Are Big Cities Really Bad Places to Live? Improving Quality-of-Life Estimates across Cities

Page 40

TABLE 2: REGRESSION OF HOUSING COSTS ON WAGE LEVELS, AND A TEST OF THE CALIBRATED SLOPE COEFFECIENT FOR THE MOBILITY CONDITION

Cities Only

Panel A: Slope Estimates Wage differential ((robust s.e.)) R-squared Number of Observations

Controls for Natural and Artificial Amenities (4)

No Controls (1)

No Controls (2)

Controls for Natural Amenities (3)

2.04 ((0.06))

2.04 ((0.17))

1.57 ((0.11))

1.26 ((0.14))

0.82 290

0.74 241

0.89 230

0.93 193

Panel B: p-value of test that the regression slope equals the mobility-condition slope Adjusted slope = 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.34 Unadjusted slope = 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.16 0.00

Panel C: Implied relationship between wages and (residual) quality of life, b Q Adjusted 0.58 0.58 0.11 Unadjusted -1.96 -1.96 -2.44

-0.20 -2.74

Natural amenities, listed in Tables 4, 5, and A3, include heating degree days, cooling degree days, percent of sunshine possible, inches of precipitation, and proximity to a coast. Artificial amenities include violent crime rate per capita, median air quality index, bars and restaurants per capita, Places Rated arts and culture index, residential land-use regulation and sprawl indices, local government expenditures net of local taxes, and federal spending differentials.


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.