NEWS
10
oofcrafters Inc. oofcrafters rns Esteemed Angie’s List Inc. Super Service Award Consistently high level of customer service
rns Esteemed Angie’s List Super Service Award
Roofcrafters Inc.
An Industry Leader In Residential Roof Replacement Free Roof Inspections 40 yrs. Licensed Roofing Contractor
Prompt roof replacement OR repair and maintenance services. Offering top of the line GAF Architectural High-Definition Shingles, “Eco-Star” faux slate, and “Firestone” EPDM for flat roofs. Financing Now Available forty years as a Roofing Contractor. in overall grade, recent 434-831-2368 With squares eview period grade. The forty over yearsone as amillion Roofing Contractor. in overall grade, recent dgaleassi@yahoo.com 434-831-2368 installed,we have adopted the motto must period also begrade. in good With over one million squares eview The VA Class ‘A’ Contractor dgaleassi@yahoo.com of the sage, “Think like a raindrop.” h must Angie’s List, pass a installed,we have adopted the motto also be in good www.roofcrafterscharlottesville.com Whether you’re thinking about check and abide by VA Class ‘A’ Contractor of the sage, “Think like a raindrop.” h Angie’s List, pass a
434-831-2368
replacing old roof, performing Whether your you’re thinking about a thoroughyour roofold maintenance, or replacing roof, performing merely fixing a pesky leak, think a thorough roof maintenance, or Roofcrafters merely fixing aInc” pesky leak, think —Damon Roofcrafters Inc”Galeassi, President
operational guidelines. check and abide by operational guidelines. fcrafters, in addition
www.roofcrafterscharlottesville.com A Certified Roofing Company
dgaleassi@yahoo.com 30 years Licensed Insured A Certified Roofing&Company Roofing www.roofcrafterscharlottesville.com 30 yearsContractor Licensed &ITC Insured
Building Code, we ofcrafters, in addition Certified Level 1 BBB “A” Roofing Contractor ITC rBuilding own set Code, of in-house we rated contractor. Certified Level 1 BBB “A” A Certified Roofing Company sr developed during my own set of in-house —Damon Galeassi, President contractor. 40 years Licensed & Insured Roofing Contractorrated • BBB class A Contractor s developed during my
STAFF PHOTO
Consistently high level of customer service Consistently high level of customer service
The Charlottesville School Board convened virtually on Monday.
School’s (not) out City schools debate reopening By Brielle Entzminger reporter@c-ville.com
July 8 – 14, 2020 c-ville.com
@cvillenews_desk
facebook.com/cville.weekly
A
You’re focused on the brighter days ahead. We’re focused on you.
15-year mortgage rate
3.25
%APR*
Want to pay off your mortgage loan faster? Talk to us! We’ll take care of the closing costs.**
Call 800.296.6246, visit cffc.com, or come meet with one of our bankers and we will build a plan that is right for you. *The APR (Annual Percentage Rate) is accurate as of 7/1/2020 based on a first deed of trust with a 15-year amortization for a primary residence or vacation home. Minimum loan amount is $50,000. A representative example for a $150,000 at 3.25% APR would result in 180 monthly payments of $1,050.36. Taxes and insurance are not included. The monthly payment obligation will be greater if taxes and insurance are included, and an initial customer deposit may be required if an escrow account for the items is established. **C&F Bank will pay the following closing costs: Tax Tracking fee, Credit Report cost, Appraisal fee, Lender’s Title Insurance Policy, Deed of Trust recording cost, Settlement fee, and Flood Determination fee. APR is based on the assumption that the finance charge may include these closing costs. Any closing costs not listed are the borrower’s responsibility. Early payoff penalties may apply. If loan is terminated within 3 years, closing costs must be reimbursed by the account holder. This loan offer is subject to change without notice and is subject to credit approval. Homeowners insurance is required. Other qualifications may be required. You should consult a tax advisor for further information regarding the deductibility of interest and charges. Other terms and rates are available. 7.20
Citizens and Farmers Bank
s new cases of the novel coronavirus pop up each day, it’s become increasingly difficult for area schools to decide how and when to reopen. And after over five hours of discussion and debate on Monday night, the Charlottesville School Board got no closer to a definite answer. Last week, the district rolled out a proposal for reopening, which would send students in kindergarten through sixth grade to school for in-person classes—with social distancing guidelines and safety measures—four times a week. Seventh through 12th graders would be split into two groups and alternate between in-person and virtual classes throughout the week, but would work from home on Fridays. All students could opt in to online-only learning, ahead of September 8, the first day of school. A number of parents, teachers, and other community members raised concerns about this model during public comment at Monday’s meeting, pointing to a variety of ways in-person classes could go awry. “I believe that people will get sick,” said Tess Krovetz, a second grade teacher at Jackson-Via Elementary. “Right now we can say with some confidence that COVID-19 does not affect children the same way it affects adults. But that’s because for the most part since March we’ve kept our children home and safe. Sending them back to school is a science experiment that can— and will—lead to trauma and loss.” Krovetz and kindergarten teacher Shannon Gillikin penned an open letter to Superintendent Rosa Atkins and the school board in support of a virtual reopening, citing case spikes due to the state reopening,
among many other concerns. To date, more than 150 staff members from across the district have signed it. Instead of putting a large amount of time and effort into planning for in-person classes, they encouraged the board to focus on training teachers and parents for equitable distance learning. Lashundra Bryson Morsberger was the only board member who fully supported an all-digital reopening. She believes there are “too many unknowns” about the virus, and that the community isn’t safe enough for in-person classes. She also thinks the proposed plan spreads staff too thin and does not adequately address concerns about contracting the virus, which could put them out of work “for months,” making it even more difficult to implement distance learning if schools had to shut down. “We need to take this time to do the best plan that we can for virtual learning, instead of losing time now talking about a plan that probably in September will just be a distant memory,” she said. Last week, more than 70 parents signed an open letter to the school district, asking for it to offer in-person classes five days a week. Multiple speakers during public comment were strongly in favor of face-to-face classes, particularly for younger students, mentioning the equity and learning gaps exacerbated by distance learning in the spring. A significant number of parents in the district are unable to work from home, they said, and would be forced to find child care, which could lead to more risk of contracting and spreading the virus. The board will make its final decision on either July 23 or 30. “No matter what we do, we’re going to have someone upset with us,” concluded board member Juandiego Wade.
