Airlines object to Italy’s ‘illegal’ flight price cap

Guy Taylor

EUROPEAN airlines have called on the European Commission to intervene in a feud with Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni, over proposals to cap air fares on certain routes.

Last week, Meloni’s populist government announced plans to cap the price of tickets between the mainland and Sardinia and Sicily during peak periods at 200 per cent of the average annual price.

In a letter seen by the Financial Times, trade body Airlines for Europe (A4E) said that Brussels must “clarify with Italy that this intervention impacts the free and deregulated air transport market in Europe”.

A4E’s managing director Ourania Georgoutsakou said airlines were “strongly concerned” that should the law be adopted, “it could set a precedent and lead to a domino effect resulting in similar regulations being adopted in other EU member states”.

The changes, he argued, would “violate” the right of airlines “to compete wherever possible, set prices and define services as they see fit”.

Major European carriers have strongly objected to the proposals, with A4E representing the likes of Easyjet and Ryanair.

Ryanair’s CEO Eddie Wilson slammed the decision to “unlawfully interfere on

WHAT I’VE BEEN DOING

business’, but less positively towards ‘CEOs’, ‘shareholders’, and ‘corporates’. Most won’t find that surprising, but its concerning when you consider that one in five people in Britain think all businesses are ‘greedy’ and one in six think businesses ‘don’t care about people like me’. I do not want to mention the two C’s – the CBI or Coutts – but businesses in Britain need to think about how they project their social and economic purpose. Because whatever they are doing now, it is not working. Of course my answer is simple, stick to your core purpose – providing great products and services, at affordable prices, and creating jobs in the process. Human society has benefitted hugely from businesses that create incredible products and services that genuinely change our lives. how airlines set prices for airfares”, arguing it would “reduce capacity, halt route development, take winter connectivity away and will raise prices for all passengers flying from the Islands to the Italian mainland”.

I have two small children under the age of three so it’s been a while since I have been blessed with time to read or watch what I want when I want. But I would recommend reading US economist Noah Smith’s Substack (Noahpinion) or listening to his podcast (Econ 102). I did enjoy Paul Johnson’s book Follow the Money (although I accept a non-fiction about fiscal policy is an acquired taste), and the wife and I loved Blue Lights on BBC iPlayer. The kids are in to PAW Patrol at the moment, so I watch a lot of that too.

The Dublin-based carrier claims the plans are “illegal” under current European Union law and could cause future air fare hikes as a result of a reduction in the number of flights.

Wizz Air, which is not a member of A4E, confirmed to City A.M. that they had also raised concerns with the European Commission yesterday.

“Our strong view is that the proposed plan is contrary to the principle of pricing freedom, which is entrenched in EU law,” a spokesperson said.

“Ultimately, we don’t believe that the decree will achieve what the Italian government intends – which is the reduction of high fares.”

Amid booming post-pandemic demand this year, the sector has faced criticism over rising ticket prices. Industry body IATA said it expects fares to keep rising for the next 10 to 15 years/

The European Commission was contacted for comment.

It came just days after a proposed windfall tax on banks’ bumper profits sent shares in a host of European lenders plummeting, in a separate row between the Italian premier and the business world.