The Cavalier Daily
O
LEAD EDITORIAL
The lessons learned
opinion
Formalized policies regarding intoxication and consent should be established to prevent sexual assault
Comment of the day SAT and/or ACT scores should not be optional for college applicants, as the author suggests. It is extremely unfair to base college admission decisions on high school GPAs, as they are nearly impossible to compare. While these standardized tests may not be perfect, they are a necessary metric to use in order to have a common benchmark for applicants. The College Board’s effort to make more preparation material publicly available shows a real desire to close the socio-economic gap. “Publius” responding to Gray Whisnant’s column “SATs still unfair” on March 19
A former naval midshipman was recently found not guilty of sexually assaulting a female midshipman. A military judge issued the verdict, and also decided the Naval Academy should internally handle the additional charge of lying to investigators. The student has resigned from the Naval Academy in exchange for the Academy dropping that lesser charge. This case has raised questions about the nature of sexual assault at institutions of higher education. The judge who delivered the verdict identified such questions as, “how drunk is too drunk” and “how does one know when someone else is too drunk.” His verdict hinged upon the conclusion that the prosecutors did not meet their burden of proof. Some are calling this case a failure of the justice system to punish a sexual offender. And that may be true. But part of the reason sexual assault cases
are difficult to prosecute is that sometimes there are not clear answers to the questions the judge in this case identified. In order to facilitate more positive legal outcomes for sexual assault victims in the future, and also to prevent future cases of sexual assault, we have to address the ambiguity of these questions and try to make their answers as clear as possible. In previous editorials we have discussed the importance of prevention over punishment of sexual assault, and the need for an “ask first” consent policy in addressing the issue of rape on college campuses. Now, we examine the issue of how alcohol consumption and intoxication level fits into the issue of rape. A woman is more likely to be assaulted on a college campus than any other location. Since alcohol is often involved in incidents of sexual assault, it is conceivable that the prevalence
of drinking in college is a factor in the high rate of sexual assault on college campuses. Legally, if a person is intoxicated, the person cannot consent to sex. But to assert that any sexual encounter which occurs when either party has consumed any alcohol is rape would be too broad of a definition. Drinking can be a positive social activity when done responsibly. In laying ground rules of acceptable conduct, we must be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. There must be an explicit standard for what level of intoxication disqualifies a person from being able to consent. It is not reasonable to expect that before sex someone pulls out a breathalyzer. But it is reasonable to expect that both parties think before they act. Some arguments for our “ask first” consent policy model can apply here. We argued that an “ask first” standard of consent is based on
the principle that no one should be presumed willing. Our vested interests should not be prioritized over respect for others’ personal autonomy. The same reasoning gives us cause not to presume someone is in a condition to consent to sex. We also argued that we must have open conversations about sexual intimacy in order to eliminate ambiguities surrounding consent. The same process should be used to establish appropriate boundaries when it comes to sexual encounters which involve alcohol. The most important principle to abide by is this: when in doubt, assume it’s a no. We need to formalize this mentality as the standard, rather than accepting a mentality that assumes a green light without confirming. That is the lesson we should take away from this case, to turn an unfortunate situation into tangible change for the future.
THE CAVALIER DAILY CAVALIER DAILY STAFF
Have an opinion? Write it down.
Editor-in-chief Rebecca Lim, @rebecca_lim Managing Editor Andrew Elliott, @andrewc_elliott Executive Editor Katherine Ripley, @katherineripley Operations Manager Lianne Provenzano, @lianneprovenz Chief Financial Officer Peter Simonsen, @pt_simonsen
Join the Opinion section.
Assistant Managing Editors Kelly Kaler, @kelly_kaler Julia Horowitz, @juliakhorowitz (S.A.) Harper Dodd (S.A.) Kathryn Fink (S.A.) Tiffany Hwang (S.A.) Thrisha Potluri (S.A.) Mitchell Wellman
Or send a guest editorial to opinion@cavalierdaily.com
News Editors Matthew Comey, @matthewcomey Joseph Liss, @joemliss (S.A.) Chloe Heskett (S.A.) Leopold Spohngellert, @cavdailynews Sports Editors Zack Bartee, @zackbartee Peter Nance, @pnance4 (S.A.) Matthew Morris (S.A.) Ryan Taylor Opinion Editors Russell Bogue, @rcbogue Ashley Spinks, @ASpinks_Opinion (S.A.) Dani Bernstein Focus Editor Michael Drash Life Editors Allison Jensen, @ajensen1506 Victoria Moran, @victoriamoran1
The Cavalier Daily
The Cavalier Daily is a financially and editorially independent news organization staffed and managed entirely by students of the University of Virginia. The opinions expressed in The Cavalier Daily are not necessarily those of the students, faculty, staff or administration of the University of Virginia. Unsigned editorials represent the majority opinion of the managing board. Cartoons and columns represent the views of the authors. The managing board of The Cavalier Daily has sole authority over and responsibility for all content. No part of The Cavalier Daily or The Cavalier Daily online edition may be reproduced in any form, in whole or in part, without the written consent of the editor-in-chief. The Cavalier Daily is published Mondays and Thursdays in print and daily online at cavalierdaily.com. It is printed on at least 40 percent recycled paper. 2014 The Cavalier Daily Inc.
Arts & Entertainment Editors James Cassar, @getcerebral Julia Skorcz (S.A.) Jamie Shalvey Health and Science Editor Meg Thornberry Production Editors Sloan Christopher, @sloanEchris Mary Beth Desrosiers, @duhrowsure Sylvia Oe, @sylviaoe16 (S.A.) Thrisha Potluri (S.A.) Caroline Trezza, @seakaytee (S.A.) Anne Owen Photography Editors Marshall Bronfin, @mbronfin Kelsey Grant, @kelcgrant (S.A.) Porter Dickie, @porterdickie Graphics Editors Emilio Esteban
Have an opinion?
The Cavalier Daily welcomes letters to the editor and guest columns. Writers must provide full name, telephone number and University affiliation, if approrpriate. Letters should not exceed 250 words in length and columns should not exceed 700. The Cavalier Daily does not guarantee publication of submissions and may edit all material for content and grammar. Submit to opinion@cavalierdaily.com or P.O. Box 400703, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4703
Stephen Rowe (S.A.) Michael Gilbertson Video Editor Drew Precious, @d_presh Online Editor Sally Aul Social Media Manager Jenna Truong, @jennajt10 Ads Manager Kirsten Steuber (S.A.) Sascha Oswald Marketing Manager Allison Xu, @allisonxuu (S.A.) Kate Garber Business Manager & Financial Controller Claire Fenichel, @clairefeni (S.A.) Sophie Mester
Questions/Comments
To better serve readers, The Cavalier Daily has a public editor to respond to questions and concerns regarding its practices. The public editor writes a column published every week on the opinion pages based on reader feedback and his independent observations. He also welcomes queries pertaining to journalism and the newspaper industry in general. The public editor is available at publiceditor@ cavalierdaily.com.
8