1.5° PATHWAYS

Page 282

WORLD ENERGY TRANSITIONS OUTLOOK

6.5 BIOMASS SUSTAINABILITY

The use of bioenergy can bring greenhouse gas reductions along with other contributions to the sustainability objectives (IRENA, IEA Bioenergy, and FAO, 2015). The production and use of bioenergy must be managed with care, however. Sustainability concerns about production and consumption are major issues in the bioenergy industry. They pose risks to investors and also discourage policy makers from making bioenergy a major pillar of their strategies for reaching 1.5°C targets. They also have a strong relationship with the estimates of potential discussed in Section 6.4.

Benefits and potential impacts Sustainable biomass practices could bring benefits, including afforestation, lowered GHG emissions, degraded land restoration, improved waste management, as well as reduced pollution. Economic benefits, especially to rural communities, can also be significant. If they are not designed and operated with care, bioenergy supply chains might harm the environment and socio-economic aspects, with impacts depending on the bioenergy technology, feedstock and end uses. Other impacts may extend to conflict over land, emissions related to land-use change, deforestation, biodiversity loss and air pollution (IRENA, 2022g).

Afforestation and avoiding carbon stock loss The development of bioenergy may encourage afforestation (timber plantations) and boost carbon stock. Viet Nam is implementing rapid afforestation because of increased demand (Arvola et al. 2020; Van Hung and Thuy 2020). Intensive management of productive forests may improve stock replenishment and the rate of carbon removal. The scale-up of bioenergy use has meanwhile triggered debate over the risk of converting forest and high carbon stock areas to monocultural agriculture or timber plantations for bioenergy production. The plantations generally have much lower carbon stock than natural forests. Carbon stock loss resulting from land conversion may exceed the emission savings achieved from fossil fuel substitution, defeating the purpose of bioenergy development. The risk is considered high in regions relying on land exploitation to induce economic development.

282


Articles inside

References

36min
pages 334-349

7.6 Case study: The European Union

2min
pages 332-333

Annex

3min
pages 350-352

7.5 Risk mitigation of supply shortages

9min
pages 325-331

7.2 What are critical materials?

1min
page 295

6.4 Availability of sustainable biomass feedstocks

12min
pages 274-281

6.5 Biomass sustainability

14min
pages 282-289

7.1 The role of critical materials in the energy transition

4min
pages 293-294

6.1 Introduction

1min
page 245

6.3 Scaling up bioenergy use in key applications: Opportunities, barriers and policies

29min
pages 258-273

5.3 Special focus: International trade of hydrogen and derivatives

14min
pages 234-241

5.1 Power system flexibility 5.2 Electrification of end-use

16min
pages 196-206

CHALLENGE

2min
pages 30-31

4.2 Priority action areas to scale up progress

41min
pages 165-189

Introduction

4min
pages 28-29

3.2 Policy baskets for a sensitivity analysis

16min
pages 121-129

3.1 Introduction

8min
pages 114-120

2.9 Policies for a just energy transition

8min
pages 108-111

Acknowledgements

1min
page 3

1.1 Introduction

1min
page 32
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.