’ 0 10 ’ 7 16

538

532

4725

(9)

744

15’ 35’

(12)

4600

4

556

210’

’ 5 5’ 1 10 (17)

5

(19) ’ 126

25

191’

(11)

565

(13)

1 20’

’ 5 5 9 ’ 0 (18) 12

29

30 4717

736

210’

13’

4733

3

2

1 00’

1 05’

75’

(7)

1 79’

106’

4757

4749

4741

28

’ 75

75’

170’

42

1.8 AC + -

55’

4

210’

’ 6 10 563

46’

’ 153

560

150’

70

(48)

220’

24

4

5

(47) 568’

4

’ 0

4589

247’

’ 0 10

2

712

12 (10)

31

(11)

709

569

15

69

4

65

1 2 8 ’

4597

(9)

’ 2 15

8’ 20

1 88 ’

80 ’

2

100’ 100’

’ 8 7

654

2

24

25

26 ’ 7 10

27 ’ 89

5 95’

4’ 1 1

0’ 1 1

4701

12

22

’ 0 15

64 ’

’ 7 14

N E E 94’ D R 23 E B 00’ 567 A 1

564

9

29 2

208’

4772

50’

LANE

4740

’ 0 15

4

4766

95’

662

170’

’ 01 1

2

30

(2)

6

7

(8)

4709

210’

21 571

2 4

63

’ 3

4598

4

64

1 1 5’

4 5

4

620 (7)

’ 0 15

32

(12)

40’ 62’ 1 05’

4750

1

2

(1)

(3)

4758

40 39

280’ 101’

72’ 1 20’

0’

7 47’ 7’ 1 1

(4)

’ 52 1

4716

’ 16 2

(13)

2

190’

2

150’

’ 3 10

KEIG 1 0 5 HL ’ COU E RT Y

52’

68

(43)

691

(8)

573

2

566

’ 9

66

14

4590

4582

4581

(42)

’ 3 2 14

B

37 ’

4

’ 2 5

1 1 44 09’ ’

568

’ ’ 6 03 9 1

(37)

1 (44) 64’

67

’ ’ 0 0 0 1 7

(41)

1 63 ’

(40) 570

35 ’

20

51

C

31

138’

’ 14 5

(36)

36 ’

(39)

4561

62

2

2

2

177’ 210’

(18)

628

(6)

4691

(14)

678

B

4700

33

420’

58 4536

3 3 5 ’

4581

59

27 1 ’ 27 ’

1 4 1 ’

61

(17)

38

’ 0 15

32

28

4679

420’ 418’

22 8’

’ 3 4

45 ’

’ 9 14

1 00’

13

210’

60

(7)

150’

1 00’

668

155’

677

210’

63’

2 4

19 575

COU RT

1 66’

57

4542

2

1 1 9’

4571

47

(35)

4590

1 01 ’

11 5 ’

’ 4 15

(9)

(15)

(1)

2

150’

51

37

160’

(6)

35

150’

14

669

4692

4659

ABERDEEN

56

572

18

(2)

(10)

34

100’

OS AGE

(34)

D

(5)

577

(16)

’ 91 36’ 1

5

2

(7) (6)

45’

(5)

636

’ 0 10

4582

52

1 00’

579

36 660

160’

165’

(29)

53

60’

’ 7 5

661

4645

’ 24 ’ 42 ’ 4’ 38 10

7’ 20

54

17

15

(3)

160’

85’

(30) 4574

4558

4550

1 23’ 1 01 ’

(31)

(4)

4631

8 7 ’

115’

A

633

(5)

8

1 5’ 1 00’

50

576

16 4619

152’

2

’ 0 10

(28)

2

’ 0 11

1 70’

4566

55

’ 6 10

160’

’ 8 9

168’

123’ (26)

(32)

580

(27)

(25)

1 80’

300’

(46)

4595

49

1’ 15

’ 0 10

47

(33)

2 92 ’

(45)

48

160’

2

2

4587

229 1 ’ 57’

1

123’ 4603

4684

33

4

B

(24)

75’

’ 8 2 77’

27

8 10

5

46

87 ’

ABERDEEN

’ 0 15

(4)

Y

34

91’

257’

4575

(11)

193 ’

4676

35

100’

16 1’

36

100’

255 ’

150’

138’

5 ’

5

37

100’

100’

38

4769

100’

2 8

4

100’

4658

644

279’

10

4753

4749

2

94’

9

33 1

26

7 0 ’

7172

02’ 1

14

39

40

4650

(12)

’ 5 14

13

100’

4642

(3) 12 8 ’

R

41

100’

8 3 ’

’ 0 10

42

4634

2

(13)

RT COU

RY NT BA ’

’ 150

4626

4618

(14)

60’

’ 0 10 ’ 2

90’

4610

(15)

131’

T

43 1 6’

(16)

100’

7

45

(17)

(18)

100’

N A

82’

4602

100’

B

4594

44 4578

(19)

(20)

100’

’ 14 9

’ 9 15

4586

100’

160 ’

(21)

100’

’ 0 10

19 0’

(22) (23)

100’

150’

101’

150’

165’

150’

97’

2

L I MI TS

150’

CI TY

150’

L AKE

150’

PI NE

40

’ 25 91 1 652

5 9

41

2

71

150’

70

4750

LAND DIST.

’ 48 1

LAND LOT

4696

25’

200’

40

ROCKBRIDGE

15 16

16

39

18

17 DATE

DEKALB COUNTY, GA.

40

12/14/09

SCALE:1"=200’


Letter of Water and Sewer Location


Zoning Map (City of Pine Lake)


USGS Water Well Survey


Subject Property


Jurisdictional Waters Survey Performed by Corblu Ecology Group, LLC


Nathan Parker From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

Chrissy Sherman Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:31 PM Nathan Parker FW: Proposal for Pine Lake Senior Residences sketch jd map.pdf

Chrissy Sherman Project Manager csherman@enercon.com 770-590-2131 direct 404-805-2890 cell 770-919-1932 fax

This email and any of its attachments contain Confidential Attorney‐Client Work Product prepared in anticipation of litigation that is privileged,  confidential. This email is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this  email, please delete it without reading it. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the  contents of and attachments to this email is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please delete the  original and any copy of this email and any printout.   

From: Micah Whiteside [mailto:mwhiteside@corblu.com] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 4:02 PM To: Chrissy Sherman Subject: RE: Proposal for Pine Lake Senior Residences

Chrissy,   please find attached the sketch map to the Pine Lake Residences project site.  As seen in the sketch map, I located the  stream running near the center of the site as we discussed on the phone.  I flagged the stream with pink flagging and  labeled the start and end points with a double flag.  As a result of the site delineation, the only stream I identified as  USACE jurisdictional waters and waters that require a buffer (local issuing authority, EPD) was the single stream running  through the center of the site.  I found no other additional streams and I found no wetlands.  Please note, The  jurisdictional waters of the U.S. or State boundaries have not been verified by the USACE or the Local Issuing Authority,  respectively.  Please feel free to get in touch with me if you have any questions or comments.    Micah W. Whiteside, C.E. Project Ecologist Corblu Ecology Group, LLC 

From: Chrissy Sherman [mailto:csherman@enercon.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:35 PM To: Micah Whiteside Subject: Re: Proposal for Pine Lake Senior Residences

You should have received a signed PO from us. Are you all set for tomorrow?     Sent from my iPhone  1


Villas at pine lake dca appendices compiled  
Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you