Endnotes 169
343.
344.
345.
346.
347.
348.
349.
350.
351.
352.
353.
354.
355.
356.
Jones, S. (2006) Talk Us Into It: Putting conversation at the heart of the public realm (London: Demos), p. 69.
357.
Ibid. p. 103. Farkas, S., Friedman, W. & Bers, A. (1995), The Public’s Capacity for Deliberation (New York: Public Agenda / Kettering Foundation)
358.
359.
Neisser, P. (2006), ‘Political Polarization as Disagreement Failure’, Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 2:1, article 9, p. 1. Jones, S. (2006) Talk Us Into It: Putting conversation at the heart of the public realm (London: Demos), p. 99.
360.
Ibid. Halpern, D. (2009), Capital Gains. (London: Royal Society of the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA)) Equality and Human Rights Commission Parliamentary Briefing,Equality Bill, Lords Second Reading briefing – 15 December 2009. Available at: www.equalityhumanrights. com/uploaded_files/Equality%20Bill/equality_bill_lords_ second_reading_briefing.doc Johnson, N. and Tatam, J. (2009), Good Relations: A conceptual analysis. Institute of Community Cohesion (iCoCo) commissioned by the Equality and Human Rights Commission 2009 NCVO and Carnegie UK Trust (2009), Altogether Now? The role and limits of civil society associations in connecting a diverse society. (London: NCVO/Carnegie UK Trust) Kadlec, A. and Friedman, W. (2007), ‘Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Power’, Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 3:1 (2007), p. 19. Participatory Methods Toolkit. A practitioners manual: www.kbs-frb.be/publication. aspx?id=178268&LangType=1033 Young, I. M. (2001), ‘Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy’, Political Theory, vol. 29:5 (2001), p. 679. John Dewey, ‘The Economic Basis of a New Society’, in Jo Ann Boydston (ed) The Collected Works of John Dewey (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press),The Later Works, 1925-1953, vol. 13, p.320; cited in Kadlec and Friedman, ‘Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Power’, p. 16
361.
Deliberative Democracy Consortium (2008), Where is Democracy Headed? Research and Practice on Public Deliberation. A Report of the Deliberative Democracy Consortium (Washington: DDC), p. 41. See www.weblab.org. Black, L. (2009), ‘Listening to the City: Difference, Identity, and Storytelling in Online Deliberative Groups’, Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 5:1; Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B. and Anderson, C. (2009), ‘Is Information Good for Deliberation? Link-Posting in an Online Forum’, Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 5:1 Adams, D. and Goldbard, A. (2000), Transforming Dialogue: Web Lab’s Explorations at the Frontiers of Online Community. An Evaluation Report for Web Lab; available at: www.weblab.org/sgd; Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B. and Anderson, C. (2009), ‘Is Information Good for Deliberation? Link-Posting in an Online Forum’, Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 5:1 (2009). For examples of current online experiment and research based in the UK, see Wilson, R. and Casey, A. (2008), Teleparticipation. Engaging Millions (London: Involve); Smith et al. (2008), ‘Online deliberation experiment project description’ (University of Southampton/University of Manchester), www.civicbehaviour.org.uk/research/ summaries/online_deliberation
Part 3 362.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W. and Earls, F. (1997), ‘Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy’. Science 15 August 1997