1 minute read
The Ending
from Rule Book
A collective win of the game is achieved when a form of commoning is established on the land on site. The images on the right represent an example of how this can be achieved. It takes a base of lands that are public (owned by the policy makers), and privatised (owned by corporations and single farmer families). It then utilised concepts of commoning to allow for empathetic understanding of how a plot of land can be used to include various different members of the community, both the humans and nonhumans.
Players are encouraged to then ask themselves:
Advertisement
What did you think of the interactive design methodology as a method to understand and control the future of the carbon offset market and ideas of commoning?
How does the incorporation of both human and non-human characters influence your understanding of this issue?
Who was there a perceived “bad guy” in this game? Why?
What would you change about the game rules to allow for a more “fair” method to monitor and manage the carbon offset system? What do you think about the Woodland and Peatland management codes?
