Page 47

The following table shows the Company's production by region for the Transition Period and the Prior Period: For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997 1996 (MMcfe) Percent (MMcfe) Percent

Mid-Continent Region .......................... Austin Chalk Trend ............................ All other fields ................................

8,852 26,220 3,396

23% 68 9

8,980 26,243 1,568

24% 71 5

Total production ...............................

38,468

100%

36,791

100%

Natural gas production represented approximately 71 % of the Company's total production volume on an equivalent basis in the Transition Period, compared to 82% in the Prior Period. This decrease in gas production as a percentage of total production was primarily the result of new production in the Louisiana Trend, which tends to produce more oil than gas. For the Transition Period, the Company realized an average price per barrel of oil of $18.59, compared to $21.88 in the Prior Period. Gas price realizations increased slightly from $2.18 per Mcf in the Prior Period to $2.24 per Mcf in the Transition Period. The Company's hedging activities resulted in decreases in oil and gas revenues of $4.3 million and $7.1 million in the Transition Period and Prior Period, respectively. Oil prices received in the first quarter of 1998 are significantly below prices realized in the Transition Period, which has the effect of reducing oil revenues and decreasing earnings.

Oil and Gas Marketing Sales. The Company realized $58.2 million in oil and gas marketing sales for third parties in the Transition Period, with corresponding oil and gas marketing expenses of $58.2 million. This compares to sales of $30.0 million, expenses of $29.5 million, and a margin of $0.5 million in the Prior Period. Interest and Other. Interest and other revenues for the Transition Period were $79.0 million compared to $2.5 million in the Prior Period. During the Transition Period, the Company realized a gain on the sale of its Bayard common stock of $73.8 million, the most significant component of interest and other revenues. Production Expenses and Taxes. Production expenses and taxes, which include lifting costs, production taxes and excise taxes, increased to $10.1 million in the Transition Period, compared to $5.9 million in the Prior Period. These increases were primarily the result of increased operating costs and increased production. On a unit of production basis, production expenses and taxes increased to $0.27 per Mcfe compared to $0.16 per Mcfe in the Prior Period. The Company expects that production expenses and taxes per Mcfe will increase in 1998, primarily as the result of completed and anticipated acquisitions that generally have higher associated lifting costs per unit than the Company's historical production. Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties. The Company utilizes the full cost method to account for its investment in oil and gas properties. Under this method, all costs of acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves (including such costs as leasehold acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenditures, certain capitalized internal costs, dry hole costs and tangible and intangible development costs) are capitalized as incurred. These oil and gas property costs along with the estimated future capital expenditures to develop proved undeveloped reserves are depleted and charged to operations using the unit-ofproduction method based on the ratio of current production to proved oil and gas reserves as estimated by the Company's independent engineering consultants and Company engineers. Costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization computation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the property or whether impairment has occurred. To the extent that capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization and related deferred income taxes, exceed the discounted future net revenues of proved oil and gas properties, such excess costs are charged to operations. The Company incurred an impairment of oil and gas properties charge of $110 million for the Transition Period. This writedown was caused by several factors, including oil prices declining from $1838 at June 30, 1997 to $17.62 at December 31, 1997, and drilling and completion costs continuing to escalate during the 27

Profile for Chesapeake Energy

Transition Report 1997  

Transition Report 1997