The BSBI and plant conservation
The BSBI and plant conservation KEVIN WALKER
E
dgar Milne-Redhead was a former president of the BSBI and a key figure in the Society’s conservation work during the post-war period. He was in charge of the BSBI’s Conservation Committee for a decade and represented the society at numerous meetings, most famously as chair of the committee set up to conserve the Lady’s-slipper Orchid. It is therefore not surprising that conservation was a central theme of his presidential address delivered in 1971 (Milne-Redhead, 1971). This provided a blueprint for how the society could and should respond to the emerging environmental issues of the day. His concluding words are as relevant now as they were in the year of my birth: ‘There is an undoubted need for statutory protection for both our rarest and some of our common plants; there is an even greater need to educate the public, making the most of the wonderful media at our disposal. We must somehow make it possible for the public to see and appreciate some of our botanical treasures rather than keep them hidden.’ Since this address threats to wildlife have increased tenfold and as a result, conservation has become mainstream. Organisations dedicated to conservation, such as Plantlife and the Wildlife Trusts, have flourished and environmental protection and legislation have increased. One could argue that the BSBI’s purpose has not changed despite this growing concern for the environment. We’ve never campaigned, spoken out or got involved with practical conservation work, although many members have in a private capacity. But this misses the point. Like the BTO the BSBI’s job is to gather the evidence that informs the good conservation work that others do. This evidence relies on the painstaking collection and checking of plant records by our fabulous volunteers. And we are very good at it. Over the last 50 years we have amassed a database of over 50 million records which we share widely with colleagues from around the globe. We
work with conservationists to produce Red Lists, Biodiversity Actions Plans and more latterly State of Nature reports. Rare Plant Registers tell us what is important and unique at a local scale. But given the pressures that wildlife is currently facing, evidence alone is not always enough. Sometimes we have to stand up for what we value most. The proposal to build a golf course on Coul Links SSSI brought this into sharp relief. It was clearly a site on national importance and quite understandably our recorders were totally opposed to it. As a result, BSBI joined forces with other environmental NGOs and put up a valiant defence which ultimately saved the site. But it’s not just about protecting the best sites. The BSBI is sitting on a gold mine of information that could be used to meet the government’s ambition of ‘recovering’ our nation’s wildlife. Over the next decade we will be planting millions of trees that will be good for the climate but potentially bad for wildlife if the wrong trees are planted in the wrong places. In England we will see the development of Local Nature Recovery Networks where a whole variety of conservation measures will be built into local planning of housing, farming and forestry. We will also have a new environmental land management scheme that is likely to direct how our farmed landscape is managed for decades to come. To be successful, all these initiatives will require access to our data and expertise. So it seems timely that the BSBI has published its long-awaited policy on nature conservation (bsbi.org/ wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/BSBI-Policy-on-natureconservation.pdf). This is a first for the Society and, whilst accepting that we are not a campaigning body or a land manager, it acknowledges the enormous contribution we could and should be making across a wide range of issues (see list of actions below). Half a century on this policy is a fitting tribute to Edgar Milne-Redhead’s vision of a world where BSBI NEWS 147 | April 2021
3
