Direct Driller Issue 18

Page 46

FEATURE

FARMER FOCUS

ANDREW WARD Direct drilling into heavy clays is a battle still to be won Eight years of trials with cover crops and direct drilling has prompted more questions than answers. The soil advisers at Agrii like to remind me that there is more to direct drilling than simply placing the seed into uncultivated ground. “You have to earn the right,” they tell me in reference to the need to first get the soil in to a condition where it will perform as expected. In my experience, ‘earn’ is an understatement. When the day comes that I am truly happy with how my direct drilled crops look and with the financial returns they deliver, it will be because I have battled hard to create that situation. This is not to say that I cannot grow crops by the direct drilling method. I can. In some years the financial returns are even reasonable, but as yet no direct drilled crop on this farm has produced a net return better than that sown after the ground was first cultivated with the Simba Solo. This is the root of my frustration. I started on this journey to identify a direct drilling approach that worked on my heavy clay soils eight years ago. I selected a 22-acre field close to the home farm at Leadenham because it was near enough that I could monitor it regularly and at my convenience. The soil type, structure, and everything else was typical of many of the fields on my 1600-acre farm half of which is 50%+ clay. I’ve used this field to investigate a range of establishment regimes, species of cover crop and following crop options. Some have worked better than others, but I’ve also had two complete crop failures. This is turning out to be an expensive exercise, but I’m also relieved not to have followed the crowd and gone ‘all in’. In harvest 2021, the long-term cover crop/direct drilling field produced a net return that was £180/ha less than the field immediately next to it which serves as the yearly comparison and where the crop is produced following the farm standard regime. This poorer financial performance reflects the cost of an additional pass to sow the cover crop, the costs of the seed itself, one or two applications of slug pellets and the lower yield of the spring barley crop. It amuses me that DEFRA is offering to pay £40/ha to farmers to sow cover crops. This is only a small contribution to the true cost these crops have within my business and I for one will not be signing-up for any of the cover crop options on offer as part of the sustainable farming incentive. Like many, my motivation for direct drilling is to cut costs and save money. If I need to invest in new machinery, extend the rotation or bring in cover crops, then so be it. So far, my experience is one of ‘two-steps forward, one-step back’. This is far from the resounding success that many preach.

46 DIRECT DRILLER MAGAZINE

Cover crops are a case in point. After several years of seemingly making good progress and a small but noticeable improvement in soil condition, disaster struck. Come the spring, the ground was rock hard, and the spring barley crop suffered at best 15% germination. It was abandoned. We soon learned that without a gentle cultivation in the autumn to create a fine tilth, there is little chance of successfully establishing a cereal crop come the spring. We’ve also tried lightly grazing the cover crop with sheep – two to three days at a low stocking density – only to find they tread the ground too much and you lose the friable tilth. This neatly sums up my experience: direct drilling into heavy soils carries a high risk. The friable tilth created in the autumn needs to be preserved until the spring. Having tried drilling cover crops directly into stubble and broadcasting the seed with a pneumatic spreader before rolling in, on the advice of others, I moved to a wide-row system. We had modified an old Simba Solo for use as an oilseed rape drill and fitted it with low-disturbance tines designed by Philip Wright of Wright Resolutions. The seed is sown in 45 cm rows before a Simba Unipress fitted with spring tines is pulled behind. This approach seems to be working well, so far.

Maintaining output In most years, the clay soils tend to produce the highestyielding crops, but also require more work and horsepower. This is my dilemma: I want to maintain the output of this land but reduce my reliance on big tractors and heavy equipment. I willingly concede my Simba Free-flow drill has its limitations. This is not to say that I haven't used it successfully to sow direct-drilled crops. I have and most of the crops that followed have been good, but it is not suited to drilling directly into cover crops or into autumn stubble where there is a thick layer of trash. In contrast, it works better where the ground has been lightly cultivated with the Simba Solo ISSUE 18 | JULY 2022


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Direct Driller Patrons

1min
pages 98-100

BASE update

4min
pages 95-97

Harvest 2023 impact of high input costs

3min
pages 74-75

Nitrogen Fert Application Strategies

3min
pages 72-73

Consumers look for high quality beef

8min
pages 84-87

Farmer Focus - John Pawsey

7min
pages 56-57

Farmer Focus - Julian Gold

13min
pages 64-67

How are margins looking?

6min
pages 76-79

Farmer Focus - Andrew Ward

8min
pages 46-47

The figures behind the Regenerative Values

18min
pages 26-33

Sustainable Land Management Learning

2min
pages 22-23

What's your Colour?

3min
pages 8-9

My Nuffield Journey - Emily Padfield

8min
pages 12-15

Featured Farmer - Philip Rowbottom

6min
pages 6-7

Water Focus: Affinity Water

3min
pages 34-35

Farmer Focus - Andy Howard

3min
pages 10-11

Farmer Focus - John Cherry

3min
pages 24-25
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.