Using green infrastructure to reduce combined sewer overflows

Page 14

Based on information obtained from the surveys and the provincial government, Ecojustice has compiled detailed information on overflows and bypasses in specific communities across Ontario (Table 2). The full text results will be the focus of an upcoming investigative report. Below are data from six representative samples. Table 2: Municipal Overflows and Bypasses, 2006 City

Total reported combined sewer overflows (litres)

Total bypasses (total and secondary) (litres)

Total known or reported incidentsa

Toronto

Yes

80

9,900,000,000

4,033,900,000

34

No

23

-

4,605,568,000

31

Niagara Falls

Yes

25

74,728,000

478,327,000

19/151b

St. Catharines

Yes

65

312,000,000

123,524,000

42/69c

26

Windsor

Yes

London

Yes

Owen Sound

Yes

b c

Green Infrastructure

Number of CSO outfalls

Hamilton

NOTES: a

Pa g e 1 4

Responded to survey

13

unknown

2,652,500,000

129

unknown

251,000,000

24

10,130,000

6,577,000

5

Note: All results are based on 2006 data, except for St. Catharines CSO data, Owen Sound data, or where noted differently below, which are based on 2007 data. Incidents refer to either sewage treatment plant bypasses or sewer overflows or sometimes both. The city reported 19 CSO events that occurred in 2007. Provincial records show 151 incidents involving the release of partially treated or raw sewage due to wet weather in 2006. The city reported that the worst CSO location can overflow up to 42 times a year, but plans will reduce this to once every two years. Provincial records show 69 sewage release incidents occurred in 2006.

ECOJUSTICE


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.