Stakeholder Meeting to discuss 17th Street Neighborhood Reinvestment Study -April 6 2021 by D.Masterson

Page 1

From: To:

"Zach Piepmeyer" <zpiepmeyer@ccdcboise.com> acantor@cityofboise.org "Angela Hansen" <AngelaHansen@cushingterrell.com> bcallaway@dwfwholesale.com "Chris Dwyer" <ChrisDwyer@cushingterrell.com> DaveDixon@cushingterrell.com "Derick Oneill" <Derick.Oneill@rivershoredevelopment.com> "Doug Woodruff" <dwoodruff@ccdcboise.com> "Farias, Andrew" <AFarias@idahopower.com> fernandd@slhs.org george.iliff@colliers.com groot@thorntonbyron.com heather.b.smith.sah0@statefarm.com "Jason Butler" <JasonButler@cushingterrell.com> jgalloway@oecworks.com jmccrosky@cityofboise.org jodi@interfaithsanctuary.org jtomlinson@cityofboise.org kcody@dfamilk.com kevin@biltmoreco.com lcarbone@cityofboise.org marc@corpuschristiboise.org Mark@mfhllc.com meagan.curtis@rivershoredevelopment.com mruffalo@cityofboise.org nicholed@tokcommercial.com pburch@cityofboise.org rgervais@cityofboise.org "Rob Bousfield" <RBOUSFIELD@cityofboise.org> "Ronk, Megan" <MRonk@idahopower.com> "Ryan Head" <RHead@achdidaho.org> "Sarah Jones" <sjones@ccdcboise.com> sday@catchprogram.org sjones@thephoenix.org skeithly@cityofboise.org story@storycommercial.com trebholtz@windermere.com whammon@idahoagc.org "Justin Vogel" <justinv@rafnah.com> rickmarjb@gmail.com INFO@CALIENTESALON.NET sbobst@rafnah.com jason5500@gmail.com pgombert@indiedwell.com sbeecham@indiedwell.com "Shirley O'Neil" <soneil@cityofboise.org> "Andy Erstad" <acerstad@erstadarchitects.com> 11/23/2021

Page 2

"Barry Miller" <Barry@mfhllc.com> "Kristy Inselman" <Kinselman@achdidaho.org> "Jordyn Neerdaels" <jneerdaels@ccdcboise.com> Date: Subject: Attachments:

4/14/2021 1:40:32 PM [External] 17th Street Reinvestment Study - Kick-Off Meeting Follow Up 20210406_Stakeholder Kick-Off Meeting Summary.pdf 17th Street Reinvestment Plan Presentation 4-6-21.pdf

afternoon,

you for par cipa ng in last week’s stakeholder kick-oﬀ mee ng. There was valuable discussion in the break-o and it is clear there is interest in seeing future investment in the 17th Street sub-area. Your input during th ng will assist CCDC in formulating policy and infrastructure recommendations geared towards incentivizing t investment.

find attached a summary of discussion items from the kick-off meeting as well as a pdf of the slides that we ted.

were not able to attend the meeting, a recording is available at this link. There are a series of short videos f g/closing remarks as well as each of the break-out rooms.

ing this email, I will send out a separate calendar invite for the next stakeholder meeting to be held on Tues 1 at 2:00-3:30pm. We look forward to having another lively discussion about neighborhood vision and will ing categories of potential future improvements.

en now and the next mee ng, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us with any follow up comments or ques

iepmeyer, P.E. t Manager – Capital Improvements

H ST, SUITE 501 BOISE, ID 83702

meyer@ccdcboise.com 208-384-4264 208-319-1204 08-870-5301

CDCBOISE.COM

11/23/2021

Page 3

MEETING SUMMARY Project:

CCDC- 17th Street Reinvestment Study

Meeting Minutes Recorded by:

Cushing Terrell

Meeting Purpose:

Stakeholder Meeting to discuss 17th Street Neighborhood Reinvestment Study

Meeting Date:

April 6, 2021

Attendees:

See attendee list

CCDC Staff and Cushing Terrell Planning Team facilitated the first of three stakeholder meetings for the 17th Street Reinvestment Study. High level overview of the neighborhood was presented to the group as a precursor to dividing into smaller discussion groups.

Overview Presentation:  



Team and Project Introductions given by Zach Piepmeyer and Angela Hansen Why this Area? o Continuing the legacy of Shoreline District Urban Framework and focusing directly on the Study Area triangle because:  Awkward barriers leftover from past eras of development  Transitional between downtown neighborhoods and Boise River  Full of opportunity sites Urban and Architectural Character o Various eras, medium to small scale buildings o Variety in the gateway experience  Greenery and trees as approached from the north  Hardscaped and urban from east Land Use and Ownership o No residential – River Walk removed, not included in Shoreline o City is the largest single owner, but the area is mostly private Stormwater o Estimated design capacity at or below a 25-year event o Environmental quality issues for storm runoff, have two outfalls into River o Infiltration basins on private and transmission in right of way and in pipes

cushingterrell.com 11/23/2021

Page 4

2 Water and Sanitary: No major deficiencies found in existing systems, but Water would require upsizing with significant new development Fiber and Power o Significant OHP lines to be undergrounded over time as property is conveyed Mobility: VRT lines 4 and 5 take you to downtown transit center and outbound to Boise Town Square and airport o Missing sidewalks noted Streetscape: no street exactly complies with the Downtown Streetscapes Typology Manual Floodplain: new FIRM maps generally place more properties in Special Flood Hazard Area o AE generally corresponds to the 100-yr FP, 0.2% chance generally 500-yr Floodplain o Makes redevelopment different than the previous year’s map Sites Susceptible to Change: sites were identified for change in the Study Area using a four-part criterion o

 



END OF PRESENTATION

Three breakout groups held discussions on:  examples of development successes and failures,  Investment barriers, and  stakeholder vision and goals for this neighborhood. The following discussion notes are provided for each of the discussion groups: Break-out group facilitated by Angela Hansen: Group members included: Kevin Amar, Jennifer Tomlinson, Scott Beecham, Tom Rebholtz, Kristi Inselman, Nicole (TOK Commercial); Lance Carbone, Jodi McCroskey Group made up of primarily public staff and employees from city, ACHD, and Boise Fire, and Boise Police Dept. Three development groups represented and one private landowner. The following comments were provided: Boise Fire- still heavily uses the Fire training tower located on Shoreline near the river. No future plans to remove the shop and maintenance services being managed from this location. Boise Parks spoke with regards to the departments focus on greenbelt improvements in this area- project to begin this spring Trestle Bridge to 9th street. Just completed upgrades to the restroom at the Fireman's memorial site. Private property owner indicated his leased property (St. Luke's currently leases). Believes area is ripe for redevelopment. People looking for a full lifestyle location where they can live, work, and play without leaving their neighborhood. 17th street has opportunity to achieve that concept. Spoke about the neighborhood being a neighborhood of transition. Would like to see residential activities, an extension of the urban core, some physical barriers exist, and creative solutions will need to be used to address these. There is opportunity for change.

cushingterrell.com 11/23/2021

Page 5

3 Barriers to Development:  Expressed safety concerns. Staffing business is difficult due to current neighborhood conditions. That improvements to lighting and parking would go a long way to enhancing the neighborhood.  Similar comments to safety concerns with parking, street camping, lighting, and general cleanliness of the streets and public spaces.  Boise Police; Attending as an observer. BPD continuing to look for ways to work with landowners to clean-up the neighborhood and police it more efficiently and effectively. Neighborhood Vision and Goals:  Low hanging fruit may be the street lighting and the parking.  General neighborhood cleanliness.  Getting eyes on the street through the development of a full-time residential development. Discussion was shared about the upcoming Mid-Rise Residential project that may begin the process of transitioning the neighborhood. Spoke of the uncertainty that comes with being the first new project to go into the neighborhood. This study comes at an opportune time and hopes were expressed about having public investment coincide with the private development.  ACHD spoke about the opportunity for the extension of the alley that runs parallel to 17th street between 17th and Americana. ACHD holds 17' of right of way within alley additional right of way could be acquired and they would be open to exploring that further.  Discussion about the vacation of the alley being an option. Break-out group facilitated by Chris Dwyer: The group had Jason Williams, Captain Burch, George Illif, Jay Story.

The comments were primarily provided by Jason, Capt. Burch, and George.  How will the Interfaith leaving affect the area and development?  Currently the area has a lack of connectivity – primarily the dead-end 17th St. o Access and connectivity are key – 17th St, pedestrian crossings @ Shoreline & Americana  There is a lack of “pull” to the area – unless you are going to a specific building why would you go to this area?  Pull off the energy from the Skate Park? It is a world-class amenity Barriers to Development:  The need for people to feel safe; to some degree the homeless population makes it difficult (whether it is a reality or not)  Desire to know more about what CCDC could do to help with redevelopment i.e. what is the scope of their abilities. Neighborhood Vision and Goals:  Housing – it will also bring additional types of business (mainly retail/food & beverage)  Capt. Burch feels that bringing balance will benefit the area. o It is not just a ‘thru’ area but it is also a ‘to’ area  Areas for bike parking, electric scooters, future technology  More connectivity to the river – make this area of the Green Belt not a ‘thru’ area  Pocket park with a specific use o Play off the skate park, the trails of Kathryn Albertson Park, and the activities of Ann Morrison Park

cushingterrell.com 11/23/2021

Page 6

4 Break-out group facilitated by Dave Dixon: The group had Andy Erstad, Derick O’Neill, Shirley O’Neil, Rob Bousfield, Mark Miller

Recent Successes/Failures:  Andy Erstad – Mark Miller has property west of overpass and City made them move some hydrants  Derick O’Neill – is associated with current owner of Powerhouse, knows connectivity and access points are important in that area going forward  Success: Across interstate across at Adare Manor 100% occupied) o St Luke’s new facility o The City’s CEPTED study and report o Parks is redoing restrooms at Firefighter Memorial o The fact that all parties are having this discussion is a win o Shirley O’Neil – Director of Community Partnerships  Agrees this discussion is great  Lighting: around Greenbelt is a upcoming project – there was a question on this but no one knew for sure what/where the project was during the meeting. o Coopers Court and shelters are decentralizing  Coming at a good time with this study o Derick – Two big moves happened to make a project on 30th Street a success  Rezoned to more intense development (C-5)  Land for Adare Manor was City-owned and given to the project o 17th St Study Area strongly parallels what happened across the interstate and could be replicated o Redevelopment plan for the Symposion property across the interstate is only possible through significant tax credits Barriers to Development:  For every dollar a developer spends on public infrastructure isn’t spent on project. All the little things the City can do will help reinvestment, for example, undergrounding overhead power is very expensive for individual property owners, and the City requires moving/adding hydrants and it feels like developers do all the work  Administration is really thinking about housing, remove the hoops you have to go through is less energy for developer  Mark – City asks for all the little nickel and dime items and then ultimately says “we don’t have infrastructure to support you so you have to pay for the improvements.”  Burden goes to next in line: if you’re next developer that comes along you’re stuck with infrastructure bill – administration/CCDC can share some of the work and/or the costs  Look at this as far as master plan: all parties are fans of the 17th St area and seem to share a vision, however that vision hasn’t been communicated or agreed on by all parties o Example: Assuming the owner is responsible for completing a missing sidewalk – if you really want to develop the area the administration and developer’s comprehensive plans need to be congruent o If CCDC fronts the cost for infrastructure it’s a great benefit for developers  Stormwater is a huge barrier and will have to be dealt with, but equally so is zoning. Allowable density is low, and Andy had a project that received C-5 zoning and it was viable  The urban camping makes people (visitors, residents, workers) drive in and want to go the other way cushingterrell.com 11/23/2021

Page 7

5 

 

Mark – Ultimately administration/CCDC/developers all have same goal – want to see greater density, workforce housing, but if developers can get viable zoning, ensure good fiber optic, that paves the way for affordable housing o City is interested in doing all the right things to make this happen Challenge: much of the property in the Study Area is exempt from taxes (e.g. City of Boise, ACHD, Idaho Power) Somehow all need to figure out how to overcome this, set the stage and create land for redevelopment

Vision and Goals:  Rob Bousfield – Boise, says that relocating shop facilities and doing something with a housing component is in the vision and would open up acres of land  The River Street Master Plan’s vision for the area is to create a near-downtown mixed-use urban neighborhood with dense, diverse and affordable residential. Is this vision shared with the stakeholders? o Certainly, possible and within the vision, but really have to look at each individual property for its merits as a multifamily project and scrutinize the costs/benefits. END OF MEETING SUMMARY The foregoing is the author’s understanding of the content of this meeting. If the attendee’s understanding differs from the above, please respond to the author within ten working days. CUSHING TERRELL

cushingterrell.com 11/23/2021

Page 8

17th Street Reinvestment Study S TA K E H O L D E R M E E T I N G # 1 APRIL 6, 2021

11/23/2021

Page 9

AGENDA OUTLINE 1 | M E ET I N G IN T ROD U CT ION (2:00 - 2:05) a . M e et in g r ul es 2 | P ROJECT IN T ROD U CT ION (2:05 – 2:10) a . Te a m b. S co p e /ti m el i ne c . W h y study thi s area now?

FAIRVIEW AVE

3 | B R EA KOU T SESSI O NS: (2 : 10 – 2:20) -W h a t re c ent pro j ec ts have been successes/ fa ilu re s? -W h a t a re s o m e exam pl es of ef for t s elsewh ere?

17TH ST

SHOR

ELINE

D BLV

RIV

A RIC

Study Area T HS

14T

N 0’

5 | STAK E H OL D ER VISION A N D GOALS ( 2:35 – 2:50) a . R o u n d tabl e o n needs o r desires 6 | B R EA KOU T S ES SION S HA RE BACK ( 2:50-2:55) 7 | N EX T STEPS (2 : 5 5 - 3 : 0 0 ) a . St a ke h ol der Meeti ngs 2 and 3 11/23/2021

250’

500’

4 | I N V EST M EN T BA RRIERS (2 :20 – 2:35) a . I n fra st ruc ture and uti l i ti es : i. Wa t er/s ani tar y s ewer ii. St o r m water/ fl o o dpl ai n iii. R o ads /s i dewal ks iv. Fa c i l i ti es v. G re enbel t , par ks, o pen s p ace vi. F ib er/tec hno l o gy b. Po lic y c . E co n o mi c s d . Ot h e r

Page 10

1 | MEETING INTRODUCTION »

PR ESEN TATIO N WIL L BE RECO RD E D. (A LL P R ES E N T E RS R E M E M B E R TO HI T R ECO R D I N B R EAKO U T ROOMS)

MUT E YOU R MIC AND TU RN O FF YOU R CA M E RA U N LES S YOU ’R E SP EA K I N G .

USE T HE CH AT FU NCTIO N TO AS K QU EST ION S.

START WI TH P ROJ ECT INFO RMAT ION A N D G O IN TO B R EA KOU T ROOM S FO R G RO U P D I S C U S S I O N .

11/23/2021

Page 11

2 | PROJECT INTRODUCTION TEAM CCDC: Zach Piepmeyer

Cushing Terrell: Jason Butler Angela Hansen Dave Dixon Chris Dwyer

SCOPE/TIMELINE Task Description

February 1 2 3 4

March 2 3 4

Task 1 - Existing Conditions Assessment Task 2 - Stakeholder Group Engagement Task 3 - Identify Public Infrastructure Opportunities Task 4 - Final Report

11/23/2021

April 2 3

May 2 3

June 2 3

Page 12

WHY THIS AREA? EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT Study Area Context and Nearby Neighborhoods ST AT E

North End Garden City

West End

MAIN

Winstead

West Downtown

FAIRVIEW

STUDY AREA FR

RIV ER

M YR

ELI

Downtown Boise

Kathryn Albertson Park

Central Rim

Shoreline District

Ann Morrison Park

is e

Rive r

East End

Morris Hill Morris Hill Cemetery

Julia Davis Park

TO L

Lusk District

ALPINE

Boise State University

Depot Bench Central Bench ROSE HILL

N 0’

1/4 Mi

Boise Heights

Southeast Boise

1/2 Mi

11/23/2021

Page 13

Examples of Urban and Architectural Character 17th St looking west

North Gateway, Shoreline Dr at Connector looking south

Greenbelt access

East Gateway, Americana Blvd at Connector looking west

IAGC LLC Office (2008)

Powerhouse (1912)

11/23/2021

Page 14

LAND USE AND OWNERSHIP

Existing Land Use and Ownership Map FAIRVIEW AVE 25TH ST

27TH ST

FRONT ST INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC

184

STATE OF IDAHO

ACHD

CITY OF BOISE (PARKS & REC)

ACHD

CITY OF SOUTHERN SOUTHERN BOISE FOODS FOODS (PARKS GROUP LP GROUP LP & REC)

DENVER WHOLESALE FLORIST CO

IDAHO POWER COMPANY

17TH ST BEST FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (BOISE) CITY OF BOISE (PARKS & REC)

ELINE

CAROUSEL RIDE LLC CAROUSEL RIDE LLC

ASHVILLE LLC

595 MAILBOX AMERICANA LLC MESSINGER FAY L

A AN

D BLV

RIV

ERI

RIVERWALK CENTER LLC

HILL COMPANIES CORPUS AMERICANA LLC CHRISTI HOUSE INC

PUBB LLC

CAROUSEL RIDE LLC

IDAHO POWER COMPANY

FULL MOON VENTURES LLC

SHOR

CHARITABLE ASSTS TO COMMUNITIES HOMELESS INC

THR LLC

IAGC LLC

2LK NC LLC

17th Street Study Area Land Use & Ownership Study Area Boundary Commercial - Office Commercial - Retail

H 14T

KATHRYN ALBERTSON PARK

Medium Industrial

Light Industrial Public Open Space

N 0’

250’

500’

H 13T

11/23/2021

Vacant

Page 15

Acres

Percent of Total

11.1

37%

Open Space

6.3

21%

Vacant

3.6

12%

Light Industrial

3.5

12%

Medium Industrial

2.7

Public

1.5

Commercial – Retail

1.4

Land Use

LAND USE AND OWNERSHIP

Commercial – Office

Existing Land Use Char ts

Retail Public Medium Industrial 9%

5% Office 37%

Vacant/ Surface 12% Parking

30.2

*Approx. 18 acres within the study area are public right-of-way

Acres

Percent of Total

CITY OF BOISE (PARKS & RECREATION)

6.4

23%

IDAHO POWER COMPANY

4.3

15%

ASHVILLE LLC

3.1

11%

ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT

2.2

SOUTHERN FOODS GROUP LP

1.5

CAROUSEL RIDE LLC

1.4

BEST FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (BOISE)

1.4

Top Land Owners

12% Light Industrial

Total

21% Open Space/ Parks

11/23/2021

Page 16

STORMWATER " "

" "

FAIRVIEW AVE

25TH ST

27TH ST

" "

FRONT ST

184 " "

" " " "

" " "

17TH ST "

" "

ELINE

" " ""

" "

" " " " " "

ERI

D BLV

RIV

A AN

SHOR

17th Street Study Area Stormwater Infrastructure

"" "

Study Area Boundary

H 14T

250’

Catch Basin Outfall

500’

Lines: 6 - 12” "

Lines: 13 - 24”

11/23/2021

Stormwater Infiltration Directional Flow

N 0’

Lines: 25 - 48”

" "

Page 17

WATER AND SANITARY SEWER

Existing Water and Sanitary Sewer Distribution System Map FAIRVIEW AVE 25TH ST

27TH ST

FRONT ST 184

17TH ST

ELINE

D BLV

RIV

ERI

A AN

SHOR

17th Street Study Area Water and Sanitary Sewer Study Area Boundary

T HS

14T

Water Lines: 2” - 6” Lines: 6“ - 12”

N 0’

250’

Lines: 12” - 24” Sanitary Sewer Lines: 2” - 12”

500’

Lines: 12” - 30”

11/23/2021

Lines: 30” - 48”

Page 18

FIBER AND OVERHEAD POWER FAIRVIEW AVE 25TH ST

27TH ST

FRONT ST 184

17TH ST

ELINE

D BLV

RIV

ERI

A AN

SHOR

17th Street Study Area Fiber and Over Head Power Study Area Boundary

T HS

14T

Fiber Optic Over Head Power

N 0’

250’

500’

11/23/2021

Page 19

MOBILITY AND SIDEWALKS FAIRVIEW AVE

& &

27TH ST

25TH ST

FRONT ST 184

17TH ST

ELINE

D BLV

RIV

RIC

E AM

A AN

SHOR

ST & &

17th Street Study Area Mobility Network and Gaps Study Area Boundary &

T HS

14T

KATHRYN ALBERTSON PARK

Incomplete Sidewalks Trails/Greenbelt & &

N 0’

250’

500’

T HS

13T

11/23/2021

Transit and Stops

14th

Neighborhood Special Capitol Boulevard Fairview-Main Gre Proposed Street Co

3rd

4th

6th

State

5th

8th

9th

10th

11th

12th

Page 20 13th

15th

URBAN CONCRETE NEIGHBORHOOD URBAN PARKWAY CAPITOL BOULEVARD FAIRVIEW-MAIN GREEN STREET SPECIAL PROPOSED STREET CONNECTIONS

16th

3 4 5 6 7

2nd

Jefferson Bannock

D OW N TOWN BO ISE STREE TSCAPE STA N DA R D S Idaho M A N UAL AN D T YPO LO G IES 2016

Existing Conditions and Streetscape Typologies 1st

Urban Concrete: 17th Street, Shoreline Drive, 25th Street

Main

Front

w Gr

can eri

R iv

ark rP

a te

Broad

Myrtle

8 I-1

vie

ir Fa

Fulton

SITUATIONAL FURNISHINGS

Capitol

Grove

Existing Conditions: Shoreline Dr N. of Americana Blvd

Find the Streetscape Type for Your Parcel Number and location of furnishings will be determined by Boise City through its designSITUATIONAL review process, FURNISHINGS and may include:

Bench 36-37 Number and location of furnishings will Litter Receptacle 38-39 its be determined by Boise City through design review process, and may40-41 include: Bike Rack Bench Movable Planters 44-45 36-37

WEST END

14 "

RIVER MYRTLE - OLD BOISE

Travel Lanes

Parking

Sidewalk Varies

14 "

8' Travel Lanes

Parking

Sidewalk

DOWNTOWN BOISE STREETSCAPE STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL :: 01

Width Varies

Concrete, 2' Modular Sidewalk Joints; Benches, Planters, etc.

Pedestrian Ramp ACHD Standard Street Tree Class II Tree 4'x8' Tree Grate Ramp Pedestrian 11/23/2021 28'-32' ACHD Approx.Standard Spacing

Proposed Streetscape Street Tree

Historic Light 56'-64' Approx. Spacing Curbside Zone 8" Concrete + 6" Curb Historic Light

Width Varies

3rd

Subsurface, Uncompacted Soil for Healthy Tree Growth and Stormwater Collection

1st

The dimensions of the pedestrian zone Main trees, and improvements All furnishings, and frontage zone will vary with overall in the street right-of-way will require sidewalk width. Grove approval by ACHD, (208) 387-6170.

Neighborhood Located 18" from back of curb Special Furnishing Zone Suspended Paving System Concrete, 2' Modular Subsurface, UncompactedCapitol Soil Boulevard Parking Pedestrian Zone and Sidewalk Joints; Meters Benches, for Healthy Tree Growth Located Concrete, 4' Modular Planters, etc. Stormwater Collection Fairview-Main Green St 18" from back of curb Sidewalk Joints Furnishing Zone Proposed Suspended Paving System Street Connec 2nd

Jefferson

The dimensions of the pedestrian zone Bannock and frontage zone will vary with overall NOTE: sidewalk width. Idaho

4th

5th

8th

6th

NOTE:

9th

10th

11th

12th

13th

State

Parking Meters

Pedestrian Zone Concrete, 4' Modular Sidewalk Joints

14th

URBAN BRICK URBAN CONCRETE W/ BRICK URBAN CONCRETE NEIGHBORHOOD URBAN PARKWAY CAPITOL BOULEVARD FAIRVIEW-MAIN GREEN STREET SPECIAL PROPOSED STREET CONNECTIONS

CENTRAL

Bike Rackto be located per Boise 40-41 Parking meters City Parking Standards Movable Planters and placed to 44-45 Existing Streetscape Typologies avoid conicts with all other streetscape furnishings. Coordinate meter placement Key Map (CCDC) Parking meters tospaces be located Boise and accessible parking withper Boise City Parking Standards and placed to City Parking Control, (208) 384-3700. avoid conicts with all other streetscape furnishings. Coordinate meter placement and accessible parking spaces with Boise City Parking Control, (208) 384-3700. 15th

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

WESTSIDE 38-39

Litter Receptacle

16th

STREETSCAPE MAP TYPES

Varies

Page 21

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette

Legend

116°13'29"W 43°37'17"N

SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT

FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP (2021)

Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V, A99

AE, AO, AH, VE, AR WithHazard BFE or Depth Zone FEMA Flood Area Map SPECIAL FLOOD

Regulatory Floodway

HAZARD AREAS

FAIRVIEW AVE

0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Zone X

ZONE AE

Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes. Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to Levee Zone D

OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD NO SCREEN

OTHER AREAS

Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard

20.2

17TH ST

17.5

ZONE AE

SHOR

D BLV

OTHER FEATURES

ST ER

RIV

A AN

ELINE

MAP PANELS

Zone D

Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall

GENERAL STRUCTURES

OD WA Y

Zone X

Effective LOMRs

FLO

Area of Minimal Flood Hazard

Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped

The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location.

17th Street Study Area Flood Hazard Areas

H 14T

N 0’

250

250’

500

500’

1,000

1,500

Feet 2,000

1:6,000

116°12'51"W 43°36'51"N

Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020

11/23/2021

This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. Study Areawith Boundary The basemap shown complies FEMA's basemap accuracy standards

0.2 % Annual Flood Chance The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 4/5/2021 at 12:23 PM and does not Area of Minimal Flood Hazard reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or Zone AEdata over time. become superseded by new This map image isFloodway void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes.

Page 22 • Lower taxable value • Large or vacant sites

SITES SUSCEPTIBLE TO CHANGE FIGURE 6: Sites Susceptible to Change SHORELINE DISTRICT (2018)

• Underutilized sites • Public sites identified as of interest for development

17th St Study Area

Shoreline Urban Framework Plan

11/23/2021

Page 23

3 | BREAKOUT SESSIONS ZAC H , C H R I S, A NG ELA AND DAVE WILL LEAD BR EAKOUT SESSIONS D I SC U SSI ON: 3 | W h a t re c ent pro j ec ts have been successes/failures? ( ~10 MINS) a . W h a t are s o m e exam pl es of ef for ts elsewh ere t h at sh ould b e con si de re d? 4 | I N V EST MEN T BA RRIERS (~ 15 MINS) a . I n fra st ruc ture and uti l i ti es : i. Wa t er/s ani tar y s ewer ii. St o r m water/ fl o o dpl ai n iii. R o ads /s i dewal ks iv. Fa c i l i ti es v. G re enbel t , par ks, o pen s p ace vi. F ib er/tec hno l o gy b. Po lic y c . E co n o mi c s d . Ot h e r 5 | STAK E H OL D ER VIS ION A N D GOALS ( ~15 MINS) a . R o u n d tabl e o n needs o r desires 6 | R EG ROU P A N D S HA RE FIN DINGS @ 2:50 ( ~5 MINS)

11/23/2021

Page 24

RECENT SUCCESSES/FAILURES a . W h a t rec ent m ovem ents o r p rojec ts ( in f rastruc t ure, p ar tn ersh ip s, i mprove me nts, pr i vate d eve lo pm ents ) have had an imp ac t on t h e stud y area? b. W h a t are s o m e exam pl es of ef for t s elsewh ere t h at sh ould b e con si de re d? E lsew h ere i n B o i s e? A c ro s s t h e n ation or in t ern at ion ally? FAIRVIEW AVE

17TH ST

SHOR

D BLV

ER RIV

A AN

Study Area T HS

14T

N 0’

250’

ELINE

500’

11/23/2021

Page 25

4 | INVESTMENT BARRIERS W h at ar e t h e b a rri e rs t o invest men t ? a. I n fr ast ru ct u re a n d u t i l it ies i . W at e r/ sa n i t a ry se w e r i i . Sto rm wa t e r/ f l o o d p l a in i i i . Ro a d s / si d e wa l k s i v . Fac i l i t i e s v . Gr e e n b e l t , p a rk s , o pen spa c e v i . Tech n o l o g y / f i b e r b . P oli c y (e .g. zo n i n g) c . E c on o m i cs d . Ot h e r

11/23/2021

Page 26

5 | STAKEHOLDER VISION AND GOALS 27TH ST

25TH ST

R o u n d t a bl e ( Return to f ull g ro u p @ 2:50pm) a . W h a t are yo ur go al s fo r this p rojec t an d t h e n eigh b orh ood ? Are t hey i n-l i ne wi th co mmu ni t y v i s i o n? b. W h a t are the o ppo r tuni ti es/low h an gin g f ruit ? FAIRVIEW AVE c . P la n s fo r future expans i o n? d . Pro je c ts o r pl ans fro m others th at d o n ot match your mission an d v i s i o n?

FRONT ST INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC

184

STATE OF IDAHO

ACHD

CITY OF BOISE (PARKS & REC)

ACHD

CITY OF SOUTHERN SOUTHERN BOISE FOODS FOODS (PARKS GROUP LP GROUP LP & REC)

DENVER WHOLESALE FLORIST CO

IDAHO POWER COMPANY

17TH ST BEST FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (BOISE) CITY OF BOISE (PARKS & REC)

CAROUSEL RIDE LLC CAROUSEL RIDE LLC

ELINE

ASHVILLE LLC

595 MAILBOX AMERICANA LLC MESSINGER FAY L

D BLV

ER RIV

ERI

RIVERWALK CENTER LLC

A AN

HILL COMPANIES CORPUS AMERICANA LLC CHRISTI HOUSE INC

PUBB LLC

CAROUSEL RIDE LLC

IDAHO POWER COMPANY

FULL MOON VENTURES LLC

SHOR

CHARITABLE ASSTS TO COMMUNITIES HOMELESS INC

THR LLC

IAGC LLC

2LK NC LLC

H 14T

KATHRYN ALBERTSON PARK N 0’

250’

500’

11/23/2021

T HS T 3 1 Existing Land Use and Ownership Map

Page 27

6 | REGROUP + SHARE FINDINGS

11/23/2021

Page 28

7 | NEXT STEPS Me et ing #2: Week O f M a y 10 Pre sent initial fi nd i ng s Me et ing #3: Wee k of J u ne 12 Pre sent and c o nf i rm f i na l rec o mmend a t i on s P le ase provide a ny a d d i ti o na l c o m m en t s t o t h e t e a m :

zpie pmeyer@c c d c b o i se .c o m an gela hansen@ c u sh i n gt e rre l l .com davedixo n@ c u sh i n gt e rre l l .c o m ch r isdwyer@c u sh i n gt e rre l l .c o m

11/23/2021