Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal Pain in Older Patients COREY LYON, LCDR, MC, USN, U.S. Naval Hospital Sigonella, Sigonella, Italy DWAYNE C. CLARK, M.D., Fond du Lac Regional Clinic, Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Acute abdominal pain is a common presenting complaint in older patients. Presentation may differ from that of the younger patient and is often complicated by coexistent disease, delays in presentation, and physical and social barriers. The physical examination can be misleadingly benign, even with catastrophic conditions such as abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture and mesenteric ischemia. Changes that occur in the biliary system because of aging make older patients vulnerable to acute cholecystitis, the most common indication for surgery in this population. In older patients with appendicitis, the initial diagnosis is correct only one half of the time, and there are increased rates of perforation and mortality when compared with younger patients. Medication use, gallstones, and alcohol use increase the risk of pancreatitis, and advanced age is an indicator of poor prognosis for this disease. Diverticulitis is a common cause of abdominal pain in the older patient; in appropriately selected patients, it may be treated on an outpatient basis with oral antibiotics. Small and large bowel obstructions, usually caused by adhesive disease or malignancy, are more common in the aged and often require surgery. Morbidity and mortality among older patients presenting with acute abdominal pain are high, and these patients often require hospitalization with prompt surgical consultation. (Am Fam Physician 2006;74:1537-44. Copyright © 2006 American Academy of Family Physicians.)
A
cute abdominal pain (generally defined as pain of less than one week’s duration) is a common presenting complaint among older patients. Approximately one fourth of patients who present to the emergency department are older than 50 years.1 The presentation of an older patient with abdominal pain may be very different from that seen in a younger patient.2-7 Older patients tend to present later in the course of their illness and have more nonspecific symptoms. In addition, a broader differential diagnosis must be considered in older patients with abdominal pain. Older patients may delay seeking care because they fear losing independence, lack health insurance, lack transportation, lack a secondary caregiver for their spouse or pet, or are afraid of hospitals or death.8 Table 18-10 lists medical assessment challenges that can make an accurate diagnosis more difficult once older patients do seek care for abdominal pain. Outcomes in Older Patients Morbidity and mortality among older patients with abdominal pain are high; evaluation and management often requires admission to the hospital and surgical con
sultation.2,11 In retrospective studies, more than one half of older patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain required hospital admission, and 20 to 33 percent required immediate surgery.2,11-13 Surgical intervention occurs twice as often in older patients when compared with a younger population.13 Overall mortality rates from retrospective series vary from 2 to 13 percent.6,11,12 The mortality rate for emergency abdominal surgery is 15 to 34 percent, with the primary cause being an underlying or coexisting disease.5,12,14-16 In a retrospective study of 380 older patients with acute abdominal pain, the presence of free air on plain film radiographs, leukocytosis with a high neutrophilic band count, and age older than 84 years were associated with an increased risk of death.11 In the same study, variables associated with the need for surgical intervention included hypotension, abnormal bowel sounds, radiographic abnormalities (e.g., dilated bowel loops, free air, air-fluid levels), and leukocytosis.11 Differential Diagnosis The causes of acute abdominal pain in older patients are not greatly dissimilar from the
Downloaded from the American Family Physician Web site at www.aafp.org/afp. Copyright © 2006 American Academy of Family Physicians. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved. Contact copyrights@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Abdominal Pain SORT: Key Recommendations for Practice Clinical recommendation Consider cholecystitis even if an older patient does not present with classic symptoms, because they often are absent in older persons. Consider small bowel obstruction in the older patient with a history of surgery who presents with diffuse, colicky pain, nausea, vomiting, altered bowel sounds, distention, dehydration, diffuse tenderness, and possibly an ill-defined mass. Consider abdominal aortic aneurysm in the older patient with back or abdominal pain, particularly if they are male or have a history of tobacco use. Consider acute mesenteric ischemia if a patient presents with severe, poorly localized pain out of proportion to physical findings.
Evidence rating
References
C
19, 20
C
4, 5
C
42
C
44, 45
A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, diseaseoriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, see page 1463 or http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.
causes in younger patients; however, certain disease processes occur more often in older patients.
vomiting. Indicators such as right upper quadrant pain and Murphy’s sign (i.e., inspiratory arrest with palpation of the right upper quadrant) are present in about CHOLECYSTITIS one half of older patients with cholecystitis and are Biliary tract disease, including cholecystitis, is the most less accurate than in younger patients.19 In fact, a sigcommon indication for surgery in older patients with nificant number of older patients do not have classic abdominal pain, accounting for one third of patients symptoms of cholecystitis. A retrospective case series of older than 55 years presenting to the emergency depart- 168 patients older than 65 years with acute cholecystitis ment with acute abdominal pain.1,2,17 Age-related changes concluded that over 60 percent of patients did not have in the biliary tract, such as an increased prevalence of back or flank pain and 5 percent had no pain at all.20 gallstones, increased lithogenicity of the bile, a greater Over 40 percent of patients did not experience nausea, percentage of pigmented stones, and an increase of the more than one half were afebrile, and 41 percent had common bile duct diameter, are thought to account for a normal white blood cell count.20 Thirteen percent of the increased incidence of gallstone disease.18 patients with acute cholecystitis had no abnormal liver The patient with acute cholecystitis usually presents function tests, fever, or leukocytosis.20 with unremitting and intensifying pain at the right Complications of acute cholecystitis occur in more side of the abdomen, often associated with fever and than one half of all patients older than 65 years.19 Such complications include acute ascending cholangitis, gallbladder perforation, emphyseTABLE 1 matous cholecystis, bile peritonitis, and Potential Challenges to the Clinical Assessment gallstone ileus. Acute ascending cholangitis of Abdominal Pain in Older Patients rarely occurs before age 40 years. Most patients with acute ascending cholangitis History taking present with Charcot’s triad (i.e., fever, Altered mentation from fever or electrolyte abnormalities; cognitive jaundice, and right upper quadrant pain). impairment; decreased mentation from drugs (e.g., opiates, The majority of patients have an elevated benzodiazepines); dementia; hearing difficulties; intoxication; language alkaline phosphatase level, 50 percent have barriers; psychiatric disorders positive blood cultures, and approximately Clinical assessment 40 percent have hyperbilirubinemia.19 ReynAbsence of fever despite a serious bacterial infection or surgical old’s pentad (i.e., Charcot’s triad plus shock condition9; absence of leukocytosis despite a surgical condition; altered and mental status changes) is reported to pain perception from chronic pain medications; coexistent disease; four times higher likelihood of hypothermic response with a significant intraoccur in only 14 percent of cases.21 abdominal process10 ; lower likelihood of localized tenderness despite a focal surgical condition; reduced rebound and guarding from decreased abdominal wall musculature; suppressed tachycardia from medications or intrinsic cardiac disease
Information from references 8 through 10.
1538 American Family Physician
www.aafp.org/afp
APPENDICITIS
Older patients with appendicitis are more likely to present with generalized pain, longer duration of pain, distention, rigidity, decreased bowel sounds, and a mass. A recent Volume 74, Number 9 ◆ November 1, 2006
Abdominal Pain
multicenter prospective abdominal pain intervention study attributes the differences in presentation of older patients to the delay in presentation, not to a difference in the disease process.22 A retrospective review of 65 patients older than 60 years with pathology-confirmed appendicitis concluded that fever alone was a poor predictor of acute appendicitis in older patients; only 23 percent of patients with appendicitis had a temperature greater than 100° F (37.7° C).23 In the same study, a band count greater than 6 percent and right lower quadrant pain were highly associated with confirmed appendicitis (positive predictive values of 100 and 90 percent, respectively). However, this study was poorly designed and probably overstated the accuracy of the latter findings.23 Diagnosis may be aided by contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT)24,25 ; however, one study comparing outcomes before and after widespread use of CT found that increasing use of CT and diagnostic laparoscopy had no impact on mortality or length of stay in the older population.26 ACUTE PANCREATITIS
Advanced age is an indicator of poor prognosis for persons with acute pancreatitis. Mortality rates in older patients with pancreatitis are reported to be 20 to 25 percent, compared with 8 to 10 percent in the general population.18 Factors that cause acute pancreatitis in older patients include alcoholism, biliary tract disease, infections, hypertriglyceridemia, a variety of medications, hypercalcemia, hypothermia, and carbon monoxide exposure.4,18 Gallstone pancreatitis accounts for most cases (65 to 75 percent) of acute pancreatitis in older patients.18 As with younger patients, older patients typically present with nausea, vomiting, dehydration, and mid epigastric pain that is constant in nature.4 The pain may radiate to the back, and the intensity may vary in older patients. Serum amylase levels of five times the upper limit of normal, used as a diagnostic indicator, have a specificity of 70 to 100 percent and a sensitivity of 79 to 95 percent.27 Lipase level is equally as sensitive and slightly more specific (80 to 100 percent), because mild elevations in amylase can be associated with other processes such as mesenteric ischemia or peptic ulcer and bowel perforation.14,27 PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE AND PERFORATION
Peptic ulcer disease accounts for 16 percent of older patients complaining of abdominal pain.28 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and infection with Helicobacter pylori are the most important risk factors November 1, 2006 ◆ Volume 74, Number 9
for peptic ulcer disease; the odds ratio for NSAID use and peptic ulcer is 2.7 for H. pylori–positive patients and 5.3 for H. pylori–negative patients.29 Symptoms of peptic ulcer disease are usually absent or vague and poorly localized; approximately 30 percent of patients older than 60 years with confirmed peptic ulcer disease have no abdominal pain.30 Often, the first sign of the disease is with an acute complication, such as perforation. Abdominal pain with a perforation classically occurs with an abrupt onset, is located in the epigastrium, presents with absent bowel sounds, and is associated with abdominal rigidity. Up to one third of patients with peptic ulcer disease do not have any pain, particularly among those taking NSAIDs.5,19,30 Elevated serum amylase and leukocytosis can develop quickly with perforation caused by pancreatic amylase spilling into the peritoneal cavity.28 Plain film abdominal radiographs are helpful if free air is seen; however, up to 50 percent of cases of perforated ulcers do not show free air.5 Barium contrast studies and upper endoscopy can confirm the diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease; however, they are contraindicated if perforation is suspected.31 Ultrasonography or CT can be useful to detect intraperitoneal free fluid or air if the diagnosis is uncertain.32 DIVERTICULAR DISEASE
The incidence of diverticular disease increases with age and is estimated to affect two thirds of those older than 90 years (in contrast to 5 percent of the general population).4,33 Over 90 percent of diverticular disease involves the sigmoid colon.33 Ten to 30 percent of patients with diverticulosis will develop painful diverticular disease or diverticulitis.2,33 Painful diverticular disease is characterized by attacks of localized abdominal pain in the absence of inflammation (i.e., no evidence of fever, leukocytosis, or peritoneal signs on examination). Diverticulitis probably occurs when there is microperforation of one or more diverticula. Because the sigmoid colon most commonly is affected, patients typically present with left lower quadrant pain and signs of inflammation. The pain of diverticulitis is more acute and more severe than that of painful diverticular disease. The diagnosis often is made clinically. CT is the modality of choice when the diagnosis is uncertain or an abscess or fistula is suspected.34 Barium enema and colonoscopy should be avoided in the acute phase because of the risk of expanding a localized perforation.4,5,33 SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION
Small bowel obstruction in older patients most commonly is caused by adhesions from previous surgery (50 to 70 percent) and hernias (15 to 30 percent).4,5,7,14,19,35
www.aafp.org/afp
American Family Physician 1539
Abdominal Pain
Patients typically experience diffuse, colicky pain, nausea, and vomiting. On physical examination there may be altered bowel sounds, distention, dehydration, diffuse tenderness, and possibly an ill-defined mass. Peritoneal signs will be present if perforation has occurred. Small bowel obstruction most commonly is diagnosed with plain film radiographs that show distended small bowel loops (greater than 2.5 to 3.0 cm), airfluid levels, and a paucity of large bowel air (Figure 1). However, radiographic findings are normal in 25 to 40 percent of patients.36 Gallstone ileus is a rare but important cause of small bowel obstruction in older patients.5,14,35 It has been implicated as the cause of small bowel obstruction in up to 20 percent of patients older than 65 years.5,14 In gallstone ileus, a gallstone (usually larger than 2.5 cm) lodges in the distal ileum. Patients present with the classic triad of small bowel obstruction, air in the biliary tree, and calculus on plain film radiographs. One half of patients have a history of gallbladder disease, and it is more common in women. Diagnosis often is delayed, and mortality rates of 15 percent or higher have been reported.4,19 LARGE BOWEL OBSTRUCTION
Malignancy is the most common cause of large bowel obstruction in older patients. Colon carcinoma without obstruction does not usually cause acute abdominal pain. Diverticulitis and colonic volvulus (i.e., narrowed, twisted lumen with a bird’s beak appearance) are less common causes of large bowel obstruction.4,5,14,35 Sigmoid volvulus is the most common type of colonic volvulus (75 to 80 percent of cases).37 Laxative use, sedatives, anticholinergics, and antiparkinson medicines predispose patients to a volvulus. Chronic distention, elongation, and increased mobility of the colon allow parts of the colon to twist on itself. Symptoms of large bowel obstruction tend to be insidious in onset, and presentation is similar to small bowel obstruction.5,35 Feculent emesis, guaiac-positive stools, weight loss, and anemia may be present. Plain film radiographs will demonstrate a dilated large bowel (greater than 5 cm) with haustral markings that incompletely traverse the circumference of the bowel. Risk of perforation occurs with dilation of more than 9 cm.19 Barium enema can confirm the diagnosis, especially in cases of volvulus.19 ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) usually are infrarenal in origin and commonly extend into the iliac 1540 American Family Physician
Figure 1. Plain film radiograph of dilated loops of small bowel in small bowel obstruction.
arteries. Most are diagnosed on routine examination or as an incidental finding on an imaging study. Patients at highest risk for AAA are older men who use tobacco and have hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and a family history of AAA.4,14,38-40 Smoking is the strongest independent risk factor; 90 percent of patients with AAA have used tobacco.38-40 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recently recommended screening for AAA in all males between 65 and 75 years of age with a history of smoking tobacco.41 Significant AAA may be asymptomatic. When symptoms develop, they are usually nonspecific, such as abdominal pain, backache, or claudication. Signs and symptoms of AAA rupture most commonly include severe abdominal pain, back or flank pain, hypotension, and a pulsatile mass on examination.3 The classic triad for a ruptured AAA (i.e., hypotension, back pain, and a pulsatile mass) is present in only 25 to 50 percent of cases.42,43 A palpable mass with flank ecchymosis is highly suggestive of a ruptured AAA. Abdominal pain and backache are common presenting symptoms.42,43 Presentation may resemble acute cholecystitis, perforated ulcer, diverticulitis, or renal colic.3,43 For this reason, patients with AAA often are misdiagnosed.43 Plain radiographs may show calcifications of the aneurysm, a soft tissue mass, loss of the psoas shadow, or loss of renal outline. Ultrasonography is a fast, safe, and reliable way to distinguish an abdominal aneurysm from another intra-abdominal process and may be performed
www.aafp.org/afp
Volume 74, Number 9 ◆ November 1, 2006
Abdominal Pain TABLE 2
Causes of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia and Associated Features Etiology
Distribution (%)
Comments
Superior mesenteric artery embolism
50
Embolus is usually cardiac in origin from a dislodged thrombus (i.e., left atrium, left ventricle, or valvular lesion). Risk factors include atrial fibrillation, cardiac chamber dilation, acute myocardial infarction, and left-sided valvular vegetations. Triad includes acute abdominal pain, history of cardiac disease, and acute gastrointestinal emptying (i.e., diarrhea or vomiting).
Superior mesenteric artery thrombosis
15 to 25
Usually superimposed on chronic mesenteric ischemia from progressive atherosclerotic disease Not usually associated with coagulation defects May have a history of chronic postprandial abdominal pain, weight loss, and other gastrointestinal symptoms. Bloody stools, hematemesis, and metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities are late presenting signs.
Nonocclusive ischemia
20
Catchall category typically caused by low-flow states (e.g., cardiogenic shock, sepsis, dialysis, hypovolemia); obstruction (e.g., intussusception, strangulated hernia); trauma; or medications (e.g., vasoconstrictors).
Mesenteric venous thrombosis
5
Portal hypertension, intra-abdominal trauma or sepsis, intra-abdominal malignancy, and hypercoagulable states are risk factors. Suspected in patients with acute abdominal pain and history of thrombotic episodes and coagulopathy Prompt anticoagulation may preserve bowel viability.
Information from references 44 and 45.
Figure 2. Computed tomography scan demonstrating a dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysm with an intimal flap (arrow) evident at the level of the kidneys.
at the bedside. Urgent CT should be reserved for clinically stable patients and to identify whether a leaking or dissecting aortic aneurysm is present.5 See Figure 2 for an example of a dissecting aneurysm. ACUTE MESENTERIC ISCHEMIA
Acute mesenteric ischemia is an uncommon but often fatal cause of acute abdominal pain in older patients. It November 1, 2006 â—† Volume 74, Number 9
has been reported to account for 0.1 percent of all hospital admissions and 1 percent of admissions for acute abdominal pain.44 Approximately one half of patients older than 45 years have some degree of atherosclerosis of the celiac, superior, and inferior mesenteric arteries.4 Particularly in smokers, this increases the risk of acute mesenteric ischemia.44 The superior mesenteric artery most commonly is implicated in acute mesenteric ischemia. The four major causes of acute mesenteric ischemia are arterial embolism, arterial thrombosis, nonocclusive ischemia, and mesenteric venous thrombosis. Key features of the four major causes of acute mesenteric ischemia are shown in Table 2.44,45 Classically, the patient with acute mesenteric ischemia presents with severe, poorly localized abdominal pain that is out of proportion to physical findings. One third of patients will have nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea, often mimicking gastroenteritis. Distention, shock, and peritoneal irritation are late findings signaling infarction and perforation.44,45 Only 25 percent of patients will have positive fecal occult blood tests.14 Leukocytosis often is present. Metabolic acidosis and elevated serum lactate and amylase may be present if infarction has occurred, but these can be normal in early ischemia.14,44,45 Plain film radiographs may initially be unremarkable; an adynamic ileus, distention, air-fluid levels, and
www.aafp.org/afp
American Family Physician  1541
Approach to the Older Patient with Abdominal Pain Initial assessment to include airway, breathing (pulse oximetry, respiratory rate), and circulation (monitor, intravenous access)
Careful history: •C hief complaint (associated symptoms of fever, pain radiation, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, melena, dysuria) • Previous surgery
• Medications • Coexistent disease (CAD, diabetes, hypertension) • Tobacco/alcohol use
Physical examination: Routine examination to include evaluation for scars, hernia, pulsatile mass, flank ecchymoses, femoral and peripheral pulses, upper and lower extremity pulses
Consider ECG if clinically indicated.
Laboratory evaluation for most patients should include: Complete blood count, electrolytes, liver studies, renal studies, amylase/lipase, urinalysis, blood cultures, cardiac enzymes
Diagnosis made: UTI, acute MI, diabetic ketoacidosis, pancreatitis, hepatitis
If no diagnosis after laboratory evaluation, proceed to initial radiologic studies.
Chest radiography: Evaluate for pneumonia, free air, CHF, PE
Kidney, ureter, bladder plain film radiography
Dilated loops of small bowel, air-fluid levels
SBO, incarcerated hernia, appendicitis
Dilated loops of large bowel, air-fluid levels
LBO, diverticulitis, volvulus
Dilated loops, air-fluid levels with thumbprinting, pneumatosis intestinalis
Mesenteric ischemia
No diagnosis made after initial evaluation (includes laboratory results and plain film radiography)
Consider ultrasonography if patient has: • RUQ or epigastric pain suspicious for biliary tract disease • Suspected possible AAA (in an unstable patient) • RLQ pain suspicious for appendicitis
Consider CT if patient has: • Nonspecific abdominal pain • Suspected bowel obstruction • Suspected mesenteric ischemia • Suspected AAA (in a stable patient) • Suspected appendicitis • Suspected pancreatitis with signs of sepsis to evaluate for infarction and necrosis
Angiography for evaluation of suspected mesenteric ischemia
Upper endoscopy for evaluation of suspected peptic ulcer disease
Figure 3. Algorithm for evaluating the older patient with acute abdominal pain. (CAD = coronary artery disease; ECG = electrocardiography; UTI = urinary tract infection; MI = myocardial infarction; CHF = congestive heart failure; PE = pulmonary embolism; SBO = small bowel obstruction; LBO = large bowel obstruction; RUQ = right upper quadrant; AAA = abdominal aortic aneurysm; RLQ = right lower quadrant; CT = computed tomography.)
TABLE 3
Laboratory and Imaging Studies for Diagnosing Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain Study
Etiology
Abdominal CT
Appendicitis; diverticulitis; bowel obstruction; pancreatitis (necrosis); abdominal aortic aneurysm in stable patient; mesenteric ischemia Bowel perforation (free air); bowel obstruction/volvulus (dilated bowel and air-fluid levels); abdominal aortic aneurysm (dilated calcified aorta); mesenteric ischemia (dilated loops, air-fluid levels, pneumatosis intestinalis [gas in bowel wall], thumbprinting [edema of bowel wall with convex indentations of lumen]) Pancreatitis (less specific than lipase); bowel obstruction; peptic ulcer perforation; bowel perforation; mesenteric ischemia Mesenteric ischemia Infection Pneumonia; free air under diaphragm Nonabdominal emergencies such as myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism Diabetic ketoacidosis; electrolyte abnormalities; metabolic acidosis with bowel infarction (mesenteric ischemia) Infection; intestinal ischemia; perforated peptic ulcer Pancreatitis; bowel obstruction; duodenal ulcer
Abdominal radiography
Amylase Angiography Blood cultures Chest radiography Electrocardiography Electrolytes Leukocytosis Lipase Liver function test and transaminases Pulse oximetry Ultrasonography Urinalysis
Cholecystitis (most commonly elevated alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyltransferase, elevated bilirubin); mesenteric ischemia (possible elevated alkaline phosphatase) Pneumonia; pulmonary embolism Cholecystitis; appendicitis (less accurate than CT, more operator dependent); abdominal aortic aneurysm in unstable patient Urinary tract infection
C T = computed tomography
fixed dilated loops may be seen as the ischemia goes untreated. A CT scan may reveal bowel wall thickening from edema or hemorrhage and intestinal wall gas. CT may rule out other pathology and may detect superior mesenteric vein thrombosis.44,45 Angiography is recommended to confirm the diagnosis if mesenteric ischemia is strongly suspected.44,45 ATYPICAL CAUSES
Other problems may present as acute abdominal pain in older patients, including urinary tract infection, pyelonephritis, myocardial infarction (inferior wall), pulmonary embolism, congestive heart failure with hepatic congestion, pneumonia, constipation, urinary retention, or an abdominal muscle injury. Approach to the Patient Table 3 summarizes pertinent laboratory evaluations, imaging studies, and associated diagnoses. An algorithm for evaluation of the acutely ill older patient with abdominal pain is shown in Figure 3. A careful history and physical examination will help determine the urgency of the remaining evaluation and direct it toward specific laboratory and imaging studies (Table 3). Most patients should have chest and abdominal radiographs, looking in particular for signs of pneumonia, mesenteric November 1, 2006 ◆ Volume 74, Number 9
ischemia, bowel obstruction, and free air. If the diagnosis is not made at this point, urgent evaluation with ultrasonography or CT (or angiography if mesenteric ischemia is suspected) should be considered. If peptic ulcer disease is suspected, a gastroenterologist should be consulted to consider upper endoscopy with biopsy. The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the U.S. Army Medical Department or the U.S. Navy at large.
The Authors COREY LYON, LCDR, MC, USN is a staff family physician at U.S. Naval Hospital Sigonella in Italy. He received his medical degree at the University of the Health Sciences - College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, Mo., and completed a family medicine residency at Naval Hospital Jacksonville (Fla.). DWAYNE C. CLARK, M.D., is a family physician with the Fond du Lac Regional Clinic and Agnesian Healthcare in Fond du Lac, Wis. At the time Dr. Clark wrote this article, he was teaching in the Department of Family Medicine at Naval Hospital Jacksonville. He received his medical degree from Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C., and completed a residency in family medicine at Naval Hospital Jacksonville. Address correspondence to Corey Lyon, LCDR, MC, USN, Department of Family Medicine, Naval Hospital Sigonella, PSC 836, Box 2670, FPO, AE 09636 (e-mail: clyon@sig.med.navy.mil). Reprints are not available from the authors. Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
www.aafp.org/afp
American Family Physician 1543
Abdominal Pain
REFERENCES 1. de Dombal FT. Acute abdominal pain in the elderly. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994;19:331-5. 2. Bugliosi TF, Meloy TD, Vukov LF. Acute abdominal pain in the elderly. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1383-6. 3. Dang C, Aguilera P, Dang A, Salem L. Acute abdominal pain. Four classifications can guide assessment and management. Geriatrics 2002;57:30-2, 35-6, 41-2.
24. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 1998;338:141-6. 25. Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn JA, Westmoreland M, Jones RC, Fisher TL, et al. The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 1999;178:485-9. 26. Hui TT, Major KM, Avital I, Hiatt JR, Margulies DR. Outcome of elderly patients with appendicitis: effect of computed tomography and laparoscopy. Arch Surg 2002;137:995-8.
4. Sanson TG, O’Keefe KP. Evaluation of abdominal pain in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1996;14:615-27.
27. Vissers RJ, Abu-Laban RB, McHugh DF. Amylase and lipase in the emergency department evaluation of acute pancreatitis. J Emerg Med 1999;17:1027-37.
5. Kauvar DR. The geriatric acute abdomen. Clin Geriatr Med 1993;9: 547-58.
28. McCarthy DM. Acid peptic disease in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1991;7:231-54.
6. Abi-Hanna P, Gleckman R. Acute abdominal pain: a medical emergency in older patients. Geriatrics 1997;52:72-4. 7. Vogt DP. The acute abdomen in the geriatric patient. Cleve Clin J Med 1990;57:125-30.
29. Voutilainen M, Mantynen T, Farkkila M, Juhola M, Sipponen P. Impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and aspirin use on the prevalence of dyspepsia and uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2001;36:817-21.
8. Rothrock SG, Greenfield RH, Falk JL. Acute abdominal emergencies in the elderly: clues to identifying serious illness. Part I – Clinical assessment and diagnostic studies. Emerg Med Reports 1992;13:177-84.
30. Hilton D, Iman N, Burke GJ, Moore A, O’Mara G, Signorini D, et al. Absence of abdominal pain in older persons with endoscopic ulcers: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:380-4.
9. Potts FE 4th, Vukov LF. Utility of fever and leukocytosis in acute surgical abdomens in octogenarians and beyond. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999;54:M55-8.
31. Saad RJ, Scheiman JM. Diagnosis and management of peptic ulcer disease. Clin Fam Pract 2004;6:569-87.
10. Cooper GS, Shlaes DM, Salata RA. Intraabdominal infection: differences in presentation and outcome between younger patients and the elderly. Clin Infect Dis 1994;19:146-8. 11. Marco CA, Schoenfeld CN, Keyl PM, Menkes ED, Doehring MC. Abdominal pain in geriatric emergency patients: variables associated with adverse outcomes. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:1163-8. 12. Kizer KW, Vassar MJ. Emergency department diagnosis of abdominal disorders in the elderly. Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:357-62. 13. Brewer BJ, Golden GT, Hitch DC, Rudolf LE, Wangensteen SL. Abdominal pain. An analysis of 1,000 consecutive cases in a University Hospital emergency room. Am J Surg 1976;131:219-23. 14. Hendrickson M, Naparst TR. Abdominal surgical emergencies in the elderly. Emerg Med Clinic North Am 2003;21:937-69. 15. Van Geloven AA, Biesheuvel TH, Luitse JS, Hoitsma HF, Obertop H. Hospital admissions of patients aged over 80 with acute abdominal complaints. Eur J Surg 2000;166:866-71. 16. Arenal JJ, Bengoechea-Beeby M. Mortality associated with emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly. Can J Surg 2003;46:111-6. 17. Kettunen J, Paajanen H, Kostiainen S. Emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly. Hepatogastroenterology 1995;42:106-8. 18. Ross SO, Forsmark CE. Pancreatic and biliary disorders in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001;30:531-45. 19. Rothrock SG, Greenfield R, Falk JL. Acute abdominal emergencies in the elderly: clinical evaluation and management. Part II – Diagnosis and management of common conditions. Emerg Med Reports 1992;13:185-92. 20. Parker LJ, Vukov LF, Wollan PC. Emergency department evaluation of geriatric patients with acute cholecystitis. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:51-5. 21. Hanau LH, Steigbigel NH. Acute (ascending) cholangitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2000;14:521-46. 22. Kraemer M, Franke C, Ohmann C, Yang Q, for the Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group. Acute appendicitis in late adulthood: incidence, presentation, and outcome. Results of a prospective multicenter acute abdominal pain study and a review of the literature. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000;385:470-81. 23. Elangovan S. Clinical and laboratory findings in acute appendicitis in the elderly. J Am Board Fam Pract 1996;9:75-8.
1544 American Family Physician
32. Grassi R, Romano S, Pinto A, Romano L. Gastroduodenal perforations: conventional plain film, US and CT findings in 166 consecutive patients. Eur J Radiol 2004;50:30-6. 33. Farrell RJ, Farrell JJ, Morrin MM. Diverticular disease in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001;30:475-96. 34. Balfe DM, Levine MS, Ralls PW, Bree RL, DiSantis DJ, Glick SN, et al. Evaluation of left lower quadrant pain. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000;215(suppl):167-71. 35. Soybel D. Ileus and bowel obstruction. In: Greenfield LJ, Mulholland MW, eds. Surgery: Scientific Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, Pa.: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:817-31. 36. Maglinte DD, Reyes BL, Harmon BH, Kelvin FM, Turner WW Jr, Hage JE, et al. Reliability and role of plain film radiography and CT in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1451-5. 37. Avots-Avotins KV, Waugh DE. Colon volvulus and the geriatric patient. Surg Clin North Am 1982;62:249-60. 38. Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM. Clinical practice. Small abdominal aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1895-901. 39. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Littooy FN, Bandyk D, et al. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:441-9. 40. Wilmink TB, Quick CR, Day NE. The association between cigarette smoking and abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1999;30:1099-105. 41. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: recommendation statement. Rockville, Md.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005. Accessed March 15, 2006, at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf05/aaascr/aaars.pdf. 42. Fielding JW, Black J, Ashton F, Slaney G, Campbell DJ. Diagnosis and management of 528 abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981;283:355-9. 43. Marston WA, Ahlquist R, Johnson G Jr, Meyer AA. Misdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:17-22. 44. Ruotolo RA, Evans SR. Mesenteric ischemia in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1999;15:527-57. 45. Greenwald DA, Brandt LJ, Reinus JF. Ischemic bowel disease in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001;30:445-73.
www.aafp.org/afp
Volume 74, Number 9 ◆ November 1, 2006